政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35831
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50817513      在线人数 : 616
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35831


    题名: 台灣地區農地重劃制度調整之研究
    A Study on the Adjustment of Farmland Consolidation Institution in Taiwan
    作者: 丁秀吟
    Ding,Hsiu Yin
    贡献者: 林森田
    Lin,Sen Tyan
    丁秀吟
    Ding,Hsiu Yin
    关键词: 農地重劃
    農村社區土地重劃
    集村農舍
    制度變遷
    制度調整
    farmland consolidation
    rural community land readjustment
    cluster farmhouse
    institutional change
    institutional adjustment
    日期: 2007
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 16:09:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　目前台灣地區農村發展之生產與生活面功能係由農地重劃、農村社區土地重劃及農地興建農舍等三個制度執行來達成，其中透過農地重劃達經濟面之生產功能，而藉由農村社區土地重劃與農地興建農舍制度提供生活面之需求。然制度個別執行之結果，不僅導致生產農地之破壞與流失，亦增加農地利用之交易成本。面臨這些問題，生產農地之維護為當務之急。雖然長期以來農地重劃為維護農地生產力之主要制度，但由於農地重劃之發展受到制度變遷路徑相依之影響，不易因應社會變遷而改變其只具單一生產功能之制度內涵，故若要同時達到農村地區之生產與生活功能，或可透過農地重劃之制度調整解決問題並兼顧生產與生活功能之農村發展。
    　　因此本研究基於制度變遷之理論基礎，針對台灣地區實施農地重劃之制度變遷進行分析，探討於社經環境變動過程，農地重劃所扮演角色之轉變，以為檢視現行農地重劃制度問題之基礎。並透過政府嘗試結合辦理農地重劃與農村社區土地重劃進行個案分析，揭示目前農村地區追求生產與生活功能同時兼備之必要性，以及於現行制度環境下，二個制度進行結合辦理之制度調整方向，產生了執行時程、重劃負擔及土地分配等問題與困難。故本研究進一步提出三個制度調整方案，利用ANP之多準則決策分析方法，評選出於多功能農地重劃之制度調整發展方向，為兼顧生產與生活等多功能目標之最佳制度調整方案。此外，針對多功能農地重劃制度之調整提出制度環境面與執行機制面之政策性建議，期望能對正在研擬與即將立法之農村再生條例草案中，整合型農地重劃之研擬與方向，提供於制度結合或制度創新上有所助益。
    Farmland consolidation institution in Taiwan has only been applied to improve the production environment during the past 50 years. Nowadays, due to the dramatic change of social and economic environment in Taiwan as well as the tendency of multifunctional rural community and agricultural development, the institution is due to proper consideration to be altered. In addition, the separately enforcement of three institutions i.e. farmland consolidation, building of farmhouse and rural community consolidation, results in the serious pollution of agricultural environment and the loss of high- quality farmland. How to adjust the current institution of farmland consolidation so as to reach the objectives of both better production and living environment in rural areas is an important issue.
    This study, based on the institutional change theory, investigates the changing role of farmland consolidation in Taiwan. Moreover, examines the problems of integrating farmland consolidation and rural community land readjustment at Shihfen area located in Tainan County Cigou Towship is examined. After literatures review and the investigation of farmhouse as well as farmland use problems, proposes three alternative institutions of farmland consolidation. Analytical Network Process (ANP) Approach is employed to evaluate. Furthermore, the criteria and implication of the choosing institution are discussed so as to benefit the framework of integrated farmland consolidation in the Bill of the Revival of Rural Community.
    參考文獻: 中文
    1. 于宗先、毛育剛、林卿，2004，兩岸農地利用，喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會：臺北市。
    2. 內政部，2005，農地重劃實錄，內政部編印：臺北。
    3. 內政部土地重劃工程局，2005，九十四年度計畫實施台南縣七股鄉十份塭農地重劃區農水路暨相關改善工程先期規劃期末報告書，內政部：臺中。
    4. 內政部地政司，2003，臺閩地區辦理完成農地重劃區計表，內政部地政司編印：臺北。
    5. 王俊豪，2007，德國整合鄉村發展與土地管理政策，，農政與農情，第183期 (http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=13114)。
    6. 王國鈞，1978，臺灣實施農地重劃之回顧與展望，土地改革訓練所：土地重劃研討會議專輯，第16-60頁。
    7. 台灣省政府地政處，1987，台灣省加速完成農地重劃五年計畫評估報告，台灣省政府地政處印製：臺中。
    8. 立法院祕書處，1982，法律案專輯第四十三輯內政(十)－農地重劃條例案，立法院祕書處：臺北。
    9. 朱慶濤、王達恕、張泉香，1960，臺南縣大甲農地重劃，臺南縣政府印行：臺南。
    10. 行政院農業委員會，1991，農業綜合調整方案，行政院農業委員會編印：臺北。
    11. 行政院農業委員會，2005a，農地資源空間規劃配置構想研擬計畫(以三星鄉為例)，行政院農業委員會：臺北。
    12. 行政院農業委員會，2005b，農村聚落型態與農地規劃策略結合之研究（期末報告），行政院農業委員會。
    13. 吳功顯、趙靜慧，1998，台灣農地重劃之探討，人與地，第178期，第4-16頁。
    14. 周順福，1973，台灣省農地重劃之研討，國立政治大學私立中國地政研究所合辦地政研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    15. 東昇工程顧問有限公司，2005，九十四年度計畫實施台南縣七股鄉十分塭農村社區土地重劃先期規劃報告書，內政部：臺中。
    16. 林孟慶，2001，農村住宅政策配合農村發展之研究，國立中興大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文：臺中。
    17. 林柏璋，2005，農地重劃推動成果及未來政策方向調整，農政與農情，第162期 (http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=10424)。
    18. 林英彥，1973，台灣之農地重劃，台銀季刊，第24卷，第3期，pp.131-134。
    19. 林英彥，1976，農地政策論，幼獅文化事業公司：臺北。
    20. 林英彥，2000，台灣之農地重劃與大陸土地整理法制之比較，土地經濟年刊，第11期，第179-198頁。
    21. 林森田，2004，農業用地分區調整及其變更為非農業使用相關問題之研究，行政院農業委員會：臺北。
    22. 施傳旺，1999，農地重劃與農村社區更新結合辦理之可行性探討，台灣地政，第156期，第37-40頁。
    23. 徐宏明，2006，集村興建農舍之制度經濟分析，國立政治大學地政學系、中國地政研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    24. 翁振益與周瑛琪，2007，決策分析：方法與應用，華泰文化：臺北。
    25. 張志豪，1992，台灣與大陸農地改革之比較研究，蘇俄問題研究雜誌社：臺北。
    26. 張訓舜，1976，農地重劃與農業發展，土地改革月刊，第26卷，第4期，第25-29頁。
    27. 張維一、吳萬順與張桂霖，1983，配合農地重劃時機辦理社區土地重劃之研究，內政部地政司：臺北。
    28. 張維一與張桂霖，1984，實施農地重劃，內政部編印：臺北。
    29. 張耀文，2007，個別農舍與集村農舍制度的比較分析－以新竹縣為例，國立政治大學地政學系、中國地政研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    30. 許世強，2001，農發條例修正後新購農地興建農舍政策之探討，人與地，第212、213期，第55-84頁。
    31. 陳明燦，2000，我國農地之使用管制：國土規劃法制之觀點，月旦法學雜誌，第58期，第68-88頁。
    32. 陳明燦，2004，我國鄉村地區農地興建農舍之法制分析，台灣鄉村研究，第4期，第41-74頁。
    33. 陳武雄，1971，土地重劃辦法之商榷，國立臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    34. 陳意昌，2004，農地重劃地區土地利用與景觀變遷之研究，國立中興大學水土保持學系博士論文：臺中。
    35. 傅鈺琇，1995，台灣農地重劃效益評估之研究，國立中興大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文：臺中。
    36. 黃明耀，2000，農地農用與開放興建農舍之政策，月旦法學雜誌，第58期，第89-94頁。
    37. 塗惇義，1986，農地重劃效益分析，土地行政雜誌，第3期，第26-28頁。
    38. 臺灣省政府農林廳，1989，改善農業結構提高農民所得方案：臺灣省七十七年度執行成果報告，臺灣省政府農林廳編印：南投。
    39. 劉冠德，2003，以農村社區土地重劃取得集村興建農舍用地之研究，國立台北大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。
    40. 劉健哲，1986，農地重劃未來發展方向芻議，土地行政，第3期，第20-25頁。
    41. 劉健哲，1997，我國農地重劃及其未來發展方向之探討，農業金融論叢，第37輯，第181-220頁。
    42. 劉健哲，2001，德國之農地重劃及其對我國之意義，臺灣土地金融季刊，第38卷，第3期，第119-136頁。
    43. 劉健哲與黃炳文，2004，農地管理政策與農地興建農舍問題之研究，經社法制論叢，第34期，第305-336頁。
    44. 賴國棟，1980，從民生主義論台灣地區之農地重劃，國立台灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    45. 鍾麗紅，1985，農村社區土地重劃之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所、中國地政研究所碩士論文：臺北。
    46. 羅台雄，2000，管理經濟學：組織管理的經濟觀，雙葉書廊有限公司：臺北。
    英文
    1. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R. and Tiwari, M. K., 2006, Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 173, pp.211-225.
    2. Alessi, L. D., 2003, Gains from private property: the empirical evidence, pp.90-111 in Anderson, T. L. and McChesney, F. S.(eds), Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict, and Law, Princeton University Press: USA.
    3. Alexander, E. R., 2005, Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalization theory to institutional design, Planning Theory, 4, pp.209-223.
    4. Aoki, M., 1990, Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MIT Press: MA.
    5. Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Aznar, J., Ferrís-Oñate, J. and García-Melón, M., 2008, Valuation of urban industrial land: an analytic network process approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 185, pp.322-339.
    6. Benthem, R. J., 1969, Changing the countryside by land consolidation, Biological Conservation, 1, pp.209-212.
    7. Burton, S. P., 1988, Land consolidation in Cyprus: a vital policy for rural reconstruction, Land Use Policy, 5, pp.131-147.
    8. Cheng, E. W. L. and Li, H., 2004, Contractor selection using the analytic network process, Contruction Management and Economics, 22, pp.1021-1032.
    9. Chung, S., Lee, A. and Pearn, W. L., 2005, Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator, International Journal of Production Economics, 96, pp.15-36.
    10. Crecente, R., Alvarez, C. and Fra, U., 2002, Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia, Land Use Policy, 19, pp.135-147.
    11. Daugstad, K., Rønningen, K. and Skar, B., 2006, Agriculture as an upholder o cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgments —A Norwegian perspective in international context, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, pp.67-81.
    12. Davis L. and North, D., 1971, Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press: USA.
    13. Davis, L. and North, D., 1970, Institutional change and American economic growth: a first step towards a theory of institutional innovation, The Journal of Economic History, 30, pp.131-149.
    14. Delgado, M. del M., Ramos, E., Gallardo, R. and Ramos, F., 2003, Multifunctionality and rural development: a necessary convergence, pp.19-36 in Huylenbroeck, G. van and Durand G. (eds) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, Ashgate: UK.
    15. Dixit, A., 1998, Transaction cost politics and the economic policy: a framework and a case study, pp.139-176 in Baldassarri, Paganetto and Phelps, (eds) Institutions and Economic Organization in the Advanced Economies, University of Rome: Rome.
    16. Durand, G. and Huylenbroeck, G. van, 2003, Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework, pp.1-16 in Huylenbroeck, G. van and Durand, G. (eds) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, Ashgate: UK.
    17. Eggertsson, T., 1996, A not on the economics of institutions, pp.6-24 in Alston, E. J., Eggertsson, T. and North, D. C.(eds), Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, Cambridge University Press: USA.
    18. Erdoğmuş, Ş., Aras, H. and Koç, E., 2006, Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, pp.269-279.
    19. European Commission, 1997, Rural Developments, CAP2000 Working Document, European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture.
    20. Evans, N. J. and Ilbery, B. W., 1992, Farm-based accommodation and the restructuring of agriculture: evidence from three English counties, Journal of Rural Studies, 8, pp.85-96.
    21. Freund, J. Kang, H-J. and Lee, S. S., 2006, U.S. response to North Korean nuclear threat, pp.225-250 in Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (eds), Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Tecnological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks: USA.
    22. Greif, A., 1993, Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: the Maghribi Traders’ Coalition, American Economic Review, 83: 3, pp.525-548.
    23. Greif, A., 1994, Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: a historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies, Journal of Political Economy, 102: 5, pp.912-950.
    24. Haktanirlar, B., 2005, Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey, Energy, 30, pp.1146-1161.
    25. Holmes, J., 2006, Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, pp.142-160.
    26. Huylenbroeck, G. Van, Coelho, J. C. and Pinto, P. A., 1996, Evaluation of land consolidation projects (LCPs): a multidisciplinary approach, Journal of Rural Studies, 12, pp.297-310.
    27. Ilbery, B. and Bowler, I., 1998, From agricultural productivism to post-productivism , pp.57-87 in Ilbery, B.(ed), 1998, The Geography of Rural Change, Addison Welsey Longman Limited: UK.
    28. Kelsey, T. W., 1998, Interdependence, rules, and rural development, Growth and Change, 29, pp.281-294.
    29. Knickel, K. and Renting, H., 2000, Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development, Sociologia Ruralis, 40, pp.512-528.
    30. Köne, A. Ç. and Büke, T., 2007, An analytical network process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey, Energy , 35, pp.5220-5228.
    31. Kovács, E. and Osskó A., 2004, Land consolidation in Hungary, dream or reality, Symposium on Modern Land Consolidation in, 10-11 September, France.
    32. Kung, W-L., Lu, M-H. and Liu, H-C., 2006, The conflict between China and Taiwan, pp.209-224 in Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (eds), Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Tecnological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks: USA.
    33. Lambert, A. M., 1961, Farm consolidation and improvement in the Netherlands: an example form the land Van Maas en Waal, Economic Geography, 37, 115-123.
    34. Lerman, Z. and Cimpoieş, D., 2006, Land consolidation as a factor for rural development in Moldova, Europe-Asia Studies, 58, pp.439-455.
    35. Magel, H., 2000, The change of paradigms in European Rural Development and Land Consolidation, TU Delft –UDMS.
    36. Mayhew, A., 1971, Agrarian reform in West Germany: an assessment of the integrated development project Mooriem, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 52, pp.61-76.
    37. Meha, M., 2004, Land consolidation in Kosovo and its impact on rural development, Symposium on Modern Land Consolidation, 10-11 September, France.
    38. Miranda, D., Crecente, R. and Alvarez, M. F., 2006, Land consolidation in inland rural Galicia, N. W. Spain, since 1950: an example of the formulation and use of questions, criteria and indicators for evaluation of rural development policies, Land Use Policy, 23, pp.511-520.
    39. Monke, E., Avillez, F. and Ferro, M., 1992, Consolidation policies and small-farm agriculture in northwest Portugal, European Rural and Agricultural Economy, 19, pp.67-83.
    40. Moral-Lopez, R., 1962, Principles of Land Consolidation Legislation: A Comparative Study, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.
    41. Naylon, J., 1959, Land consolidation in Spain, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 49, 361-373.
    42. Niemira, M. P. and Saaty, T. L., 2004, An analytic network process model for financial-crisis forecasting, International Journal of Forecasting, 20, pp.573-587.
    43. North, D. C., 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.: USA.
    44. North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, USA.
    45. North, D. C., 1991, Institutions, The Jorunal of Economic Perspectives, 5, pp.97-112.
    46. North, D. C., 1995, Institutions and economic development, Taiwan Economic Review(經濟論文叢刊), 23, pp.1-24.
    47. OECD, 2001, Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
    48. Ploeg, J. D. van der and Reop, D., 2003, Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe, pp.37-53 in Huylenbroeck, G. van and Durand, G. (eds) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, Ashgate: UK.
    49. Ploeg, J. D. van der, Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., Roest, K. de, Sevilla-Guzmán, E. and Ventura, F., 2000, Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory, Sociologia Ruralis, 40, pp.391-408.
    50. Potter, C. and Burney, J., 2002, Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO—legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism?, Journal of Rural Studies, 18, pp.35-47.
    51. Riddell, J. and Rembold, F., 2000, Farm land rationalisation and land consolidation: strategies for multifunctional use of rural space in Eastern and Central Europe, Quo Vadis – International Conference, 21-26 May, Prague.
    52. Roland, G., 2004, Understanding institutional change: fast-moving and slow-moving institutions, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, pp.109-131.
    53. Saaty, T. L., 2001, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications: USA.
    54. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G., 2001, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers: USA.
    55. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G., 2006, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, Springer: USA.
    56. Sabates-Wheeler, R., 2002, Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in Eastern European agriculture, Journal of International Development, 14, 1005-1018.
    57. Sarkis, J. and Sundarraj R. P., 2002, Hub location at Digital Equipment Corporation: a comprehensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors, European Journal of Operational Research, 137, pp.336-347.
    58. Sklenicka, P., 2006, Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic, Land Use Policy, 23, pp.502-510.
    59. Thomas, J., 2004, Modern land consolidation – recent trends on land consolidation in Germany –, Symposium on Modern Land Consolidation, 10-11 September, France.
    60. Vitikainen, A., 2004, An overview of land consolidation in Europe, Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, pp.25-44.
    61. Williamson, O. E., 1998, the institutions of governance, The American Economic Review, 88, pp.75-79.
    62. Zervoudaki, S. (ed), 1999, Cap Reform: Rural Development, European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture: Belgium.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    88257503
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088257503
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    25750301.pdf252KbAdobe PDF21096检视/开启
    25750302.pdf305KbAdobe PDF22022检视/开启
    25750303.pdf374KbAdobe PDF21702检视/开启
    25750304.pdf378KbAdobe PDF21479检视/开启
    25750305.pdf487KbAdobe PDF24732检视/开启
    25750306.pdf1358KbAdobe PDF22568检视/开启
    25750307.pdf574KbAdobe PDF22013检视/开启
    25750308.pdf288KbAdobe PDF21557检视/开启
    25750309.pdf263KbAdobe PDF21281检视/开启
    25750310.pdf293KbAdobe PDF21628检视/开启
    25750311.pdf502KbAdobe PDF24538检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈