政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36547
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51184762      Online Users : 798
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36547


    Title: 首度上市上櫃公司高階主管持股, 初次投資宣告與公司價值關係之研究
    Executive Ownership, Initial Investment Announcement and the Corporate Value in Publicly Traded Corporations in Taiwan
    Authors: 溫福星
    Wen, Fur-Hsing
    Contributors: 陳隆麒
    吳啟銘

    Chen, Long-Chi
    Wu, Eric

    溫福星
    Wen, Fur-Hsing
    Keywords: 高階主管持股
    股權集中度
    初次投資宣告
    訊號放射理論
    資訊不對稱
    投資規模
    initial investment announcement
    ownership
    corporate value
    signaling
    asymmetric information
    agent problem
    Date: 2001
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 18:49:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 財務三大決策:投資、融資與股利政策一直是學術界研究探討的主題,也是實務界關心的重要課題。過去有關融資與股利支付宣告的文章不少,但投資支出相關研究則一直被視為股權結構下的控制變數,鮮少學者探討有關投資宣告對公司價值的影響。
    本研究嘗試從資訊不對稱的角度,探討首度上市上櫃公司管理當局為傳遞公司經營績效及未來成長機會給予外部投資人,透過自身的持股與投資規模進行初次投資宣告,藉以傳遞公司真正價值予投資人,以追求公司與自身財富的最大化。本研究在訊號放射理論的架構下,透過完美貝氏的分離均衡解,經過模式推導獲致三個研究命題,並以此研究命題、個案訪談與文獻整理推衍出可驗證的八個假說。
    在假說驗證方面,以民國80年至89年共225家新上市上櫃公司的初次投資宣告為研究樣本,並依未來前景看佳與否、股權集中度高低與初次宣告投資規模大小來分類,將研究樣本區分為八個子樣本,利用事件研究法對宣告公司事件日的平均異常報酬率反應以及累積異常報酬率反應進行假說的檢驗。並且,以產業類別、高階主管持股、高階主管持股的二次方、投資規模、初次投資支出類型為自變數,公司規模、市場景氣與負債比率為控制變數,對事件窗口(-1,+1)的累積平均異常報酬率進行橫斷面迴歸分析,探討宣告事件對股票異常報酬率反應的影響。經由上述的實證過程,本研究獲得以下主要結論:
    1.初次投資宣告具有資訊內涵,當股權集中度越高的高科技股公司,若進行大規模的初次投資支出宣告,則公司股票異常報酬率的正面反應訊號越強。
    2.投資人對高科技股與非高科技股公司的初次投資宣告有不同的評價,屬於未來前景看佳的高科技股,進行初次投資宣告的股票異常報酬率反應顯著為正,且顯著高於未來前景不佳的非高科技股公司。
    3.屬於資本支出類型的初次投資宣告有利於公司價值的提升。

    目錄
    第壹章 緒論…………………………………………... 1
    第一節 研究動機與研究目的……………………………… 3
    第二節 研究範圍與研究限制……………………………… 8
    第三節 研究流程與論文架構……………………………… 11
    第貳章 文獻探討與個案訪談整理…… ……………. 17
    第一節 代理理論與資訊不對稱…………………………… 18
    第二節 股權結構與公司價值之關係……………………… 23
    第三節 資本支出與公司價值之關係……………………… 28
    第四節 股權、資本支出與公司價值相關實證文獻……… 31
    第五節 文獻評述與個案訪談整理………………………… 50
    第參章 理論模式建立…………………… …………. 59
    第一節 模式背景……,,…………………………………… 60
    第二節 模式架構與模式條件設定………………………… 63
    第三節 模式推導與命題建立……………………………… 72
    第肆章 研究設計… ………………………………… 81
    第一節 實證架構與研究假說……………………………… 82
    第二節 資料來源與樣本選取……………………………… 93
    第三節 變數操作性定義…………………………………… 96
    第四節 實證分析方法……………………………………… 102
    第伍章 實證結果分析…… ………………………… 113
    第一節 樣本資料統計分析………………………………… 114
    第二節 全體樣本初次投資支出宣告的效果分析………… 121
    第三節 研究假說的驗證……………………………………. 132
    第四節 投資支出宣告異常報酬率影響因素分析………… 150
    第五節 實證結果與涵義……………………………………. 154
    第陸章 結論與建議…… …………………………… 163
    第一節 結論………………………………………………… 164
    第二節 建議………………………………………………… 166
    參考文獻
    中文部分……………………………………………………… 171
    英文部分……………………………………………………… 173
    表目錄
    表2-1 國外其他股權結構與公司價值關係實證文獻整理… 36
    表2-2 國外其他資本支出與公司價值關係實證文獻整理… 43
    表2-3 個案訪談發現與對本研究的涵義……………………. 56
    表3-1 研究模式的前提設計…………………………………. 67
    表3-2 研究模式符號說明……………………………………. 68
    表4-1 研究範疇的分類情形…………………………………. 86
    表4-2 研究範疇的分類情形與對應的假說…………………. 90
    表4-3 市場景氣劃分……………………………………… 101
    表5-1 整體上市上櫃公司的分配狀況……………………… 115
    表5-2 研究樣本按初次投資支出宣告年度分類…………… 116
    表5-3 研究樣本按產業類別分類…………………………… 117
    表5-4 研究樣本按高科技類股與市場景氣分類統計……… 118
    表5-5 各研究變數的樣本統計量…………………………… 119
    表5-6 全體樣本初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率…… 122
    表5-7 全體樣本事件窗口累積異常報酬率………………… 123
    表5-8 高科技股公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬…. 125
    表5-9 非高科技股公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率126
    表5-10 高科技股公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率…………… 127
    表5-11 非高科技股公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率………… 127
    表5-12 投資規模大的公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬129
    表5-13 投資規模小的公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬130
    表5-14 投資規模大的公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……… 131
    表5-15 投資規模小的公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……… 131
    表5-16 研究樣本交叉分類分布情形(n=225) ……………… 132
    表5-17 第一種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率134
    表5-18 第一種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率 135
    表5-19 第二種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率136
    表5-20 第二種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………137
    表5-21 第三種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率138
    表5-22 第三種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………139
    表5-23 第四種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率140
    表5-24 第四種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………141
    表5-25 第五種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率142
    表5-26 第五種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………143
    表5-27 第六種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率144
    表5-28 第六種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………145
    表5-29 第七種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率146
    表5-30 第七種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………147
    表5-31 第八種情況公司初次投資支出宣告的平均異常報酬率148
    表5-32 第八種情況公司事件窗口累積異常報酬率……………149
    表5-33 累積異常報酬率的橫斷面多元迴歸分析………………153
    表5-34 各研究假說實證結果……………………………………158
    圖目錄
    圖1-1 研究流程………………………………………………. 12
    圖3-1 初次投資支出宣告的信號放射………………………. 63
    圖3-2 研究模式與觀念架構………………………………... 65
    圖3-3 初次投資出宣告的樹狀機率分析…………………… 71
    圖4-1 實證架構…………………………………………………82
    圖4-2 實證分析方法與流程……………………………………102
    圖4-3 事件研究的各時間參數的關係……………………… 105
    Previous foreign studies on corporate investment impact on market prices have revealed that investors react positively to the announcement of increases in capital expenditure. But, the few papers study the topic in Taiwan.
    This study applies the agency theory, the signaling theory which reduce the asymmetric information and agent problems between the management and external investors and the perfect Baysian Equilibrium to construct the theoretic model to analyze the effect of the initial investment announcement. Following the theoretical model, case interview and literature review, the study derives the three propositions and eight hypotheses.
    We test these hypotheses for the publicly traded corporations in Taiwan considering a sample composed of the initial investment announcement. The period of the study was January 1991 to December 2000, and the firms selected were all companies listed on the Taiwan Security Exchange or the OTC. The number of the initial investment announcements initially collected was 365 for publicly traded corporations. Nevertheless, the final sample was reduced to 225 after excluding the confounding events and other screen. Finally, we separated the full sample to eight sub-samples by corporate type, ownership and investment scale and used the event study and regression analysis to test the information effect of the initial investment announcement.
    Our empirical results are not hold in the full sample since no significant market reaction, but are supported in the sub-samples grouped by high-tech. Moreover, the initial investment announcements of high-tech, high ownership, and high scale companies lead the significant positively abcdrmal rate of return at the announcement day. In addition, the investors significantly positively react to the initial investment announcements belong to the capital investment.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王威能,企業資本投資與研發支出的效益分析:以台灣製造業上市公司為例,國立中興大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國86年6月。
    呂東英,鄭如蘭與徐恭忠,證券發行與實務,台北市:中華民國證券市場發展基金會,民國78年。
    邱炳乾,公司所有權結構、資本結構與投資計畫之關係探討,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文,民國83年6月。
    沈中華與李建然,事件研究法:財務與會計實證研究必備,台北市:華泰書局,民國89年9月。
    李文雄,資訊不對稱下我國上市公司融資行為宣告對股票報酬率影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國88年6月。
    吳宏仁,台灣企業資本投資宣告對股東財富之影響,私立輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,民國83年6月。
    吳君誠,上市公司融資選擇與股價關聯性之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國90年12月。
    吳政穎,我國上市公司股權集中度,薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國89年6月。
    吳啟銘,企業評價,台北市:智勝文化出版公司,民90年1月。
    吳建頤,董事會規模對公司價值的影響,中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。
    林燈煤,股權結構、投資與公司價值之關係--以臺灣上市公司為例,國立中正大學企研所碩士論文,民國88年6月。
    孫秀蘭,董事會制度與經營績效之研究,國立臺灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月
    孫梅瑞,國內上市公司從事公司購併活動對經營績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國89年1月。
    翁銘鴻,我國上市公司董事會特徵與經營績效之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國83年6月。
    許淑娟,上市公司國際直接投資宣告對股票報酬影響之研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月。
    陳金鈴,臺灣上市公司股權結構之研究分析,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民國86年6月
    陳柏錩,上市公司資本支出、成長機會與股東財富之關係,國立中正大學財務金融研究所,民國88年6月。
    陳隆麒,當代財務管理,台北市:華泰書局,民國88年9月。
    陳隆麒、闕河士、黃國誠與黃旭輝,「公司上市後首次支付股利對股東財富影響之研究」,中山管理評論,第4卷,第1期,135-152,民國85年。
    黃國誠,聲譽模式下股利宣告與成長機會對股價影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國86年6月。
    黃楚淵,臺灣上市公司宣告海外直接投資訊息對股東財富之影響:異質條件變異數分析法,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月。
    張旭玲,我國股票上市公司股權結構暨經營績效之研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月
    溫育芳,國內上市公司的鉅額交易、股票價格與經營績效關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文,民國90年5月。
    楊俊中,股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文,民國87年6月
    楊慧玲,董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究,朝陽大學企業管理系碩士碩士論文,民國89年6月。
    謝劍平,「以公司托賓Q比率預測股價對公司投資變動的反應」,管理評論,第14卷,第1期,33-45,民國84年。
    闕河士,股票股利信號發射模式與宣告效果之研究,國立政治大學企業管理系研究所博士論文,民國85年6月。
    二、英文部分
    Akerlof, G., 1970, “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89, 488-500.
    Ambarish, R., K. John And J. Williams,1987, “Efficient Signaling with Dividends and Investments,” Journal of Finance, 42, 321-44.
    Asquith, P. and D. Mullins, 1983, “The Impact of Initiating Dividend Payments on Shareholder’s Wealth,” Journal of Business, 56, 77-96.
    Bajaj, M. and A.M Vijh,1995, “Trading Behavior and the Unbiasedness of theMarket Reaction to Dividend Announcements,” Journal of Finance, 50, 255-279.
    Baker, M. and P. Gompers, 1999, “An Analysis of Executive Compensation, Ownership and Control in Closedly held Firms,” Working Paper.
    Banker, R.D., S. Das and S.M. Datar, 1993, “Complimentarily of Prior Accounting Information: The Case of Stock Dividend Announcement,” The Accounting Review, 68,.1, 28-47.
    Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen, and L. W. Senbet, 1981, “Market Imperfections, agency Problems and Capital Structure: a Review,” Financial Management, 10, 7-21.
    Barnhart, S. and S. Rosenstein, 1998, “Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis,” The Financial Review, 33, 1-16.
    Bathala, C., K. Moon and R. Rao, 1994, “Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy and the Impact of Institutional Holdings: An Agency Perspective,” Financial Management, 23, 38-50.
    Berle, A. and G. C. Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: MacMillan.
    Bhattacharya, S., 1979, “Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy and ‘the Birds in the Hands’ Fallacy,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 259-270.
    Bizjak, J. M., J. A. Brickley, and J. L. Coles, 1993, “Stock-based Incentive Compensation and Investment Behavior,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 349-372.
    Blose, L. and J. Shieh, 1997, “Tobin’s q Ratio and Market Reaction to Capital Investment Announcements”, The Financial Review, 32, 449-476.
    Bollerslev, T., 1987, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
    Brander, J. and B. J. Spencer, 1987, “Moral Hazard Output Decisions and Financial Structure:Pure Compitition and Monopoly,” Working Paper, University of British Columbia.
    Chan, S. H., G. Gau and K. Wang, 1995, “Stock Market Reaction to Capital Investment Decisions: Evidence from Business Relocations,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 81-100.
    Chan, S. H., J. Martin and J. Kensinger, 1990, “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 255-276.
    Chauvin, K. W. and M. Hirschey, 1993, “Advertising R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm,” Financial Management, 22, 128-141.
    Chen, C. and T. Steiner, 1999, “Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflict: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy and Dividend Policy,” The Financial Review, 34, 119-136.
    Chen, C. and T. Steiner, 2000, “Tobin’s Q, Managerial Ownership and Analyst Coverage: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations Model,” Journal of Economic and Business, 52, 365-382.
    Cho, M., 1998, “Ownership Structure, Investment and the Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 103-121.
    Chung, K. H. and S. W. Pruitt, 1996, “Executive Ownership, Corporate Value and Executive Compensation: A Unifying Framework,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1135-1159.
    Chung, K. H., P. Wright and C. Charoenwong, 1998, “Investment Opportunities and Market Reaction to Capital Expenditure Decisions,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 41-60.
    Demsetz, H., 1983, “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 375-390.
    Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn, 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177.
    Denis, D., 1994, “Investment Opportunities and the Market Reaction to Equity Offerings”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 159-177.
    Denis, D.J., D.K. Denis, and A. Sarin, 1994, “The Information Content of Dividend Changes: Cash Flow Signaling, Over-investment, and Dividends Clienteles,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 4, 567-587.
    Denis, D. and A. Sarin, 1998, “Ownership and board structures in publicly traded corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 187-223
    Doukas, J. and L. Switzer, 1992, “The Stock Market’s Caluation of R&D Spending and Market Concentration,” Journal of Economics and Business, 44, 95-114.
    Easterbrook, F. H., 1984, “Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends,” The American Economic Review, 74, 650-659.
    Eisenhardt, K. M.,1989, “Agency Theory: an Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
    Engle, R. F., 1982, “Autoregressive Conditional Hereroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
    Fama, E. F.,1980, “Agency Problem and Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy , 88, 288-307.
    Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen, 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
    Fama, E. F. and M.H. Miller, 1972, The Theory of Finance, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
    Friend, I. and L. Lang, 1988, “An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate,” Journal of Finance, 43, 271-281.
    Glazer, J. and R. Israel, 1990, “Managerial Incentives and Financial Signaling in Product Market Competition,” Internal Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 271-280.
    Gomez-Mejia, L. R.,1994, “Executive Compensation: Areassessment and a Future Research Agenda,” Edited by G.R. Ferris, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 12:161-222, Palo Alto, CA: JAI Press, Inc.
    Gorton, G. and F. Schmid, 1999, “Corporate Governance, Ownership Dispersion and Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Austrian Cooperative Banking,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 119-140.
    Grinblatt, M., R. Masulis, and S. Titman, 1984, “The Valuation Effect of Stock Splits and Stock Dividends,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 461-490.
    Griner, E. and L. Gordon, 1995, “Internal Cash Flow, Insider Ownership, and Capital Expenditures: A test of The Pecking Order and Managerial Hypothesis,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22 , 179-199.
    Guesneric, R., P. Piard and P. Rey, 1988, “Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard with Risk Neutral Agents,” European Economic Review, 33, 807-823.
    Hall, H. B., 1993, “The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Investment during the 1980’s,” American Economic Review, May, 259-264.
    Hanson, R. C. and M. H. Song, 1995, “Managerial Ownership Change and Firm Value: Evidence from Dual-Class Recapitalizations and Insider Trading,” The Journal of Financial Research, 43, 281-297.
    Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1989, “The Design of Securities,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 255-287.
    Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1990, “Capital Structure and the Informational role of debt,” Journal of Finance, 45, 321-349.
    Hermalin, B. and M. Weisbach, 1991, “The Effects of Broad Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance,” Financial Management, 20, 101-112.
    Himmelberg, C., G. Hubbard and D. Palia, 1999, “Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership an Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353-384.
    Hirschey, M., 1982, “Intangible Capital Aspects of Advertising and R&D Expenditures,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 4, 375-390.
    Holderness, C. and D. Sheehan, 1988, “ The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 317-346.
    Holmstorm, B., 1979, “Moral Hazard and Observability”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
    Hoshi, T., A. Kashyap and D. Schartstein, 1991, “Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Feb., 33-60.
    Israel, R. , 1992, “Capital and Wonership structure, and the Market for Corporate Control,” Review of Financial Studies, 5, 181-198.
    Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg and T. S. Zorn, 1992, “The Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt and Dividend Policies,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 247-236.
    Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. and K. J. Ruback, “1990, “The Market for Corporate Control: the Scientific Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
    Jose, M., L. Nichols and J. Stevens, 1986, “Contributions of Diversification, Promotion, and R&D to the Value of Multiproduct Firms: A Tobin’s q Approach”, Financial Management, 15, 33-42.
    Ke, B., K. Petroni and A. Safieddine, 1999, “Ownership Concentration and Sensitivity of Executive Pay to Accounting Performance Measures: Evidence from Publicly and Privately-Insurance Companies,” Working Paper.
    Lang, L. and R. H. Litzenberger, 1989, “Dividend Announcements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Free Cash Flow Hypothesis?” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 181-191
    Lang, L., E. Ofek and R. Stulz, 1996, “Leverage, Investment and Firm Growth,” Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 3-29.
    Lee, S. B. and K. Y. Ohk, 1992, “Does Futures Trading Increase Stock Market Volatility? The U. S., Japan, the U. K., and Hong Kong.,” Review of Futures Markets, 11, 253-293.
    Leech, D. and J. Leahy, 1991, “Ownership Structure, Control Style Classifications and the Performance of Large British,” The Economic Journal, 101, 1418-1437.
    Leland, H. and D. H. Pyle, 1977, “Information Asymmetric, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediation,” Journal of Finance, 32, 371-388.
    Macho-Stadler, I. and D. Perez-Castrillo, 1997, An Introduction to the Economics of Information, Oxford University Press.
    Masson, R. T., 1971, “Executive Motivations, Earning, and Consequenct Equity Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 79, 1278-1282.
    McConnell, J. and C. Muscarella, 1985, “Corporate Capital Expenditure Decisions and the Market Value of the Firm,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 399-422.
    McConnell, J. and H. Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612.
    McConnell, J. and H. Servaes, 1995, “Equity Ownership and the Two Face of Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 131-157.
    McNichols, M. and A. Dravid, 1990, “Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, and Signaling,” Journal of Finance, 45, 857-879.
    Mehran, H., 1995, “Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 163-184.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
    Murphy, K., 1985, “Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 11-42.
    Myers, S. C., 1977, ”Determiniants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5,147-176.
    Myers, S. C., 1984, “Presidential Address: the Capital Structure Puzzle,” Journal of Finace, 39, 575-592.
    Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221.
    Oviatt, B. M. , 1988, “Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship, Incentives for Congruent Interests,” Academy of Management Review, 13, 214-225.
    Palia, D. and F. Lichtenberg, 1999, “Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: A Re-examination Using Productivity Measurement,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 323-339.
    Pilotte, E., 1992, “Growth Opportunities and the Stock Price Responses to New Financing,” Journal of Business, 65, 371-395.
    Poiterin, M., 1990, “Strategic Financial Signaling,” Internal Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 499-518.
    Pound, J., 1988, “ Proxy contents and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.
    Ravid, A. and O. H. Sarin, 1991, “Financial Signaling by Committing to Cash Outflow,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 165-180.
    Richardson, G., S. Sefcit, R. Thompson, 1986, “A Test of Dividend Irrelevance Using Volume Reaction to a Change in Dividend Policy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 313-333.
    Rosenstein, S. and J. Wyatt, 1997, “Inside Directors, Board Effectiveness and Shareholder Wealth,” Journal of Financial Economics, 44, 229-250.
    Ross, S. A., 1977, “The Determination of Financial Structure: the Incentive Signaling Approach,” Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 209-243.
    Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1986, “Large Shareholders and Corporate control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
    Short, H. and K. Keasey, 1999, “managerial Ownership and the Performance of Firm: Evidence from UK,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 79-101.
    Smith, A., 1990, “Corporate Ownership Structure and Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 145-164.
    Smith, C. W., 1984, “Raising Capital: Theory and Evidence,” Midland Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, .6-22.
    Smith, C. W. and J. Warner, 1979, “On Financial Contracting: an Analysis of Bond Covenants,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 117-161.
    Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts, 1992, “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263-292.
    Spence, M., 1973, “Job Market Signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-379.
    Stulz, R., 1988, “ Managerial Control of Voting Rights, Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-54.
    Stulz, R., 1990, “Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies,” Journal of Financial Economic, 20, 3-27.
    Szewczoyk, S. H., G. P. Tsetsekos and Z. Zantout, 1996, “The Valuation of Corporate R&D Expenditure: a Evidence from Investment Opportunities and Free Cash Flow,” Financial Management, 25, 105-110.
    Vogt, S., 1994, “The Cash Flow/Investment Relationship: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms,” Financial Management, 23, 3-20.
    Williamson, O. E., 1963,“Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior,” The American Economic Review, 53, 1032-1057
    Williamson, O. E., 1983, “Organization form Residual Claimants and Corporate Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 351-366.
    Zantout, Z. and G. P. Tsetsekos, 1994, “The Wealth Effects of Announcements of R&D Expenditure Increases,” The Journal of Financial Research, 42, 205-216.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    85355506
    90
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administation] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback