政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36852
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51212904      線上人數 : 889
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/36852


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36852


    題名: 多國公司區域策略、區域組織及子公司角色改變－三者關係之研究
    作者: 李貴惠
    貢獻者: 于卓民
    司徒達賢
    李貴惠
    關鍵詞: 多國公司
    區域策略
    區域組織設計
    區域總部
    子公司角色
    multinational corporation
    regional strategy
    regional organization
    regional headquarters
    subsidiary role
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 19:56:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文基於在區域整合的趨勢下，國內學界及業界對於台灣市場可能被邊緣化感到憂慮，以及在國際企業理論的領域裏，與區域策略搭配的區域組織設計之探討仍不足的動機下，探討當多國公司的母公司為因應環境的改變而採取區域策略時，會如何進行區域內的組織結構設計。研究著重在區域總部、次區域總部與子公司角色的定位與演變。本論文採用質性研究，研究十家母國在美國或歐洲的多國公司的區域組織設計，這十家多國公司均為全球五百大公司之列，且在產業內有極高的市場佔有率排名。本論文以台灣做為地主國，上述各多國公司的台灣子公司均為擁有良好能力與知識的子公司，且過去均有足可證明的事件佐證該子公司在多國公司內部具有重要的策略地位。
    本論文共分為四個研究。在第一個研究，本論文探討台灣子公司成長過程中的重要網絡，以了解內外部網絡對於多國公司在台子公司角色演化的影響。本論文發現影響貢獻型子公司成為卓越中心或託管中心的內外部網絡因素主要有四大方面：(1)多國公司內部資源流；(2)地主國市場策略重要性；(3)子公司打破規則；(4)母公司政策。而貢獻型子公司成為卓越中心或託管中心後，可以進一步地影響地主國的共生與競食系統共同發展，並使母公司賦予其更多的任務，因此是一種正向循環的效果－有能力與負責重要責任的子公司，因網絡的影響，將愈有能力與負責更多任務。
    第二個研究著重探討多國公司的經營策略與子公司角色改變的關係。本論文發現當多國公司擬從全球策略或複國內化策略改變成區域策略時，就會產生授權程度的改變，亦有可能增加或減少組織層級，使台灣子公司的自主權受到影響，台灣子公司角色重要性可能會提高或減低。若台灣子公司的角色上升，代表多國公司會運用台灣子公司的能力知識到整個區域市場，這種情形可能有三個原因：（一）當產業的關鍵成功因素之一是與外部網絡的鑲嵌程度有關，且貢獻型子公司與外部網絡的鑲嵌程度高時。這是因為台灣子公司具有中國子公司較欠缺的管理外部網絡的知識，而這種知識對於建立產業遊戲規則是很重要的。（二）當台灣的消費者在區域內具有領先指標意義時。具有領先指標的台灣子公司的知識被中國子公司「借用」的部分愈大，則台灣子公司的角色愈重要。（三）當母公司愈不了解中國市場，而台灣市場跟中國市場的性質很相近時。一旦母公司認為台灣子公司是一個中介者的角色時，就會依賴這種溝通的機制，而不會輕易抽離這個導管。
    第三個研究探討多國公司為執行區域策略所做的組織層級的調整。本論文發現多國公司會在原本的組織結構裏增加一個新的組織層級。如：原本為母公司、亞太區域總部、子公司等三個層級的多國公司，現在可能變成母公司、亞太區域總部、大中華次區域總部、子公司等四個層級。本論文發現次區域總部的設立是一種普遍的現象，且次區域總部會取代區域總部去管理其所屬區域內的各子公司。本論文發現次區域總部的設立可以使得多國公司更有效地平衡全球整合效率與地主國回應壓力等二股力量。本論文亦發現多國公司的許多功能別政策，在次區域總部成立後，已改由次區域總部做決策，取代了過去由子公司或是由區域總部作決策的現象，且次區域總部取代子公司或區域總部作決策的替代程度，受到二個因素的影響而有程度不等的現象：一為該產業的整合與回應壓力，一為該多國公司在亞太地區的銷售表現。
    第四個研究探討區域策略動機、區域組織結構與子公司角色的關係。本論文發現多國公司為了追求區域的規模經濟而採用區域策略，則市場銷售量較小的邊緣地主國的子公司成為被整合者，（次）區域總部成為強力整合者。多國公司若為了掌握地區的機會而採用區域策略，則擁有挑剔的消費者的子公司成為機會提案者，（次）區域總部成為機會執行者。多國公司若為了掌握地主國的大客戶而採用區域策略，則擁有挑剔的大客戶的子公司成為客戶服務者，（次）區域總部成為服務子公司者。多國公司若為了促進子公司之間的能力知識流通而採用區域策略，則擁有特殊能力與知識的子公司成為一個整合性玩家，（次）區域總部成為能力發掘者與知識交換促進者。當多國公司的區域整合動機主要是為了追求效率與回應的平衡時，則區域總部扮演一個整合平台的角色，宜較為集權；當多國公司區域整合的動機是為了將各項要素更有效地流通到子公司時，區域總部較為分權。區域總部的設立位置是取決於與它互動最密切的內外部網絡的地點，因此當多國公司的價值活動佈局與利益關係人的地理位置愈分散，區域總部就愈有可能呈現出虛擬式的型態。次區域總部是個次層級的整合平台，多國公司是否須設次層級的整合平台，取決於該平台欲整合的標的物（如產品、知識）在該次區域內的互動程度是否遠大於與其他次區域內的子公司的互動程度。
    總結來說，本論文對於多國公司的組織設計提出具體的理論與實務上的建議。在不同的環境前提與能力條件前提的考量下，多國公司可考慮在母公司或子公司進行目標、環境認知、決策、流程、能力、資源等的整合，也可以設立一個新的平台－即區域總部或次區域總部－來進行目標、環境認知、決策、流程、能力、資源等的整合。多國公司的母公司可以透過設立區域總部、劃分次區域、以及設計以下三個組織層級─區域總部、次區域總部和子公司─的分權程度及所扮演的角色，將區域的競爭優勢達到最大。
    The thesis explores the roles and responsibilities change of regional headquarters, sub-regional headquarters and subsidiaries when MNCs change to adopt regional strategy in accordance to the environmental changes by a qualitative research method. Ten MNCs among the top 500 enterprises with good performance and operation in Taiwan are investigated in order to understand how they design their regional organizations in the host region and what the roles Taiwan subsidiaries play along with the change to regional strategy.
    The thesis consists of four studies. The first study explores how network resources influence MNCs subsidiary to gain, maintain or lose the roles of center of excellence or mandates in Taiwan by grounded theory. The study finds that policies of headquarters, flows of resources within a MNC, the importance of a host country, the cooperative and competitive local players and initiative-taking by subsidiaries are important factors for the evolution of subsidiaries roles. When a subsidiary becomes a center of excellence or has a mandate, it may improve its ability and then in turn further enables it to gain more responsibilities – a subsidiary will become stronger and stronger and get more and more charters.
    Using a case study approach, the second study explores how regional strategy adopted by MNCs influences the role of contribution subsidiaries. A contribution subsidiary will be more important to a MNC in the following situations: when a key successful factor of the industry is network embeddedness; when sophisticated consumers in the host market are opinion leaders within the region; and when a parent does not have enough knowledge about the host country of a black hole while the nature of the market served by the contribution subsidiary is similar to that host market. A MNC can adopt three kinds of organizational design to explore the ability of contribution subsidiaries, namely, virtual, charismatic and focused centers of excellences. The more important a contribution subsidiary is, the more knowledge it integrates, and the more functional activities it is in charge. Subsidiary autonomy increases with the increase of subsidiary importance, too.
    The third study explores the organizational adjustments within MNCs following the trend of regional integration. The result shows that MNCs set up sub-regional headquarters (e.g., Greater China sub-regional headquarters) under a regional headquarters (e.g., Asia-Pacific regional headquarters). A sub-regional headquarters replaces a regional headquarters in order to directly manage subsidiaries within the sub-region. The emergence of sub-regional headquarters is in response to the need for a balance between integration and local responsiveness. An increasing number of decisions are made by sub-regional headquarters, instead of by subsidiaries, parent companies, or regional headquarters. Although the emergence of sub-regional headquarters is a trend, industry characteristics and the degree of the transfer of a firm’s specific advantages (FSAs) from home to a host region both affect the delegation of authority to a sub-regional headquarters.
    The fourth study explores the motivation of MNCs in adopting regional strategies and the reaction of MNCs to design regional organization and assign subsidiary roles. When a MNC adopts a regional strategy for the purpose of economies of scale, a contribution subsidiary becomes a periphery and the regional headquarters becomes a strong integrator. When a MNC adopts a regional strategy for the purpose of regional opportunity, a contribution subsidiary becomes an opportunity provider and the regional headquarters becomes an opportunity executor. The two motivations mentioned above make a regional headquarters more centralized. When a MNC adopts a regional strategy for the purpose of following the customer, a contribution subsidiary becomes a service provider and the regional headquarters becomes a supporter. When a MNC adopts a regional strategy for the purpose of facilitating the knowledge transfer, a contribution subsidiary becomes an integrated player and the regional headquarters becomes a knowledge facilitator. The two motivations mentioned above make a regional headquarters more decentralized. The location of a regional headquarters is decided according to the location of the most important stakeholders. The decision whether to set up sub-regional headquarters is made according to the frequency of the interaction with the cross subsidiaries in that sub-region.
    MNCs can design a regional organization to make sure the regional strategy can be executed in the most efficient way. MNCs can gain competitive advantage through the assignments of the roles of regional headquarters, sub-regional headquarters and subsidiaries under the regional strategy.
    參考文獻: 于卓民（民84），「區域製造中心的成立與台灣中小企業的因應策略」，經濟情勢暨評論，1(1), 第40-47頁。
    司徒達賢（民94），管理學的新世界，台北，天下文化。
    吳芝儀、廖梅花（民90），質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法，台北：濤石出版社。
    翁良杰（民92），「多國籍企業在大中華區域策略研究：以兩岸子公司間關係為焦點」，國立中山大學企業管理學研究所未出版博士論文。
    陳向明（民91），社會科學質的研究，台北：五南出版社。
    潘淑滿（民92），質性研究：理論與應用，台北：心理出版社股份有限公司。
    Aoki, A. and D. Tachiki (1992), “Overseas Japanese business operations: the emerging role of regional headquarters”, RIM: Pacific Business and Industries, 24(1), pp. 28-39.
    Allison, G. T. (1971), Essence of Decision, Boston, MA：Little, Brown.
    Andersson, U. and M. Forsgren (1996), “Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation”, International Business Review, 5(5), pp. 487-508.
    Andersson, U. and M. Forsgren (2000), “In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations”, Management International Review, 40(4), pp. 329-350.
    Andersson, U., M. Forsgren and U. Holm (2002), “The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), pp. 979-998.
    Baden-Fuller, C. W. and J. M. Stopford (1991), “Globalization frustrated: the case of white goods”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), pp. 493-507.
    Baldwin R. E. (1997), “The causes of regionalism”, The World Economy, 20(7), pp. 865-888.
    Bartlett, C. (1985), Global Competition and MNC Managers. ICCH Note no. 0-385-287, Harvard Business School.
    Bartlett C. (1986), “Building and managing the transnational: the new organizational challenge”, in Michael E. Porter, ed., Competition in Global Industries, Boston, MA: Harard Business School.
    Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1986), “Tap your subsidiaries for the global reach”, Harvard Business Review, 64(6), pp. 87-94.
    Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Benito, G. R. G., B. Grogaard and R. Narula (2003), “Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic Countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5), pp. 443-456.
    Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Bhagwati, J. (1993), “Regionalism and multilateralism: an overview”, in Anderson K. and R. Blackhurst (eds), Regional Integration and the Global Trading System. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. (1996), “How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), pp. 467-495.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. (1997), “Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 207-229.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. (1998), “Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations: how subsidiary initiate drives internal market efficiency”, European Management Journal, 16(3), pp. 355-364.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and N. Fry (1998), “Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets”, Sloan Management Review, 39(3), pp. 51-61.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and N. Hood (1997), “An empirical study of development processes in foreign-owned subsidiary in Canada and Scotland”, Management International Review, 37(4), pp. 339-364.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and N. Hood (1998a), “Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies”, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp. 773-795.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and N. Hood (1998b), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, Hampshire [England] : Macmillan Press.
    Birkinshaw, J. M., N. Hood and S. Jonsson (1998), “Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), pp. 221-241.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and A. Morrison (1995), “Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiary of multinational corporations”, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), pp. 729-754.
    Birkinshaw, J. M., A. Morrison and J. Hulland (1995), “Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(8), pp. 637-655.
    Brock, D. M. and J. Birkinshaw (2001), “Multinational strategy and structure: a review and research agenda”, Management International Review, 44(1), pp. 5-14.
    Buckley, P. J., J. Clegg, N. Forsans and K. T. Reilly (2001), “Increasing the size of the “country”: Regional economic integration and foreign direct investment in a globalised world economy”, Management International Review, 41 (3), pp. 251-274
    Buckley, P. J. and N. Hashai (2004), “A global system view of firm boundaries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), pp. 33-45.
    Buckley, P. J., C. L. Pass and L. Prescott (1994), Canada-UK Bilateral Trade and Investment Relations, London: Macmillan London.
    Business International Corporation (1989), Managing Today’s International Company: The New Role of Headquarters. NY: Business International Corporation.
    Cantwell, J. and R. Mudambi (2000), “The location of MNE R&D activity: the role of investment incentives”, Management International Review, 40(1), pp. 127-148.
    Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Charkravarthy, B. D. and H. V. Perlmutter (1985), “Strategic planning for a global business”, Columbia Journal of World Business, 20(2), pp. 3-10.
    Collis, D. J. (1991), “A resource-based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(SI), pp. 49-68.
    Crookell, H. (1987), “Managing Canadian subsidiaries in a free trade environment”, Sloan Management Review, 29(1), pp. 71-76.
    Crookell, H. and A. Morrison (1990), “Subsidiary strategy in a free trade environment”, Business Quarterly, 55(2), pp. 33-39.
    Daniels, J. D., R. A. Pitts and M. J. Tretter (1985), “Organizing for dual strategies of product diversity and international expansion”, Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), pp. 223-237.
    D’cruz, J. R. (1986), “Strategic management of subsidiaries”, In H. Etemand, and S. Delude (Ed.), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary, London: Croom Helm.
    Delany, E. (2000), “Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking”, Long Range Planning, 33(2), pp. 220-244.
    Delios, A and P. W. Beamish (2005), “Regional and global strategies of Japanese firms”, Management International Review, 45(SI 1), pp. 19-36
    Devinney, T. M., D. F. Midgley and S. Venaik (2000), “The optimal performance of the global firm: formalizing and extending the integration-responsiveness framework”, Organization Science, 11(6), pp. 674-695.
    Douglas, S. P. and Y. Wind (1987), “The myth of globalization”, Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(4), pp. 19-29.
    Doz, Y. (1976), National Policies and Multinational Management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.
    Dunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests”, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), pp. 9-30.
    Dunning, J. H., M. Fujita and N. Yakova (2007), “Some macro-data on the regionalization/globalization debate: a comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis”, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), pp. 177-199.
    Edstrom, A. and J. R. Galbraith (1977), “Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 248-263.
    Egelhoff, W. G. (1982), “Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: an information-processing approach”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 435-458.
    Egelhoff, W. G. (1988), “Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: a revision of the Stopford and Wells model”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), pp. 1-14.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 532-550.
    Enright, M. J. (2002), “Trends in multinational strategies and organizations in the Asia-Pacific”, in Horaguchi, H. and K. Shimokawa (eds.), Japanese Foreign Direct Investment and the East Asian Industrial System, Tokyo: Springer Verlag.
    Enright, M. J. (2005a), “Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific”, Management International Review, 45(SI 1), pp. 59-82.
    Enright, M. J. (2005b), “The roles of regional management centers”, Management International Review, 45(SI 1), pp. 83-102.
    Enright, M. J. and E. E. Scott (2000), “The RHQ question”, Business Asia, 32(25), pp.1-4.
    Etemand, H. and L. S. Dulude (1986), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary: Response to Environmental Change and the Host Nation R&D policies. London: Croom Helm.
    Franko, L. G. (1974), The European Multinationals, NY: Harper.
    Franko, L. G. (1976), The European Multinationals: A Renewed Challenge to American and British Big Business, Stamford, Conn.: Creylock.
    Frost, T. S., J. M. Birkinshaw and P. C. Ensign (2002), “Centers of excellence in multinational corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), pp. 997-1008.
    Galbraith, K. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Galunic, D. C. and K. M. Eisenhardt (1996), “The evolution of intracorporate domains: divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations”, Organization Science, 7(3), pp. 255-282.
    Gates, S. R. and W. G. Egelhoff (1986), “Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships”, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(1), pp. 71-92.
    Ghemawat, P. (2001), “Distance still matters”, Harvard Business Review, 79(8), pp. 137-147.
    Ghemawat, P. (2003), “Semiglobalization and international business strategy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), pp. 138-152.
    Ghoshal, S. (1987), “Global strategy: an organizing framework”, Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), pp. 425-440.
    Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett (1990), “The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network”, Academy of Management Review, 15(4), pp.603-625.
    Ghoshal S. and N. Nohria (1993), “Horses for courses: organizational forms for multinational corporations”, Sloan Management Review, 32(2), pp. 23-35.
    Glaser, B. G. and C. A. Strauss (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. NY: Aldine.
    Grein A. F., C. S. Craig and H. Takada (2001), “Integration and responsiveness: marketing strategies of Japanese and European automobile manufacturers”, Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), pp. 19-50.
    Gupta, A. K. and V. Govindarajan (1991), “Knowledge flows and the structuring of control within multinational corporations”, Academy of Management Review, 16(4), pp. 768-792.
    Gupta, A. K. and V. Govindarajan (2000), “Knowledge flows within multinational corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), pp. 473-496.
    Haas, E. and L. Collen (1963), “Administrative practices in university departments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(1), pp. 44-60.
    Habib, M. M. and B. Victor (1991), “Strategy, structure and performance of US manufacturing and service MNCs: a comparative analysis”, Strategy Management Journal, 12(7), pp. 589-606.
    Hamel and Prahalad (1985), “Do you really have a global strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, 63(4), pp. 139-148.
    Harzing A. W. (2000), “An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), pp. 101-120.
    Hedlund, G. (1981), “Autonomy of subsidiaries and formalization of headquarters subsidiary relationships in Swedish MNCs. In Otterbeck, L. (ed.), The Management of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations. NY: St Martin Press.
    Heenan, D. A. (1979), “The regional headquarters decision: a comparative analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), pp. 410-415.
    Heenan, D. A. and H. V. Perlmutter (1979), Multinational Organization Development, Reading, MA: Addison-Wedley.
    Herbert, T. (1984), “Strategy and multinational organization structure: an interorganizational relationships perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 259-270.
    Hewett, K., M. S. Roth and K. Roth (2003), “Conditions influencing headquarters and foreign subsidiary roles in marketing activities and their effects on performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), pp. 567-585.
    Hout, T., M. E. Porter and E. Rudden (1982), “How global companies win out”, Harvard Business Review, 60(5), pp. 98-108.
    Hungenberg, H. (1993), “How to ensure that headquarters add value”, Long Range Planning, 26(6), pp. 62-73.
    Jarillo, J. C. and J. I. Martinez (1990), “Different roles for subsidiaries: the case of multinational corporations in Spain”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), pp. 501-512.
    Johanson , J. and J. E. Vahlne (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), pp. 23-32.
    Johansson, J. K. and G. S. Yip (1994), “Exploiting globalization potential: U.S. and Japanese strategies”, Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), pp. 579-601.
    Kanter and Dretler (1998), ““Global strategy” and its impact on local operations: lessons from Gillette Singapore”, The Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), pp. 60-68.
    Kim, C. and R. A. Mauborgne (1991), “Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(SI), pp. 125-143.
    Kobrin, S. J. (1991), “An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(SI), pp. 17-31.
    Kogut, B. (1985), “Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility”, Sloan Management Review, 27(1), pp. 27-38.
    Kriger, M. P. and P. J. J. Rich (1987), “Strategic governance: why and how MNCs are using boards of directors in foreign subsidiaries”, Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(4), pp. 39-46.
    Krugman, P. (1993), “Regionalism versus multilateralism: analytic notes”, in De Melo J. and A. Panagariya (eds.), New Dimensions in Regional Integration, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Lamont, B. T., V. Sambamurthy, K. M. Ellis and P. G. Simmonds (2000), “The influence of organizational structure on the information received by corporate strategists of multinational enterprises”, Management International Review, 40(3), pp. 231-252.
    Langley, A. (1999), “Strategies for theorizing from process data”, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), pp. 691-710.
    Lasserre, P. (1996), “Regional headquarters: the spearhead for Asia Pacific markets”, Long Range Planning, 29(1), pp. 30-37.
    Lasserre, P. and J. Probert (1998), Competing in Asia Pacific: understanding the rules of the game”, Long Range Planning, 31(1), pp. 30-50.
    Lawrence, R. (1996), Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deeper Integration. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institute.
    Lawrence, P. and J. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Lee, A. S. (1989), “A scientific methodology for MIS case studies”, MIS Quarterly, 13(1), pp. 33-50.
    Leong, S. M. and C. T. Tan (1992), “Managing across borders: an empirical test of the Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) organizational typology”, Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), pp. 449-460.
    Levitt, T. (1983), “The globalization of markets”, Harvard Business Review, 61(3), pp. 92-102.
    Levy, B. (1995), “Globalization and regionalization: toward the shaping of a tripolar world economy?”, The International Executive, 37(4), pp. 239-371.
    Li, L. (2005), “Is regional strategy more effective than global strategy in the US service industries?”, Management International Review, 45(SI 1), pp. 37-57.
    Lofland, J. and L. Lofland (1984), Analyzing Social Settings: A Guild to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Lu, T. E., L. J. Chen and W. R. Lee (2007), “Subsidiary initiatives in subsidiary role changing – In the case of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology”, Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(1), pp. 280-284.
    Malnight, T. (1995), “Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: an evolution perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), pp. 119-141.
    Malnight, T. (1996), “The transition from decentralized to network-based MNC structures: An evolutionary perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), pp. 43-65.
    Malnight, T. (2001), “Emerging structural patterns within multinational corporations: toward process-based structures”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp. 1187-1210.
    Mauri, A. J. and A. V. Phatak (2001), “Global integration as inter-area product flows: the internalization of ownership and location factors influencing product flows across MNC units”, Management International Review, 41(3), pp. 233-249.
    Miller, D. (1986), “Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis”, Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), p. 233-249.
    Moore, K. J. (2001), “A strategy for subsidiaries: Centres of excellences to build subsidiary specific advantages”, Management International Review, 41(3), pp.275-290.
    Moore, K. J. and J. M. Birkinshaw (1998), “Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence”, Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), pp. 81-92.
    Morrison, A. J., D. A. Ricks and D. Roth (1991), “Globalization versus regionalization: which way for the multinational?” Organizational Dynamics, 19(3), pp. 17-29.
    Morrison, A. J. and K. Roth (1992), “A taxonomy of business-level strategies in global industries”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), pp. 399-418.
    Mudambi, R. and P. Navarra (2004), “Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), pp. 385-406.
    Nahria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1997), The Differentiated Network. NY: Jossey Bass.
    O’Donnell, S. W. (2000), “Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), pp. 525-548.
    Oh, C. H. and A. M. Rugman (2007), “Regional multinationals and the Korean cosmetics industry”, Asia Pacific Journal Management, 24(1), pp. 24-72.
    Ohmae, K. (1985), Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition. NY: Free Press.
    Ohmae, L. (1989), “Managing in a borderless world”, Harvard Business Review, 67(3), pp. 152-161.
    Paik, Y. and J. H. D. Sohn (2004), “Striking a balance between global integration and local responsiveness: The case of Toshiba corporation in redefining regional headquarters’ role”, Organizational Analysis, 12(4), pp. 347-359.
    Parsons, T. (1956), “Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations, I and II”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), pp. 63-85.
    Patel, P. and K. Pavitt (1991), “Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of “non-globalisation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), pp. 1-21.
    Paterson, S. L. and D. M. Brock (2002), “The development of subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis”, International Business Review, 11(2), pp. 139-163
    Pearce, R. and T. Tavares (2000), “Emerging trading blocs and their impact on the strategic evolution of multinationals”, Managerial Finance, 26(1), pp. 26-40.
    Penrose, E. T. (1995), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Perry, M. (1992), “Promoting corporate control in Singapore”, Regional studies, 26(3), pp. 289-294.
    Perry, M., H. Yeung and J. Poon (1998), “Regional office mobility: the case of corporate control in Singapore and Hong Kong”, Geoforum, 29(3), pp. 237-255.
    Pettigrew, A. M. (1985), The Awakening Giant. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
    Pinfield, L. T. (1986), “A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 365-388.
    Pla-Barber, J. (2002), “From Stopford and Well’s model to Bartlett and Ghoshal’s typology: new empirical evidence”, Management International Review, 42(2), pp. 141-156.
    Poon, J. P. H. and E. R. Thompson (2004), “Convergence or differentiation? American and Japanese transnational corporations in the Asia Pacific”, Geoforum, 35(1), pp. 111-125.
    Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy. NY: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E. (1986), Competition in Global Industries. Boston: HBS Press.
    Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
    Prahalad, C. K. (1975), The Strategic Process in a Multinational Corporation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.
    Prahalad, C. K. and Y. Doz (1981), “An approach to strategic control in MNCs”, Sloan Management Review, 22(4), pp. 5-14.
    Prahalad, C. K. and Y. Doz (1987), The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. NY: Free Press.
    Poynter, T. A. and A. M. Rugman (1982), “World product mandates: how will multinationals respond?”, Business Quarterly, 47(3), pp. 54-61.
    Proof H. (2002), “Business unit strategies between regionalization and globalization”, International Business Review, 11(2), pp. 231-250.
    Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner (1969), “The context of organization structures”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), pp. 91-114.
    Roth, K. and A. J. Morrison (1990), “An empirical analysis of the integration-responsiveness framework in global industries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), pp. 541-564.
    Roth, K. and A. J. Morrison (1992), “Implementing global strategies: characteristics of global subsidiary mandates”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), pp.715-735.
    Rugman, A. M. and C. Brain (2003), “Multinational enterprises are regional, not global”, Multinational Business Review, 11(1), pp. 3-12.
    Rugman, A. M. and S. Girod (2003), “Retail multinationals and globalization: the evidence is regional”, European Management Journal, 21(1), pp. 24-37.
    Rugman, A. M. and R. Hodgetts (2001), “The end of global strategy”, European Management Journal, 19(4), pp. 333-343.
    Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke (2001), “Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises”, Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), pp. 237-520.
    Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke (2003), “Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), pp. 125-137.
    Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke (2004), “A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), pp. 3-18.
    Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke (2005), The Regional Multinationals: MNEs and ‘Global’ Strategic Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke (2007), “Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. (2007), Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), pp.200-205.
    Schlie E. and G. Yip (2000), “Regional follows global: strategy mixes in the world automotive industry”, European Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 343-354.
    Schutte, H. (1995), “Henkel’s strategy for Asia-Pacific”, Long Range Planning, 28(1), pp. 95-103.
    Schutte, H. (1997), “Strategy and organization: challenges for European MNCs in Asia”, European Management Journal, 15(4), pp. 436-445.
    Schutte, H. (1998), “Between headquarters and subsidiaries: the RHQ solution”, in Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood (ed.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, Hampshire, England: Macmillan Press.
    Stopford, J. M. and L. T. Wells (1972), Managing the Multinational Enterprises. NY: Basic books.
    Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Svensson, G. (2001), ““Glocaliation” of business activities: a “glocal strategy” approach”, Management Decision, 39(1), pp. 6-18.
    Svensson, G. (2002), “Beyond global marketing and the globalization of marketing activities”, Management Decision, 40(6), pp. 574-583.
    Taggart, J. H. (1997a), “An evaluation of the integration-responsiveness framework: MNC manufacturing subsidiaries in the U.K.”, Management International Review, 37(4), pp. 295-318.
    Taggart, J. H. (1997b), “Autonomy and procedural justice: a framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), pp. 51-75.
    Tai, S. H. C. and Y. H. Wong (1998), “Advertising decision marketing in Asia: “glocal” versus “regcal” approach”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 5(3), pp. 318-339.
    Thorngate, W. (1976), “Possible limits on a science of social behavior”, in Strickland, J. H., F. E. Aboud and K. J. Gergen (Eds), Social Psychology in Transition. N. Y.: Plenum.
    Van den Bulcke, D. (1995), “The strategic management of multinationals in a triad-based world economy”, In A. M. Rugman, Van den Broeck, and A. Verbeke (Ed.), Global Strategic Management: Beyond the Diamond. Greenwide, CN: JAI Press.
    Van De Ven, A. H. and M. S. Poole (1990), “Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program”, Organization Science, 1(3), pp. 313-335.
    Van De Ven, A. H. And M. S. Poole (1995), “Explaining development and change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 510-540.
    Vernon, R. (1966), “International investments and international trade in the product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 190-207.
    Vernon, R. (1996), “Passing through regionalization: the transition to global markets”, The World Economy, 19(6), pp. 621-633.
    Wasilewski, N. (2002), “An empirical study of the desirability and challenges of implementing transnational marketing strategies”, Advances in Competitiveness Research, 10(1), pp. 123-149.
    Weick, K. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Westney, D. E. (2006), “The regional multinationals: MNEs and ‘Global’ strategic management”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), pp.445-449.
    White, R. E. and T. A. Poynter (1984), “Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada”, Business Quarterly, 49(2), pp. 59-69.
    Yeung, H. W. C., J. Poon and M. Perry (2001), “Towards a regional strategy: the role of regional headquarters of foreign firms in Singapore”, Urban Studies, 38(1), pp. 157-183.
    Yin, E. and C. J. Choi (2005), “The globalization myth: The case of China”, Management International Review, 45(SI 1), pp. 103-120.
    Yip, G. S. (1989), “Global strategy…in a world of nations?”, Sloan Management Review, 31(1), pp. 29-41.
    Yip, G. S. (1992), Total Global Strategy: Managing for Worldwide Competitive Advantage, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Yip, G. S. (1994), “Industry drivers of global strategy and organization”, The International Executive, 36(5), pp. 529-556.
    Yip, G. S., P. M. Loewe and M. Y. Yoshino (1988), “How to take your company to the global market?”, Columbia Journal of World Business, 23(4), pp.37-48.
    Zander, I. (1999), “How do you mean “global”? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation”, Research Policy, 28(2,3), pp. 195-213.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    91355505
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913555051
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55505101.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21035檢視/開啟
    55505102.pdf109KbAdobe PDF22986檢視/開啟
    55505103.pdf99KbAdobe PDF21092檢視/開啟
    55505104.pdf105KbAdobe PDF2984檢視/開啟
    55505105.pdf239KbAdobe PDF23389檢視/開啟
    55505106.pdf621KbAdobe PDF26277檢視/開啟
    55505107.pdf255KbAdobe PDF23190檢視/開啟
    55505108.pdf341KbAdobe PDF21579檢視/開啟
    55505109.pdf559KbAdobe PDF22971檢視/開啟
    55505110.pdf237KbAdobe PDF21323檢視/開啟
    55505111.pdf453KbAdobe PDF21581檢視/開啟
    55505112.pdf156KbAdobe PDF21471檢視/開啟
    55505113.pdf96KbAdobe PDF21894檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋