Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36322
|
| Title: | THE COMPARISON OF EGO- IDENTITY BETWEEN NEW TAIWANESE AND LOCAL TAIWANESE JUNIOR HIGH STUDENTS IN XINDIAN CITY TAIPEI COUNTY
THE COMPARISON OF EGO- IDENTITY BETWEEN NEW TAIWANESE AND LOCAL TAIWANESE JUNIOR HIGH STUDENTS IN XINDIAN CITY TAIPEI COUNTY |
| Authors: | 蘇莉婷 |
| Contributors: | 劉小蘭
Liu, Xiao- lan
蘇莉婷 |
| Keywords: | ego- identity
New Taiwanese |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 18:00:43 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | Research concerning New Taiwanese issue is focused on New Taiwanese students’ family environment, academic achievement, school life adaptability, behavioral development in the past years. Although New Taiwanese adolescents will be an emerging population, there has no research that looks specifically at the identity development during early adolescence. There is considerable literature on school life; however, no of it addresses New Taiwanese psychological development. This study, informed by Erikson’s (1959) model of psychosocial development and Marcia’s (1966) four statuses of identity, compared ego- identity development in New Taiwanese junior high students to local Taiwanese junior high students. The purpose in the present study was to provide an approach to the investigation of identity formation among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students.
The hypothesis of this study is that there are differences in ego- identity development between local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. Variations in identity status will be measured by administering the EOM-EIS- 2 (Adams & Bennion, 1989) and a demographic survey to junior high students from three different schools in Xindian City, Taipei County. The study also utilized the qualitative approach method to provide a sound basis for analyzing respondents’ experience and/ or perspectives by Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI).
Identity scores and distributions were examined for 550 (422 local Taiwanese, 128 New Taiwanese) junior high students. Results indicated that the significant difference in Foreclosure Identity between New Taiwanese and local Taiwanese was observed with local Taiwanese scoring higher. Local Taiwanese may therefore be more inclined to adopt their parents’ commitments to religious and political beliefs, occupational preferences, and philosophical lifestyles. Results also indicated that New Taiwanese were founded to be significantly more ideological diffused than their local Taiwanese peers. The environment for New Taiwanese was more constricted and less likely to provide room for the adolescent’s exploration and have not made decision regarding.
Additionally, the present study revealed that 52% of the sample (245 participants including 196 local Taiwanese and 49 New Taiwanese junior high students) fell into one of the four discrete identity status categories, with 56% of this group classified as either diffused or foreclosed. Within these two less sophisticated statuses, New Taiwanese less frequently fell into Identity Foreclosed than local Taiwanese but more frequently fell into Identity Diffusion than local Taiwanese. To gain in- depth information of participants’ experience and/ or perspectives, 43 (32 local Taiwanese, 11 New Taiwanese) of the 245 participants were also assessed using Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Although this finding highlights the differences ego- identity development during early adolescence among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students, most of the identity developmental outcomes were the same between the two groups.
Research concerning New Taiwanese issue is focused on New Taiwanese students’ family environment, academic achievement, school life adaptability, behavioral development in the past years. Although New Taiwanese adolescents will be an emerging population, there has no research that looks specifically at the identity development during early adolescence. There is considerable literature on school life; however, no of it addresses New Taiwanese psychological development. This study, informed by Erikson’s (1959) model of psychosocial development and Marcia’s (1966) four statuses of identity, compared ego- identity development in New Taiwanese junior high students to local Taiwanese junior high students. The purpose in the present study was to provide an approach to the investigation of identity formation among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students.
The hypothesis of this study is that there are differences in ego- identity development between local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students. Variations in identity status will be measured by administering the EOM-EIS- 2 (Adams & Bennion, 1989) and a demographic survey to junior high students from three different schools in Xindian City, Taipei County. The study also utilized the qualitative approach method to provide a sound basis for analyzing respondents’ experience and/ or perspectives by Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI).
Identity scores and distributions were examined for 550 (422 local Taiwanese, 128 New Taiwanese) junior high students. Results indicated that the significant difference in Foreclosure Identity between New Taiwanese and local Taiwanese was observed with local Taiwanese scoring higher. Local Taiwanese may therefore be more inclined to adopt their parents’ commitments to religious and political beliefs, occupational preferences, and philosophical lifestyles. Results also indicated that New Taiwanese were founded to be significantly more ideological diffused than their local Taiwanese peers. The environment for New Taiwanese was more constricted and less likely to provide room for the adolescent’s exploration and have not made decision regarding.
Additionally, the present study revealed that 52% of the sample (245 participants including 196 local Taiwanese and 49 New Taiwanese junior high students) fell into one of the four discrete identity status categories, with 56% of this group classified as either diffused or foreclosed. Within these two less sophisticated statuses, New Taiwanese less frequently fell into Identity Foreclosed than local Taiwanese but more frequently fell into Identity Diffusion than local Taiwanese. To gain in- depth information of participants’ experience and/ or perspectives, 43 (32 local Taiwanese, 11 New Taiwanese) of the 245 participants were also assessed using Marcia’s Identity Status Interview (ISI). Although this finding highlights the differences ego- identity development during early adolescence among local Taiwanese and New Taiwanese junior high students, most of the identity developmental outcomes were the same between the two groups. |
| Reference: | Abraham, K. G. (1986). Ego- identity differences among Anglo- American and Mexican- American adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 151- 166.
Adams, G. R., Bennion, L., & Huh, K. (1989). Objective measure of ego identity status: A reference manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph, Canada.
Adams, G. R., & Fitch, S. A., (1982). Ego stage and identity status development: A cross- sequential analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (3), 574- 583.
Adams, G. R., Shea, J. A., & Fitch, S. A. (1979). Toward the development of an objective assessment of ego- identity status. Journal of Adolescence, 8, 81-89.
Archer, S. L. (1982). The lower age boundaries of identity development. Child Development, 53, 1551- 1556.
Archer, S. L., & Waterman, A. S. (1993). Identity status interview: Early and middle adolescent form. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 285- 302). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Aronson J. & Good, C. (2002). The development and consequences of stereotype vulnerability in adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, Vol.2: Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 299- 330). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Amy E. Y. (2000). Barriers to ego identity status formation: a contextual qualification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 95- 106.
Barbara N. A. & Jerelyn B. S. (2001). Interpersonal identity formation during early adolescence. Adolescence, 36, 509- 523.
Bennion, L. D. & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 183- 198.
Bernard, H. S. (1981). Identity formation during adolescence: A review of some empirical findings. Adolescence, 16, 349- 358.
Berzonsky, M. D., & Neimeyer, G. J. (1988). Identity status and personal construct systems. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 195- 204.
Bourne, E. (1978). The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal. Part I. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7 (3), 223- 251.
Cote, J. E. (1996). Identity: a multidimensional analysis. In Psychosocial Development during Adolescence: progress in developmental contextualism, Adams, G. R., Montmayor, R. and Gullotta T. P. (Eds). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (pp. 130- 180).
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. (1987). A formulation of Erikson’s theory of ego identity formation. Developmental Review, 7, 273- 325.
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. (1988). The relationship between ego identity status and Erikson’s notions of institutionalized moratoria, value orientation stage, and ego dominance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17 (1), 81- 99.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830- 847.
Erikson, E. H. (1958). Young man Luther. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society (2nd Ed.). New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle. NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
Glodis, K. A. & Blosi, A. (1993). The sense of self and identity among adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8 (4), 356- 380.
Grotevant, H. D. (1983). The contribution of the family of the facilitation of identity formation in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 225- 237.
Grotevant, H. D. (1986). Assessment of identity development: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1 (2). 175- 182.
Grotevant, H. D. & Adams, G. R. (1984). Development of an objective measure to assess ego identity development in adolescence: Validation and replication. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13 (5), 419- 438.
Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1988). The role of family experience in career exploration: A lifespan perspective. In P. B. Baltes, D. C. Featherman, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior, Vol. 8. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hwang, K.K. (1998). Two moralities: Reinterpreting the findings of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 211- 238.
Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: The types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 129- 149.
Jodl, K. M., Michael A., Malanchuk O., Eccles J. S., & Sameroff A. (2001). Parents’ Roles in shaping Early Adolescents’ Occupational Aspirations. Child Development, 72(4), 1247- 1265.
Jones, R. M., Akers, J. F., & White, J. M. (1994). Revised classification criteria for the Extended Objective measure of Ego Identity Status (EOMEIS). Journal of Adolescence, 17(6), 533- 549.
Jones, R. M. & Streitmatter, J. L. (1987). Validity and reliability of the EOMEIS for early adolescents. Adolescence, 22 (87), 647- 659.
Lavoie J. C. (1994). Identity in adolescence: issues of theory, structure and transition. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 17- 28.
Marcia, J. E. (1964). Determination and construct validation of the ego identity status. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego- identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3 (5), 551- 558.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity In adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp.159- 187). New York: John Wiley.
Marcia, J. E. (1989). Identity and intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 401- 410.
Marcia, J. E. (1993a). The ego identity status approach to ego identity. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 3- 21). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Marcia, J. E. (1993c). The status of the statuses: Research Review. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 22- 41). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Marcia, J. E. (2003). Personal communication.
Markstrom- Adams, C. & Adams, G. R. (1995). Gender, ethnic, and grade differences in psychological functioning during middle adolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 397- 417.
Meeus, W. (1996). Studies in identity development in adolescence: An overview of research and some new data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 569- 598.
Mortimer, J. T., Lorence, J., & Kumka, D. S. (1986). Work, family, and personality: Transition to adulthood. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Muuss, R. E. (1975). Theories of Adolescence. New York: Random House.
Papini, D. R., Micka, J. C., & Barnett, J. K. (1989). Perceptions of intrapsychic and extrapsychic functioning as bases of adolescent ego identity statuses. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 462- 481.
Raskin, P. M. (1984). Procedures in research on identity status: Some notes on method. Psychological Reports, 54, 719- 730.
Rogow, A. M., Marcia, J. E. & Slugoski, B. R. (1983). The relative importance of the identity status interview components. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 387- 399.
Sigleman, C. K. (1999). Life- Span Human Development (3 rd Ed.). Pacific, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
Streitmatter, J. L. (1988). Ethnicity as a mediating variable of early adolescent identity development. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 335- 346.
Taylor R. D. & Oskay, G. (1995). Identity formation in Turkish and American late adolescents. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 26, 8- 22.
Waterman, A. S. (1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review research. Developmental Psychology, 18, 341- 358.
Waterman, A. S. (1988). Identity status theory and Erikson’s theory: Communalities and differences. Developmental Review, 8, 185- 208.
Waterman, A. S. (1989). Curricula interventions for identity change: Substantive and ethical considerations. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 389- 400.
Waterman, A. S. (1990). Personal expressiveness: Philosophical and psychological foundations. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 47- 74.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Findings something to do or someone to be: A Eduaimonist perspective on identity formation. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity (pp. 147- 165), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Waterman, A. S. (1993a). Developmental perspectives on identity formation: From adolescence to adulthood. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 42- 68). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Waterman, A. S. (1993b). Overview of the identity status scoring criteria. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 156- 176). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Taipei Times. Nov 05, 2003. Survey points to general ignorance and suspicion toward Asian female spouses.
Life not easy for foreign spouses. (2004, November 09). Taipei Times, p. 2.
Rights groups protest MOE over foreign wife remark. (2004, July 13). Taipei Times, p. 4.
Cabinet to hold special day for kids. (2004, July 28). Taipei Times, p. 3.
王宏仁 (2001)。 社會階層化的婚姻移民與國內勞動市場：以越南新娘為例。台灣社會研究季刊，41，99- 27。
邱琡雯 (1999)。 在地國際化？外籍新娘在地化：就讀嘉義地區國小補校的外籍新娘之社會生活。 台灣社會問題研究學術研討會。中央研究院社會問題研究推動委員會。
林璣萍 (2003)。 台灣新興的弱勢學生- 外籍新娘子女學校適應現況之研究。未出版碩士論文，台東：國立台東大學 教育研究所。
吳錦惠 (2004)。 新台灣之子的教育問題與課程調適之研究。 (未出版) 台南：國立台南大學 教育學系課程與教學碩士論文。
夏曉鵑 (2000)。 資本國際化下的國際婚姻- 以台灣的「外籍新娘」現象為例。 台灣社會研究季刊 39：45- 92。
夏曉鵑 (2002)。 流離尋岸：資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象。 台灣社會研究雜誌社。
陳清花 (2004)。 澎湖縣新移民女性子女學校學習之探討。 (未出版) 高雄：國立中山大學 公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
楊艾俐 (2003)。 台灣變貌：新移民風潮。 天下雜誌 271：101,102。
楊艾俐 (2003)。 新台灣之子。 台北：天下雜誌95- 99。
楊智馨、林世華 (1998)。大學生生涯發展狀況與自我認定狀態之相關研究。教育心裡學報 30, 1- 6。
鄭雅雯 (2000)。 南洋過台灣：東南亞外籍新娘在台婚姻與生活探究- 以台南市為例。 (未出版) 花蓮：國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所碩士論文。
劉秀燕 (2003)。 跨文化衝擊下外籍新娘家庭環境及其子女行為表現之研究。 (未出版) 嘉義：國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文。
劉美芳 (2001)。 跨國婚姻中菲籍女性得生命訴說。 (未出版) 高雄：高雄醫學大學護理學研究所碩士論文。
盧秀芳 (2004)。 在台外籍新娘子女家庭環境與學校生活適應。 (未出版) 台北：國立政治大學學校行政碩士班碩士論文。
蔡雅玉 (2001)。 台越跨國婚姻現象之初探。 (未出版) 台南：國立成功大學地理學政治經濟研究所碩士論文。
顏錦珠 (2002)。 東南亞外籍新娘在台生活經驗與適應歷程之研究。 (未出版) 嘉義：國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
蕭昭娟 (2000)。 國際遷移之調適研究：以彰化社頭鄉外籍新娘為例。 (未出版) 台北：國立台灣師範大學地理學碩士論文。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
臺灣研究英語碩士學位學程
94924009
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094924009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [台灣研究英語碩士學程(IMTS)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 843 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
