政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37357
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51320048      線上人數 : 850
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37357


    題名: 集合住宅面積混合對社區管理維護影響之路徑分析
    A path analysis for influence of condominiums area mixture on property management
    作者: 陳妍如
    貢獻者: 張金鶚
    陳妍如
    關鍵詞: 線性結構方程式
    住宅混合
    社會混合
    管理維護
    Linear Structural Modeling
    housing mix
    social mix
    Property Management
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2009-09-19 13:15:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國集合住宅市場常見一個案有數種面積產品混合之現象，在過去研究指出不同面積之產品進行投資組合已成為建商降低風險與穩定報酬的手段，僅在供給面被討論，卻忽略了住宅市場應以『使用』為目的，換言之，產品面積混合(Housing mix)隱含購屋者其生活水平及背景之異質性(Social mix)，將可能造成社區管理維護上之不易，本文試圖延伸過去此現象在需求面及管理維護上探討的不足。在實證方面，採問卷調查台北市建管處公寓大廈管理科所提供之已報備成立管理組織的主任委員2,877份，回收率為11.30%，剔除沒有舉辦活動之社區並符合設定樣本大小與母體可容忍誤差α=10%之要求下，共307筆有效問卷。輔以公寓大廈科報備資料掌握至所有面積及其對應之戶數，建立『面積混合度』之衡量，結合當前國內外住宅混合與住宅隔離議題，透過路徑分析方式衡量面積混合對社區管理維護績效之影響為直接影響或間接影響？釐清混合對管理維護影響過程之因果關係。
    研究結果顯示，建商供給者之面積混合策略對於住戶需求者之管理維護績效將是間接負面影響而非傳統迴歸所觀察得到的直接影響，驗證了國外負面外溢效果在國內亦是如此。而主要影響路徑為面積混合愈高則提高了社區衝突，進而對管理維護產生負面影響。其次，過去認為除面積混合之外，新舊社區與大小規模亦會影響管理維護，故進行兩群分析究竟何者影響管理維護較大？實證發現混合社區在經過搬遷磨合期將減緩混合因異質性所造成的不和睦，但混合之負面影響仍大於新舊社區之影響。
    The phenomenon of one construction case with housing mix usually appears in the condominium market. Some studies indicated that the portfolio of housing mix has become a means of reducing risk and having a stable reward for construction companies. However, the discussion was only on supply, and ignored that “use” should be the main purpose in the condominium market. In other words, housing mix implied the social mix of homebuyers’ living standard and background, and it might make the community management and maintenance not easy. The study tries to extend the deficiency in the treatment of the phenomenon on supply or on community management and maintenance. In proof, a questionnaire survey was adopted in the study. There were 2877 pieces of questionnaires released to the chairmen of registered management organizations according to the data from the Apartment and Building Management Division in the Building Administration Office of Taipei City Government. The recovery rate was 11.3%. The communities without holding activities were culled out, and in order to satisfy the requirement of the set sample dimension and the error tolerance of matrix belowα=10%, total valid questionnaires were 307 pieces. The measurement of “housing mix” can be built up by the supplementary information from the Apartment and Building Management Division, which includes all square measure and corresponding houses. Combing the subjects of residential mix and residential separation at home and abroad, housing mix could be measured by path analysis to see whether it has a direct or indirect affect on community management and maintenance to further figure out the casual relationship during the affection process of the housing mix and the community management and maintenance.
    The study results show that the policy of housing mix from the suppliers, construction companies, has an indirect negative affection on the performance of community management and maintenance for residents, the demanders, instead of having a direct affection observed by traditional regression analysis. The result proves the negative spillover effect no matter at home or abroad. The path of impact is that the higher the housing mix is, the higher the community conflict will be, and the situation will generate negative affection on community management and maintenance. Furthermore, except the housing mix, new and old communities or the sizes of communities were thought to affect community management and operation, and they were usually divided into two groups to analyze which one has greater affection on management and maintenance ? It is found by evidences that the communities with housing mix show less disharmony caused by social mix after the run-in period of movement. However, the negative affection of housing mix is still higher than the one of new and old communities.
    參考文獻: 一、中文參考文獻
    1. 李春長，2008，「資訊揭漏、信任、搜尋成本對委託房屋仲介業售屋意願之實證研究」，『住宅學報』，17(1)：71-104
    2. 朱芳妮，2008，「集合住宅混合使用對管理維護績效之影響」，『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』，上冊：87
    3. 林瑞穗、林萬億，1996，「社區發展與村里組織功能問題之探討」，『行政院研究發展考核委員會報告書』，頁3
    4. 林欣柔、彭建文、曾明遜，2004，「起造人於公寓大廈管理維護作用之探討」，『台灣土地研究』，7(2)：4
    5. 洪幸妙、張金鶚，1993，「住宅管理維護對住宅品質之影響研究」，『都市與計畫』，20(1)：1-22
    6. 洪子茵、張金鶚，1993，「台北市集合住宅管理維護模式之研究」，『都市與計劃』，29(3)：421-444
    7. 侯錦雄、宋念謙，1998，「住台中市黎明住宅社區居民社區意識之研究」，『建築學報』，24： 51-65
    8. 張維升、張金鶚，2008，「夢醒時分─購屋理想與現實之差距」，『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』，上冊：252
    9. 張玉貞、張宗銘、樓翠針、黃銘顯（1993），『產品定位實務』，基泰顧問。
    10. 陳建良、林祖嘉，1998，「財富效果、所得效果、與住宅需求」，『住宅學報』，7：83-100
    11. 陳香妃、張金鶚、葉毅明，2007，「從集體行動看社區意識與管理制度對公寓大廈管理維護之影響－管理維護客觀績效與社區主委主觀滿意度分析」，『都市與計畫』，34(2)：139-163
    12. 溫豐文，1997，『公寓大廈管理問題之研究』，行政院研考會委託。
    13. 郭益銘、張金鶚，2008，「住宅個案產品類型混合度之研究─以台北都會區為例」，『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』，下冊：742
    14. 楊宗憲，2003，「住宅市場之產品定位分析—建商推案行為之研究」，『住宅學報』，12(2)：123-139
    二、外文參考文獻
    1. Adepoju, G.. O., 1974, “Evaluating consumers` satisfaction with housing: An Application of a Systems Approach” ,American Institute of Physics,40:189-200
    2. Andersson, R., Musterd, S. G., Galster, G. & Kauppinen, T. M. , 2007 ,“What Mix Matters? Exploring the Relationships between Individuals’Incomes and Different Measures of their Neighbourhood Context”,Housing Studies, 22(5):637–660
    3. Beckhoven van Ellen, Musterd S., Ostendorf W., Sankey Siân, 2004,“Physical policies for social problems”, Social Housing, UNECE Symposium, November:28-30
    4. Blau, G. J. & Boal, K. B., 1987,“Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organization Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism”, Academy of Management Review, 12(2):288-300
    5. Blokland, T., 2003,“Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood”, Urban Bonds,Polity Press, Cambridge
    6. Chattopadhyay, R.R., 1998,“ Possible Mechanism of Antihyperglycemic Effect of Gymnema sylvestre Leaf Extract, Part I”, Elsevier Science,31(3): 495–496
    7. Chou, S. C., Boldy, D.P. & Andy, L.H. , 2003,“Factors Infouencing Risidents’ Satisfaction in Residential Aged Care”, The Gerontologist, 43(4):459-472
    8. Downs, A., 1999,“Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline”, Housing Policy Debate,10(4):955-974
    9. Galster, G. C., 2002,“An economic efficiency analysis of deconcentrating poverty populations”, Journal of Housing Economics, 11: 303-329
    10. Galster G, C., 2005,“Consequences From the Redistribution of Urban Poverty During the 1990s: A Cautionary Tale”, Economic Development Quarterly ,” 19: 119-125
    11. Gurran, N. and Milligan, V. and Baker, D. C. and Bugg, L. B. and Christensen, S. A., 2008,“New directions in planning for affordable housing: Australian and international evidence and implications”, Research and Policy Bulletin, 105(120):1-143.
    12. Leishman, C.,2001 ,“ House building and product differentiation: An hedonic price approach”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(2):131-152
    13. Lu, M., 1999,“Determinants of residential satisfaction:ordered logit vs. regression model”,Growth and Change, 30:264-287
    14. Maruyama, G. M., 1997,“Basics Of Structural Equation Modeling”, SAGE Pablictions Ltd., pp.25
    15. Mikyoung, H., 1989,“The determinant of residential environmental quality and satifaction: Toward Developing Residential quality Indices”, Oklahoma State University PHD.
    16. Jacobs, J. M., 1993,“The City Unbound: Qualitative Approaches to the City”,Urban Studies ,30(4-5):827-48
    17. Grant J., Greene, K. D.,Maxwell, K., 2004,“The planning and policy implications of gated communities. Canadian Journal of Urban Research”, Supplement: Canadian Planning and Policy, 13(1): 70-88
    18. Kearns, A, and Mason, P., 2007,“Mixed Tenure Communities and Neighbourhood Quality”, Housing Studies, September 22 (5): 661–691
    19. Kearns, A. and Parkes, A., 2003,“Living In and Leaving Poor Neighbourhood Conditions in England”,Housing Studies , 18(6):827-851
    20. Kemp,.P.A., 1995,“Researching Housing management Performance”,Housing Studies , 32(4-5):779-790
    21. Li, Z. G., Xue, D., Wei, L., 2007,“Housing Mix in European and American Cities: Theoriesa, Application and Implication”,City Planning Review, 2007(2): 38-44
    22. Madanipour A, G Cars, et al., 1998, “Social Exclusion in EuropeanCities: Processes, Experiences and Responses”, London, Routledge
    23. Murie, AS.& Musterd, S., 2004,“Social Exclusion and Opportunity Structures in European. Cities and Neighbourhoods”, Urban Studies, 41(8):1441-1459.
    24. Musterd S, Andersson R., 2005,“Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities”,Urban Affairs Review, 40:761-790
    25. Marcuse, P.and Kempen, van R., 2002,“Of States and Cities: The Partitioning of Urban Space”, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    26. Portes A, M Zhou, 1996,“Self-employment and earnings of immigrants”, American Sociological Review, 61(2):219-230
    27. Savasdisara, T., 1988,“Residents’ satisfaction and neighbourhood characteristics in Japanese urban communities”,Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:201-210
    28. Sharp, M., 2004,“Supplementary Planning Guidance:Market Housing Mix”, Huntingdonshir District Council Press, pp.6-7
    29. Susan S. Fainstein, 2005,“ Cities and Diversity,” Urban Affairs Review”, 41:3-19
    30. Tunstall, R. & Fenton, A., 2006,“In the Mix. A Review of Mixed Income, Mixed Tenure and Mixed Communities”, Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Housing Corporation, London:English Partnerships, pp.40
    31. Vesselinov, E., Cazessus, M,. Falk, W., 2007,“Gated communities and spatial inequality”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2)
    32. Wilson, W. J., 1987,“The declining significance of race: The truly disadvantaged—the inner city, the underclass, and public policy”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp254.
    33. Ostendorf, W., Musterd, S. & Sjoerd, D. V., 2001,“Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence”,Housing Studies, 16(3): 371–380
    34. Xavier, M. J., 1999,“ Strategic marketing: a guide for developing sustainable competitive advantage”,New Delhi:Thousand Oaks
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    96257002
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096257002
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    700201.pdf120KbAdobe PDF2846檢視/開啟
    700202.pdf154KbAdobe PDF21056檢視/開啟
    700203.pdf178KbAdobe PDF2884檢視/開啟
    700204.pdf116KbAdobe PDF2836檢視/開啟
    700205.pdf271KbAdobe PDF21173檢視/開啟
    700206.pdf229KbAdobe PDF21485檢視/開啟
    700207.pdf398KbAdobe PDF21983檢視/開啟
    700208.pdf261KbAdobe PDF22247檢視/開啟
    700209.pdf229KbAdobe PDF21215檢視/開啟
    700210.pdf171KbAdobe PDF2993檢視/開啟
    700211.pdf188KbAdobe PDF21075檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋