Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37207
|
| Title: | 教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係：量化模式建構與典範案例分析
Teacher Community, Work Hope, and Creative Transformation: Model Construction and Case Analysis |
| Authors: | 楊智先
Yang,Chih Hsien |
| Contributors: | 詹志禹
吳靜吉
Chan,Jason Chih Yu
Wu,Jing Jyi
楊智先
Yang,Chih Hsien |
| Keywords: | 社群互動
工作希望感受
創造性轉化
teacher community
work hope
creative transformation |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 12:41:56 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 教師專業學習社群（簡稱「教師社群」）是一種協助現場教師突破孤立狀態、與同儕相互學習、以持續專業發展、進而提升創意之重要方式。
本研究透過量化模式的檢驗，探究教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係，以問卷調查法，針對台灣地區教師，進行取樣研究，有效問卷共計891份。研究工具包括「社群互動品質量表」、「工作希望感受量表」與「創造性轉化行為量表」。此外，並透過對典型個案之訪談，探究四個「創意教師行動研究」成功社群的經營策略。
量化研究主要發現：「教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化」模式之驗證獲得支持。此模式的意義在於：良好的教師社群必須兼顧認知與情感層面的互動；如此，除了可直接促進教學上的創造性轉化之外，認知與情感互動尚可以透過工作希望感受之中介效果來影響教師的創造性轉化。至於教師工作希望感受的提升，則能直接影響創造性轉化的展現。其次，根據個案分析整理歸納出經營社群的重要策略，如：「感動策略」、「友誼策略」、「共同解決問題策略」、「榮耀共享策略」、「低調漸進緩慢策略」、「彰權益能策略」、「成就感策略」、「資源網絡拓展策略」、「雁行領導策略」以及「持續互動策略」。
最後，本研究根據上述發現並針對教育實務與未來研究層面，提出具體建議以供參考。
Nowadays, the concept of a “teacher professional learning community” (Teacher Community, TC) is an important approach to cultivate, develop, and sustain teachers’ professional development and creativity. In Taiwan, from the perspective of TC, how to facilitate teachers’ creativity is also valued under the Creative Education policy. However, empirical evidence is rarely discussed.
Thus, this study addresses two aspects: (1) the relationship of TC, work hope and creative transformation (Study I), (2) to explore the main strategies of managing teacher communities (Study II).
In Study I, a SEM model is proposed using the linear structural relations (LISREL) to test the research hypotheses with the data from 891 valid questionnaires collected. Instruments used include Interactions of Communities Scales, Work Hope Scale, and Creative Transformation Scale. The estimated results of the proposed model are found to substantiate the requirements of the general LISREL model. The majority of the fit indices have indicated good fit of the model to the data. The main findings include (1) Cognitive interactions of communities have significantly direct and indirect effects through work hope on creative transformation; (2) Affective interactions of communities have significantly direct and indirect effects through work hope on creative transformation; (3) Work hope has a significantly direct effect on creative transformation. These results have suggested that teachers’ work hope, and their cognitive and affective interactions in communities have a significant, positive influence on creative transformation. In addition, work hope has played a role as a mediator between the interactions in communities and creative transformation.
In Study II, teachers in communities of four typical cases funded for four years under the Project on the Enhancement of Creative Education are interviewed. Based on the data, there are several strategies for managing teacher communities: (1) witnessing strategy, (2) friendship strategy, (3) problem-solving strategy, (4) honor- sharing strategy, (5) low-profile strategy, (6) empowerment strategy, (7) sense of achievement strategy, (8) networking strategy, (9) flying geese strategy, and (10) sustaining strategy.
Limitations of the current research and implications for the practice of teacher community were discussed. |
| Reference: | 中文部份
尤幸弘（2005）。Amabile創造力成份理論模式驗證之研究:以廣告業為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
王沂釗（2005）。幽谷中的曙光－正向心理學發展與希望理論在輔導上的應用。教育研究月刊，134，106-117。
史美奐（2003）。國中教師創新教學專業能力之研究－以臺北市國民中學為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
江羽慈（2003）。影響國小教師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
池榮尉（2004）。國民小學教師團隊發展歷程之研究—以啄木鳥教師團隊為例。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
吳振賢（2002）。教師網路融入教學態度、網路融入教學行為及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
李佩玲（2002）。教師分級制對教師專業發展的影響－專業學習社群教師的觀點。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
李宗倫（2003）。個人創造力歷程之研究 — 動機理論之整合觀點。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文，未出版。
李勇諭（2005）。透過網路學習社群提昇一位初任教師的數學 教學專業知識之研究。臺北市立師範學院數學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
房柏成（2003）。國小學習型教師團隊建立教學檔案經驗之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林偉文（2002）。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
林富能（2003）。網路實務社群為基礎的音樂教師在職進修研究。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林毓生（1988）。中國傳統的創造性轉化。北京：三聯。
邱皓政（2005）。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育集刊，30，50-73。
洪素蘋（2004）。重要他人回饋、創意自我效能、內、外在動機對創意行為的影響：社會認知理論為基礎的結構方程模式檢驗。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
唐淑華（2004）。希望感的提升－另一個進行情意教育的取向（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC92-2413-H259-001）。
唐淑華（2005）。希望感的提升－另一個進行情意教育的取向（II）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC93-2413-H259-002）。
許春葉（2004）。國中數學教師於任教學校發展學習型組織社群之行動研究。彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文，未出版。
郭木山（2001）。國民小學學校本位教師專業發展之個案研究－以一個教師社群協同反省的行動研究為例。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳怡蒹（2007）。希望理論融入生涯輔導方案以提升國中體育班學生生涯發展概念與希望感之實驗研究。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳美玉（2005）。師資生個人知識管理及其對專業學習與發展影響之研究。師大學報，50（2），181-202。
陳雅智（1998）。國中理化教師的行動研究：專業改變與學習社群。國立高雄師範大學/科學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
曾敬梅、蔡政安、吳靜吉（2003）。不同類別研究生在創造力特質、創新行為與所知覺系所創造氛圍上之比較。中國心理學會第四十屆年會會議論文。
黃郁婷、蔡碧璉（2005）。靈光乍現？系統建構？--創意教師行動研究歷程剖析。「培養新世紀的國民」學術研討會。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所主辦。
黃惠君（2006）。國中教師人口變項、玩興、教學動機、快樂感受與創意教學之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃德祥、謝龍卿、薛秀宜、洪佩圓（2003）。國小、國中與高中學生希望、樂觀與學業成就之相關研究。彰化師大教育學報，5，33-61。
楊美姍（2004）。社群協助創意教師行動研究之個案研究─以高雄師範大學Adept實驗室為例。國立高雄師範大學物理學系碩士論文，未出版。
楊振富譯（2002）。Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000)原著。學習型學校（下冊）（Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook or educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education）。台北：天下。
楊智先（2000）。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
詹志禹（2002）。創造力教育白皮書－小學教育。台北：教育部。
詹志禹（2003）。課程創新與教師的自我創化－系統演化的觀點。教育資料集刊，28，145-173。
詹志禹（2005）。臺灣地區國小高年級兒童的創意經驗及其家庭因素。教育與心理研究，28(4)，591-615。
詹婉鈺（2006）。國中小教師教學熱情及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
劉三寶（2005）。經營一個教師行動研究網路社群之行動研究。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
劉家全（2002）。透過網路成長社群互動提昇一位國中初任數學教師教學專業發展之研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士論文，未出版。
歐志昌（2003）。網路學習社群對數學教師專業能力提升之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
潘建光（2001）。促進教師互動與學習社群網站之建構－以國民中學公民與道德科為例。大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蔡宜貞（2005）。組織創新氛圍、教師工作內外在動機對國小教師創意教學行為影響之結構方程模式檢驗。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蔡碧璉（投稿中）。優質創意教師行動研究計畫歷程之探究。
蕭詔文（2002）。高中資優生師徒關係及相關因素之研究－數理生、藝術生與一般生之對照。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文未出版。
繆長泉（2004）。經營自然領域教師網路社群之研究。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
薛秀宜（2004）。希望理論在學生輔導上之應用。教育研究，120，94-100。
顏宏如（2003）。以國小英語教師專業成長社群瞭解英語閱讀教學現狀與教師參與團體之感想。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
羅逸園（2003）。多國籍企業子公司創新程度影響因素之探討－以3M亞洲地區子公司為例。中原企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
英文部分
Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994). The team climate inventory (TCI) and group innovation: A psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Pschology, 67, 143-151.
Amabile, T. M.(1996). Creativity in the context. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
Ancona, D. C., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Reciew, 106, 529-550.
Balach, C. A., Szymanski, G. J. (2003). The growth of a professional learning community through collaborative action research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 477527)
Berlinger-Gustafson, C.(2004). Building professional learning communities. Retrieved October 22, 2004, from http://www.teachinflorida.com/teachertoolkit/ PLC.htm
Black, A. L., & Halliwell, G. (2000). Accessing practical knowledge: how? why? Teaching and Teacher education,16(1), 103-115.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson(Eds.), Review of research in education, Vol. 24(pp.249-306). Washington, DC: American Educational research Association.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed),Handbook of creativity(pp. 313-335). NY: Cambridge.
DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Indiana: National Educational Service.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “ Professional learning community” ? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics & Creative Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Fulton, K. P., and Riel, M.(1998).Professional development through learning communities. Edutopia online. Retrieved October 22, 2004, from http://www. gse.uci.edu/vkiosk/faculty/reil/reil-fulton.html
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams’ engagement in creative process. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453-470.
Gilson, L.L. (2001). Diversity, dissimilarity and creativity: Does group composition or being difference enhance or hinder creative performance. Washongton, DC: Academy of Management Meetings.
Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Academy of Management Review, 42, 787-805.
Glazer, E. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 179-193.
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
Hara, N. (2001). Formal and informal learning: Incorporating communities of practice into professional development. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 659)
Hord, S. M. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood Creek school. Issue…about Change, 6(2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 424 685)
Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. M. Hord(Ed.). Learning together, leading together: Changing school through professional learning communities(pp.5-14). NY: Teachers College Press.
Huffman, J. B. (2001). The role of shared values and vision in creating professional learning communities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 466028)
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power(Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion. (pp.521-539). New York: Wiley.
Isen, A. M. (2003). Positive affect as a source of human strength. In Lisa G. Aspinwall & Ursula M. Staudinger (Eds.). A psychology of human strengths(pp.179-195). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10(pp.169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M. & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring school. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757-767.
Massachusetts ASCD(2004). Learning communities: A new definition of professional development. Retrieved October 22, 2004, from http://www.mascd.org/docs/ focwin04.htm
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed),Handbook of creativity(pp.449-460). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2001). Secondary schoolteaching in context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meichenbaum, D. (1975). Enhancing creativity by modifying what subjects say to themselves. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 129-145.
Monge, P. R., Cozzen, M. D., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Communicational and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3, 250-274.
Nelson, B. C., & Hammerman, J. K. (1996). Reconceptualizing teaching: Moving toward the creation of intellectual communities of students, teachers, and teacher educators. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman(Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices(pp.3-21). New York: Teachers College Press.
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89-106.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sergiovanni, T. (1999). The story of community. In J. Retallick, B. Cocklin, and K. Coombe (eds.) Learning communities: issues, strategies and contexts(pp.9-25) , New York: Routledge.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33-53.
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E.(2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1-22.
Sim, C. (2006). Preparing for professional experiences-incorporating pre-service teachers as ‘communities of practice’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 77-83.
Simonton, K. D. (1984) Genius, creativity, and leadership. MA: Harvard University Press.
Simonton, K. D. (1999).Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),Handbook of creativity(pp.116-133). NY: Cambridge.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 241-256.
Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbow in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249-275.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 257-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 321-335.
Sutherland, L. M., Scanlon, L. A., & Sperring, A. (2005). New directions in preparing professionals: examing issues in engaging students in communities of practice through a school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 79-92.
ten Dam, G. T. M., Blom, S. (2006). Learning through participation: The potential od school-based teacher education for developing a professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 647-660.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers’ work. NY: Teachers College Press.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review,18, 293-321. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
89152511
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0891525111 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
