Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37283
|
| Title: | 跨文類網絡與媒體整合：以狄更斯及其作品為例
Transgeneric Network and Media Hybridization: A Case Study of Charles Dickens and His Works |
| Authors: | 陳徵蔚
Chen, Zheng wei |
| Contributors: | 藍亭
Lane , Timothy
陳徵蔚
Chen, Zheng wei |
| Keywords: | 狄更斯
媒體科技
電影
劇場
電腦
超文本
Charles Dickens
Media Studies
Cinema
Theater
Computer
Hypertext |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:02:19 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 科技媒體看似創新，實際上卻不斷重拾基本人性與感官習慣，人類文明演進因而呈現永恆回歸的螺旋。十九世紀末的電影發明似乎新穎，但實際上卻是利用新技術來重現人們眼中的「自然」。電腦網絡彷彿是嶄新概念；然而虛擬空間卻源自對現實空間的複製、強化與變形。網絡文化日新月異，最後脫穎而出的卻是部落格、影像分享或播客。高度複雜的媒體演化，最後竟整合了各種傳統媒體的特色，並且重拾了最簡單的表達與溝通模式。媒體重建視聽感官，不斷貼近符合自然的環境。
文學創作的演進，也與媒體科技共同演化，而走向「回歸」之路。看似以線性發展的文類，其實不斷環繞著「口語回歸」的中心，以螺旋方式演進。在這樣的螺旋中，經典內容不斷被吸納進入新的媒體，形成文化演進的動力。從戲劇、詩詞到小說，似乎從口語推進至書寫與印刷；但二十世紀的廣播、電影與電視，乃至於電腦網絡，卻將文學重新帶回口語場域。這不禁讓人思考，創新並非進步的真正動力；反倒是新舊混雜、多元流動的媒體整合，才能在跨越文類疆界後，重新尋回最貼近人性的藝術表現形式。
類似的跨文類與媒體整合現象，可從狄更斯作品在不同媒體的流動中見到端倪。狄更斯不但是位傑出的小說家，同時也是出色的演員以及雜誌經營者。他那跨越文類的創作活力，使其作品於媒體演進的過程中，不斷被吸納更新。狄更斯的跨文類網絡提供了一個具體而微的模型，足以檢視媒體整合的歷史演進，以及科技重拾人類自然溝通模式的不同階段。本論文旨在研究狄更斯小說與媒體整合之間的微妙關係，藉此觀察媒體整合感官的進程。論文將分為四大部分。
首先，狄更斯深受劇場傳統影響，而他的小說也經常被改編成為維多利亞通俗劇，這反映了經典內容於書寫（小說）與口語（戲劇）間擺盪的流動性。在小說興起的時代，書寫作品經常被搬上舞台，回歸最直覺的視聽環境，而一般大眾不但熱衷劇場，同時也習慣以劇場經驗來閱讀小說。這種「書寫」與「口語」相互滲透的現象，證明了口語文化的強韌性，也反映出「口語回歸」的趨勢。
其次，狄更斯大眾說書的空前成功，不但說明了觀眾對於視聽表演的熱愛，也暗示著作者試圖從書寫形式外尋求更多創作可能的嘗試。更重要的是，這代表了作者從十九世紀書寫印刷技術回歸吟遊詩人傳統的潛在慾望。透過反覆刪編與練習，狄更斯無須像史詩吟唱者般口頭記頌，而得以藉文字幫助強化表演的變化性與靈活度。透過舞台符號的暗示，狄更斯同時又策略性維護了自身「文化菁英」的形象，在口語與書寫間，取得了策略性的平衡。
第三，狄更斯小說被改編成為電影的過程，顯示了文字被搬上螢幕時所產生的複雜文類互動與媒體間的交互滲透，而作者的敘述技法，則直接影響了許多電影先驅的運鏡與影像語言。攝影機實現了文字藝術所無法表達的事物，然而文字卻馳騁想像，啟發了電影場面調度的概念。本文將觀察狄更斯小說於十九世紀連載時，小說與插圖間的微妙關係，以及小說敘述中的視覺元素，檢視其對於二十世紀電影改編的影響。然而，文字述刺激想像；但電影卻直接將影像呈現於眼前。倘若文字的「留白」是意猶未盡的空間，那麼過於露骨的影像，卻可能剝奪想像的彈性，這是媒體創作必須省思的課題。
最後，本文將研究狄更斯於網際網絡上以不同形式出現的現象，並解讀其在媒體整合中所代表的意義。除提供狄更斯資源的學術網站外，網絡上的電子書與有聲書也同時可見於網絡資源中，甚至許多部落格也提供個人製作的狄更斯改編影片。邇來盛行的「播客」，將數位科技帶往了口語表達的方向，傳統的文字創作開始成為有聲媒體的重要內容，經典作品被數位化、有聲化、影像化，朝更加貼近人性以及自然溝通環境的方向發展。。
狄更斯小說的跨文類網絡提供了一個具體而微的跨媒體網絡模型，透過此模型，我們可以更清楚地觀察媒體整合與演進的歷程，並觀察其不斷回歸的螺懸。近年來文學研究日漸偏向科際整合、媒體整合的文化研究發展，然而也因此不免陷入了自我定義的危機。狄更斯的跨媒體現象足以提供文學研究者一個未來文學與文類發展的可能方向，並於此機械複製的時代，為文學的發展提出可能的解答。
Media never really innovate; they actually restore the natural balance of human eyesight and earshot with the hybridization of various perceptive elements. For instance, cinema was regarded as an invention in the late nineteenth century, but it only reflected the natural environment people observed with their pre-wired biological perceptions. Cyberspace may appear innovative to us, yet the “Virtual Reality” is still the duplication, amplification or transformation of the nature. The Internet optimists had once dreamt about immense possibilities; the real application of blog, video sharing and podcast, however, merely hybridizes the existent audio and video media. The most sophisticated technologies always aim to approximate the natural mode of human perception, which makes the evolution of media more a spiral that constantly returns to the natural habits than a linear progress into the future.
Similarly, literature co-evolves with media to restore the most natural elements — the oral tradition, primary or secondary as it may be, is thus perennial in all literary genres. The evolution seems to advance in a linear pattern; it, nevertheless, revolves around the center of orality and progresses in an anthropotropic spiral, where the classic motifs in various works are sucked and hybridized. Although the canonical transition from drama, poetry to novel sacrifices the natural oral-aural environment to the stable storage in words, the twentieth-century literary representation on radio, film, television and the Internet eventually restore the classic contents in the audio-visual environment. Such a spiral invites us to speculate an essential question: the technological innovation may not be the only dynamic to propel the evolution; instead, it is the restoration of the human-friendly environment that validates the value of the new media.
Similar restoration and hybridization can also be observed in the transformation of Charles Dickens’s works into various genres. Dickens is not only an outstanding novelist but also a brilliant performer and an influential magazine entrepreneur. The vitality of his works transcends varieties of literary genres and is absorbed into innumerable modern media as the technology advances. Dickens’s transgeneric network provides a model to observe the transition of media hybridization when the modern technology restores the human natural communication. This dissertation aims to analyze the delicate relationship between Dickens’s novels and the continuous consolidation of human sensory perceptions in various media. My research will be divided into four main categories:
First, it will study Dickens’s indebtedness to the tradition of theater and the nineteenth-century melodramatic adaptation of his works to see how the contents of the classic literature oscillate between the pure written form (novels) and the residual of the oral performance (melodrama). The study of such a complicated relationship helps clarify Dickens’s transgeneric metamorphosis profoundly influenced by the social milieu and the mass entertainment in the Victorian period.
Second, the success of Dickens’s Public Readings not only epitomizes the audience’s craze for the audio-visual performance but also suggests the author’s endeavors to seek more creative possibilities besides the writing format. More importantly, this singular phenomenon represents the social collective unconsciousness, though repressed by the dominant culture of typography, to return to the ancient tradition of minstrels and bards. Through meticulous editing and intensive rehearsal, Dickens was able to perform with more improvisation and higher accuracy. Furthermore, with a series of symbols onstage, he strategically maintained his identity as a cultural elite and meanwhile enjoyed the ecstasy of orality. Dickens’s unique strategy to reach the equilibrium between orality and literacy will also be analyzed in the dissertation.
Third, several film and television adaptations of Dickens’s works will be examined to show the modern transition of his stories from the written genre to the audio-visual media. Dickens directly influenced many cinematic forerunners, and the film fulfills the imagination of the author, which could not be realized on the written page. Furthermore, the cooperation of the novelist and the illustrators in the Victorian magazine serialization will also be analyzed to see how the illustrations inspire the later design of movies on screen. However, the “un-represented” may more often than not be more pregnant with meanings than the explicit representation on screen. Therefore, it will be an important issue to re-consider the meaning of recollecting the natural environment in the literary creation.
The final analysis concentrates upon Dickens’s works in the cyberspace, monitoring his afterlife in this cutting-edge medium. Besides the websites that contain the scholarly resources, the old radio clips that recite Dickens’s works and the hypertext reproduction of the novels are all juxtaposed in the virtual space. Moreover, many personal blogs provide their own video adaptations, and the other productions such as the podcast become popular on the Internet. The reincarnation of Dickens’s works in the cyberspace represents the novelist’s unique status as the “cultural modem” that bridges the gaps separation the past, present and future. His works epitomize a clear lineage of the technological transition that endeavors to recollect the most instinctive pattern of human cognition.
The transformation of Dickens’s works into so many genres forms a transgeneric network that could help envision the hybridization of media in the literary history. When literature tends to include all media into its field of study, it sometimes undergoes a severe crisis of self-definition. Dickens’s model may provide some clues to envisage the future development of the literary genres in the age of mechanic reproduction. |
| Reference: | Ackroyd, Peter. Dickens. New York: HarperCollins, 1990.
Amerongen, J. B. van. The Actor in Dickens: a Study of the Histrionic and Dramatic Elements in the Novelist`s Life and Works. New York: B. Blom, 1969.
Andrews, Malcolm. “The ‘Set’ for Charles Dickens’s Public Readings.” Dickens Quarterly, 21:4 (2004 Dec): 211-24.
---. Editorial. Dickensian, 94 (1998): 83-4.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “The Significance of Literacy.” Thinking It through: an Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003.
Auerbach, Nina. Private Theatricals: the Lives of the Victorians. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP, 1990.
“Babbage, Charles.” Encyclopedia Americana. 2008. Grolier Online. 29 Apr. 2008 <http://ea.grolier.com/cgi-bin/article?assetid=0029040-00>.
Baker, H. Barton. History of the London Stage and Its Famous Players, 1576-1903. New York: B. Blom, 1969.
Baker, R. “The Dramatization of Dickens’s Novels.” American Magazine, 16, ns 6 (1900/01): 545-49.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1968.
---. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
---. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, Texas: U of Texas P, 1986
---. Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, Tex.: U of Texas P, 1996.
Balcerzak, Scott. “Dickensian Orphan as Child Star: Freddie Bartholomew and the Commodity of Cute in MGM`s David Copperfield (1935).” Literature Film Quarterly (2005) <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3768/
is_200501/ai_n12412544/pg_1>.
Barreca, Regina. “‘The Mimic Life of the Theatre’: The 1838 Adaptation of Oliver Twist.” MacKay 87-95.
Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.
---. “From Work to Text.” Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1979: 73-81.
Baskin, Ellen. Serials on British Television, 1950-1994. Brookfield: Ashgate, 1996.
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books, 1986: 217-51.
Bevis, Matthew. “Dickens in Public.” Essays in Criticism: A Quarterly Journal of Literary Criticism, 51:3 (2001 July): 330-52.
Biello, David. “Back to the Future: How the Brain “Sees” the Future.” Scientific American. 02 January 2007. <http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=
sa003&articleID=CFEBFD00-E7F2-99DF-3E7DCD24612A6C36>.
Billington, Michael. “Dickens on the Screen.” Illustrated London News, 257 (28 November 1970): 19-21.
Bolter, Jay David. Writing Space: the Computer, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
Bolton, H. Philip. Dickens Dramatized. London: Mansell, 1987.
Booth, Michael. English Melodrama. London: Herbert Jenkins, 1965.
---. English Plays of the Nineteenth Century. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976.
---. “Melodrama and the Working Class.” MacKay 96-109.
---. “The Theatre and Its Audience.” Leech .
Bowen, John. “David Copperfield’s Home Movies.” Glavin, 2003 29-38.
Brunson, Martha L. “Novelists as Platform Readers: Dickens, Clemens, and Stowe.” Thompson 651-82.
Bull, John Anthony. The Framework of Fiction: Socio-cultural Approaches to the Novel. Totowa: Barnes & Noble, 1988.
Bush, Vannevar. “As We May Think.” Atlantic Monthly. July 1945. <http://www.
theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush>.
Butler, Ivan. “Dickens on the Screen.” Film Review 1972-73. New York: A. S. Barnes, 1972: 18-25.
Cain, Jeffrey. “Forum on the Crisis of Self-Definition in English Studies.” Rocky Mountain Review. Spring 2001: 83-92.
Card, James. Seductive Cinema: The Art of Silent Film. New York: Knopt, 1994.
Carlson, Darren K. “Poll Shows Continuing Strong American Reading Habits.” Gallup Poll News Service. 4 October 1999. <http://www.gallup.com/poll/
release/pr991004b.asp>.
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-worship, and the Heroic in History. New York: Chelsea House, 1983.
Castelli, Louis P. and Caryn Lynne Cleeland. David Lean: A Guide to References and Resources. Boston: G K Hall & Co, 1980.
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996.
Clark, Andy. “Language: The Ultimate Artifact.” Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT, 1997.
---. “Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Cognition.” Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Peter Carruthers and Jill Boucher, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Clark, Mary E. “A Thirst for Meaning.” In Search of Human Nature. London: Routledge, 2002.
Clayton, Jay. Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: the Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture. New York: Oxford UP, 2003.
cmdelavega. “Batman`s Christmas Carol.” YouTube. 24 November 2006. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPKQs7Jy3cg>.
Cockshut, A. O. J. The Imagination of Charles Dickens. New York: New York UP, 1962.
Colby, Robert A. “Thackeray and Dickens on the Boards.” MacKay 139-51.
Cole, David. Acting as Reading: the Place of the Reading Process in the Actor’s Work. Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan P, 1992.
Coleman, Edward D. “The Jew in English Drama [Oliver Twist]: an Annotated Bibliography.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 44 (1940): 432-34.
Collins, Philip, ed. Charles Dickens: The Public Readings. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.
---. “Dickens’s Public Readings: Texts and Performances.” Dickens Studies Annual, Vol. 3 (1974): 182-84.
---. Dickens: the Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1971.
coolduder. “Charles Dickens` A Christmas Carol Spoof.” YouTube. 19 August 2007. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3qQ6m9iXmk>.
Cox, Philip. “The Professional Writer: Adaptations of Dickens’s Early Novels.” Reading Adaptations: Novels and Verse Narratives on the Stage, 1970-1840. New York: Manchester UP, 2000: 121-62.
Deacon, Terrence. “Language.” The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. New York: W.W. Norton, 1997.
Deleuze, Gilles. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: U. of Minnesota P, 1987.
Den Hartog, Dirk. Dickens and Romantic Psychology: the Self in Time in Nineteenth-century Literature. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1987.
Denman, Kamilla L. Haunted Screen and Shadowed Texts: Film Adaptations of British Victorian Prose Fiction. Diss. Harvard U, 1996.
Dennett, Daniel. “How Words Do Things With Us.” Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, 1991.
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Glayph 1. John Hopkins Textual Studies. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1977.
---. Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: U. of Chicago P, 1981.
---. Glas. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1990.
Dickens, Charles. Sketches by Boz: Illustrative of Every-day Life and Every-day People. London; New York: Oxford UP, 1966.
---. Oliver Twist. New York: New American Library, 1980.
---. David Copperfield. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.
---. The Speeches of Charles Dickens: a Complete Edition. Fielding, K. J, ed. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press International, 1988.
---. Great Expectations: Complete, Authoritative Text with Biographical and Historical Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from Five Contemporary Critical Perspectives. Boston: Bedford, 1996.
---. A Christmas Carol. Oxford : Heinemann, 2002.
---. The Letters of Charles Dickens. 6 Vols. Madeline House and Graham Storey, eds. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.
---. “Charles Dickens Filmography.” The International Movie Database. 2007. <http://www.imdb.com>.
---. A Tale of Two Cities. Recite. Aker, Jane. Podcast Online. LearnOutLoud. <http://www.learnoutloud.com/Catalog/Literature/European-Classics/A-Tale-of-Two-Cities-Podcast/19799>.
---. A Christmas Carol. Online Podcast. LearnOutLoud. <http://www.learnoutloud.com/Catalog/Literature/European-Classics/A-Christmas-Carol-by-Charles-Dickens-Audio-Book-Podcast/23094#listen>.
---. A Christmas Carol. Recite. Geoffrey Palmer. Online Podcast. New York: Penguin, 2005. <http://www.ismckenzie.com/2005/12/charles_dickens_a_christmas_
ca.html>.
---. Oliver Twist. Recite. Lenny Glionna Jr., et al. Online Podcast. LibriVox, 19 November 2006. <http://librivox.org/oliver-twist-by-charles-dickens/>.
---. The Old Curiosity Shop. Recite. Nathaniel Tapley. Online Podcast. The Podcasts of Charles Dickens. 2007. <http://dickenspodcasts.blogspot.
com/>.
Dickens, Mamie. My Father as I Recall Him. Amsterdam: Fredonia, 2004.
Dolby, George. Charles Dickens as I Knew Him: the Story of the Reading Tours 1866-1870. New York: 1970.
Donald, Merlin. Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993.
Eagleton, Terry. “Introduction: What is Literature?” Literary Theory: an Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985: 1-14.
Edel, Leon. “Novel and Camera.” The Theory of the Novel: New Essays. John Halperin, ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1974: 177-88.
Eigner, Edwin M. The Dickens Pantomime. Berkeley : U of California P, 1989.
Eisenstein, Sergi. “Dickens, Griffith, and the Film Today.” Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Trans. Jay Leyda. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949: 195-255.
Eliot, George. “The Natural History of German Life.” The Living Age, Vol. 50, issue 639. 23 August, 1856. < http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/
moa-cgi?notisid=ABR0102-0050-189>.
Elliott, Kamilla. Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. New York: Cambridge UP, 2003.
---. “Cinematic Dickens and Uncinematic Words.” Glavin, 2003 113-121.
Ellis, John. Literature Lost: Social Agendas and the Corruption of the Humanities. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997.
Elsaesser, Thomas and Adam Baker, eds. Early Cinema: Space, Frame, Narrative. London: British Film Institute, 1990.
Emmens, Carol A. Short Stories on Film and Video. Littleton: Library Unlimited, 1985.
Fawcett, F Dubrez. Dickens the Dramatist: on Stage, Screen and Radio. London: W. H. Allan, 1952.
Ferguson, Susan L. “Dickens`s Public Readings and the Victorian Author.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 41:4. Autumn 2001: 729-49.
Finnegan, Ruth H. Oral Traditions and the Verbal Arts: a Guide to Research Practices. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Semiotics of Theater. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1992.
Fitz-Gerald, S. J. Adair. “David Copperfield on the Stage.” Dickensian, 10 (1914): 228-34.
---. “Dickens and the Stage.” Dickensian, 13 (1917): 124-26.
---. Dickens and the Drama: An Account of Charles Dickens’s Connection With the Stage and the Stage’s Connection With Him. New York: Benjamin Blom, 1971.
FitzSimons, Raymund. The Charles Dickens Show: An Account of His Public Readings, 1858-1870. London: Geoffrey Bles, 1970.
Flaxman, Rhoda L. Victorian Word-Painting and Narrative: Toward the Blending of Genres. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI Research Press, 1987.
Flint, Kate. The Victorians and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
Foley, John Miles, ed. Teaching Oral Traditions. New York: MLA, 2002.
Foster, John. The Life of Charles Dickens. London: Dent, 1927.
Foucault, Michel. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage, 1973.
---. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.
Fulkerson, Richard P. The Dickens Novel on the Victorian Stage. Diss. Ohio State U, 1970.
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, 1991.
Giddings, Robert, ed. The Changing World of Charles Dickens. London: Vision, 1983.
Giddings, Robert, et al. Screening the Novel: the Theory and Practice of Literary Dramatization. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.
Glavin, John. After Dickens: Reading, Adaptation, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
---, ed. Dickens on Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
Goldberg, Michael. “Dickens and the Early Modern Theatre.” MacKay 168-83.
Goody, Jack. The Interface between the Written and the Oral. London & New York: Cambridge UP, 1987.
Griffith, Linda A. When the Movies Were Young. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, 1925.
Grove, Martin A. “Novel Reading Decline Not Good for H’wood.” The Hollywood Reporter. 4 August 2004. <http://www.hollywoodreporter.
com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000592251>.
Grubb, Gerald Giles. “Dickens` Pattern of Weekly Serialization.” English Literary History (ELH), Vol. 9, No. 2. (Jun., 1942). p. 141-156. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-8304%28194206%299%3A2%3C141%3ADPOWS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-1>.
Guida, Fred. A Christmas Carol and Its Adaptations: A Critical Examination of Dickens’s Story and Its Production on Screen and Television. London: McFarland & Co, 2000.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Oxford: Polity Press, 1989.
Harlow, Nancy. Dickens’s Cinematic Imagination. Diss. Brown U, 1974.
Hayward, Jennifer Poole. Consuming Pleasures: Active Audiences and Serial Fictions from Dickens to Soap Opera. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1997.
Holland, Norman N. “The Power(?) of Literature: A Neuropsychological View.” New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation, 35:3 (2004 Summer): 395-410.
House, E. H. The English World Which Stimulated the Literature of Charles Dickens & the Early Victorians. [S.l.]: The American Classical College, [19--?].
jacoboeagle. “David Lean’s Opening Sequence of Great Expectations (1946).” YouTube. 14 May 2007. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
eXyo68s-f1E>.
James, Henry. “Charles Dickens.” Literary Criticism. New York: Viking Press, 1984: 853.
Johnson, Edgar. Charles Dickens: His Tragedy and Triumph. New York: Penguin, 1986.
Johnson, Edward Dudley Hume. Charles Dickens: An Introduction to His Novels. New York: Random House, 1969.
Johnson, Steve. “The Dickensian Memex; or, the 19th-century Roots of Hypertext.” 21stC: Issue 3.2. <http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/
issue-3.2/johnson.html>.
Jones, Alison, ed. Chambers Dictionary of Quotations. Edinburgh: Chambers, 1996.
Jordan, Tim. Cyberpower: the Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Katz, Jon. Geeks: How Two Lost Boys Rode the Internet out of Idaho. New York: Villard Books, 2000.
Katz, Pamela. “Directing Dickens: Alfonso Cuaron’s 1998 Great Expectations.” Glavin, 2003 95-103.
kc4wq. “Scrooge A Christmas Carol part I.” YouTube. 23 July 2007. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdDdFq5X1Ns&mode=related&search=>.
Kent, Charles. Charles Dickens as a Reader. New York: Haskell House Publishers, 1973.
Kernan, Alvin. The Death of Literature. New Haven: Yale UP, 1990.
Konner, Melvin. “Logos.” The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit. New York: Times Books/Henry Holt, 2002.
Lahr, John, ed. The Diaries of Kenneth Tynan. New York: Bloomsbury, 2001.
Landow, George P. Hypertext 2.0: the Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1997.
---. Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.
---, ed. The Dickens Web. Cambridge, MA: Eastgate, 1992.
Landow, George P and Paul Kahn. “Where’s the Hypertext? The Dickens Web as a System-Independent Hypertext.” D. Lucarella, eds. The Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext, ECHT `92 Milano. ACM Press, 1992: 149-160.
Lazenby, Walter S., Jr. Stage Versions of Dickens’s Novels in America to 1900. Diss. Indiana U, 1962.
Leech, Clifford, and T. W. Craik, eds. The Revels History of Drama in English, Vol. VI: 1750-1880. London; New York: Routledge, 1996.
Leonard, William Torbert. Theater: Stage to Screen to Television. 2 vols. London: Scarecrow, 1981: I: 293-303; II: 1137-50, 1510-16.
Levinson, Paul. The Soft Edge: a Natural History and Future of the Information Revolution. New York: Routledge, 1997.
---. Mind at Large: Knowing in the Technological Age. Greenwich: Jai, 1988.
---. Digital McLuhan: a Guide to the Information Millennium. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Lodge, David. Consciousness and the Novel: Connected Essays. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002.
---. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Lord,Albert Bates. The Singer of Tales. New York: Atheneum, 1970.
MacKay, Carol Hanbery. Dramatic Dickens. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989.
Maclean, Robert Simpson. “William Pleater Davidge Presents an ‘Evening with Charles Dickens’: Some Newly Discovered Manuscripts of the First Dickens Reader.” The Dickensian, 92:4 (440) (1996 Winter): 195-207.
Mannoni, Laurent. The Great Art of Light and Shadow. Exeter, Devon: U of Exeter P, 2000.
Marsh, Joss L. “Inimitable Double Vision: Dickens, Little Dorrit, Photography, Film.” Dickens Studies Annual, 22 (1993): 239-82.
McCracken, Scott. Pulp: Reading Popular Fiction. New York: Manchester UP, 1998.
Mckee, Robert. Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting. New York: Regan, 1997.
McLuhan, Marshall. Gutenberg Galaxy: the Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: Toronto UP, 1962.
---. Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
---. The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. New York: Bantam, 1967.
McLuhan, Marshall and Eric McLuhan. Laws of Media: the New Science. Toronto Buffalo: U of Toronto P, 1988.
McMaster, Juliet. Dickens the Designer. Totowa: Barnes & Noble, 1986.
Meckier, Jerome. “Charles Dickens, George Dolby, and New York in 1867-68.” A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews, 15:1 (2002 Winter): 39-46.
Meisel, Martin. Realizations
Millard-Anderson, Barbara S. Cultural Transformations of ‘Nicolas Nickleby’: from the Book to the Boards. Diss. U. of South Carolina, 1995.
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1989.
Montgomery, George E. “Dickens on the American Stage.” American Magazine, 8 (1888): 190-203.
Morley, Malcolm. “Stage Appearances of Copperfield.” Dickensian, 49 (1952/53): 77-85.
---. “Stages of Great Expectations.” Dickensian, 51 (1954/55): 79-83.
Morris, Pam. Dickens’s Class Consciousness: a Marginal View. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1991.
Moulthrop, Stuart. “Rhizome and Resistance: Hypertext and the Dreams of a New Culture.” Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1994: 299-319.
Mozzara. “The Artful Dodgers Love Life” YouTube. 17 May 2007. <http://www.
youtube.com/watch?v=LgHu7JhEBfU>.
Mulvey, Laura. Visual and Other Pleasures. London: Mcmillan, 1989.
Nash, Walter. Language in Popular Fiction. London: Routledge, 1990.
Neider, Charles, ed. The Autobiography of Mark Twain. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2000.
Nelson, Theodor H. “A File Structure for the Complex, the Changing and the Intermediate.” Association for Computing Machinery, Proceedings of the National Conference, 20th. New York: ACM, 1965: 84-100.
Olson, David. “Literacy.” The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Robert A. Wilson and Frank Keil, eds. Cambridge: MIT, 1999.
Ong, Walter J. Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1971.
---. The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. Minneapolis: Minnesota UP, 1981.
---. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. London: Cornell UP, 1982.
---. Orality and Literacy : the Technologizing of the Word. New York: Routledge, 1991.
Orwell, George. “Charles Dickens.” Inside the Whale and Other Essays. London: Penguin, 1981.
Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.
Plato. Phaedrus and the Seventh and Eighth Letters. Trans. Walter Hamilton. New York: Penguin, 1973.
Pointer, Michael. Charles Dickens on the Screen: the Film, Television, and Video Adaptations. London: Scarecrow, 1996.
Ponting, David. “Charles Dickens: The Solo Performer.” Giddings 109-34.
Poole, Mike. “Dickens and Film: 101 Uses of a Dead Author.” Giddings, 1983: 148-62.
Redmond, James. “Action, Character, and Language: Dickens, His Contemporaries, and the Lure of the Stage.” MacKay 125-38.
Ren, Tore. Dickens, Melodrama, and the Parodic Imagination. New York: AMS, 2002.
Rosenberg, Bruce A. Folklore and Literature: Rival Siblings. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1991.
Rowell, George, ed. Nineteenth Century Plays. London: Oxford UP, 1972.
Ryan, Marie-Laure. Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1999.
Said, Edward. “Restoring Intellectual Coherence.” MLA Newsletter. Vol. 31, No. 1 (Spring 1999): 5.
Saunders, Mary. “Dickens and Film: a Survey of Filmographical, Bibliographical, and Critical Materials.” Victorian Institute Journal, 20 (1992): 303-13.
Schaffer, Simon. “Babbage’s Intelligence: Calculating Engines and the Factory System.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994). 203-227. <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0093-1896(199423)21%3A1%3C203%3ABICEAT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B >.
Schlicke, Paul. Dickens and Popular Entertainment. London: Allen & Unwin, 1985.
Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon. Intercultural Communication: a Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
Sennwald, Andre. “The Capitol Presents a Distinguished Screen Edition of ‘David Copperfield’ – ‘The County Chairman.’” The New York Times. January 19, 1935.
Shaw, George Bernard. Pen Portraits and Reviews. London: Constable and Co, 1932.
Siddon, Henry. Practical Illustrations of Rhetoric Gestures. New York: B. Blom, 1968.
Sivier, Evelyn. “Penny Readings: Popular Elocution in Late Nineteenth-century England.” Thompsn 223-30.
Skrypnyk Leonid. Narysyz Teorii Mystetstva Kino. Keiv, Ukraine: Derzhavne vyd, 1928.
Small, Helen. “A Pulse of 124: Charles Dickens and a Pathology of the Mid-Victorian Reading.” James Raven, eds. The Practice and Representation of Reading in England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996: 263-90.
Smiley, Jane. Charles Dickens. New York: Viking, 2002.
Smith, Jonathan. “What`s All this Hype About Hypertext?: Teaching Literature with George P. Landow`s The Dickens Web.” Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996): 121-29.
Smith, Grahame. Dickens and the Dream of Cinema. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2003.
Steig, Michael. Dickens and Phiz. Bloomington & London: Indiana UP, 1978
Stephenson, Ralph. The Cinema as Art. Baltimore: Penguin, 1968.
Steward, Garrett. “Dickens, Eisenstein, Film.” Glavin, 2003 122-144.
Stone, Hary, ed. Dickens’ Working Notes for His Novels. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.
Stormgren, Richard L. and Martin F. Norden. Movies: a Language in Light. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
Tannen, Deborah, ed. Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood: Ablex, 1982.
---, ed. Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Norwood: Ablex, 1984.
Thomlin, E. W. F, ed. Charles Dickens 1812-1870. London: Chatto & Windus, 1969.
Thompson, David W, eds. Performance of Literature in Historical Perspectives. Lanham: UP of America, 1983.
tinytimton. “WPTC Presents... ‘A Christmas Carol’ - PART 1.” YouTube. 23 December 2006. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVx2OzPf99I>.
Tompson, Trevor and Dennis Junius, Associated Press. “Poll: 1 in 4 U.S. Adults Read No Books Last Year.” International Herald Tribune. 21 August 2007. <http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/21/america/NA-GEN-US-Reading-Habits-AP-Poll.php>.
Vlock, Deborah M. “Dickens, Theater, and the Making of a Victorian Reading Public.” Studies in the Novel, 29:2 (1997 Summer): 164-90.
---. Dickens, Novel Reading, and the Victorian Popular Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defore, Richardson and Fielding. Middlesex: Penguin, 1957.
Weintraub, Stanley. Shaw; an Autobiography, 1856-1898: Selected from His Writings. New York: Weybright and Talley, 1969.
Williams, Emlyn. “Dickens and the Theater.” Tomlin.
Williams, Martin. Griffith: First Artist of the Movies. New York: Oxford UP, 1980.
Williams, Raymond. Introduction. Dombey and Son. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.
Williams, Tony. “Fellowship Forum: Imitating the Imitable? — Dickens and Adaptation.” Dickensian, 97 (2001): 74-6.
Woolcott, Alexander. Mr. Dickens Goes to the Play. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1922.
Worton, Michael and Judith Still, eds. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. New York: Manchester UP, 1990.
Zambrano, Ana L. “Modern Film Adaptations of the Novels of Dickens.” Dickens and Film. New York: Gorden, 1977: 241-379. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
91551501
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915515011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英國語文學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
