政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37360
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造访人次 : 51219788      在线人数 : 898
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37360


    题名: 不動產估價師與買賣雙方對住宅價格影響因素認知差異分析
    作者: 邱信智
    贡献者: 陳奉瑤
    邱信智
    关键词: 不動產估價師
    買賣雙方
    認知差異
    行為研究
    appraiser
    buyer and seller
    cognition difference
    behavioral research
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2009-09-19 13:16:03 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 不動產估價師的本質在於解釋不動產於市場上價值反應的情況，而價格係由買賣雙方透過公開市場所決定，故不動產估價師不僅在解釋不動產之價值所在，亦在說明買賣雙方於公開市場中的行為模式。然此行為模式主要根據買賣雙方對不動產價格之認知基礎，因此不動產估價師以比較法進行項目調整時，若缺乏考量買賣雙方之認知，對不動產價格的合理區間即可能無法清楚掌握。而國外過去對此議題僅著重於估價師與買方之討論，然不動產價格係由買賣雙方共同合意，故應加入賣方進行探討。
    本文以台北市住宅不動產為例，透過對不動產價格影響因素的認知角度，探討不動產估價師、買方及賣方對住宅價格影響因素重要性的認知差異情形，並進一步分析不動產估價師和買賣雙方認知產生差異的可能原因。
    研究根據問卷調查結果，實證顯示買賣雙方彼此間對住宅價格影響因素並無明顯認知差異，然而不同家戶屬性的買方、賣方對價格影響因素仍有不同的認知。另外，研究亦發現不動產估價師與買賣雙方之間，對價格影響因素認知存有差異，這是由於環境與制度面使然，且本研究亦證實台灣不動產估價師以區位交通因素為調整價格的首要因素，然而區位未必代表一切，研究結果顯示住宅環境對買賣雙方的重要性甚至更高。
    The real estate appraiser is not only interpreting the value range, but telling the behavior of buyer and seller. The objective of this study is to probe into the cognition differences to the variables determining residential property values between appraiser, buyer and seller. The survey was carried out within a period involved buyers and sellers which participated in the sales of residential property from June 2008 to February 2009 in Taipei City.
    The results show that buyers and sellers do not have obvious cognition difference, but they do have different cognition with different household attributes. Besides, there is exactly cognition difference between appraiser, buyer and seller, and this is because of the residential property transaction environment and institution. Furthermore, the study reveals that the real estate appraisers in Taiwan take Location factors as the most important ones when they adjusting property price; however, buyers and sellers put even more attention on Residential factors.
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻
    Engel, J. F., R. D. Blackwell, and P. W. Miniard著，王志剛、謝文雀譯，1999，『消費者行為』，台北：華泰書局。
    王士鳴，2006，「不動產估價師信心判斷行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    江穎慧，2009，「不動產價格之估值認知與調整─估價行為、大量估價與估值機率之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系博士論文，台北市。
    吳明隆，2007，『SPSS操作與應用─問卷統計分析實務』，台北市，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    李易璇，2005，「不動產估價人員估值決定行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    汪駿旭，2005，「不動產估價人員受客戶影響之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    洪鴻智、張能政，2006，「不動產估價人員之價值探索過程：估價程序與參考點的選擇」，『建築與規劃學報』，7 (1)：71-90。
    徐詩怡，2007，「不動產估價師與地價人員估值決定行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    張曦方，1994，「住宅樓層價差之探討：以台北市為例」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    張能政，2004，「不動產估價行為研究─行為理論之應用」，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文，台北市。
    梁仁旭、陳奉瑤，2006，『不動產估價』，台北市：陳奉瑤。
    連經宇，2003，「應用模糊語意方法與不連續選擇理論建立家戶購屋選擇行為模式之研究」，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所博士論文，台南市。
    彭建文、賴鳴美，2006，「賣方訂價策略對成交價格之影響分析」，『住宅學報』，15(1):67-84。
    劉秀玲，1992，「台北市住宅品質對住宅價格影響關係之探討」，國立中興大學都市計劃硏究所，台北市。
    潘淑滿，2003，『質性研究：理論與應用』，台北市，心理出版社。
    賴明宏，1998，「影響房價因素之屬性特徵與總體變數分析」，碩士論文，國立臺灣工業技術學院管理技術硏究所，台北市。
    薛立敏、陳琇里，1998，「住宅租擁選擇下家計消費支出之比較」，『住宅學報』，7:21-40。
    外文參考文獻
    Adair, A., J. Berry and S. McGreal, 1996a, “Valuation of residential property: analysis of participant behavior”, Journal of Property Valuation & Investment, 14(1): 20-35.
    Aluko, B. T., 2007, “Examining valuer’s judgement in residential property valuations in metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria”, Journal of Property Management, 25(1): 98-107.
    Appraisal Institute, 2002, The dictionary of real estate appraisal, Chicago: Appraisal Institute.
    Bello, M. O. and V. A. Bello, 2007, “The Influence of Consumers Behavior on the Variables Determining Residential Property Values in Lagos, Nigeria”, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(10): 774-778.
    Brunswik, E., 1956, Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, Berkeley, University of California Press.
    Blundell, G. F. and C. W. R. Ward, 1999, “The Accuracy of Valuation- Expectation and Reality”, working paper, Department of Land Management, University of Reading.
    Cubbins, J., 1974, “Price, Quality, and Selling Time in the Housing Market”, Applied Economics, 6(2):171-187.
    Daly, J., S. Gronow, D. Jenkins, and F. Plimmer, 2003, “Consumer behavior in the valuation of residential property: A comparative study in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia”, Journal of Property Management, 21:295-314.
    DeLisle, J. R., 1985, “Behavioral theory and residential appraisal”, The Appraisal Journal, 51: 493-506.
    Diaz, J.III, 1990b, “The process of selecting comparable sales”, The Appraisal Journal, 58(4):533-540.
    Diaz, J.III, 1999, “The first decade of behavioral research in the discipline of property”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4):326-332.
    Diaz, J.III and J. A. Hansz, 1997, “How valuers use the value options of others”, Journal of Property valuation and Investment, 15(3):256-260.
    Diaz, J.III and M. L. Wolverton, 1998, “A longitudinal examination of the appraisal smoothing hypothesis”, Real Estate Economics, 26(2):349-358.
    Epple, D., 1987, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products”, Journal of Political Economy, 95(1):59-80.
    Foxall, G. R., R. E. Goldsmith and S. Brown, 1998, Consumer Psychology for Marketing, 2nd ed, London: Cengage Learning EMEA.
    Frenzen J. K. and H. L. Davis, 1990, “Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1):1-12.
    Gallimore, P., 1999, “Editorial”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4): 323-324.
    Gallimore, P. and M. Wolverton, 1999, “Client Feedback and the Role of the Appraiser”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(3):415-431.
    Gibler, K. M. and S. L. Nelson, 2003, “Consumer behavior applications to real estate education”, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6(1): 63-83.
    Greaves, M., 1985, “The determinants of residential values: the hierarchical and statistical approaches”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 3(1):5-23.
    Grissom T. V. and J. Diaz III, 1991, “Valuation without Comparables”, The Appraisal Journal, 59(3):370-376.
    Hutchison, N., B. MacGergor, N. Nanthakumaran, A. Adair and S. McGreal, 1996, Variations in the Capital Valuation of UK Commercial Property, London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
    Isakson, Hans R., 1997, “An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of the Value of Vacant Land”, Journal of Real Estate Reasearch, 13(2):103-114.
    Jud, G. D., 1980, “The Effects of Zoning on Single-Family Residential Property Values: Charlotte, North Carolina”, Land Economics, 56(2): 142-154.
    Kassarjian, H. H. and M. J. Sheffet, 1991, “Personality and Consumer Behavior: An Update”, in Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, ed. Harold H. Kassarjian and Thomas S. Robertson, 281-303.
    Kestens, Y., M. Thériault and F. Des Rosiers, 2006, “Heterogeneity in hedonic modelling of house prices: looking at buyer’s household profiles”, Journal of Geographical Systems, 8:61-96.
    Mackmin, D., 1985, “Is there a residential valuer in the house?”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 3:384-390.
    Matysiak, G. and P. Wang, 1995, “Commercial Property Market Prices and Valuation: Analyzing the Correspondence”, Journal of Property Research, 12(3):181-202
    Rosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition”, Journal of Political Economy, 82: 34-55.
    Sirmans, G. S., D. A. Macpherson and E. N. Zietz, 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1):3-41.
    Xu, T., 2008, “Heterogeneity in housing attribute prices: A study of the interaction behavior between property specifics, location coordinates and buyers’ characteristics”, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 1(2):166-181.
    Yavas, A. and S. X. Yang, 1995, “The Strategic Role of Listing Price in Marketing Real Estate: Theory and Evidence”, AREUEA Journal, 23(3):347-368.
    Yiu, C. Y., B. S. Tang, Y. H. Chiang and L. H. T. Choy, 2006, “Alternative Theories of Appraisal Bias”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 14(3):321-344.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    96257020
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096257020
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    702001.pdf112KbAdobe PDF21218检视/开启
    702002.pdf135KbAdobe PDF21323检视/开启
    702003.pdf183KbAdobe PDF21370检视/开启
    702004.pdf166KbAdobe PDF21304检视/开启
    702005.pdf205KbAdobe PDF21501检视/开启
    702006.pdf239KbAdobe PDF21995检视/开启
    702007.pdf307KbAdobe PDF21630检视/开启
    702008.pdf353KbAdobe PDF21478检视/开启
    702009.pdf187KbAdobe PDF21427检视/开启
    702010.pdf228KbAdobe PDF21545检视/开启
    702011.pdf418KbAdobe PDF21748检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈