政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37297
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 115256/146303 (79%)
造訪人次 : 54536377      線上人數 : 334
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37297


    題名: 教師回饋在多次文稿寫作上的成效--以台灣高中英文課為例
    The Efficacy of Teacher Feedback on Multi-draft Writing--A Case Study in Taiwan High School English Class
    作者: 黃淑萍
    Huang, Shu Ping
    貢獻者: 尤雪瑛
    黃淑萍
    Huang, Shu Ping
    關鍵詞: 教師回饋
    英文寫作
    多次文稿
    批改
    評語
    心得單
    分數
    teacher feedback
    English writing
    multi-draft
    error correction
    comments
    cover sheets
    grades
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2009-09-19 13:05:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 教師回饋在學生的寫作過程中是很重要的，所以如何給予有效的回饋是個值得探討的議題。這個研究是在評估老師的書面回饋對於高中生多次文稿英文寫作練習的成效。桃園市某所國立高中的高三學生，一班共36位 (男生27位，女生9位) 參與這項為期從2007年九月到2008年一月的研究。教師回饋的方式是在第一次文稿上給予代號批改及評語，在第二次文稿上直接寫上正確答案及評語，在第三次文稿上直接給予答案並附上評語。老師不會在每次的文稿上評分，而學生在繳交改寫的文稿時要附上心得單。這項研究包含敘述文體的前測及後測、兩份參與者對教師回饋的問卷、及參與者的訪談。研究結果如下：第一，這種教師回饋對於整體的寫作品質上的進步有所貢獻。第二，雖然這樣的教師回饋對於整體的寫作正確度上沒有明顯的改善，但在時態及標點符號方面卻有正向的影響。第三，參與者對於這樣的教師回饋抱持著正面的態度。最後，討論此研究在教學上的意涵及對未來研究的建議。
    Teacher feedback is important in students’ writing process, so how to give effective teacher feedback is an issue worth investigation. The present study assessed the effect of teacher written feedback on high school students’ multi-draft English writing practice. A class of 36 seniors (27 boys and 9 girls) in a national senior high school in Taoyuan City participated in this study from Sep. 2007 through Jan. 2008. The teacher feedback was to give coded correction and comments on Draft 1, to offer direct correction and comments on Draft 2, and to provide direct correction and comments on Draft 3. Grades were assigned randomly and the participants had to submit cover sheets in revision. The study included the pre-test and the post-test on narrative writing, two questionnaires on the participants’ perceptions of the teacher feedback, and interviews. The results are as follows: First, this teacher feedback contributed to significant improvement in the overall writing quality. Second, this teacher feedback yielded no significant difference in the overall writing accuracy, but it had some positive effect on tense and punctuation. Third, the participants took a positive attitude toward this teacher feedback. Finally, some implications for teaching and suggestions for future research were discussed.
    參考文獻: Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. R. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education part II (pp.95-113). Chicago: the National Society for the Study of Education.
    Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
    Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,14, 191-205.
    Bowen, J. D., Madsen, H. & Hilferty, A. (1985). TESOL techniques and procedures. Singapore: Newbury House.
    Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17-30.
    Cault, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181-188.
    Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
    Chang, C. C. (1998). The case study of the effect of error correction on the grammatical structures of three Chinese university students` EFL writing. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu. ROC.
    Chang, H. (2004). A descriptive study of TVE teachers` and students` perspectives on English writing instruction. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, ROC.
    Chang, S. C. (2005). The effect of multi-draft writing procedure on EFL high school students` writing quality and their attitudes toward writing and revision. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, ROC.
    Chao. T. C. (2004). The effects of web-based peer assessment on lowering senior high students` writing apprehension. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, ROC.
    Chen. B. L. (2004). A comparative study of teacher evaluation and peer evaluation on the English writing of senior high school students. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, ROC.
    Chiang, P. J. (1992). How to improve English composition teaching in Taiwan`s high schools: A study of error types and learning strategies. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, ROC.
    Chien, C. W. (2005). Effects of online peer response on EFL college writing. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, ROC.
    Chuang. H. C. (2005). Taiwanese students` perceptions on peer review activity. Unpublished master`s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, ROC.
    Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147-179.
    Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 39-60.
    Ferris, D. R. (1995a). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 18-22.
    Ferris, D. R. (1995b). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
    Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
    Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
    Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How
    explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
    Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155-182.
    Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 63-80.
    Goldstein, L. M. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
    Hayward, V. (1993). Assessing students` writing: A hands-on guide from the northern territory. In C. Bouffler (Ed.), Literacy evaluation: Issues & practicalities (pp. 63-76). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255-276.
    Hendrickson, J. M. (1987). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 355-369). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Hsu, J. Y. (2005). A study of senior high school English teachers` practices and beliefs about writing instruction. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, ROC.
    Huang, H. H. (2004). A study of senior high students` responses to peer and teacher feedback on EFL compositions. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, ROC.
    Huang, L. J. (2006). A comparison of the effects of underlining with coding system and underlining: Teachers’ feedback on accuracy and fluency. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, ROC.
    Huang, Y. P. (2006). The effects of error correction on the English writing of senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, ROC.
    Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33-54.
    Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185-212.
    Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Jun, L. (2005). Understanding models in L2 writing. In Y. J. Chen & Y. N. Leung (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 91-102). Taipei, ROC.: Crane.
    Krashen, S. (2005). The composing process and the academic composing process. In Y. J. Chen & Y. N. Leung (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 66-78). Taipei, ROC.: Crane.
    Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 219-248). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Kuo, J. H. (2004). A survey for the academic preparedness of Taiwanese high school English teachers for the teaching of writing. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, ROC.
    Lai, H. L. (2006). The effectiveness of writing conferences in improving coherence in high school students` composition. Unpublished master`s thesis, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, ROC.
    Leki, I. (2005). The challenges of teaching EFL writing. In Y. J. Chen & Y. N. Leung (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 79-90). Taipei, ROC.: Crane.
    Li, Y. D. (2005). An analysis of comment on English majors` writing in China. Sino-US English Teaching, 2(7), 59-63.
    Li, S. S. (2002). A case study of peer review for university-level undergraduate writing students in Taiwan. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, ROC.
    Liao, C. N. (2005). The effects of peer-response activities on senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master`s thesis, Tunghai University, Taichung, ROC.
    Maybin, J. (1994). Teaching writing: Process or genre? In S. Brindley (Ed.), Teaching English (pp. 186-194). London: Routledge.
    Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
    Nadell, J., McMeniman, L., & Langan, J. (1994). The Macmillan writer: Rhetoric, reader, handbook (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students` perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.
    Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-142.
    O`Malley, J. M. & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Purves, A. C. (1987). Literacy, culture and community. In D. A. Wagner (Ed.), The future of literacy in a changing world (pp.216-232). New York: Pergamon Press.
    Rainey, M. C. (2003). Expressions: An introduction to writing, reading, and critical thinking. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Sokolik, M. (2003). Writing. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (1st ed., pp. 87-108). New York: McGraw-Hill Contemporary.
    Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (1997). Student annotations: What NNS and NS university students say about their own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(3), 245-264.
    Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes.
    Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
    Truscott, J. (1999). The case for "the case against grammar correction in L2 writing
    classes": A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-
    122.
    Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response
    to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.
    Tso, W. W. (2002). The effectiveness of peer evaluation on EFL writing. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, ROC.
    Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.
    Williams, J. D. (1998). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.
    Winterowd, W. R., & Murray, P. Y. (1985). English writing and skills. San Diego, CA: Coronado.
    Wu, C. P. (2003). A study on the use of feedback in senior high school English composition: Students` preferences and teachers` practices. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, ROC.
    Wu, M. M. (2006). Taiwan’s High School English Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Writing Instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, ROC.
    Yates, R., & Kenkel, J. (2002). Responding to sentence-level errors in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 24-47.
    Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-102.
    Zamel, V. (1987). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 267-287). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Yang, I. L. (2003). 高中英文寫作教學之我見 [My opinion on writing instruction in senior high school]. Newsletter for Teaching the Humanities and Social Science, 14(1), 92-113.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    94951002
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951002
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    100201.pdf99KbAdobe PDF2919檢視/開啟
    100202.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2914檢視/開啟
    100203.pdf82KbAdobe PDF2871檢視/開啟
    100204.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2843檢視/開啟
    100205.pdf65KbAdobe PDF2857檢視/開啟
    100206.pdf113KbAdobe PDF2981檢視/開啟
    100207.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2946檢視/開啟
    100208.pdf72KbAdobe PDF2947檢視/開啟
    100209.pdf122KbAdobe PDF21120檢視/開啟
    100210.pdf109KbAdobe PDF21031檢視/開啟
    100211.pdf169KbAdobe PDF21084檢視/開啟
    100212.pdf75KbAdobe PDF2939檢視/開啟
    100213.pdf101KbAdobe PDF22129檢視/開啟
    100214.pdf651KbAdobe PDF21018檢視/開啟
    100215.pdf425KbAdobe PDF21096檢視/開啟
    100216.pdf357KbAdobe PDF21556檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋