Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36950
|
| Title: | 理解科技的後採用困難：實務契合度觀點的質化研究
Understanding Difficulties of Post Technology Adoption: A Practices Fit Perspective |
| Authors: | 陳信宏
Chen,Shin-Horng |
| Contributors: | 季延平
Chi,Yen-Ping
陳信宏
Chen,Shin-Horng |
| Keywords: | 後科技採用
實務契合度
供應鏈系統
採用困難
詮釋性質化研究
post technology adoption
practices fit perspective
supply chain system
difficulty of technology adoption
interpretive qualitative research |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 20:15:12 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 科技的採用問題，一直是資訊管理領域一個重要的議題。而以往研究，為了解為何科技會無法被採用，在研究上會分析科技導入至採用初期所面臨到的障礙與挑戰，以協助組織排除科技採用的困難。然而，對於科技的採用而言，採用困難的發生，並不只局限於科技的「前採用階段」而已，在科技被採用以後，同樣也會面臨到科技因為不適用所帶來的採用問題。為此，本論文之研究目的，即在於理解科技在「後採用階段」，發生科技採用困難的本質與原因。
在本論文中，作者主要從實務契合度的觀點，來理解供應鏈系統的採用困難。實務契合度的觀點認為，科技具有內嵌「實務」的特性，每一種科技，根據它的目的，都會被植入一些實務，來協助採用者進行組織活動。因此，所謂的科技採用就是將科技所內嵌的實務，轉移到採用者身上。然而，由於採用者處於他們所屬社會/組織系統中，可能也有他們自己一套的實務活動方式，所以科技內嵌實務與採用者實務之間的不契合，就會發生在科技採用的過程中。在本研究中，根據這樣的看法，作者以詮釋性質化研究的方式，分析了一家筆記型電腦公司的供應鏈系統採用問題。從中發現，根據組織結構、產品材料技術與產業網路的條件原因所影響，供應商會和該公司形成出不同類型的採購實務，而供應鏈系統所提供出的「實務」，因為和這些供應商與該公司的採購實務之間，有著全然不同的特性與假設，故導致了系統採用上的困難。本論文相信，這樣的研究成果，將會加深對科技採用問題的理解，並對供應鏈系統的管理，有實務的貢獻。
Technology adoption has always been a central research issue in the information systems discipline. Despite years of investigative effort, most of past studies primarily focus on the pre-adoption stage, but very few studies examine post-adoption behaviors, post IT application, and consequences of adoption. In this dissertation, unlike the typical studies to analyze adoption difficulties during pre-adoption stage, I focus on the post technology adoption stage and aim to understand why technology adoption may become failures in organizations after effective deployment for a period of time.
In this dissertation, I consider an adoption of supply chain system from the practices fit perspective. The practices fit lens argues that organizational practices (such as procurement practices) are embedded in the technology (such as supply chain systems), and the technology adoption could be as a transfer of the practices to the recipient’s adopters. However, since adopters lie in their specific social/organizational context over time, they have gradually developed a variety of practices to deal with organizational matters. In this circumstance, after the technology is adopted, the difficulties of adoption may occur because of the incompatibility between adopters’ practices and technology practices. From this perspective, I apply an interpretive stance in the study to report a case of supply chain system, and to analyze how and why practices misfit may induce the problems of the adoption. The case study reveals that there are different types of procurement practices for an organization to conduct procurement activities with their suppliers. Each type of procurement practices is affected by the organizational structures, product technologies, and industrial network. However, the supply chain system is not to take account of these conditions into the system principles. As a result, the system is considered inapplicable for supporting the procurement activities by adopters. Important implications are provided to enhance the theoretical development of technology adoption. Practical insights are discussed with regard to supply chain management. |
| Reference: | Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. 107-136.
Alvesson, M., and Wilmott, H. (eds.). Critical Management Studies, Sage Publications, London, 1992.
Archer, S. “Qualitative Research and the Epistemological Problems of the Management Disciplines,” in Competitiveness and the Management Process, A. Pettigrew (ed.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, New York, 1988, pp. 286-302.
Attewell, P. “Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing,” Organization Science (3:1), 1992, pp. 1-19.
Avgerou, C. “The Significance of Context in Information Systems and Organizational Change,” Information Systems Journal (11), 2001, pp. 43-63.
Avgerou, C. Information Systems and Global Diversity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002.
Avgerou, C., and McGrath, K. “Power, Rathionality, and the Art of Living Throuth Socio-Technical Change,” MIS Quarterly (31:2), 2007, pp. 295-315.
Barley, S. R. “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments,” Administrative Science Quarterly (31:1), 1986, pp. 78-109.
Barley, S. R. “The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), 1990, pp. 61-103.
Barrett, M. “Challenges of EDI Adoption for Electronic Trading in the London Insurance Market,” European Journal of Information Systems (8:1), 1999, pp. 1-15.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., and Mead, M. “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (11:3), 1987, pp. 369-386.
Bhattacherjee, A. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model,” MIS Quarterly (25:3), 2001, pp. 351-370.
Bhattacherjee, A., and Premkumar, G. “Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test,” MIS Quarterly (28:2), 2004, pp. 229-254.
Boudreau, M. C., and Robey, D. “Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective,” Organization Science (16:1), 2005, pp. 3-18.
Bourdieu, P. Outline of A Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1977.
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., and Sambamurthy, V. “Shaping up for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies,” MIS Quarterly (26:2), 2002, pp. 65-89.
Chau, P. Y. K., and Tam, K. Y. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study,” MIS Quarterly (21:1), 1997, pp. 1-24.
Christensen, C. M. The Innovator`s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, 1997.
Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S. “Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model,” Information Systems Research (12:3), 2001, pp. 304-321.
Cooper, R. B., and Zmud, R. W. “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach,” Management Science (36:2), 1990, pp.123-139.
Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994.
Crowston, K., and Myers, M. D. “Information Technology and the Transformation of Industries: Three Research Perspectives,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (13), 2004, pp. 5-28.
Damanpour, F. “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderator,” Academy of Management Journal (34:3), 1991, pp. 555-590.
Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-340.
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., and Vandenberg, R. J. “Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (25:2), 2001, pp. 167-193.
Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994.
DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M. S. “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science (5:2), 1994, pp. 121-147.
Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., and Chu, W. “Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practices” in Supply Chain Management,” California Management Review (40:2), 1998, pp. 57-77.
Eisenhardt, K.M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review (14:4), 1989, pp. 532-550.
Farhoomand, A. F., Tuunainen, V. K., and Yee, L. W. “Barriers to Global Electronic Commerce: A Cross-Country Study of Hong Kong and Finland,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (10:1), 2000, pp. 23-48.
Feldman, M. S., and Pentland, B. T. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly (48:1), 2003, pp. 94-118.
Fichman, R. G. “The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations,” in Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past, R.W. Zmud (ed.), Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, 2000, pp. 105-127.
Fichman, R. G. “The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Organizational Innovation,” MIS Quarterly (25:4), 2001, pp. 427-455.
Fichman, R. G., and Kemerer, C. F. “The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning perspective,” Management Science (43:10), 1997, pp. 1345-1363.
Fisher, M. L. “What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?” Harvard Business Review (March-April), 1997, pp. 105-116.
Gadamer, H-G. Philosophical Hermeneutics, University of California press, Berkeley, CA, 1976.
Gadamer, H-G. Truth and Method, The Continuing Publishing Corporation, New York, 1975.
Gersick, C. J. G. “Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multilevel Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm,” Academy of Management Review (16:1), 1991, pp. 10-36.
Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1984.
Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), 1995, pp. 213-236.
Granovetter, M. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddendness,” American Journal of Sociology (91), 1985, pp. 481-510.
Griffith, T. L. “Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking,” Academy of Management Review (24:3), 1999, pp. 472-488.
Grover, V. “An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer-Based Interorganizational Systems,” Decision Sciences (24:3), 1993, pp. 603-640.
Hargrave, T. J., and Van De Ven, A. H. “A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation,” Academy of Management Review (31:4), 2006, pp. 864-888.
Heeks, R. “Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations,” The Information Society (18), 2002, pp. 101-112.
Howard-Grenville J. A., and Carlile, P. R. “The Incompatibility of Knowledge Regimes: Consequences of the Material World for Cross-Domain Wrok,” European Journal of Information Systems (15:5), 2006, pp. 473-485.
Howard-Grenville, J. A. “The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context,” Organization Science (16:6), 2005, pp. 618-636.
Hsiao, R. “Technology Fears: Distrust and Cultural Persistence in Electronic Marketplace Adoption,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (12:3), 2003, pp. 169-199.
Hsiao, R., Tsai, S. D., and Lee, C. “The Problem of Embeddedness: Knowledge Transfer, Coordination and Reuse in Information Systems,” Organization Studies (27:9), 2006, pp. 1289-1317.
Hsu, P., Kraemer, K. L., and Dunkle, D. “Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (10:4), 2006, pp. 9-45.
Huber, G. P. “Transfer of Knowledge in Knowledge Management Systems: Unexplored Issues and Suggested Studies,” European Journal of Information Systems (10:2), 2001, pp. 72-79.
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S. “Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology,” MIS Quarterly (19:4), 1995, pp. 465-485.
Jasperson, J. S., Carter, P. E., and Zmud, R. W. “A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems,” MIS Quarterly (29:3), 2005, pp. 525-558.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L. “Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 183-204.
Kaufman, A., Wood, G. H., and Theyel, G. “Collaboration and Technology Linkages: A Strategic Supplier Typology,” Strategic Management Journal (21), 2000, pp. 649-663.
Kedia, B. L., and Bhagat, R. S. “Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management,” Academy of Management Review (13:4), 1988, pp. 559-571.
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., and Yates, J. “Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations,” Organization Science (17:1), 2006, pp. 22-44.
Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretative Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 1999, pp. 67-94.
Kostova, T. “Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective,” Academy of Management Review (24), 1999, pp. 308-324.
Kuan, K. K. Y., and Chau, P. Y. K. “A Perception-Based Model for EDI Adoption in Small Businesses Using A Technology-Organization-Environment Framework,” Information and Management (38), 2001, pp. 507-521.
Kumar, K., and van Dissel, H. G. “Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems,” MIS Quarterly (20:3), 1996, pp. 279-300.
Kumar, K., van Dissel, H. G., and Bielli, P. “The Merchant of Prato-Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information System,” MIS Quarterly (22:2), 1998, pp. 199-226.
Kumar, R. L., and Crook, C. W. “A Multi-Disciplinary Framework for the Management of Inter-Organizational Systems,” Database for Advances in Information Systems (30:1), 1999, pp. 22-37.
Larsen, M. A., and Myers, M. D. “When Success Turns into Failure: A Package-Driven Business Process Re-Engineering Project in the Financial Services Industry,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (8:4), 1999, pp. 395–417.
Langley, A. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data,” Academy of Management Review (24:4), 1999, pp. 691-710.
Latour, B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
Lave, J. Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York 1988.
Leavitt, H. J. “Applying Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches,” in Handbook of Organizations, J.G. March (ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, 1965, pp. 1144-1170.
Lee, H. L. “Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,” California Management Review (44:3), 2002, pp. 105-119.
Lee, Z., and Lee, J. “An ERP Implementation Case Study from a Knowledge Transfer Perspective,” Journal of Information Technology (15:4), 2000, pp. 281-288.
Lee. A. S. “A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies,” MIS Quarterly (13:1), 1989, pp. 33-52.
Lee. A. S. “Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research,” Organization Science (2:4), 1991, pp. 342-365.
Leonard-Barton, D. “Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization,” Research Policy (17:5), 1988, pp. 251-267.
Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V. “Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers,” MIS Quarterly (27:4), 2003, pp. 657-678.
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., and Xue, Y. “Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management,” MIS Quarterly (31:1), 2007, pp. 59-87.
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, (eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994, pp. 163-188.
Lyytinen, K., and Hirschheim, R. “Information Systems Failures -- A Survey and Classification of the Empirical Literature,” in Oxford Surveys in Information Technology 4, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 257-309.
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S. “Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team,” MIS Quarterly (24:4), 2000, pp. 569-601.
Malone, W., Yates, J., and Benjamin, R. I. “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communication of the ACM (30:6), 1987, pp. 484-497.
Markus, L., and Soh, C. “Structural Influences on Global E-Commerce Activity,” Journal of Global Information Management (10:1), 2002, pp. 5-12.
Markus, M. L. “Finding a Happy Medium: Explaining the Negative Effects of Electronic Communication on Social Life at Work,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (26:6), 1994, pp. 119-149.
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., and Tanis, C. “Learning from Adopters` Experiences with ERP: Problems Encountered and Success Achieved,” Journal of Information Technology (15), 2000, pp. 245-265.
Markus, M. L., Steinfidld, C. W., Wigand, R. T., and Minton, G. “Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry,” MIS Quarterly (30:Special Issue), 2006, pp. 439-465.
Meyer A. D., and Goes, J. B. “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal (31:4), 1988, pp. 897-923.
Mitchell, J. C. “Case and Situation Analysis,” The Sociological Review (31), 1983, pp. 187-211.
Mitchell, V. L., and Zmud, R. W. “Endogenous Adaptation: The Effects of Technology Position and Planning Mode on IT-Enabled Change,” Decision Sciences (37:3), 2006, pp. 325-355.
Mohr, L. B. Explaining Organizational Behavior, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1982.
Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 192-222.
Neuman, W. L. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1997.
Orlikowski W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., and Fujimoto, M. “Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use,” Organization Science (6:4), 1995, pp. 423-444.
Orlikowski, W. J. “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective”, Information Systems Research (7:1), 1996, pp. 63-92.
Orlikowski, W. J. “Material Knowing: The Scaffolding of Human Knowledgeability,” European Journal of Information Systems (15:5), 2006, pp. 460-466.
Orlikowski, W. J. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (3:3), 1992, pp. 398-427.
Orlikowski, W. J. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (11:4), 2000, pp. 404-428.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Barley, S. R. “Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?” MIS Quarterly (25:2), 2001, pp. 145-165.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Gash, D. C. “Technology Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (12:2), 1994, pp. 174-207.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Yates, J. “Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly (39:4), 1994, pp. 541-574.
Parthasarathy, M., and Bhattacherjee, A. “Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services,” Information Systems Research (9:4), 1998, pp. 362-379.
Pettigrew, A. M. “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm,” Journal of Management Studies (24:6), 1987, pp. 649-670.
Pettigrew, A. M. “The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research,” Strategic Management Journal (13:Special Issue), 1992, pp. 5-16.
Pettigrew, A.M. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice,” Organization Science (1:3), 1990, pp. 267-92.
Premkumar, G., and Ramamurthy, K. “The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems,” Decision Sciences (26:3), 1995, pp. 303-336.
Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S. “Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems (11:2), 1994, pp. 157-186.
Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. W. “The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation,” Organization Science (12:2), 2001, pp. 117-135.
Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., and Germann, K. “Legitimizing A New Role: Small Wins and Microprocesses of Change,” Academy of Management Journal (49:5), 2006, pp. 977-998.
Richard, P. J., and Devinney, T. M. “Modular Strategies: B2B Technology and Architectural Knowledge,” California Management Review (47:4), 2005, pp. 86-113.
Ricoeur, P. “Hermeneutics: Restoration of Meaning or Reduction of Illusion?” in Critical Sociology, Selected Readings, P. Connerton (ed.), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK, 1976, pp. 194-203.
Robey, D., and Newman, M. “Sequential Patterns in Information Systems Development: An Application of a Social Process Model,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (14:1), 1996, pp. 30-63.
Robey, D., Ross, J. W., and Boudreau, M. “Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:1), 2002, pp. 17-46.
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.
Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., and Goles, T. “The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model,” Organization Science (12:2), 2001, pp. 179-197.
Schultze, U., and Boland, R. J. “Knowledge Management Technology and the Reproduction of Knowledge Work Practices,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9), 2000, pp. 193-212.
Schultze, U., and Orlikowski, W. J. “A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies,” Information Systems Research (15:1), 2004, pp. 87-106.
Scott-Morton, M. The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.
Soh, C., and Sia, S. “An Institutional Perspective on Sources Package-Organisation Misalignments of ERP,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (13:4), 2004, pp. 375–397.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.
Swanson, E. B. “Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations,” Management Science (40:9), 1994, pp. 1069-1092.
Szulanski, G. “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practices within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), 1996, pp. 27-43.
Teo, T. S. H., and Pian, Y. “A Contingency Perspective on Internet Adoption and Competitive Advantage,” European Journal of Information Systems (12:2), 2003, pp. 78-92.
Teo, T. S. H., Rangannathan, C., and Dhaliwal, J. “Key Dimensions of Inhibitors for the Deployment of Web-Based Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (53:3), 2006, pp. 395-411.
Thong, J. Y. L. “Resource Constraints and Information Systems Implementation in Singaporean Small Business,” Omega-The International Journal of Management Science (29), 2001, pp. 143-156.
Tornatzky, L. G., and Fleischer, M. The Process of Technological Innovation, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1990.
Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (29:1), 1982, pp. 28-45.
Turner, J. H. The Structure of Sociological Theory, Wadsworth Publications, Belmont, 1998
Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H., and Romanelli, E. “Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution,” California Management Review (29:1), 1986, pp. 86-113.
Tyre, M. J., and Orlikowski, W. J. “Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations,” Organization Science (5:1), 1994, pp. 98-118.
Vaast, E., and Walsham, G. “Representations and Actions: The Transformation of Work Practices with IT Use,” Information and Organization (15), 2005, pp. 65-89.
Van de Ven, A. H., and Poole, M. S. “Explaining Development and Change in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review (20:3), 1995, pp. 510-540.
Venkatesh, V. “Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making,” Decision Sciences (37:4), 2006, pp. 497-518.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), 2003, pp. 425-478.
Walsham, G. “Doing Interpretive Research,” European Journal of Information Systems (15:3), 2006, pp. 320-330.
Walsham, G. “Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method,” European Journal of Information Systems (4:2), 1995, pp. 74-81.
Walsham, G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Wiley, Chichester, 1993.
Wolfe, R. A. “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions,” Journal of Management Studies (31:3), 1994, pp. 405-431.
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J., and Okamura, K. “Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres: Electronic Communication in a Japanese R&D Organization,” Organization Science (10:1), 1999, pp. 83-103.
Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
Zhu, K., and Kraemer, K. L. “Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry,” Information Systems Research (16:1), 2005, pp. 61-84.
Zhu, K., Dong, S., Kraemer, K. L., and Xu, S. “The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business,” Management Science (52:10), 2006a, pp. 1557-1576.
Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., and Kraemer, K. L. ”Innovation Diffusion in Global Contexts: Determinants of Post-Adoption Digital Transformation of European Companies,” European Journal of Information Systems (15:6), 2006b, pp. 601-616.
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., and Xu, S. “Electronic Business Adoption by European Firms: A Cross-Country Assessment of the Facilitators and Inhibitors,” European Journal of Information Systems (12:4), 2003, pp. 251-268.
Zigurs, L., and Buckland, B. K. “A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness,” MIS Quarterly (22:3), 1998, pp. 313-334. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
資訊管理研究所
90356503
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903565031 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
