政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37042

政大典藏 > College of International Affairs > Masters Program in Strategic and International Affairs > Theses > Item 140.119/37042

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37042

Title:	武裝衝突法中陸戰法規之理論與實踐
Authors:	彭玉明
Contributors:	趙國材彭玉明
Keywords:	武裝衝突法陸戰法規童兵地雷 The Law of Armed Conflict The Law of War on Land Child Soldier Landmine
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2009-09-18 20:35:28 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	武裝衝突法已成為各交戰國(方)爭取國際支持之重要手段，軍隊執行作戰任務，必須遵守武裝衝突法及國際法的相關規範，始可確保作戰行動的合法性及正當性。陸戰法規是一系列戰爭法規則和慣例的重要歷史淵源，為武裝衝突法之主體。隨著以規範交戰規則為主的海牙法體系與規範人道保護規則為主的日內瓦法體系逐漸整合，陸戰法規除規範作戰使用武器的規則外，其他有關交戰者、敵對行為及軍事佔領等規則均納入1949年日內瓦公約及1977年的兩項附加議定書。觀察國際社會對陸戰法規實踐的面向，除可從戰史例證中得到驗證外，尚可從童兵、地雷、武裝衝突遺留爆炸物處理及文化資產保護等議題，得以進一步瞭解陸戰法規實踐的全貌。要禁止利用童兵的行為，除了國家行為者應負履約義務外，對非國家行為者侵犯兒童權利行為的制止是當務之急，國際刑事法院應扮演更積極的角色。2003年波灣戰爭中，《禁雷公約》雖未能阻止伊拉克使用人員殺傷雷，但已顯示該公約對非締約國產生的隱性約束力，禁用人員殺傷雷的規範雖未完全實現，但已為多數國家認同，未來可能成為一項習慣國際法。《戰爭遺留爆炸物議定書》雖可為解決武裝衝突結束後平民所面臨的主要威脅提供一項法律制度，但因條約內容強制性不足，成效尚難顯現。目前對文化資深保護的重點在於免遭武裝衝突毀損為主要議題，因武裝衝突而流落異域之文化資產回復或返還，可能成為未來發展之主要議題。 The Law of Armed Conflict has become one of the important means to win the international support for all belligerent. The army must comply with the Law of Armed Conflict in combat, in order to ensure the legitimacy of military operation. The law of war on land has its historical origins for regulations and customary of the Law of War, and also has codified as the main body of the Law of Armed Conflict. The Law of The Hague and the Law of Geneva have been gradually integrated. All these regulations of the law of war on land about combatant, hostilities and military occupation were included in the “Geneva Conventions of 1949” and two “Additional Protocols of 1977”, except the regulations of the use of the weapon. Observing the different aspects of the law of war on land in the international community from the cases above, furthermore, the issues of “Child Soldier”, “Landmine”, “Explosive Remnants of Armed Conflict” and “Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict”, can help to understand the full view of the practice of the law of war on land. For stopping the use of child soldiers, the obligation of convention should be executed by the state actors, the task of top priority should prevent the infringements of the right of child of the non-state actors, and the International Criminal Court should play a more positive role. In the “Gulf War 2003”, the rule, “Convention on Prohibition of Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Landmines and on Their Destruction”, although it has not prevent Iraq from the use of anti-personnel landmine, had showed the indistinct effect of the convention to the powers in the conflict that may not be parties to the convention. Although the rule of prohibition of use of anti-personnel mines has not completely realized, it had already been approved by most states, and may become one of the international customary in the future. The “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War annexed to the “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention)” provided a legal protection for the civilian after the armed conflict. Its effect was still too difficult to manifest, because the force of provisions of the protocol were insufficient. The protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict focuses on exempting from the damage of cultural property at present, but the issue like how to recover the cultural properties which were pillaged in armed conflicts, would become the main theme in the foreseeable future.
Reference:	壹、中文部分一、專書王鐵崖編。《國際法》。北京：法律，1995年。王鐵崖、朱荔蓀、田如萱等編。《戰爭法文獻集》。北京：解放軍，1986 年。俞正山。《武裝衝突法》。北京：軍事科學，2002年。高文俊。《韓戰憶往—浴血餘生話人權》。台北：生智文化，2000 年。馬繼東編。《生化武器與秘密戰爭》。北京：解放軍文藝，2001年。陳榮傳。〈由國際法觀點論武裝衝突事件中文化資產之保護〉，丘宏達教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會編，《國際法論文集》。台北：三民，2001年。盛紅生、楊澤偉、秦小軒。《武力的邊界─21世紀前期武裝衝突中的國際法問題研究》。北京：時事，2003年。張景恩。《國際法與戰爭》。北京：國防大學，1999年。楊永明。《國際安全與國際法》。台北：元照，2003年。雷崧生。《日內瓦法典》。台北，中華，1964年。董霖。《國際公法與國際組織》。台北：台灣商務，1995年。趙永琛編。《國際刑法約章滙編》。北京：中國人民公安大學，1999年。端木正。《國際法》。北京：北京大學，1989年。魏靜芬。《戰爭法學》。台北：社團法人台灣海洋事務策進會，2005年。叢文勝。《戰爭法原理與實用》。北京：軍事科學，2003年。叢文勝。《法律戰經典案例評析》。北京：解放軍，2004年。中國人民志願軍政治部編。《中國人民志願軍抗美援朝戰爭政治工作總結》。北京：解放軍出版社，1985年。軍事社會科學叢書編輯部編。《美伊作戰研究專輯》。台北：政治作戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心，2004年。二、譯作夏爾‧盧梭(C., Rousseau)。《武裝衝突法》，張凝等譯。北京：中國對外翻譯公司，1987年。葛德斯坦(Goldstein, Joshua S.)。《國際關係》(International Relations)，歐信宏、胡祖慶合譯。台北：雙葉，2003年。古特曼(Gutman, Roy)、瑞夫(David Rieff)編。《戰爭的罪行》(Crimes of War)，席代岳譯。台北：麥田，2002年。勞特派特(Lauterpacht, H.)編。《奧本海(L. Oppenheim)國際法：下卷(第一分冊)》王鐵崖、陳鐵強譯。北京：商務印書館，1972年。奧本海(Oppenheim, L.)。《國際法》(International Law)，岑德彰譯。台北：台灣商務印館，1969年。羅吉斯(Rogers, Anthony P.V.)、麥赫比(Paul Malherbe)。《中道之師：武裝衝突法手冊》(Fight It Right: Model Manual on the Law of Armed Conflict for Armed Forces)，楊紫函、周茂林、林健全等譯。桃園：國防大學，2005年。盧梭(Rousseau, J.J.)。《社會契約論》(Du Contract Social)，何兆武譯。北京：商務印書館，1980年。三、期刊論文王俊南。〈武裝衝突法要義之闡釋〉，《陸軍學術雙月刊》，42卷489期。2006年10月，頁139-151。王玉強。〈周恩來與朝鮮戰爭戰俘遣返問題〉，《黨的文獻》，4 期。1999 年，頁28-33。江瑞林。〈從兩伊戰爭中看核生化武器在未來戰爭中所扮角色〉，《核生化防護季刊》，第50期。1995年10月，頁6-13。冷新宇。〈論徵募兒童兵作為戰爭罪〉，《西安政治學院學報》，19卷2期。2006年4月，頁69-73。徐燄。〈朝鮮戰爭中的戰俘之迷〉，《世界軍事》，2004年3期。2004年3月，頁50-55。高銘暄、王秀梅。〈建立國際刑事法院的法律意義〉，《吉林大學社會科學學報》，第3期。2004年6月，頁16-21。賀明。〈中朝與美軍在遣返戰俘問題上的鬥爭〉，《文史精華》，2 期。1996 年，頁4-9。張立。〈僱傭軍的戰爭遊戲〉，《中國科技縱橫》，8期。2004年8月，頁8-17。鄭建國。〈從國際法關於戰俘的規定看虐囚事件〉，《襄樊學院學報》，25卷4期。2004年7月，頁65-68。叢文勝。〈試析現代戰爭法的幾個基本問題〉，《中國軍事科學》，17卷1期。2004年2月，頁73-81。四、碩士論文張謨猷。〈禁止化學武器公約之研究〉。國立政治大學外交究所，碩士論文，2004年4月。五、網際網路專文沈志華、李丹慧。〈1953年朝鮮停戰：莫斯科的安排和做法—關於朝鮮停戰談判最後階段的俄國檔案文獻〉。http://www.shenzhihua.net/cxzz/000023_4.htm 祖國斌。〈虐待戰俘是違反國際法和公約的嚴重罪行〉。CRI Online國際在線，http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.chinabroadcast.cn/3821/2004/05/12/107@156337.htm 胡瑞麟。〈現代戰場殺手－燃料空氣彈〉。軍事刊物http://past_journal.mnd.gov.tw/%E5%BE%8C%E5%8B%A4%E5%8D%8A%E5%B9%B4%E5%88%8A/Magazinefile/mag31/No31/31-4.htm 〈美國大使談聯合國維和人員得到一年豁免的問題〉。美國參考，http://usinfo.org/mgck/usinfo.state.gov/regional/ea/mgck/archive02/0715icc.htm 〈擔憂出國可能被捕，以高級軍官停止赴英進修〉。中央社，http://www.mnd.gov.tw/modnews/mininews/matter.aspx?PublicID=1821 〈萬處考古點千名美軍守不住伊拉克古文物遭竊〉，台灣立報http://publish.lihpao.com/InternationalEducationNews/2005/09/03/05C09023/ 〈紅十字國際委員會擴大與私營軍事和安全公司的連絡〉。紅十字國際委員會，http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QL8XG 〈以軍在黎埋設的地雷炸傷多名排雷專家和醫生〉，新華網，貝魯特2006年11月25日電訊， http://news.gxnews.com.cn/staticpages/20061126/newgx4569061d-885673.shtml 〈讓我們終結人員殺傷雷的時代〉，紅十字國際委員會http://www.icrc.org/Web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QP47E 〈伊拉克戰爭對文化遺產造成的後果〉，文建會世界遺產知識網，http://wh.cca.gov.tw/tc/learning/learn_1_c.asp?learn_id=284 槍械詞匯。http://gunglossary.home.comcast.net/big5/chi_gun_dict_4.htm 貳、英文部分一、官方文件 Report of the UN Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict, 10 Nov. 2003. Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in the Sudan, 17 Aug. 2006. Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in Côte d’Ivoire, 25 Oct. 2006. The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 37: Tax Strategy for 2003, 19 Sept. 2003. The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 39: Foreign Investment, 26 June 2003. The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 46: Amendment of CPA Order 39 on Foreign Investment, 20 Dec. 2003. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 610(VII), Korea: Reports of the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea, 3 Dec. 1952. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2603(XXIV), Question of Chemical and Bacteriological (Biological) Weapons, 16 Dec. 1969. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2849(XXVI), Development and Environment, 20 Dec. 1971. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 3264(XXIX), Prohibition of Action to Influence the Environment and Climate for Military and Other Purposes, Incompatible with the Maintenance of International Security, Human Well-being and Health, 9 Dec. 1974. U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, the Situation in the Middle East, 22 Nov. 1967. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1261, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Aug. 1999. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1314, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 11 Aug. 2000. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1379, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 20 Nov. 2001. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1460, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Jan. 2003. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 22 Apr. 2004. U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 26 July 2005. 二、專書 Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993). Borrie, John, Explosive Remnants of War: A Global Survey (London: Landmine Action, 2003). Boylan, Patrick J., Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1993). Cave, Rosy, Anthea Lawson and Andrew Sherriff, Cluster Munitions in Albania and Lao PDR (Geneva: UNDIR, 2006). Feilchenfeld, Ernst. H., The International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1942). Fischer, David. Stopping the Spread of Nuclear Weapons: The Past and the Prospects (London: Routledge, 1992). Gasser, Hans-Peter. ‘International Humanitarian Law – An Introduction’, in Hans Haug (ed.), Humanity for All – The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1993), 22-71. Glahn, Gerhard Von, The Occupation of Enemy Territory: A Commentary on the Law and Practice of Belligerent Occupation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957). Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave: law and foreign policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2nd edn., 1979). Ingrid, Detter, The Law of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., 2000). Mccoubry, H., International Humanitarian Law: the Regulation of Armed Conflicts (Hampshire: Gower Pub. Co., 1990). McDougal, Myres S., and Florention P. Feliciano, Law and Minimum World Public Order : The Legal Regulation and International Coercion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961). Moyes, Richard (ed.), Foreseeable Harm: The Use and Impact of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon: 2006 (London: Landmine Action, 2006). Roberts, David Lloyd, The Law of Armed Conflict Teaching File for Instructors: Lesson 1 –Basic Knowledge (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2002). Rogers, A. P. V., Law on the Battlefield (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995). Rosas, Allan, The Legal Status of Prisoners of War: A Study in International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1976). Stone, Julius, Legal Controls of International Conflict: A Treatise on the Dynamics of Disputes and War-law (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1954). Toman, Jiri, The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1996). Williams, Sharon A., The International and National Protection of Movable Cultural Property: A Comparative Study (New York: Oceana Publications, 1978). 三、期刊 Aldrich, George H., ‘The Law of War on Land’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 90, Issue 1 (Jan. 2000), 42- 63. Clement, Etienne, ‘Some Recent Practical Experience in the Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 11-25. Dennis, Michael J., ‘Newly Adopted Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No.4 (Oct. 2000), 789-796. Eirinberg, Keith W., ‘The United States Reconsiders the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 25-35. Gerson, Allan, ‘War, conquered territory, and military occupation in the contemporary international legal system’, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Summer 1977), 525-556. Goldblat, Jozef, ‘The Biological Weapons Convention - An overview’, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 318 (June 1997), 251-265. Harbom, Lotta, & Wallensteen, Peter, ‘Armed Conflict and Its International Dimensions, 1946–2004’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 5 (Sept. 2005), 623-635. Kastenberg, Joshua E., ‘The Legal Regime for Protecting Cultural Property During Armed Conflict’, Air Force Law Review, Vol. 42 (1997), 277-305. Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94 (Apr. 2000), 239-277. Meyer, David A., ‘The 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention and Its Emergence into Customary International Law’, Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 11 (1993), 349-376. O’Keefe, Roger, ‘The Meaning of “Cultural Property” under the 1954 Hague Convention’, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. XLVI (1999), 26-56. Oyer III, Harvey E., ‘The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict-Is it Working? A Case Study: The Persian Gulf War Experience’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 23 (1999), 62-84. Scheffer, David, ‘Beyond Occupation Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Oct. 2003), 842-860. Sopf, Davor, ‘Temporary Protection in Europe After 1990: The ‘Right to Remain’ of Genuine Convention Refugees’, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Vol.6 (2001), 109-156. Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, (Apr. 1997), 125-134. Wright, Quincy, ‘The Meaning of the Pact of Paris’, American Journal of International Law, Vol.27, No.1 (Jan. 1933), 39-61. Zander, Jean Pascal, ‘The CWC in the Context of the 1925 Geneva Debates’, The Nonproliferation Review, Vol.3, No.3 (Spring-Summer 1996), 38-45. 四、報紙 Butcher, Tim, ‘Marines Plan the Siege of Basra’, Daily Telegraph, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 15. Catán, Thomas, ‘Iraq Business Deals May Be Invalid, Law Experts Warn’, Financial Times/UK, 29 Oct. 2003, p. 12. ‘Choosing Targets; Iraqi Fighters or Civilians? Hard Decision for Copters’, New York Times, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 5. Weisman, Steven R., ‘US Set to Name Civilian to Oversee Iraq’, New York Times, 2 May 2003, p. 18. 五、網際網路專文 Genser, Jared, ‘Drum beats louder for UN action on Burma’, The Nation http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/05/10/opinion/opinion_30003658.php Wiseman, Paul, ‘Cluster Bombs Kill in Iraq, Even after Shooting Ends’. USA TODAY http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-10-cluster-bomb-cover_x.htm ‘Child Soldiers: Global Report 2004’, Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2004/csucs-glob-17nov.pdf ‘Infantry Conference Summary’, Infantry Online http://www.benning.army.mil/OLP/InfantryOnline/issue_39/art_255.htm ‘LM Report 2006’, Landmine Monitor, http://www.icbl.org/lm/2006/intro/survivor.html#fnB85 ‘Landmine Charity MAG Clears Over One Million Mines and Bombs in Iraq Since the War and Says the Work Must Continue’, Relief Web http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/ACOS-64CPWU?OpenDocument ‘Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq’, Human Rights Watch http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htm ‘US/UK Report on the conduct of the Persian Gulf War’, http://www.ndu.edu/library/epubs/cpgw.pdf ‘World Decries Taleban Plan to Raze Age-old Buddhas’, CNN.com/WORLD http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/03/02/afghan.statues.03/index.html 六、參考網站紅十字國際委員會網站http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/htmlall/section_ihl_databases?OpenDocument 聯合國Official Documents System of the United Nations http://www.un.org/chinese/documents/index.html 瑞典斯德哥爾摩和平研究中心http://www.sipri.org/contents/conflict/MAC_patterns.html 人權觀察 http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htm
Description:	碩士國立政治大學外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班 94922002 95
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094922002
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Masters Program in Strategic and International Affairs] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
200201.pdf	45Kb	Adobe PDF2	957	View/Open
200202.pdf	85Kb	Adobe PDF2	1204	View/Open
200203.pdf	65Kb	Adobe PDF2	1044	View/Open
200204.pdf	201Kb	Adobe PDF2	2446	View/Open
200205.pdf	528Kb	Adobe PDF2	7760	View/Open
200206.pdf	463Kb	Adobe PDF2	5305	View/Open
200207.pdf	426Kb	Adobe PDF2	1464	View/Open
200208.pdf	179Kb	Adobe PDF2	2435	View/Open
200209.pdf	223Kb	Adobe PDF2	1674	View/Open
200210.pdf	291Kb	Adobe PDF2	7764	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...