政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35822
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50952536      Online Users : 949
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35822


    Title: 住宅市場之價格搜尋行為-定錨效果、仲介服務與市場機制選擇之影響
    Housing Price Search Bebavior: The Effects of Anchoring, Brokerage Service, and Market Mechanism Choice
    Authors: 廖仲仁
    Liao，Chung-Jen
    Contributors: 張金鶚
    Chang，Chin-Oh
    廖仲仁
    Liao，Chung-Jen
    Keywords: 搜尋成本
    分量迴歸
    仲介服務
    價格分散
    市場機制
    定錨效應
    search cost
    quantile regression
    brokerage service
    price dispersion
    market mechanism
    anchoring effect
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 16:08:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 住宅市場是典型的不完全訊息市場，每個市場參與者並不知道潛在交易對象的所在位置、偏好，與保留價格。不完全訊息意涵著，交易者必須透過搜尋才能找到交易對象，因而必須支付搜尋成本，也會形成搜尋市場。不論是住宅交易的買方或者賣方，都可以選擇是自行搜尋交易對象，或者透過仲介業者來協助交易的達成。然而，仲介業者對於住宅搜尋市場之影響，目前仍存在著許多問題是尚待釐清的，而拍賣市場在台灣所扮演的重要性愈來愈高，其市場機制的價格效果也是值得關注的問題：
    一、跨區購屋、定錨行為與仲介服務效果
    買賣房屋幾乎必然會有議價過程，雙方的議價能力除了受到市場條件的影響外，賣方對於本身所蓋或者所擁有的房屋及附近地區市場等資訊都較買方為多，因此賣方處於較有利的地位。因此，本研究的第一個研究問題即是：就購屋者彼此之間，在地購屋者是否比跨區購屋者具有訊息優勢？參考價格偏誤是否存在？具有訊息優勢的仲介服務能否改善購屋者的搜尋成本與參考價格偏誤？本研究實證結果顯示，基於搜尋成本較高的原因，跨鄉鎮市區的跨區購屋者相對於未跨區者需要多支付3.8%的價格貼水。其次，參考價格愈高的地區，其購屋者會因為定錨效果或參考點偏誤而多支付1%的價格貼水，此外，高價格分配信念的購屋者，平均會支付4.9%的價格貼水。第三，地價上漲率較高地區的購屋者，會誤用自身地區的外推性預期，以為遷入地區也有同等的價格增值空間，而多支付約11.4%的價格貼水。最後，購屋者若尋求仲介服務亦能改善其出價能力，約可降低2.9%的價格貼水，然而，仲介服務在改善搜尋成本與定錨的效果方面則不顯著。
    二、仲介服務對於價格分散之影響
    本研究利用搜尋成本與價格分散的觀點，檢視具有訊息優勢的仲介服務業者是否真能提高住宅市場的價格搜尋效率。以台北地區的住宅市場資料，指出仲介服務的存在的確可以提高購屋者的搜尋能力。價格分散的估計與檢定結果則顯示：第一，購屋者成交價價格分散小於訂價價格分散；第二，透過仲介服務搜尋者訂價價格分散未顯著異於自行搜尋者的訂價價格分散，可是透過仲介服務搜尋者的成交價價格分散則顯著小於自行搜尋者的成交價價格分散，同時透過仲介服務的價格收斂比率較高。此乃表示，仲介服務業者並未運用其訊息優勢協助賣方進行較有效率的訂價，但是能有效地協助買賣雙方透過配對與議價活動，大幅地降低成交價的價格分散程度。此外，進一步比較國內相關研究結果，目前台北市的住宅市場訊息效率已較過去有顯著的改善，特別是透過仲介服務的改善效果更為明顯。
    三、不對稱的仲介服務價格效果
    過去有關仲介服務對於交易價格影響的實證結果卻出現許多分歧而不一致的現象，本研究認為過去相關文獻的差異，可能源自以普通最小平方迴歸的方式來估計仲介服務的價格效果時，會忽略住宅價格條件分配的差異。以分量迴歸估計後發現，仲介服務係數在各價格分量呈現很大的差異且顯著，仲介服務的價格效果，在0.10分量約有4.4%的溢價，而 0.75分量以上則約有-5.6%的折價現象。因此，本研究嘗試以高低價格分量的不對稱訂價策略，作為仲介服務價格效果不一致的現象的檢視觀點，並得到實證上的支持。
    四、搜尋與拍賣市場機制選擇及拍賣市場績效之再檢視
    拍賣市場為購屋者的重要次級市場之一，因此拍賣市場的績效就顯得愈來愈重要。本研究考慮了購屋者的搜尋成本對於市場機制自我選擇偏誤的影響，重新檢視拍賣市場的績效。本研究實證結果顯示，在未考慮自我選擇偏誤下，拍賣市場機制的估計係數為-22.6%，且達1%統計顯著水準。但是，在控制買方與物件的自我選擇偏誤後，我國拍賣市場與搜尋市場間並無顯著的價格差異存在，因而本研究對於過去國內相關文獻認為拍賣市場一定比搜尋市場折價較多的說法，提出了相當的質疑。惟此三年間我國北部地區拍賣市場的拍定率從10%快速成長到30%，而市場條件的快速變化，很可能會造成較大的拍賣價格變異。因此在後續研究上，可以比較拍定率差異較大的時間進行比較研究，以了解本研究結果之穩定度。
    This dissertation employs search theory and behavior theory to study four relative essays. The first essay is to test three questions using a unique data base in the viewpoint of search cost and Anchoring behavior: First, is there anchoring effect or reference price bias on home-purchasing behavior? Second, is there any extrapolative expectation effect of reference price change on homebuyers? Third, can homebuyers reduce price premium from their high search cost or perceived bias? Those answers can help us understand if we can get alternative interpretation to housing price dispersion and if government should provide housing information service. Empirically, we find that out-of-town/district buyers pay a statistically significant price premium in the Taipei area. We also find some evidence consistent with the price premium being driven by high search costs, anchoring effect and extrapolative expectation from heuristics. Finally, homebuyers can lower price premium through real estate brokers in the market.
    The second essay is to examine the efficiency of housing and brokerage markets in view of price dispersion. We find brokerage service enhance the search ability of homebuyers. We use listing price prices as the prices before search and the actual transaction prices as the price after search, and we also separate the sample into search by homebuyers and search by broker. We find that search by broker decreases the price dispersion compared to search by homebuyers. The third essay is try to explain a number of past and recent studies provided conflicting empirical answers to the effect of real estate brokerage service on housing price. We employ quantile regression to capture the behavior at each quantile of conditional house price distribution and to test the asymmetric effects of brokerage service. An important findings of this paper is that the price effects of real estate brokerage service are significant heterogeneous across the conditional price distribution. The contribution of this paper to the prior literature is to provide empirical evidence by showing that broker might have a positive, negative, or zero impact on the housing prices.
    The final essay is to discuss the decision making behavior of housing markets mechanism choice. Real estate auction market has been one of main market mechanisms of home purchase. Therefore, the performance of real estate auctions is a very important issue. This article reviews the price premium or discount of real estate auctions by correcting the self-selectivity bias in a view of homebuyers’ search cost. The empirical result shows that the availability of an auction as an alternative has the result of high search cost buyers attending auctions. Next, after accounting for the endogenous nature of this choice and controlling for property and buyer characteristics, prices of properties sold at auction were not lower than those of comparable properties sold in a search market. It is questionable to say the performance of real estate auctions is inferior to that of negotiated sales at Taiwan.
    Reference: 白金安、吳美申、蕭芳怡、楊惠雅與王韻婷，2003，影響購屋者選擇房屋拍賣方式因素之研究，討論稿，國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系。
    李建德，2004，「近年來所興起之各種不動產拍賣方式對不動產交易市場之影響」，現代地政，275期：137-148。
    李春長、張金鶚，1996，「房地產仲介市場賣方訂價與成交價和銷售期間關係之研究」，經濟論文，22卷4期: 592-616。
    李春長，2002，不動產仲介市場分析，台北：文笙書局。
    林祖嘉，1994，「價格分散與搜尋均衡：在台灣地區住宅市場上之驗證」，經濟論文叢刊，22(2)：237-267。
    邱國勳、張金鶚，2003，「我國不良資產處理方式之研究」，管理評論，22卷1期：75-97。
    莊家彰、管中閔，2004，「以分量迴歸檢驗報酬率和成交量的V字關係」，2004年經濟學會年會研討會論文。
    許瑞宏，2003，台灣貨幣需求實證研究—誤差修正模型之分量迴歸，台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    郭迺峰、陳美琇，2003，「貨幣供給成長率、黃金交叉期間與股市報酬率之關係—分量迴歸法之應用」，貨幣觀測與信用評等。
    陳憶茹、張金鶚，2004，「法拍屋市場結構與價格之分析」，2004年中華民國住宅學會第13屆年會學術研討會論文集：608-620，新竹。
    彭芳琪、張金鶚，2005，「不同拍賣機制對不良資產價格之影響」，2005年中華民國住宅學會第14屆年會學術研討會論文集，台北。
    楊澤泉、陳勇順，2001，「仲介服務、銀行服務與房地產市場」，中華管理評論，4卷2期：97-107。
    廖仲仁、張金鶚，2004，「搜尋成本與定錨行為對於購屋者價格貼水之影響」，住宅學報，13卷2期：47-62。
    蔡芬蓮、林秋瑾、張金鶚，1997，「法拍屋價格影響因素之研究—台北市為例」，1997年中華民國住宅學會第6屆年會學術研討會論文集，台北。
    鄭麗玉，1993，認知心理學—理論與應用，台北：五南書局。
    饒育蕾與劉達鋒，2003，行為金融學，上海財經大學出版社。
    Adams, P., Kluger, B., and Wyatt, S. 1992. Integrating auction and search market: the slow Dutch auction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 5(3): 239-253.
    Allen, M.T. and Swisher, J. 2000. An analysis of the price formation process at a HUD auction. Journal of Real Estate Research, 20(3): 279-298.
    Arnold, M.A. 1999. Search, bargaining and optimal asking prices, Real Estate Economics, 27(3): 453-481.
    Ashenfelter, O. and Genesove, D.1992. Testing for price anomalies in real estate auctions. American Economic Review, 82(2): 501-505.
    Bailey, J.P. 1998. Electronic Commerce: Prices and Consumer Issues for Three Products: Books, Compact Discs, and Software, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD/GD(98)4.
    Barnow, B.S., Cain, G.G., and Goldberger, A.S. 1980. Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. In E. W. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas (Eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 5: 43-59. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Baryla E.A. and Zumpano, L.V. 1995. Buyer search duration in the residential real estate market: the role of the real estate agent, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(1): 1-14.
    Benjamin, J.D., Jud, G.D., and Sirmans, G.S. 2000. What do we know about real estate brokerage? Journal of Real Estate Research. 20(1): 5-30.
    Black, F. 1986. Noise, Journal of Finance. Vol. 41:529-43.
    Brown, G.R. and Matysiak, G.A. 2000. Real Estate Investment: A Capital Market Approach. Singapore: Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd.
    Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M. 2000. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers, Management Science, 46(4): 563-585.
    Cade, B.S. and Noon, B.R. 2003. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists, Frontier Ecological Environment, 1(8): 412-420.
    Camerer, C. 1995. Individual decision making, Handbook of Experimental Economics. J. Kagel and A. E. Roth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Case, K.E. and Shiller, R.J. 1988. The behavior of home buyers in boom and post-boom markets, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 890. November 2.
    Chamberlain, G. 1994. Quantile regression, censoring and the structure of wages, in Advance in Econometrics. Christopher Sims, ed. New York: Elsevier: 171-209.
    Cronin, F.J. 1982. The efficiency of housing search, Southern Economic Journal. 48: 1016-1030.
    Diamond, P. 1987. Consumer differences and prices in a search model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(2): 429-436.
    1993. Search, sticky prices, and inflation, Review of Economic Studies, 60(1): 53-68.
    Diaz, J. III. 1997. An investigation into the impact of previous expert value estimates on appraisal judgment, Journal of Real Estate Research. 13(1):49-58.
    and Wolverton, M. 1998. A longitudinal examination of the appraisal smoothing hypothesis, Real Estate Economics. 26(2): 349-358.
    and Hansz, J.A. 2002. Behavioral research into the real estate valuation process: process toward a descriptive model, in Wong, Ko and Wolverton, M.L. (Ed), Real Estate Valuation Theory. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Doiron, J.C., Shilling, J.D., and Sirmans, C.F. 1985. Owner versus broker sales: evidence on the amount of the brokerage commission capitalized, Real Estate Appraisal and Analyst: 44-48.
    Dotzour, M.G., Moorhead, E., and Winkler, D.T. 1998. The impact of auctions on residential sales prices in New Zealand. Journal of Real Estate Research, 16(1):57-71.
    Elder, H.W., Zumpano, L.V., and Baryla, E.A. 1999. Buyer search intensity and the role of the residential real estate broker. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18(3):351-368.
    .2000. Buyer brokers: do they make a difference? their influence on selling price and search duration. Real Estate Economics, 28(2): 337-362.
    Frank, R.H. 2003. Microeconomics and Behavior, The Mc-Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. press.
    Frew, J. and Jud, G. D. 1987. Who pays the real estate broker’s commission?, Research in Law and Economics, 10: 177-187.
    Goldberg, P.K. and Verboven, F. 2001. The Evolution of Price Dispersion in the European Car Market, Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 68(4): 811-48.
    Gould, W. W. 1992. sg11.1: Quantile regression with bootsrapped standard errors. Stata Technical Bulletin 9: 19-21. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, 2: 137-139.
    1997. sg70: Interquantile and simultaneous-quantile regression. Stata Technical Bulletin 38: 14-22. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, 7:167-176.
    Greene, W. H. 1993. Econometric analysis (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Hamilton, B.H. and Nickerson, J.A. 2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research, Strategic Organization, 1:53-80.
    Hartog, J., Pereira, P.T., and Vieira, J. 2001. Changing returns to education in portugal during the 1980s and early 1990s: OLS and quantile regession estimators, Applied Economics, 33: 1021-1037.
    Harvey, J. 2000. Urban Land Economics. Palgrave Publishers Ltd.
    Haurin, D. 1988. The duration of marketing time of residential housing, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal. Vol. 16(4): 396-410.
    Heckman, J.J., 1974. Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply, Econometrica, 42: 679-694.
    , 1979. Sample selectivity bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153-161.
    and Robb Jr., R.1985. Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions: an overview, Journal of Econometrics, 30(1-2):239-267.
    Janssen, C.T.L. and Jobson, J. D.. 1980. Applications and implementation on the choice of realtor, Decision Sciences, 11: 299-311.
    Jud, G..D. 1983. Real estate brokers and the market for residential housing, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 11: 69-82.
    ,and Frew, James. 1986. Real estate brokers, housing prices, and the demand for housing, Urban Studies, 23: 21-31.
    ,Winkler, D.T. and Kissling, G. 1995. Price spreads and residential housing market liquidity, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(3): 251-60.
    Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47,2: 263-292.
    Kalyanaram, G. and Winer, R. 1995. Empirical generalization from reference price research, Marketing Science. 14(3): G161-169.
    Kamath, R. and Yantek, K.. 1982. The influence of brokerage commissions on prices of single-family homes, Appraisal Journal: 63-70.
    Kettell, B. 2001. Financial Economics: Making Sense of Market Information. Pearson Education Limited.
    Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. Jr. 1978. Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46: 211-244.
    and Hallock, K.F. 2001. Quantile regression, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, Num 4: 143-156.
    Lambson, V.E., McQueen, G.R., and Slade, B.A. 2004. Do out-of-state buyers pay more for real estate? an examination of anchoring-induced bias and search costs, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 32(1): 85-126.
    Lee, L.F., 1978. Unionism and wage rates: a simultaneous equation model with qualitative and limited (censored) dependent variables, Internation Economic Review, 19: 415-433.
    ,1982. Some approaches to the correction of selectivity bias. Review of Economic Studies, 49(3): 355-372.
    Leung, C.K.Y, Leong, Y.C.F., and Wong, S.K. 2005. Housing Price Dispersion: An Empirical Investigation, Discussion Papers from Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics.
    Levitt, S.D. and Syverson, C. 2005. Do real estate agents exploit their information advantage? NBER Working Paper, No.11053.
    Lippmanm, S. and McCall, J. 1976. The economics of job search: a survey, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 14(2) :155-189.
    Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
    Lusht, K.M. 1990a. Kenneth Lusht discusses real estate auctions, Australian Style. ORER Letter. The office of real estate research at University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
    .1990b. Auctions versus Private Sales of Houses: A Description and Empirical Analysis of Melbourne, Australia Market. Working paper, The Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia, PA.
    .1994. Order and price in a sequential auction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(3): 259-266.
    .1996. A comparison of prices brought by english auctions and private negotiations. Real Estate Economics, 24(4): 517-530.
    Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Maher, C. 1989. Information, intermediaries and sales strategy in an urban housing market: the implications of real estate auctions in Melbourne. Urban studies, 26(5): 495-509.
    Masten, S.E. 1996. Empirical research and transaction cost economics: challenges, progress, directions, in J. Grownewegen (ed), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, pp. 43-64. Boston MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Mayer, C.J. 1995. A model of negotiated sales applied to real estate auctions. Journal of Urban Economics, 38(1): 1-22.
    .1998. Assessing the performance of real estate auctions, Real Estate Economics, 26(1): 41-66.
    McAfee, R.P. and McMillan, J. 1987. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2): 699-738.
    Miceli, T.J. 1988. Information costs and the organization of the real estate brokerage industry in the U.S. and Great Britain. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal. Vol. 16(2): 173-188.
    Miller, N.G. 1978. Time on the market and selling price, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal. Vol. 6: 164-174.
    Monroe, K.B. 2003. Pricing: Making Profitbale Decisions, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. press.
    Newell, G., MacFarlane, J., Lusht, K., and Bulloch, S. 1993. Empirical Analysis of Real Estate Auction versus Private Sale Performance, Working Paper, University of Western Sydney: Hawkesbury, Austrailia.
    Northcraft, G. and Neale, M. 1987. Expert, amateurs, and real estate: an anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39: 84-97.
    Phlips, L. 1989. The Economics of Imperfect Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Quan, D.C. 1994. Real estate auctions: a survey of theory and practice. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9(1): 23-49.
    .2002. Market mechanism choice and real estate disposition: search versus auction. Real Estate Economics, 30(3): 365-384.
    Ratchford, B.T., Agrawal, J., Grimm, P., and Srinivasan, N. 1996. Toward understanding the measurement of market efficiency, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 15: 167-184.
    Rauh, M. 2001. Heterogeneous beliefs, price dispersion, and welfare-improving price controls, Economic Theory, 18: 577-603.
    Reck, C. 2003. Heterogeneity and Black-White Labor Market Differences: Quantile Regression with Censored Data 1979-2001, working paper, Dept of Economics, UIUC.
    Reed, C. 1991. Maintenance, housing quality, and vacancies under imperfect information, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal. 19: 138-153.
    Rinne, H. J. 1981. An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Reference Prices Sales. Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University Press.
    Roger, W. H. 1992. sg11: Quantile regression standard errors. Stata Technical Bulletin 9: 16-19. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, 2: 133-137.
    Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy. 82: 34-55.
    Salant, S.W. 1991. For sale by owner: when to use a broker and how to price the house. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4: 157-173.
    Salop, S. and Stiglitz, J.E.. 1985. Equilibrium price dispersion [the theory of sales: a simple model of equilibrium price dispersion with identical agents, American Economic Review, 72(5): 1191-1194.
    Shiller, Robert J. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press.
    Silberberg, E. and Suen, W. 2001. The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical Analysis, (3rd) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Press.
    Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. 1971. Comparison of bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 6: 649-744.
    Spulber, D.F. 1999. Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Stigler, G.J. 1961. The economics of information, Journal of Political Economy, 69: 213-225.
    Stromsdorfer, E. W. and Farkas, G. (Eds.). 1980. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 5, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
    Telser, L.G. 1978. Economic Theory and the Core, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Thaler, R. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice, Marketing Science. 4(3) :199-214.
    Turnbull, G. and Sirmans, C.F. 1993. Information, search, and house prices, Regional Science and Urban Economics. Vol. 23(4) : 545-557.
    and Benjamin, J.D.. 1990. Do corporations sell house for less? a test of housing market efficiency, Applied Economics. 23: 1389-1399.
    Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, New Series 185(4157): 1124-1131.
    Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16(1):8-37.
    Wheaton, W.C. 1990. Vacancy, search, and prices in a housing market matching model, Journal of Political Economy. 98: 1270-1292.
    Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. NY: The Free Press.
    . 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractural relations, The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(Oct).
    Wilson, R. 1977. A bidding model of perfect competition. Review of economic studies, 44(3): 511-518.
    Wurtzebach, C.H., Miles, M.E., and Cannon, S.E. 1994. Morden Real Estate (5th ed), John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    Yavas, A. 1992. A simple search and bargaining model of real estate markets, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 20, 4: 533-548.
    1994a. Economics of brokerage: an overview, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 2: 169-195.
    1994b. Middlemen in bilateral search markets, Journal of Labor Economics, 12: 406-419.
    and Colwell, P.F. 1995. A comparison of real estate marketing system: theory and evidence, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 10, No. 5: 583-599.
    and Yang, S. 1995. The strategic role of listing price in marketing real estate: theory and evidence, Real Estate Economics, 23(3): 347-368.
    Yu, K., Lu, Z., and Stander, J. 2003. Quantile regression: applications and current research areas, The Statistician, 52,3: 331-350.
    Zumpano, L.V., Elder, H., and Baryla, E.A. 1996. Buying a house and the decision to use a real estate broker. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 13(2): 169-181.
    , Johnson, K.H., and Andersion, R.I. 2003. Internet use and real estate brokerage market intermediation, Journal of Housing Economics, 12: 134-150.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    86257504
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086257504
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    25750401.pdf259KbAdobe PDF21057View/Open
    25750402.pdf243KbAdobe PDF21196View/Open
    25750403.pdf333KbAdobe PDF21113View/Open
    25750404.pdf453KbAdobe PDF21042View/Open
    25750405.pdf466KbAdobe PDF21264View/Open
    25750406.pdf522KbAdobe PDF21658View/Open
    25750407.pdf521KbAdobe PDF21878View/Open
    25750408.pdf536KbAdobe PDF21445View/Open
    25750409.pdf664KbAdobe PDF21512View/Open
    25750410.pdf540KbAdobe PDF21872View/Open
    25750411.pdf454KbAdobe PDF21090View/Open
    25750412.pdf353KbAdobe PDF21419View/Open
    25750413.pdf464KbAdobe PDF21031View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback