政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36899
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50982748      線上人數 : 929
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/36899


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36899


    題名: 智慧資本轉換能力與企業績效之關聯性研究—資料包絡分析法之應用
    作者: 謝蕙如
    貢獻者: 林良楓
    謝蕙如
    關鍵詞: 資料包絡分析法
    系統理論
    智慧資本轉換能力
    智慧資本增值係數
    Data envelopment analysis
    System theory
    Intellectual capital transform capability
    Value Added Intellectual Coefficient(VAIC)
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 20:05:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 經濟時代，智慧資本係企業創造競爭優勢及永續經營之核心關鍵，基於有效管理智慧資本，對其進行衡量之應用需求日漸殷切。本研究嘗試利用資料包絡分析法整合系統理論「投入—轉化—產出」之觀念，將智慧資本衡量指標區分為投入與產出項目，建構企業智慧資本轉換能力，並藉複迴歸分析，探討其對企業績效之影響；此外，與另外一項評估工具—智慧資本增值係數比較，探討何者對於企業績效具有相對較高之解釋能力。研究對象為我國2005年至2007年92家資訊電子業上市公司之縱橫資料。
    實證結果發現，智慧資本轉換能力對市價淨值比未達顯著影響，顯示目前大部分投資人進行投資決策時較關注反映企業營運結果之財務產出面向，而不注重過程面資源投入產出間之成本效益分析；智慧資本轉換能力與資產週轉率呈正向相關並達顯著水準，亦即轉換能力越高，企業運用資源的效率越好；而在Vuong test檢測下，智慧資本轉換能力對企業績效解釋能力並未顯著優於智慧資本增值係數。本研究結果顯示，智慧資本轉換能力確實可提供一具體衡量企業智慧資本之指標，作為企業資源配置決策之有用資訊以提升企業經營績效。
    Intellectual capital(IC) is vital to achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the knowledge-based economy. In attempting to effectively managing IC, demands for IC measurement and application are increasing. This study integrates the system theory with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to measure a firm’s intellectual capital transform capability (ICTC). The main purpose of this study is to examine the association between ICTC and corporate performance. Moreover, the study also compares the relative explanatory ability about business performance between ICTC and Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAICTM). Samples are drawn from 92 listed firms in Taiwan information and electronics industry, covering a 3-year panel data from 2005 to 2007.
    The result indicates ICTC has a significant positive impact on asset turnover ratio, which suggests that ICTC can be an indicator to measure a firm`s operating capability. However, ICTC is unrelated to market-to-book ratio, which shows that ICTC explains business operating performance better than market performance. The Vuong test reveals that in explaining the performance of a business VAICTM does not have a higher explanatory ability than ICTC. This finding implies that ICTC can provide a valuable indicator for measuring IC, help a firm to efficiently allocate its resource and improve a firm`s operating performance.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王文英與張清福，2004，智慧資本影響績效模式之探討：我國半導體業之實證
    研究，會計評論，第39期：89-113。
    李爵妃，2006，智慧資本與公司生產力之關聯性研究—以我國資訊電子業為
    例，國立彰化師範大學會計學系碩士論文。
    林怡芳，2002，市場價值與帳面價值之差異探討—以IC設計產業為例，國立
    台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    林秀足，2006，智慧資本投入、產出與價值動因對企業價值之關聯性—以IC
    設計產業為例，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    吳秀娟，2000，企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究—以我國資訊電子業
    為例，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    吳思華，顏妙如與賴鈺晶，2000，網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究，經
    濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。
    吳安妮，2002，剖析智慧資本，會計研究月刊，第204期（11月）：57-66。
    吳艦芝，2003，智慧資本與公司價值之攸關性探討，中原大學會計學系碩士論
    文。
    柯家瑜，2003，智慧資本揭露與智慧資本績效值之關聯性研究，國立中央大學
    企業管理學系碩士論文。
    柯家瑜、許明峰、鄭明松與羅庚辛，2004，智慧資本揭露程度與智慧資本績效
    的關聯性研究，政大智慧財產評論，第二卷，第2期：51-80。
    徐中琦與黃騰緯，2007，智慧資本與企業經濟價值關聯性之實證研究，科技管
    理學刊，第十二卷，第4期：35-66。
    陳信宏與劉孟俊，2005，解析高科技資訊電子業之經濟產出，今日會計，第
    99期：6-22。
    莊家豪，2006，以智慧資本指標與財務指標探討企業價值—以台灣上市櫃IC
    設計公司為例，東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    黃文雄，2006，從科學園區發展看我國高科技產業的現況與未來，教育資料與
    研究雙月刊，第69期：199-212。
    黃劭彥、林有志、林琦珍與施志成，2008，智慧資本、智慧資本增值與企業績
    效之整合分析，台灣管理學刊，第八卷，第1期：27-42。
    曾俊堯，2003，創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究，國立台北大學企
    業管理學系博士論文。
    詹文男，2002，資訊科技產業智慧資本衡量之研究—系統理論之觀點，國立中
    央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
    詹維玲，2004，知識資本與經濟結構的變化—以資訊電子業為例，科學發展，
    第381期：70-75。
    溫士賢，2002，研發、廣告與人力支出和企業價值之關聯性探討—以台灣上市
    上櫃企業為例，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    廖俊杰，2004，智慧資本投入、產出及企業價值的因果關聯研究—以本國製造
    業為例，國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    歐進士、陳博舜與李貴富，2004，台灣資訊電子業之訓練活動的企業價值分
    析，人力資源管理學報，第四卷，第4期：51-72。
    薛健宏，2005，無形資產投入量與企業報酬及風險之研究，國立政治大學會計
    學系博士論文。
    英文部分
    Acs, Z. J., L. Anselin, and A. Varga. 2002. Patents and
    innovation counts as measures of regional production of
    new knowledge. Research Policy 31(7): 1069-1085.
    Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some
    models for estimating technical and scale
    inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management
    Science 30(9): 1078-1092.
    Bassi, L. J., and M. E. Van Buren. 1999. Valuing investment
    in intellectual capital. International Journal of
    Technology Management 18(5/6/7/8): 414-432.
    Bertalanffy, V. L. 1951. General system theory: A new
    approach to unity of science. Human Biology 23
    (December): 303-361.
    ________. 1968. General system theory: Foundations,
    development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
    Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study
    that develops measures and models. Management Decision
    36(2): 63-76.
    ________. 1999. Managing organizational knowledge by
    diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing
    the state of the field. International Journal of
    Technology Management 18(5/6/7/8): 433-457.
    Boulding, K. E. 1956. General system theory: The skeleton
    of science. Management Science 2(April): 197-208.
    Bounfour, A. 2003. The IC-dVAL approach. Journal of
    Intellectual Capital 4(3): 396- 412.
    Brooking, A. 1997. The management of intellectual capital.
    Long Range Planning 30 (3): 364-365.
    Brooking A., P. Board, and S. Jones. 1998. The predictive
    potential of intellectual capital. International
    Journal of Technology Management 16(1/2/3): 115-125.
    Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring
    the efficiency of decision making units. Europeans
    Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429-444.
    ________. 1981. Evaluating program and managerial
    efficiency: An application of DEA to program follow
    through. Management Science 27(6): 668-697.
    Chen, M. C., S. J. Cheng, and Y. Hwang. 2005. An empirical
    investigation of the relationship between intellectual
    capital and firms’ market value and financial
    performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2): 159-
    176.
    Cohen, D., D. E. Smith, L. Prusak, and R. Azzarello. 1997.
    Managing knowledeg for business success. Report No.
    1194-97-CH. New York: The Conference Board, Inc.
    Cooper, W. W. and C. A. K. Lovell. 2000. New approaches to
    measure of efficiency in DEA: An introduction. The
    Journal of Productivity Analysis 13(2): 91-92.
    Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as
    measures of firm performance: The role of accounting
    accruals. Journal of Accounting and
    Economics 18(January): 3-42.
    Deng, Z., B. Lev, and F. Narin. 1999. Science and
    technology as predictors of stock performance.
    Financial Analysts Journal 55 (May/June): 20-32.
    Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-capitalist society. Oxford:
    Butterworth Heinemann.
    Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of
    intellectual capital: An introduction. Management
    Accounting 78（February）: 32-36.
    Edvinsson, L., and M. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital:
    Realizing your company’s true value by finding its
    hidden brainpower, New York: HarperCollins Publishers
    Inc. （林大容譯，1999，智慧資本－如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價
    值，台北：麥田。）
    Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive
    efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society-Series
    A 120(3): 253-290.
    Galbraith, J. 1969. The New Industrial State.Harmondsworth:
    Penguin.
    Horibe, F. 1999. Managing knowledge workers: New skills and
    attitude to unlock the intellectual capital in your
    organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.（黃進發譯，
    2001，智慧資本，台北：商智文化。）
    Johnson, W. H. A. 1999. An integrative taxonomy of
    intellectual capital: Measuring the stock and flow of
    intellectual capital components in the firm.
    International Journal of Technology Management 18
    (5/6/7/8): 562-575.
    Kaufmann, L., and Y. Schneider. 2004. Intangibles: A
    synthesis of current research. Journal of Intellectual
    Capital 5(3): 366-388.
    Klein and Prusak. 1994. Characterizing intellectual
    capital. Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation.
    Kujansivu, P., and A. Lönnqvist. 2007. Investigating the
    value and efficiency of intellectual capital. Journal
    of Intellectual Capital 8(2): 272-287.
    Lev, B., and P. Zarowin. 1999. The boundaries of financial
    reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting
    Research 37(2): 353-389.
    Leitner, K.-H., M. Schaffhauser-Linzatti, R. Stowasser, and
    K. Wagner. 2005. Data envelopment analysis as method
    for evaluating intellectual capital. Journal of
    Intellectual Capital 6 (4): 528-543.
    Lynn, B. E. 1998. Performance evaluation in the new
    economy: Bringing the measurement and evaluation of
    intellectual capital into the management planning and
    control system. International Journal of Technology
    Management 16(1/2/3): 162-176.
    ________. 1999. Culture and intellectual capital
    management: A key factor in successful ICM
    implementation. International Journal of Technology
    Management 18(5/6/7/8): 590-603.
    Masoulas, V. 1998. Organizational requirements definition
    for intellectual capital management. International
    Journal of Technology Management 16(1/2/3): 126- 143.
    Morin, R. A., and S. L. Jarrel. 2001. Driving shareholder
    value. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    OECD. 1996. Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD/DG
    Pulic A. 2000. VAICTM- an accounting tool for IC
    management. International Journal of Technology
    Management 20(5/6/7/8): 702-714.
    Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating shareholder value: The new
    standard for business performance. New York: The Free
    Press.
    Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 2003. Intellectual capital and firm
    performance of US multinational firms: A study of the
    resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of
    Intellectual Capital 4(2): 215-226.
    Roos, G., and J. Roos. 1997. Measuring your company’s
    intellectual performance. Long Range Planning 30(3):
    413-426.
    Roos J. 1998. Exploring the Concept of Intellectual Capital
    (IC). Long Range Planning 31(1): 150-153.
    Saint-Onge, H. 1996. Tacit knowledge: the key to the
    strategic alignment of intellectual capital. Strategy
    and Leadership 24(2): 10-14.
    Shiu, H. J. 2006. The application of value added
    intellectual coefficient to measure corporate
    performance: evidence from technological firms.
    International Journal of Management 23(2): 356-365.
    Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual capital: The new wealth
    of organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell
    Publishing Group, Inc.（宋偉航譯，1998，智慧資本－企業資訊時
    代的利基，台北：智庫。）
    Sveiby, K.E. 1997. The new organizational wealth: Managing
    and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco:
    Berrett-Koehler.（莫菲譯，1999，無形資產致勝策略—微軟、網
    景、昇陽等成功企業的新財富，台北：圓智文化。）
    Ulrich, D. 1998. Intellectual capital = competence *
    commitment. Sloan Management Review 39(2): 15-26.
    Van Buren, M. E. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge
    management. Training and Development 53(5): 71-78.
    Vuong, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model
    selection and non-nested hypothesis. Econometric 57
    (March): 307-334.
    Williams, S. M., and S. Firer. 2003. Intellectual capital
    and traditional measures of corporate performance.
    Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(3): 348-360.
    Wu, W. Y., H. J. Tsai, K. Y. Cheng, and M. Lai. 2006.
    Assessment of intellectual capital management in
    Taiwanese IC design companies: Using DEA and the
    Malmquist productivity index. R & D Management 36(5):
    531-545.
    Yalama, A., and M. Coskun. 2007. Intellectual capital
    performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock
    exchange market. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8(2):
    256-271.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    96353017
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353017
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    301701.pdf93KbAdobe PDF2774檢視/開啟
    301702.pdf134KbAdobe PDF2830檢視/開啟
    301703.pdf122KbAdobe PDF2839檢視/開啟
    301704.pdf124KbAdobe PDF2866檢視/開啟
    301705.pdf187KbAdobe PDF21938檢視/開啟
    301706.pdf276KbAdobe PDF21962檢視/開啟
    301707.pdf314KbAdobe PDF21682檢視/開啟
    301708.pdf274KbAdobe PDF21175檢視/開啟
    301709.pdf161KbAdobe PDF2906檢視/開啟
    301710.pdf151KbAdobe PDF21123檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋