English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51297270      Online Users : 852
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37352


    Title: 住商混合使用對房價之影響-台北市經驗
    The impact of mixed land-use on housing price:Taipei experience
    Authors: 楊珮欣
    Yang,Pei Hsin
    Contributors: 蔡育新
    Tasi,Yu Hsin
    楊珮欣
    Yang,Pei Hsin
    Keywords: 住商混合
    空間尺度
    住宅房價
    特徵價格模型
    多元迴歸分析
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 13:14:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在大眾運輸導向(Transit-Oriented Development, TOD)所推行的捷運站區土地混合使用政策的背景下,本研究探討住商混合使用對於住宅房價之影響。本研究之研究假設有三:第一,不同空間尺度的混合使用,會對房價形成不同的影響;第二,其他土地使用種類越多,住宅房價越高;第三,商業使用之量體大小,對於房價形成不同的影響。本研究以台北市住宅為研究對象,研究時間為2001年,樣本數670 份。分析工具包含運用地理資訊系統(Geographic Information Systems, GIS)進行空間變數處理,以及多元迴歸分析(Multiple regression analysis)進行統計分析。研究成果驗證研究假設,於同棟及同街廓的空間尺度中,住商混合對住宅房價造成下降的影響,而相鄰街廓的住商混合使用使得住宅房價提升;且相鄰街廓混合使用種類越多,住宅房價越高。研究結果可做為政府擬定土地使用管制計畫之參考。
    Reference: 1、宋良政,1986「住商混合使用之研究-以台北市為例」,中國文化大學工學院實業計劃研究所工學組碩士論文。
    2、李怡婷,2005「大眾運輸導向發展策略對捷運站區房地產價格之影響分析」,成功大學都市計畫硏究所。
    3、林享博,2001「台北市分區規則的實質環境管制對地價之影響」,成功大學都市計畫研究所。
    4、林國民,1996「高雄市自有住宅特徵價格之研究」,成功大學都市計畫硏究所。
    5、范垂爐,1991「房地產真實交易價格之研究」,中興大學都市計劃研究所。
    6、張孝德,2007「建成環境對兒童通學方式與運具選擇之影響-台北市文山區國小學童之實證分析」,台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
    7、張雅鳳,1993「住商綜合大樓居住環境品質滿意度調查」,中原大學建築研究所。
    8、莊琮博,2001,「從維護居住環境品質觀點探討台北市住宅區混合使用管制實施策略- 以大安區車層里與龍雲里為例」,臺灣科技大學建築系碩士論文。
    9、許智宏,2006「都市混合土地使用形態及其影響因素之研究 : 以台南市為例」,成功大學都市計畫研究所。
    10、連婉淳,2003「工業區不動產價格之實證分析」,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
    11、陳昌顯,1994,「混合土地使用之都市活動、運輸、與停車需求整合模式之研究」,台灣大學土木工程研究所學博士論文。
    12、黃詩純,2005「探討視覺景觀因素對不動產價格的影響」,台北大學不動產城鄉暨環境學研究所碩士論文。
    13、蕭博正,2003,「台北市土地混合使用特性對旅運需求之影響」,台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
    14、賴彥伶,2006,「由住宅混合空間尺度探討居住偏好與居住選擇之關係」,逢甲大學都計研究所碩士論文。
    15、賴春綢,1990,「住商工混合地區生活環境之研究-以台北市大同區大同段為例」,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
    16、蘇京晧,2003「特徵價格法與地理資訊系統之應用:以輸變電設施對住宅價格影響為例」,台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
    17、Bartik, T., 1998,”Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements on hedonic models.”, Land economics, 64(2):172-183.
    18、Cao, T.V., Cory, D.C., 1981,”Mixed land uses, land-use externalities, and residential property values: a re-evaluation.”, Annals of Regional Science, 16:1-24.
    19、Caulfield, 1994,”City form and everyday life: Toronto`s gentrification and critical social practice.” , In Toronto : University of Toronto press.
    20、Cervero, R., 1989,”Job-housing balancing and Regional Mobility.”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(2):136-150.
    21、Cervero, R., and M. Duncan., 2004,” Neighborhood Composition and Residential Land Prices: Does Exclusion Raise or Lower Values? “, Urban Studies, 41(2): 299-315.
    22、Cervero, R., Wu, K., 1997, ”Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay.”Environment and Planning A, 29:865-886.
    23、Cervero,R., Kockelman, K., 1997, ”Travel demand and 3Ds : density, diversity”, Transportation Research, 2(3):199-219.
    24、Chin, Foong, 2006, “Influence of school accessibility on housing values.” Journal of urban planning and development,132 (3):120-129.
    25、Ewing R., Deanna, M., Li, S.C., 1996, ”Land use impacts on trip generation rates. “,Transportation Research Record, 1518:1-6.
    26、Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L.A., Bockstael, N.E., 1997, ”Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework, an ecological economics analysis using GIS.” , Ecological Economics, 23:251-264.
    27、Grant, J., 2002, “Mixed Use in Theory and practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle.”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1):71-85.
    28、Ihlanfeldt, K.R., 2006, “The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices.”, Journal of urban economics, 61:420-435.
    29、Irwin, E.G., 2002, ” The effects of open space on residential property values. “, Land economics, 78(4):465-480.
    30、John W. Matthews, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, 2007 , “Neighborhood Street Layout and Property Value: The Interaction of Accessibility and Land Use Mix” The journal of real estate finance and economics, 35(2):111-141.
    31、Jud, G., 1980,” The effect of zoning on single-family residential property values: Charlotte, North Carolina.” , Land economics, 56:142-154.
    32、Lewis, P., 2000, “What type of city to be? Local government receptivity to industrial, commercial, and residential development.” Public policy institute of California, San Francisco, CA.
    33、Li, M.M., Brown, H.J, 1980. “Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices.” , Land Economics, 56(2):125-141.
    34、Luscher, D.R., 1995, “The odds on TODS: transit oriented development as a congestion reduction strategy in the San Francisco Bay Area.”, Berkeley planning journal, 10:55-74.
    35、McMillen, D., McDonald, J., 1991,” A simultaneous equations model of zoning and land values.” , Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21:55-72.
    36、Pierre Filion, 2000, “Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make?”Environment and Planning A, 33:141-160.
    37、Renne, J.L., Well, J.S., Bloustein, E.J., 2005, ”Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a strategy to measure success, National cooperative highway research project.” Transportation Research Board, 5:20-65.
    38、Ridker, R.G., Henning, J.A, 1967, “The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution.” rev.econ.stat., 49(2):246-257.
    39、Rosen, 1974, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy, 82(1)
    40、Song, Y., Knaap, G.-J., 2003,”New urbanism and housing values: a disaggregate assessment.” Journal of Urban Economics, 54:218–238.
    41、Yan Song, Gerrit-Jan Knaap, 2004,” Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. “,Regional Science&Urban Economics, 34:663-680.
    42、Yu-Hsin Tsai,2005,”Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus ‘Sprawl’”, Urban Studies, 42(1)
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    95257009
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095257009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700901.pdf44KbAdobe PDF21328View/Open
    700902.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21071View/Open
    700903.pdf65KbAdobe PDF21147View/Open
    700904.pdf76KbAdobe PDF21133View/Open
    700905.pdf136KbAdobe PDF21760View/Open
    700906.pdf185KbAdobe PDF24736View/Open
    700907.pdf187KbAdobe PDF21793View/Open
    700908.pdf151KbAdobe PDF225364View/Open
    700909.pdf181KbAdobe PDF23902View/Open
    700910.pdf100KbAdobe PDF21907View/Open
    700911.pdf101KbAdobe PDF21328View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback