政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35923
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51071664      Online Users : 938
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35923


    Title: 產業群聚、政府與企業—臺北新竹四個產業園區的比較研究
    Authors: 麻匡復
    Contributors: 邊泰明
    麻匡復
    Keywords: 產業群聚
    制度
    公共領域
    政府
    industrial cluster
    institutions
    public domain
    the state
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 16:24:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 相較於過去認為政策導向產業園區開發成效優於市場導向產業園區的研究，本論文從產業群聚的觀點重新檢視兩種園區，則並未發現上述的現象，內科與土城頂埔的發展成就，也突顯了市場導向產業園區對於產業群聚的調適性要快於政策導向的產業園區。制度架構的完整性是形成上述狀況的主要原因，也就是第二章理論與文獻中所提到的「公共領域」是否充足的問題。臺北新竹地區一直是世界知名的電子產業群聚地點，甚至有亞洲矽谷的美稱(Mathews, 1997)，這裡不僅匯集了臺積電、鴻海與廣達等知名企業，也有像是新竹科學園區、南港軟體園區、頂埔科技園區以及內湖科技園區等具有高新聞性的產業園區。<br>在竹科與南軟的個案中，政府都透過政策直接規範廠商規模與產業結構，單就園區開發與招商而言，明確的制度規範固然有助於降低開發招商過程的不確定性與交易成本，但就強調廠商間彼此互動而衍生出綜效 (synergy) 的產業群聚而言，完善的制度規範與政策引導反而限縮了廠商的互動機會，讓非交易性依賴的形成遭遇困境。反觀幾乎沒有制度規範的內科與土城頂埔園區，由市場自行決定進駐廠商規模與產業結構，則提供了廠商非交易依賴的形成基礎。由上可知，廠商 (市場) 而非政府政策才是產業園區創造產業群聚效應的主要形成原因。
    Reference: 于宗先與王金利 (2003)，一隻看得見的手—政府在經濟發展過程中的角色，臺灣經濟論叢10，臺北：聯經出版社。
    天下雜誌編輯部 (2005)，2005全臺1000大製造業特刊，臺北：天下雜誌社。
    王蘭生 (1993)，工業區位政策應用領域式發展途徑之評估—由台灣工業區開發經驗論起，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    朱凌毅 (2003)，浮現中的地方發展型國家？臺北內湖科技園區與上海張江高科技園區的比較。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    吳思華與沈榮欽(1999)，臺灣積體電路產業的形成與發展，收錄於蔡敦浩編，管理資本在臺灣，頁57-150，臺北：遠流出版社。
    吳敏華(2002)，臺灣產業空間在地條件之研究—以科學園區為例，國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。
    李立國 (2004)，智慧型軟體工業園區開發、興建與營運管理之研究，國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
    李翠卿 (2004)，三千寵愛集一身—南港軟體工業園區，就業情報雜誌第337期。
    周志龍 (2002)，全球化、臺灣國土再結構與制度，臺北：詹氏書局。
    周素卿 (1997)，都市政治與都市發展政策：以臺北市信義計畫區和南港經貿園區為例，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    林保全 (2004)，臺灣積體電路工業策略聯盟趨勢分析之研究，國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    林森田 (2002)，土地使用分區之制度經濟分析，土地問題研究季刊，第1卷第1期，頁9-18。
    林德福 (2003)，全球經濟中浮現的北臺都會區域—後進者全球生產網絡與空間結構轉化之研究(1980-1990年代末)，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。
    紀建良 (2004)，大有為到小而美—從內科廠商空間集結過程論證全球化作用下臺灣政府角色轉變，元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士學位論文。
    胡太山 (2003)，知識創新、產業聚群與區域發展─新竹高科技區域之發展論述，新竹：建都文化。
    徐進鈺 (1998)，邁向一個學習性的區域？臺北—新竹高科技走廊的廠商聚集與技術學習，師大地理研究報告，第29期，頁143-159。
    徐進鈺 (1999)，流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展，臺灣社會研究季刊，第35期，頁1-29。
    徐進鈺與鄭陸霖 (2001)，全球在地化的地理學：跨界組織場域的統理，都市與計劃，第28卷第4期，頁391-411。
    財團法人環境規劃與城鄉研究文教基金會 (2004)，工業區產業群聚調查及策略規劃，經濟部工業局委託。
    張維安與高承恕 (2001)，政府與企業：臺灣半導體產業發展的分析，收錄於張維安編，臺灣的企業組織結構與競爭力，頁57-92，臺北：聯經出版社。
    許松根與莊朝榮 (1991)，我國工業用地政策之探討，中央研究院經濟研究所現代經濟探討叢書第13種，臺北：中央研究院。
    陳介玄 (1994)，協力網絡與生活結構—臺灣中小企業的社會經濟分析，臺北：聯經出版社。
    陳志柔 (2001)，中國大陸農村財產權制度變遷的地方制度基礎：閩南與蘇南的地區差異，台灣社會學，第2期，頁219-262。
    陳東升 (1997)，積體電路產業組織網絡的形式及其形成的制度基礎，收錄於：張維安編，臺灣的企業組織結構與競爭力，臺灣經濟論叢8，臺北：聯經出版社。
    陳東升 (2003)，積體網路：臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析，臺北：群學出版社。
    陳玟君 (2003)，群聚觀點下的的產業空間分布之研究：以電子產業為例，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    陳冠甫 (1988)，臺灣高科技工業的依賴發展與空間結構—新竹科學園區的個案，臺灣社會研究季刊，第一期，頁113-149。
    彭漣漪 (2004)，「科技加人文，打造『臺灣第e都』」，2005年10月20日取自e天下雜誌電子版，網址：http://www.techvantage.com.tw/content/044/044084.asp。
    彭懷恩 (1990)，臺灣發展的政治經濟分析，臺北：風雲論壇出版社。
    黃玉蓮 (2005)，臺北市政府內科行銷策略之研究—以SWOT為分析焦點，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士學位論文。
    新竹科學工業園區管理局 (2000)，新竹科學工業園區廿週年紀念專刊，臺北：行政院國家科學委員會出版。
    楊友仁與夏鑄九 (2005)，跨界生產網絡之在地鑲嵌與地方性制度之演化：以大東莞地區為例，都市與計劃，第32卷第3期，頁277-301。
    楊智盛 (2004)，臺灣地區製造業產業群聚之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    詹偉雄 (2005)，美學的經濟—臺灣社會變遷的60個微型觀察，臺北：風格者出版。
    臺北市政府建設局網站，http://ibs.taipei-elife.net/cgi-bin/big5/ibs2005/ae09。
    蔡佩純 (2004)，區域創新系統下數位遊戲產業技術與知識網絡之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    蕭西君 (2001)，臺北市—白領專業的天堂，cheers快樂工作人雜誌第8期。
    龐建國 (1993)，國家發展理論：兼論臺灣發展經驗，臺北：巨流圖書公司。
    邊泰明 (2005)，臺北市新興產業發展策略分析研究—臺北市工業區產業發展自治條例(草案)之研擬，臺北市政府建設局委託研究，未出版。
    Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365-378.
    Amin, A. (1999). The Emilian model: institutional challenges. European Planning Studies. 7(4):389-405.
    Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995). Institutional issues for the European regions: from markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association, Economy and Society, 24(1), 41-66.
    Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995). Globalisation, institutional thickness and the local economy, in P.Healey et al. eds, Managing cities: the new urban context, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global: In Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds). Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford:Oxford University Press.pp1-22.
    Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), 571-587.
    Amsden, A.(1985). The state and Taiwan’s economic development. In Evans, P., Rueschemyer, D., and Skocpol, T.(Ed.), Bringing the State Back In. (pp.78-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Amsden, A., and Chu, W-W. (2003). Beyond late development: Taiwan’s upgradeing policies, Mass: MIT Press.
    Antonelli, C. (2000). Collective knowledge communication and innovation:the evidence of technological districts, Regional Studies, 34(6), 535-547.
    Aoyama, Y. (1999). Policy intervention for industrial network formation: contrasting historical underpinnings of the small business policy in Japan and the United States, Small Business Economics, 12,217-231.
    Araujo, L. (1998). Knowing and Learning as Networking. Management Learning, 29(3), 317-336.
    Arthur, B. (1989). Competiting technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, Economic Journal, 99,116-131.
    Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Belussi, F. (1999). Path-dependency vs. industrial dynamics: an analysis of two heterogeneous districts, Human System Management, 18, 161-174.
    Bergman, E., and Feser, E. (1999). Industrial and regional clusters: concepts and comparative application, the web book of regional science, West Virginia: West Virginia University.
    Best, M. (1990). The New Competition, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    Biemans, W. (1996). Organizational networks: toward a cross-fertilization between practice and theory, Journal of Business Research, 35:29-39.
    Boari, C., and Lipparini, A. (1999). Networks within industrial districts: organizing knowledge creation and transfer by means of moderate hierarchies, Journal of Management and Governance, 3:339-360.
    Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
    Boschma, R. and Lambooy, J.(2002). Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts, Growth and Change, 33(2), 291-311.
    Boschma, R. and Lambooy, J. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 411-429.
    Braczyk ,H. J, Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world, London : UCL Press.
    Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., and Saxenian, A. (2001). Old economy inputs for new economy outputs: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4):835-860.
    Breznltz, D. (2005). Development, flexibility and R & D performance in the Taiwanese IT industrial: capability creation and the effects of state-industry coevolution, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(1):153-187.
    Bromley, D. (1997). Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims in a Dynamic World. Contemporary Economic Policy. 15: 43-54.
    Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralization and social integration, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, 167-184.
    Burt, R. S.(1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Camagni, P. (1995). The concept of “innovative milieu” and its relevance for public policies in european lagging regions, Papers in Regional Science, 74,317-340.
    Caniëls, M., and Romijn, H. (2003). Firm-level knowledge accumulation and regional dynamics, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6):1253-1278.
    Chen, J-S., and Paliwoda, S. (2002). On the application of multi-branding strategy, American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings: Chicago, 13:43-49.
    Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 3: 1-44.
    Cooke, M. (2004). The politics of greater China’s integration into the global info tech supply chain, Journal of Contemporary China, 13(40):491-506.
    Cooke, P. and . Morgan, K.(1998). The associational economy: firms, regions, and innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Cumbers, A. and MacKinnon, D. (2004). Introduction: clusters in urban and regional development, Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 959-969.
    Deyo, F.(1987). Introduction. In Deyo, F.(Ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. (pp.11-22). Ithaca, NY: CornellUniversity Press.
    Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535-556.
    Ernst, D. (2001). Small firms competing in globalized high-tech industries: the co-evolution of domestic and international knowledge linkages in Taiwan’s computer industrial, In: Guerrieri, P., Iammarino, S. and Pietrobelli, C. (eds.) The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, Northhampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 95-130.
    Ernst, D. et al. (1999). New chanllenges for industrial clusters and districts: global production networks and knowledge diffusion, in: P. Guerrieri, S. Iammarino, and C. Pietrobelli eds, The global challenge to industrial districts: small and medium enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, Northhampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy : States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Fan, C. and Scott, A. (2003). Industrial agglomerateion and development: a survey of spatiall economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions, Economic Geography, 77(4):315-328.
    Fan, P. and Goyal, V. (2006). On the pattern and wealth effects of vertical mergers, Journal of Business, 79(2):877-902.
    Feenstra, R. and Hamilton G. (2006). Emergent Economies, Divergent Paths: Economic Organization and International Trade in South Koera and Taiwan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Feldman, M., Francis, J., and Bercovitz, J. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters, Regional Studies, 39(1):129-141.
    Flamm, K. (1993). Semiconductor dependency and strategic trade policy, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1993(1):249-333.
    Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region, Futures, 27:527-536.
    Forfas Institute, (2004) Innovation Networks, Forfas institute, http://www.forfas.ie/publications/_list/innovation.html [15 April 2005]
    Foxall, G. R. (1988). Marketing New Technology: Markets, Hierarchies, and User-initiated Innovation. Managerial and Decision Economic), 9(3), 237-250.
    Gertler, M. (2001). Best practice? geography, learning and the institutional limits to strong covergence, Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 5-26.
    Gold, T. (1986). State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. White Plains, NY: M.E.Sharpe, Inc.
    Gordon, I. and McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37(3), 513-532.
    Grabher, G., and Stark, D. (1997). Organizing diversity: Evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies, 31(5), 533-544.
    Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic acton and social structure , American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510.
    Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic socilogy, in: N. Nohria and R. Eccles eds, Networks and organizations: form and action, 25-56, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Express.
    Guerrieri, P., Iammarino, S., and Pietobelli, C. (2001). The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
    Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21:203-215.
    Hamilton, . (2006).
    Harrison, B. (1992). Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5): 469-483.
    Hedlund, G. (1993). Assumption of hierarchy nad heterarchy: an application to the multinational corporation. In Ghoshal, S. and Westney, D. (eds) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, 211-236. New York : St. Martin`s Press
    Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Martin, H., Coe, N., and Yeung, W.C. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development, Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 436-464.
    Henry, N. and S. Pinch.(2001). Neo-Marshallian Nodes, Institutional Thickness, and Britain’s “Motor Sport Valley”: Thick or Thin? Environment and Planning A. 33:1169-1183.
    Hess, M. (2004). Spatial relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness, Progress in Human Geography, 28(2):165-186.
    Hodgson, M.(1988) Economics and Institutions, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Hospers, G-J. and S. Beugelsdijk. (2002). Regional cluster policies: learning by comparing? Kylos, 55(3), 381-402.
    Hsu, J.Y. (2006). The dynamic firm-territory nexus of Taiwanese informatics industry investment in China, Growth and Change, 37(2): 230-254.
    Husted, B. (1994). Transaction costs, norms, and social networks: a preliminary study of cooperation in industrial buyer-seller relationships in United State and Mexico, Business and Society, 33(1):30-57.
    Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university-industrial-government relationship during transition, Research Policy, 33, 975-995.
    Jakobsen, S-E. and Onsager, K. (2005). Head office location: agglomeration, clusters or flow nodes?. Urban Studies. 42(9): 1517-1535.
    Johansson, B., and Quigley, J. (2004). Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies, Papers in Regional Science, 83:164-176.
    Jou, S-C., and Chen, D-S. (2001). Keeping the high-tech region open and dynamic: the organizational networks of Taiwan’s integrated circuit industry, GeoJournal, 53:81-87.
    Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore, B., and Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning process, networking and `institutional thickness` in the Cambridge region. Regional Studies, 33(4), 319-332.
    Kenny, M., And Patton, D.(2005). Entrepreneurial Geographies: Support Networks in three High-Technology Industries. Economic Geography .81(2): 201-228.
    Khan, H. (2004). Technology and economic development: the case of Taiwan, Journal of Contemporary China, 13(40):507-521.
    Khan, J. and Ghani, J. (2004). Clusters and entrepreneurship: implications for innovation in a developing economy, Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 9(3):221-238.
    Kuo, W-J., and Wang, J-C. (2001). The dynamics of Taiwan’s SMEs: the case of electronics, In: Guerrieri, P., Iammarino, S. and Pietrobelli, C. (eds.) The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, Northhampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 63-94.
    Kurgman, P. (1991). History and industrial location: the case of manufacturing belt, American Economic Review, 81(2), 80-83.
    Lau, L.(1997). The Role of Government in Economic Development: Some Observations from the Experience of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In Aoki, M., Kim, H-K., and Fujiwara, M-O. (Ed.), The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis. (pp.41-73). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Lechner, C., and Dowling, M. (1999). The Evolution of Industrial Districts and Regional Networks: The Case of the Biotechnology Region Munich/Martinsried. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(4), 309-338.
    Libecap, G.(1989). Contracting for Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lorenz, E. H.(1992). Trust, community and cooperation: towards a theory of industrial districts, in: Storper M, Scott A .J Eds, Pathways to industrialization and regional development, Routledge, London.
    Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the “new regionalism”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379-395.
    MaCann, P., and Gordon, I. (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks. Urban Studies, 37(3), 513-532.
    MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., and Chapman, K. (2002). Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates, Progress in Human Geography, 26(3):293-311.
    MacLeod, G. (2001). Beyond soft institutionalism: accumulation, regulation, and their geographical fixes, Environment and Planning A, 33,1145-1167.
    Maillet, D. (1995). Territorial dynamics, innovative milieus and regional policy, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7:157-165.
    Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of local economies, Environment and Planning A, 34(3):429-449.
    Markusen, A. (1994). Studying regions by studying firms, Professional Geographer, 46(4):477-490.
    Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72(3):293-313.
    Markusen, A. (1999) Fuzzy concept, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies, Regional studies, 33(9),869-884.
    Markusen, A. (1999).Fuzzy concept, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies, Regional studies, 33(9),869-884.
    Martin, R. (1999). The new “geographical turn” in economics: some critical reflections, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(1), 65-91.
    Martin, R. (2001) Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda, Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 189-210.
    Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chatoic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5-35.
    Martinez, J. and Jarillo, O. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 489-514.
    Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-943.
    Maskell, P., and Lorenzen, M. (2004). The cluster as market organization. Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 991-1009.
    Mathews, J. (1997). A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry. California Management Review. 39(4): 26-54.
    McCann, P., and Sheppard, S. (2003). The rise, fall and rise again of industrial location theory, Regional Studies, 37(6/7):649-663.
    Miller, G. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas: the Political Economy of Hierarchy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Molina-Morales, X.F, and Fernandez-Martinez, T.M. (2004). How much difference is there between industrial district firms? A net value creation approach, Research Policy, 33:473-486.
    Morris, J. (2002). Flexibility internationalization in the electronics industry: implications for regional economies, Environment and Planning C, 10:407-421.
    Nelson, R. and Winter, S.(1982). An evolutionary theory of economic growth, Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
    Newlands, D. (2003). Competition and cooperation in industrial clusters: the implications for public policy, European Planning Studies, 11(5), 521-532.
    North, D. (1981). Structure and change in economic history, New York: Norton Press.
    North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups , Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University press.
    Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the revolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Pang, C-K.(1992). The State and Economic Transformation: The Taiwan Case. NY: Garland Publishing Ltd.
    Phelps, N. (2004). Clusters, dispersion and space in between: for an economic geography of the banal, Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 971-989.
    Piore, M. and Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide : Possibilities for Prosperity, New York : Basic Books.
    Pohl, N.(2004). Where is Wall Street? Financial Geography After 09/11. The Industrial Geographer. 2(1): 72-93.
    Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
    Porter, M. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations :With a New Introduction, New York : Macmillan Business
    Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Bowie, J. I., and Smith-Doerr, L. (2002). The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships. Regional Studies 36(3): 291-305.
    Qiu, Y. (2005). Personal networks, institutional involvement, and foreign direct investment flows into China’s interior, Economic Geography, 81(3):261-281.
    Raco, M.(1999). Competition, Collaboration and New Industrial Districts: Examining The Institutional Turn In Local Economic Development. Urban Studies. 36(5-6):951-968.
    Robertson, P. and Langlois, R. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration, Research Policy, 24:543-562.
    Rugman, A., And Verbeke, A.(1998). Multinational Enterprises and Public Policy. Journal of International Business Studies. 29(1): 115-136.
    Rugman, A., and Verbeke, A.(2005). Toward a Theory of Regional Multinationals: A Transaction Cost Economics Approach. Management International Review. 45(Special Issue 1): 5-17.
    Rugman, A., and Verbeke, A.(2005). Toward a Theory of Regional Multinationals: A Transaction Cost Economics Approach. Management International Review. 45(Special Issue 1): 5-17.
    Sadler, D. (2004) Cluster evolution, the transformation of old industrial regions and the steel industry supply chain in north east England, Regional Studies, 38(1), 55-66.
    Saka-Helmhout, A. and Karabulut, E. (2006). Institutional barriers to entrepreneurship in clusters: evidence from the Turkish textile sector”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1(2):128-146.
    Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a world economy, Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press.
    Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 .Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    Saxenian, A. L., and Hsu, J. (2001). The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 893-920.
    Scott, A. (1988). New industrial spaces, London: Aldershot: Ashgate.
    Simpson, W. (1992) Urban structure and the labor market: worker mobility, commuting and underemployment in cities, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    St John, C. and Pouder, R. (2006). Technology clusters versus industry clusters: resources, networks, and regional advantages, Growth and Change, 37(2):141-171.
    Staber, U. (2001). The structure of networks in industrial districts, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(3):537-552.
    Storper, M. (1988). The transaction to flexible specialization in the US film industry: external economics, the division of labor, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13, 273-305.
    Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2:191-222.
    Stroper, M. (1997). The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York: Guilford Press.
    Sturgeon, T. (2003). What really goes on in Silicon Valley? Spatial clustering and dispersal in modular production networks, Journal of Economic Geography, 3:199-225.
    Taylor, M. and Asheim, B. (2001). The concept of the firm in economic geography, Economic Geography, 77(4):315-328.
    Torre, A. and Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization, Regional Studies, 39(1):47-59.
    Tullock, G. (1993). Rent-Seeking. Aldershot, Hants, England : Brookfield, Vt.Edward Elgar Press.
    Veronigue, S., and Stam, E. (2003). The Evolution and Nature of Young Firm Networks: A Longitudinal Perspective. Small Business Economics. 21(2): 115-134.
    Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the role of the Government in the East Asian Industrialization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Walcott, S.(2002).Chinese industrial and science parks: bridging the gap,. Professional Geographer ,54, 349-364.
    Wang, J.H. and Lee, C.K.(forthcoming). Global production networks and local institutional building: the development of the information technology industry in Suzhou, China. Environment and Planning A.
    Webster, C. and Lai, W.C. (2003). Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Williamson, O. (1975). Market and Hierarchy: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
    Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.
    Wood, A., Watt, D., and Wardle, P. (2004). Growth-orented small firms and the nature extent of local embeddedness: the case of a traditional metalworking cluster, Growth and Change, 35(4):419-433.
    Wood, G. and Parr, J. (2005). Transaction costs, agglomeration economies, and industrial location, Growth and Change, 36(1):1-15.
    Yeung, W.C. (2005). The firm as social networks: an organizational perspective, Growth and Change, 36(3):307-328.
    Zook, M. (2004) The Knowledge Brokers: Venture Capitalists, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 621-641.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    91257501
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0912575012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    57501201.pdf34KbAdobe PDF2808View/Open
    57501202.pdf151KbAdobe PDF2822View/Open
    57501203.pdf596KbAdobe PDF2997View/Open
    57501204.pdf683KbAdobe PDF21168View/Open
    57501205.pdf841KbAdobe PDF2893View/Open
    57501206.pdf927KbAdobe PDF21361View/Open
    57501207.pdf944KbAdobe PDF21106View/Open
    57501208.pdf930KbAdobe PDF21034View/Open
    57501209.pdf1119KbAdobe PDF21102View/Open
    57501210.pdf469KbAdobe PDF2946View/Open
    57501211.pdf414KbAdobe PDF2919View/Open
    57501212.pdf257KbAdobe PDF21279View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback