Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36306
|
| Title: | 辦公室市場租區與區位之研究
A Study of Rents and Location in Office Market |
| Authors: | 黃名義
Ming-Yih Huang |
| Contributors: | 張金鶚
Chin-Oh Chang
黃名義
Ming-Yih Huang |
| Keywords: | 辦公室
租金
區位
住宅
住辦混合
大型企業
分公司
office
rent
location
housing
the mix-used
the largerest corporations
branch |
| Date: | 2001 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 17:56:58 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 值此工商業蓬勃發展之際，辦公室活動早已取代製造業活動，成為都市中最重要之經濟活動基礎，然而國內有關商用不動產之研究卻仍方興未艾，未見系統化與學術上之專門研究，遠落後於國外之研究幾達二十年，是以本研究試圖從國內對住宅不動產研究之心得，加以嘗試引藉用於探討住宅與辦公室之租金差異，藉以瞭解面積、區位與產品特徵屬性等要素對於兩種租賃不動產租金之影響。其次，進一步加入國內合法與違規混合使用之住辦混合產品進行討論，以便於澄清住辦混合產品的相輔與轉換使用彈性優勢，是否使其享有更好的租金報酬。本研究第二部分探討國內大型企業辦公室最近十年間的區位選擇與遷徙活動，分析大型企業的主要辦公室區位是否與產業的變遷趨勢一致？並探討生產力函數中的效率參數--電子與面對面資訊，以及資本、勞力、產業類型與經營績效等變數，對大型企業廠商辦公室區位變遷決策的影響，藉以釐清大型企業辦公室的區位活動。最後，則是從一般性的辦公室活動討論中，進一步切入以分公司辦公室活動作為研究主題，探討廠商擴張後的分公司辦公室區位選擇，是否與一般辦公室活動相同？藉以澄清分公司辦公室活動對地區發展之影響。綜上三大研究課題，本文獲致如下結論：
一、從辦公室、住宅與住辦混合產品租金比較中發現，面積、區位與產品特徵屬性對辦公室和住宅租金的影響有顯著差異，而住辦混合產品在各要素對租金的彈性變動敏感程度普遍不及於其他兩種產品，顯示住辦混合產品在各要素對租金的影響上不如單一使用的產品，亦間接推論住辦混合產品的外部成本可能大於外部經濟，使得單純使用的辦公室或住宅所反映的高品質依舊能享有較高的租金。同樣的，住辦混合中間產品的轉換特性也未使其出現辦公室大於住辦混合，又大於住宅產品之經濟直覺般的競租順序。因此，未來廠商或出租者在產品的規劃設計上，應該要朝向以提供高品質單一用途之租賃不動產為主。其次，從產品特徵屬性對不同類型不動產租金的影響結果發現，辦公室比較重視總樓層所帶來的名望效果，以及業務吸引力；而住宅則比較看重所在樓層之效用可及性，顯示未來在產品規劃上，辦公室除了著重區位考量外，也應重視總樓層所帶來的效益，而住宅則可以加強對所在樓層特徵屬性之考量。
二、從大型企業辦公室的區位選擇與遷徙研究中發現，大型企業廠商的辦公室區位選擇與其產業的區位變遷並不一致；服務業的大型企業辦公室顯著的集中在市中心，但製造業的大型企業辦公室則因著區位先佔優勢與惰性，以及生產性服務業之特性，並未同其產業一樣顯著的遷徙至市郊，顯示製造業的外移，並未同時影響其企業主要辦公室同樣外移，反倒是若干服務業辦公室在擠不進市中心的情況下，只得選擇郊化外移。因此，未來應視大型企業之資訊需求種類與強度，誘導其向市中心或市郊聚集，對於僅需電子資訊的大型企業，應加強資訊技術提昇，以降低面對面接觸之通勤往返成本，並促使其向郊區搬遷，以便於獲得更廉價的辦公空間，並降低廠商營運之租金成本，而空出的市中心辦公大樓，也能為企業賺取一份租金收益。其次，面對大型企業辦公室的外移趨勢，未來應推動郊區辦公園區的規劃，以便於聚集日益增加的後勤辦公室，而市中心的再發展與更新，也有助於吸引更多需要面對面資訊的大型企業進駐。再者，從大型企業廠商辦公室的遷徙決策研究中發現，除了需要電子資訊的大型企業有顯著的遷徙以外，個別產業的遷徙仍不明顯，惟可察覺出遷徙的軌跡是由市中心移出，並向市區與市郊移動，是以為預防中心都市之衰頹與降低都市擴張，應儘早加強中心商業區之更新。
三、分公司辦公室區位選擇研究結果發現，分公司辦公室的區位活動並不完全像典型辦公室活動一般集中於市中心，不同類型的分公司辦公室明顯的集中在不同的核心地區。其中，輔助性活動型分公司顯著的集中在市中心，面對面營業型分公司辦公室則是聚集在人口密集地區，而業務集散轉運型分公司更是向聯外交通便捷地區發展。由於分公司屬於企業的分支機構與擴張，其區位選址除了廠商自身利益的追求考量以外，更是決定一個地區發展與就業成長的關鍵。因此，對於不同核心地區，提供適當的商業用地、公共設施，並在法令上規定允許的使用項目，將有助於分公司辦公室的活動與整個都市的成長。其次，本研究從影響分公司區位選擇的因素中發現，除了專技人員薪資、資本與稅捐及規費等顯著的影響分公司設立於市中心以外，資本、稅捐及規費也顯著的影響分公司設立於人口密集地區，而樓地板面積、一般職員薪資與租金則是顯著的影響分公司辦公室選擇聯外交通便捷地區，此一結果顯示影響一般辦公室區位選擇的因素，對於分公司辦公室區位選擇的影響呈現出明顯的差異，影響分公司辦公室設立於人口密集地區與聯外交通便捷地區的變數要多於市中心，凸顯了分公司辦公室區位選擇的不同，應在辦公室的區位選擇研究中加以有所區隔。
目 錄
第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………1
一、研究動機 ………………………………………………………1
二、研究目的 ………………………………………………………3
三、研究方法 ………………………………………………………4
四、資料說明 ………………………………………………………5
五、名詞定義 ………………………………………………………5
六、研究限制 ………………………………………………………6
七、研究流程 ………………………………………………………7
第二章 相關理論與文獻回顧 ……………………………...8
一、辦公室、住宅與住辦混合租金相關理論與文獻回顧 ………8
二、區位和聚集理論與辦公室相關文獻回顧 ……………………9
第三章 辦公室、住宅與住辦混合租金比較分析 ………..15
一、前言 ……………………………………………………………15
二、理論基礎與研究假說建立 ……………………………………16
三、現況分析與資料樣本統計描述 ………………………………22
四、實證分析 ………………………………………………………23
五、小結 ……………………………………………………………30
第四章 大型企業辦公室區位選擇與遷徙分析 …………..33
一、前言 ……………………………………………………………33
二、理論基礎 ………………………………………………………34
三、台北都會區大型企業辦公室概況分析 ………………………38
四、實證分析 ………………………………………………………46
五、小結 ……………………………………………………………61
第五章 分公司辦公室區位選擇分析 ……………………..64
一、前言 ……………………………………………………………64
二、理論基礎 ………………………………………………………65
三、實證模型與資料分析 …………………………………………69
四、實證分析結果與說明 …………………………………………73
五、小結 ……………………………………………………………78
第六章 結論 ………………………………………………...80
一、結論 ……………………………………………………………81
二、後續研究 ………………………………………………………84
參考文獻 …………………………………………………….86
附錄 ………………………………………………………….93
索引 ………………………………………………………….96
This dissertation consisted of three relative essays. In the first paper, I analyzes the differences in the rent of office, housing and the mix-used from three factors - floor area, location, and characteristics of products. Empirical results show that the effect of the increase in floor area on the rent of housing is larger than that of office and the mix-used. There is a difference in marginal rent between office and housing in the city, while not difference in downtown. Additionally, the marginal rent for the location in the mix-used falls behind the other two types. In the characteristics of products, office emphasizes the reputation and business attraction brought about by the total number of floor while the housing puts more accessibility on the located floor in the building. However, the marginal rent of housing is more than that of office in the accessibility. As for the rent between office and the mix-used or for that between the housing and the mix-used, the characteristic show little significance because of the mixed use between these two types. In sum, the effects of the mix-used on the marginal rent and factors elasticity are not superior to the single use in all factors, and office or housing still has the higher rent. Results also show that transformation characteristic of the mix-used does not support the intuitional bid-rent order of office greater than the mix-used and housing in Taipei.
In the second paper, I examined the largest corporations office location change in Taipei metropolitan area. This study uses the data that collected by China credit Information Service, Ltd. to analyze the location choice and migration of largest corporations. The empirical results show that the location choice of largest corporations differs from the location change of industries. The corporation of service industry significantly concentrates downtown while the manufacturing industry have no trend to significantly concentrate downtown because of prior occupation advantages and inertia. Additionally, firms requiring face-to-face information significantly concentrate in downtown, and high-tech firms requiring electronic information have significantly chose the location in the suburbs. As for the part of the foreign investment enterprises, they choose the location in downtown as well because of information and prestige image. In the decision of migration, firms requiring electronic information have significant movement while others are not obvious. Nevertheless, the whole migration process is obviously from downtown to the city area and the outskirts. Furthermore, the location choice of largest corporations having movement is the same as that of aforementioned largest corporations in the capital, work force, foreign investment enterprises, and operation performance.
The final paper examined the location choice of branch office. The empirical results show that the location activities of branch office do not as same as general office to concentrated in CBD. The ancillary service branch (such as the law) is concentrated in CBD significantly. The business branch (such as bank) is concentrated in highly density of population district. And then the type of branches with distribution and transport (such as storehouse) is even more concentrated in convenient communications district. Next, the influences of factors on general office location choice have obvious difference to branch office. |
| Reference: | 1.不動產季刊（1993-1998），梁振英不動產投資顧問有限公司，No.1-20。
2.李如君（1997），台北地區住宅租金水準之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
3.金家禾（1999），邁向世界都市之台北都會區產業結構與空間分佈變遷，1999年中華民國區域科學學會年會發表論文。
4.林元興、陳錦賜（2000），影響家庭住宅費用各種因素之探討，住宅學報，Vol.9, No.1，33-48。
5.林祖嘉（1990），台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究，台灣銀行季刊，43：1，279-312。
6.林祖嘉、林素菁（1993），台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析，住宅學報，No.1，21-45。
7.林秋瑾（1996）,穩健性住宅租金模式之探討—異常點之分析，住宅學報，No.4，51-72。
8.唐富藏（1986），外部性，經濟學百科全書8，聯經出版事業公司。
9.徐瑞梅（1985），台北市土地混合使用之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
10.陳明吉（1989），房地產價格及其變動因素之影響，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
11.陳彥仲（1997），有關多項logit模型對參數指定方式的議論及比較分析，1997年中華民國區域科學學會年會發表論文。
101.------- (1987), The Cyclic Behavior of the National Office Market, AREUEA Journal, 15: 4, Winter, 281-299.
102.Wheaton, W. C. and Torto, R. (1992), Office Rent Indices and Their Behavior Over Time, Center for Real Estate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, January. Draft.
103.Williams, K., E. Burton and M. Jenks (2000), Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, E & FN Spon, An Imprint of Taylor and Francis: London and New York.
104.Wu, Fulong (2000), Modelling Intrametropolitan Location of Foreign Investment Firms in a Chinese City, Urban Studies, 37:13, 2441-2464.
105.Zellner, A. (1962), An Efficient Methods of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348-368.
12.陳建良、林祖嘉（1998），財富效果、所得效果與住宅需求，住宅學報，No.7，83-99 。
13.曾慧真（1999），新竹市住宅區商業混合使用環境品質之研究，中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
14.張麗姬（1994），從遠期契約和現貨的角度論預售屋和成屋的價格關係--以台北市為例，住宅學報，No.2，67-85。
15.張金鶚、白金安（1995），以遠期交易與期貨定價理論探討國內預售屋價格之研究，行政院國科會。
16.張金鶚、林秋瑾、楊宗憲（1995），台灣地區住宅價格指數之研究，經建會專題研究。
17.張金鶚、范垂爐（1993），房地產真實交易價格之研究，住宅學報，No.1，75-97。
18.張金鶚（1999），住宅資訊系統之整合與規劃研究，內政部營建署。
19.黃健二（1991），都市住宅區可相容使用用途與分類之研究，內政部建築研究所籌備處。
20.黃名義、張金鶚（1999）,台北市辦公室市場租金之研究，中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論文集，77-93。
21.-------（2000），不同產業大型企業辦公室區位選擇之研究，2000年中華民國住宅學會第九屆年會發表論文。
22.-------（2002），辦公室、住宅與住辦混合租金之比較分析---面積、區位與產品異質性之影響，都市與計劃，預計刊登於第二十八卷，第三期。
23.黃名義（2000），高科技產業與傳統產業大型企業辦公室區位選擇之研究，2000年第一屆地政學術研討會發表論文。
24.-------（2001），不同產業企業總部辦公室之區位選擇，建築學報，第38期，129-146。
25.楊重信（2001），台灣都市製造業動態外部之實證，2001年中華民國區域科學學會年會暨論文研討會發表論文。
26.諮群不動產評論期刊（1998），諮群企業管理顧問股份有限公司，December。
27.劉秀玲（1992），台北市住宅品質對住宅價格影響關係之探討，國立中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
28.賴春綢（1990），住商工混合地區生活環境之研究：以台北市大同區大同段為例，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
29.薛立敏（1990），台北市房價上漲決定因素之估計，台灣金融情勢與物價問題研討會論文集，中央研究院經濟研究所。
<br>30.Aldrich, J. and F. Nelson (1984), Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models, Sage Pubilications: New York.
31.Alonso, W. (1964), Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent, Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
32.Beale, C. L. and M. A. Butler (1994), Rural-Urban Continuum Codes for Metro and Nonmetro Counties, 1993. USDA Staff Report No. 9425.
33.Benjamin, J. D., G. S. Sirmans and E. N. Zietz (1997), Security Measures and the Apartment Market, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 14:3, 347-358.
34.Belsley, D. A., E. Huh and R. E. Welsch (1980), Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Source of Collinearity, John Wiley and Sons: New York.
35.Bodenman, J. E. (2000), Firm Characteristics and Location: The Case of the Institutional Investment Advisory Industry in the United States, 1983-1996, Regional Science, 79, 33-56.
36.Breheny, M. (1992), Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Pion: London.
37.Brennan, T. P., R. E. Cannaday and P. F. Colwell (1984), Office Rent in The Chicago CBD, AREUEA Journal, 12:3, Fall, 243-60.
38.Cassel, E. and R. Mendelsohn (1985), The Choice of Functional Forms for Hedonic Price Equations: Comment, Journal of Urban Economics, 18, 135-142.
39.Cervero, R. and K. Kockelman (1997), Travel Demand and the 3Ds:density, diversity and design, Transportation Research D, 2:3, 199-219.
40.Clapp, J. M. (1979), The Substitution of Urban Land for Other Inputs, Journal of Urban Economics, 6, 122-134.
41.------- (1980), The Intrametropolitan Location of Office Activities, Journal of Regional Science, 20:3, 387-99.
42.------- (1993), Dynamics of Office Markets, AREUEA Monograph Series, No.1.
43.Clapp, J. M., H. O. Pollakowski and L. Lynford (1992), Intrametropolitan Location and Office Market Dynamics, AREUEA Journal, 20:2, 229-257.
44.Coffey, W. J. and A. S. Bailly (1992), Producer Services and Systems of Flexible Production, Urban Studies, 29:6, 857-868.
45.Coffey, W. J. and M. Polese (1987), Trade and Location of Producer Services: A Canadian Perspective, Environment and Planning A, 19, 63-71.
46.Colwell, P. F. and R. E. Cannaday (1988), Trade-Offs in the Office Market, Chap. 8 in J. M. Clapp and S. D. Messner, Editors, Real Estate Market Analysis, 172-191, Praeger.
47.Colwell, P. F., H. J. Munneke and J. W. Trefzger (1998), Chicago`s Office Market: Price Indices, Location and Time, Real Estate Economics, 26:1, 83-106.
48.Frank, L. and G. Pivo (1994), Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single Occupant Vehicle, Transit and Walking, Transportation Research Record, 1446, 44-52.
49.Fujita, M. (1989), Urban Economic Theory—Land Use and City Size, Cambridge University Press.
50.Gat, D. (1998), Urban Focal Points and Design Quality Influence Rents: The Case of the Telaviv Office Market, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 16:2, 229-247.
51.Georgantzas, N. and L. Shilton (1992), Corporate Creativity and Control: Manhattan Office Demand, Presented at The International System Dynamics Conference, Amsterdam, July.
52.Glascock, J. L., S. Jahanian and C. F. Sirmans (1990), An Analysis of Office Market Rents: Some Empirical Evidence, AREUEA Journal, 18:1, 105-119.
53.Guntermann, K. L. and S. Norrbin (1987), Explaining the Variability of Apartment Rent, AREUEA Journal, 15:4, 321-340.
54.Gujarati, D. N. (1988), Basic Econometrics, McGRAW-HILL International Editions.
55.Hansen, E. (1987), Industrial Location Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 17, 89-108.
56.Hansen, N. (1994), The Strateaic Role of Producer Services in Regional Development, International Regional Science Review, 16:1~2, 187-195.
57.Hanson, R (ed.). (1983), Rethinking Urban Policy Development in Advanced Economies, National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
58.Holloway, S. and J. Wheeler (1991), Corporate Headquarters Relocation and Changes in Metropolitan Corporate Dominance, 1980-87, Economic Geography, 67:1, 55-72.
59.Hosmer, D. W. and S. Lemeshow (1989), Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons.
60.Hough, D. E. and C. G. Kratz (1983), Can ‘Good‘ Architecture Meet the Market Test? , Journal of Urban Economics, 14:1, July, 40-54.
61.Hysom, J. L. and P. J. Crawford (1997), The Evolution of Office Building Research, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 5:2, 145-158.
62.Ihlanfeldt, K. R. and M. D. Raper (1990), The Intrametropolitan of New Office Firms, Land Economics, 66:2, 182-198.
63.Jenks, M., E. Burton and K. Williams (1996), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? E & FN Spon, An Imprint of Chapman and Hall, London.
64.Knight, C. (1996), Economic and Social Issues, In The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (eds Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M.), E & FN Spon, An Imprint of Chapman and Hall, London.
65.Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishiny (1992), The Structure and Performance of the Money Management Industry, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, The Brookings Institution, Washington.
66.Liao, T. F. (1994), Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models, (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-101), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.Lichtenberg, R. M. (1960), One-tenth of a National, Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
68.Lucas, R. E. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22:3-42.
69.Marks (1984), The Effect of Rent Control on the Price of Rental Housing: An Hedonic Approach, Land Economics February, 81-94.
70.Maddala, G. S. (1989), Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Chap. 2, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
71.Mcfadden, D. (1978), Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in Zaredmbka, P. (ed.) (1973), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press: New York.
72.------- (1981), Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, ed. by C. F. Manski and D. Mcfadden, The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
73.Mills, E. (1967), An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in A Metropolitan Area, American Economic Review, 57:2, 197-210.
74.Mills, E.S. (1992), Office Rent Determinants in the Chicago Area, AREUEA Journal, 20:1, 273-287.
75.Nicholson, W. (1978), Microeconomic Theory, Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
76.O`Hara, D. J. (1977), Location of Firms Within a Square Central Business District, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1189-1207.
77.Ota, M. and M. Fujita (1993), Communication Technologies and Spatial Organization of Multi-Unit Firms in Metropolitan Areas, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23, 695-729.
78.Petherick, A. (1991), Benefits of Over-The-Shop Schemes for Local Authorities, In Living Over The Shop, Working Paper No.3, University of New York.
79.Pivo, G. (1993), A Taxonomy of Suburban Office Clusters: The Case of Toronto, Urban Studies, 30, 31-49.
80.Poter, M. (1998), Location, Clusters, and The “New” Micro Economics of Competition, Business Economics, 33:1, 7-13.
81.Rohrer, J. (1990), Money Management Powerhouses. Institutional Investor January: 44-49.
82.Romer, P. M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economic, 94, 1002-1037.
83.------- (1990), Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economic, 98:2, Pt.2:s71-s101.
84.Rosen, S. (1974), Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34-55.
85..Rubin, M., I. Wagner and P. Kramer (1976), Industrial Migration: A Case Study of Destination by City-Suburban Origin within The New York Metropolitan Area, AREUEA Journal, 6, 417-27.
86.Rutgers (1991), The Effect of Rent Control on Housing Quality: A Longitudinal Analysis, Working Paper.
87.Schreuder, Y. (1995), Geographical Clustering of The Pharmaceutical Industry in Mid-Atlantic US, NSF Award 950488, National Science Foundation: Washington DC.
88. Scott, A. J. (1988), New Industrial Spaces, Pion: London.
89.Sirmans, G. S. and J. D. Benjamin (1990), Examining the variability of apartment rent, The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, 43-48.
90.Sirri, E. R. and P. Tufano (1993), Competition and Change in the Mutual Fund and Industry. In: Hayes SL (Ed) Financial Services: Perspectives and Challenges. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.
91.Shilling, J. D., C. F. Sirmans and J. B. Corgel (1992), Natural Office Vacancy Rates: Some Additional Estimates, Journal of Urban Economics, 31: 140-43.
92.Shilton, L. and J. Webb (1995), Office Employment and Headquarters Location in The New York City Region, Journal of Real Estate Economics and Finance, 10, 145-59.
93.Shilton, L. and C. Stanley (1999), Spatial Patterns of Headquarters, Journal of Real Estate Research, 17:3, 341-64.
94.Shukla, V. and P. Waddell (1991), Firm Location and Land Use in Discrete Urban Space: A Study of the Spatial Structure of Dallas-Fort Worth, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1, 225-253.
95.Solow, R. M. (1973), On Equilibrium Models of Urban Locations. In J. M. Parkin, Ed., Essays in Modern Economics, 2-16, Longman: London.
96.Stretton, H. (1996), Density, Efficient and Equality in Australian City, in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (eds Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M.), E & FN Spon: London.
97.Thibodeou, T. G. (1990), Estimating the effect of high-rise office buildings on residential property values, Land economics, 66:4, 402-408.
98.Van, Uyen-Phen and M. Senior (2000), The Contribution of Mixed Land Uses to Sustainable Travel in Cities, in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, (eds Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks M.), E & FN Spon, An Imprint of Taylor and Francis: London and New York.
99.Von Thünen, J. H. (1826), Der Isoliererte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalekonomie: Hamburg.
100.Wheaton, W. C. (1984), The Incidence of Interjurisdictional Differences in Commercial Property Taxes, National Tax Journal, 37: 4, December, 515-527. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
86257502
90 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 382 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
