政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36969
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113393/144380 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51240622      線上人數 : 896
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36969


    題名: 台灣產物保險公司併購、市場結構與經營績效
    Merger and Acquisition, Market Structure and Performance in Property-Liability Insurance: Evidence from Taiwan Market
    作者: 胡育寧
    Hu , Yu Ning
    貢獻者: 張士傑
    Chang, Shih Shieh
    胡育寧
    Hu , Yu Ning
    關鍵詞: 市場集中度
    核保利潤
    結構行為績效假說
    相對市場力量假說
    Concentration
    Underwriting Profit
    SCP hypothesis
    RMP hypothesis
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 20:19:43 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文旨在探討台灣產物保險業在併購活動後市場結構之變化與產物保險公司經營之績效。本研究以赫芬德指數(Herfindahl Index)來衡量市場集中度之變化，以核保利潤(Underwriting Profit)作為經營績效指標，並採用Mason(1939)、Bain(1956)與Scherer(1970)等人提出的結構行為績效假說(Structure-conduct-performance Hypothesis)以及Rhoades(1985)提出的相對市場力量假說(Relative Market Power Hypothesis)進行市場結構與經營績效間關聯性的分析，研究期間為2000年至2006年。結構行為績效假說提出廠商的獲利主要取決於市場結構，市場集中度與廠商獲利之間存在正向關係；另一方面，相對市場力量假說主張廠商獲利與市場集中度無關，與市場佔有率呈現正向關係。
    研究發現：(1)產物保險市場集中度呈現上升趨勢，市場集中度從2000年的0.0800上升至2006年的0.0913，其中保證保險、火災保險、汽車保險、工程保險、責任保險與貨物運輸保險之集中度呈現上升趨勢，而傷害保險、其他財產保險、漁船保險、船體保險與航空保險之集中度呈現下降趨勢；(2)實證結果支持結構行為績效假說，市場集中度與產物保險公司核保利潤呈現顯著正向關係，其p值為0.004。產物保險業經歷併購活動後造成市場集中度上升，併購活動對於經營績效的改善應有正面助益。
    This thesis analyzes concentration effects of merger and acquisition measured by Herfindahl index in Taiwan property-liability insurance industry. The relationships between market structure and underwriting performance are also analyzed for the time period 2000 to 2006 by testing two hypotheses: structure-conduct-performance (SCP) hypothesis which developed by Mason (1939), Bain (1956), and Scherer (1970) and relative market power (RMP) hypothesis which proposed by Rhoades (1985). The SCP hypothesis proposed that concentration is positively related to performance while the RMP hypothesis asserts that market share is positively related to performance.
    Implications of study results are: (1) Concentration level experiences increase from 0.0800 in 2000 to 0.0913 in 2006. Bonding & credit, fire, automobile, engineering, liability and marine cargo insurances trends to increase in concentration over the time period, whereas accident, fishing vessel, others, marine hull and aviation insurances trends to decrease; (2) The SCP hypothesis is supported. Concentration level is positively related to underwriting performance with p-value of 0.004. Higher concentration level and positive concentration-performance relationship infer that merger and acquisition activities would have positive effects upon firm performance.
    參考文獻: Akhigbe A. and Madura J., “Intra-Industry Signals
    Resulting from Insurance Company Mergers,” Journal of
    Risk and Insurance 68 (2001): 489-506.
    Areeda P.E. and Hovenkamp H., Fundamentals of Antitrust
    Law, New York: Aspen Law & Business, 2002.
    Bajtelsmit V.L. and Bouzouita R., “Market Structure and
    Performance in Private Passenger Automobile
    Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 65 (1998):
    503-514.
    Berger A.N., “The Profit-Structure Relationship in
    Banking: Test of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure
    Hypotheses,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27
    (1995): 404-431.
    Berger A.N. and Cummins J.D. and Weiss M.A., “The
    Coexistence of Multiple Distribution Systems for
    Financial Services: The Case of Property-Liability
    Insurance,” Journal of Business 70 (1997): 515-546.
    Berkovitch E. and Narayanan M.P., “Motives for Takeovers:
    An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Financial and
    Quantitative Analysis 28 (1993): 347-362.
    Carroll A.M., “An Empirical Investigation of the Structure
    and Performance of the Private Workers’ Compensation
    Market,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 60 (1993): 185-
    207.
    Chesher A., “Testing the Law of Proportionate Effect,”
    Journal of Industrial Economic 27 (1979): 403-411.
    Choi B.P. and Weiss M.A., “An empirical investigation of
    market structure, efficiency and performance in
    property-liability insurance,” Journal of Risk and
    Insurance 72 (2005): 635-673.
    Clarke R. and Davies S.W., “Aggregate Concentration,
    Market Concentration and Diversification,” The
    Economic Journal 93 (1983): 182-192.
    Clarke R. and Davies S.W. and Waterson M., “The
    Profitability-Concentration Relation: Market Power or
    Efficiency?,” Journal of Industrial Economics 32
    (1984): 435-450.
    Cummins J.D., Tennyson S., and Weiss M.A., “Consolidation
    and Efficiency in the U.S. Life Insurance Industry,”
    Journal of Banking and Finance 23 (1999): 325-357.
    Cummins J.D. and Xie X., “Efficiency and Value Creation in
    Acquisitions and Divestiture: Evidence from the U.S.
    Property-Liability Insurance Industry,” University of
    Pennsylvania, 2006.
    Cummins J.D. and Xie X., “Mergers and Acquisitions in the
    US Property-Liability Insurance Industry: Productivity
    and Efficiency Effects,” Journal of Banking and
    Finance 32 (2008): 30-55.
    Demsetz H., “Industrial Structure, Market Rivalry, and
    Public Policy,” Journal of Law and Economics 16
    (1973): 1-9.
    Evanoff D.D. and Fortier D.L., “Reevaluation of the
    Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking,”
    Journal of Financial Service Research 1 (1988): 277-294.
    Fisher I., The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their
    Varieties, Tests, and Reliability, 3rd ed., New York:
    Augustus M. Kelley, 1967.
    Jessen M.C., “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate
    Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review 76
    (1986): 323-329.
    Jacquemin A.P. and Kumps A.M., “Changes in the Size
    Structure of the Largest European Firms: An Entropy
    Measure,” Journal of Industrial Economics 20 (1971):
    59-70.
    Jensen M.C., “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate
    Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review 76
    (1986): 323-329.
    Hall M. and Tideman N., “Measures of Concentration,”
    Journal of the American Statistical Association 62
    (1967): 162-168.
    Healy P.M. and Palepu K.G. and Rubak R.S., “Dose Corporate
    Performance Improve After Mergers?,” Journal of
    Financial Economics 31 (1992): 135-175.
    Herfindahl O.C., “Concentration in the Steel Industry,”
    Columbia University, 1950.
    Hirschman A.O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign
    Trade, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945.
    Hymer S. and Pashigian P., “Turnover of Firms as a Measure
    of Market Behavior,” The Review of Economics and
    Statistics 44 (1962): 82-87.
    Kwoka J.E., “Large Firm Dominance and Price-cost Margins
    in Manufacturing Industries” Southern Economic Journal
    44 (1977): 183-189.
    Nissan E., “Concentration in American Property-Casualty
    Companies,” Journal of Actuarial Practice 4 (1996):
    131-142.
    Nissan E. and Caveny R., “Concentration in the Property
    and Liability Insurance Market by Line of Insurance,”
    Journal of Actuarial Practice 8 (2000): 89-114.
    Rhoades S.A., “Market Share as a Source of Market Power:
    Implications and Some Evidence,” Journal of Economics
    and Business 37 (1985): 343-363.
    Roll R., “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers,”
    The Journal of Business 59 (1986): 197-216.
    Scheffé H., The Analysis of Variance, New York: John Wiley
    & Sons, 1959.
    Scherer F.M. and Ross D., Industrial Market Structure and
    Performance, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1990.
    Seth A., “Value Creation in Acquisitions: A Re-examination
    of Performance Issues,” Strategic Management Journal
    11 (1990): 99-115.
    Stigler G.L., “A Theory of Oligopoly,” Journal of
    Political Economy 72 (1964): 44-61.
    Swiss Re, “Getting together: globals take the lead in life
    insurance M&A,” Sigma No.1, 2006.
    Swiss Re, “World insurance in 2006: Premiums came back to
    life,” Sigma No.4, 2007.
    Theil H., Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam,
    Holland: North Holland Publishing Company, 1967.
    Tschoegl A.E., “Concentration among International Banks,”
    Journal of Banking and Finance 6 (1982): 567-578.
    Weaver S.C. and Weston J.F., Mergers and Acquisitions,
    McGraw-Hill, 2002.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    風險管理與保險研究所
    95358009
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095358009
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    800901.pdf44KbAdobe PDF2944檢視/開啟
    800902.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2924檢視/開啟
    800903.pdf61KbAdobe PDF21558檢視/開啟
    800904.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2880檢視/開啟
    800905.pdf18KbAdobe PDF21097檢視/開啟
    800906.pdf35KbAdobe PDF21763檢視/開啟
    800907.pdf42KbAdobe PDF21046檢視/開啟
    800908.pdf22KbAdobe PDF22273檢視/開啟
    800909.pdf114KbAdobe PDF21122檢視/開啟
    800910.pdf65KbAdobe PDF21140檢視/開啟
    800911.pdf17KbAdobe PDF21017檢視/開啟
    800912.pdf18KbAdobe PDF21057檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋