Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35659
|
| Title: | 公共網絡管理：臺北市政府戶政業務跨機關服務傳遞協力合作網絡實證研究
Collaborative Public Management: the Empirical Study of Interagency Service DeliveryNetwork on the Household Registration Services in Taipei City Government |
| Authors: | 謝俊義 |
| Contributors: | 顏良恭
吳秀光
謝俊義 |
| Keywords: | 網絡管理
跨機關服務傳遞協力合作網絡
個體層次
機關層次
network management
interagency service delivery collaborative network
individual level
agency level |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 15:37:11 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 跨機關服務協力合作網絡的有效形成，在官僚體制漸漸無法發揮績效的情況下，更顯得重要。為了探討在機關間協力合作的種種問題，本研究以公共網絡管理文獻建構跨機關間協力合作的模型。公共網絡管理的文獻，主要在探索公共管理者的行為與角色，以及機關間的協力合作行為，如何貢獻於服務傳遞協力合作網絡績效，而這兩個研究問題，也存在於本論文的觀察單位-臺北市政府戶政業務之中。資料來源主要是以問卷方式調查臺北市政府負責戶政業務戶政人員的主觀認知性資料。研究方法則是透過描述性統計、相關係數、信度考驗、確認性因素分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA)、迴歸分析、迴歸診斷與結構方程式（Structural Equation Model, SEM）。
本研究的問卷抽樣數共524份，有效問卷為338份，回收率為64.5％。在統計分析上，無論在因素負荷量、信度考驗、迴歸模型解釋比率，以及結構方程式的模型適配度皆符合或接近標準。而多元迴歸分析（OLS）與結構方程式（SEM）亦顯示機關之間的資源分享與協助並無助於戶政服務傳遞協力協力合作網絡間的績效，這也解釋部分理論文獻對協力協力合作網絡過於樂觀的質疑。本研究亦發現網絡管理文獻所建構的特定因素如核心機關（民政局）的協調，以及策略與結構的協調與整合是有助於戶政服務傳遞協力協力合作網絡績效。在研究貢獻上，期許檢驗研究問題與研究假設，以及這些規範性理論應用至政府實務的深度。
The efficient formation for interagency service delivery network is comparatively important when the bureaucracy falis to make it well in public affairs. This research employs the literatures of public network management to construct the model of interagency collaborations. Two research are discussed in public network management and our research with the observed unit of the household registration of Taipei City Government: how the behaviors and roles of public network managers and collaborative behaviors among public agencies contribute to the network performance of interagency service delivery network. The data sources are draw from subjective perceptive data of public managers and public administrators who response for household registration services in Taipei City Government. The research method employs descriptive statistics, correlations, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, regression analysis, regressive dignosis and structural equation model.
The response rates in this research are 64.5%(338/524). In statistics, the the factor loadings, reliability, R2 for the regression model, and the goodness of the fit for structural equation model(SEM) also show that the resources-sharing among the agencies does not benefit the netwotk performance in household service-delivery network, which doubt the celebratory viewpoints from some public network management literatures. This research also finds some factors such as the coordination of network core administrative agency (the Bureau of Civil Affairs), the integration and coordination of strategies and structures, are helpful for network performance in collaborative network of household service-delivery network. For the contributions of research, this research expects to examine our research questions and research hypotheses and then applies these normative theories to the depths of government practices. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文部分
王健雄 (2006)。區域治理與跨域合作機制之研究—以行政院南部與中部聯合服
務中心為例。暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士論文。
呂育誠（1995）。市政業務主管人員工作態度與角色行為之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
朱鎮明(2005)。「政策網絡中協力關係的成效：理論性的探討」。公共行政學報，第十七期：113-158。
史美強（2005）。制度、網路與府際治理。台北：元照出版公司。
李阿興 (2004)。台北縣鄉鎮市垃圾處理跨域治理之研究。臺北：銘傳大學公共
事務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
李明寰(1998)。政策網絡之研究—以我國醫藥分業政策為個案。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政（2000）。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。臺北：五南圖書出版
公司。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北：雙葉書廊
有限公司。
黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式理論與應用。四版，臺北：五南圖書出版有限公
司。
黃榮護、黃東益、郭昱瑩、謝仁和(2000)。以議題管理途徑型塑臺北市政府多部
門協力關係策略。臺北市：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
黃睦凱（2004）。政府普通基金預算與績效管理關聯性之研究－以臺北市戶政機關為例。國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
陳恆鈞、張國偉(2006)。「組織協力與組織績效之研究：以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為例」。公共行政學報，第十九期：1-54。
陳偉華（2001）。基層官僚機關服務品質衡量之研究以臺北市戶政機關為例。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
楊俊宏（1995）。DEA應用在行政機關生產力衡量方法之研究-以北高二市各戶政事務所為例。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
馮艾雯（2002）。台北市戶政機關中高階主管核心能力建構之研究。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
鈕文英(2007)。教育研究方法與論文寫作。臺北：雙葉書廊。
梁美慧（2002）。臺北市戶政事務所人員工作倦怠感之研究。私立中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
周文賢（2002）。多變量統計分析：SAS/STAT使用方法。臺北：智勝文化公司。
張家宜、李怡禛(2002) 。「全面品質管理應用於高等教育行政之實證研究教育研究資訊」。教育研究資訊，10(1)：29-53。
張慈慧(2003)。從跨域管理觀點－ 探討台十六線公路砂石車問題。逢甲大學公
共政策研究所碩士論文。
蔡秀涓(2004)。「公務人員組織信任模型之建構：以臺北市政府為例」。人文及社會科學集刊，16(2)：241-279。
鍾金玉（2003）。台北市戶政機關實施便民措施成本效能分析－以台北市文山區第一戶政事務所為例。私立大學世新大學行政管理學系碩士論文。
藍建國（1999）。組織氣候與自願離職傾向關係之研究--以臺北市戶政機關為例。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
趙永茂(2003)。「臺灣府際關係與跨域管理：文獻回顧與策略途徑初探」。政治科學論叢，18：53-70。
趙容瑄（2006）。府際關係與跨域管理機制之建構—行政院中部聯合服務中心之
重構為例。臺北：臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文。
劉宜君（1999）。「政策網絡與國家機關自主性：比較英國、美國與台灣之健康保險政策網絡」。空大行政學報，第九期：279-306。
劉宜君(2001)。「我國全民健康保險政策分析─國家機關自主性與政策網絡的觀點」。空大行政學報，第十一期：161-211。
劉宜君（2004）。「政府部門應用知識網絡之研究─以阿瑪斯號洩油事件為例之分析」。公共行政學報，第十三期：27-58。
劉宜君、陳敦源、蕭乃沂、林昭吟（2005）。「網絡分析在利害關係人概念之應用：以我國全民健保政策改革為例」。台灣社會福利學刊，第四卷，第一期：95-130。
劉宜君(2006a)。「社會網絡與公部門個人知識管理之分析」。考銓季刊，第48期：64-76。
劉宜君(2006b)。「公共網絡的管理與績效評估之探討」。行政暨政策學報，第四十二期：107-142。
劉邦富（2006）。台灣貧窮家庭兒童照顧政策落差研究。台中：東海大學社會工作學系博士論文。
龔意琇(2001)。臺灣垃圾跨區域處理之個案研究。國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論
文。
貳、英文部分
Acock, Alan C.(2006). A Gentle Introduction to Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
Akerlof, George A.（1970）.The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84, 488-500.
Agranoff, Robert(1991). Human Services Integration: Past and Present Challenges in Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 51(6), 533-542.
Agranoff, Robert(2005). Managing Collaborative Performance. Public Performance and Management Review. 29(1), 18-45.
Agranoff, Robert(2006). Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 56-65.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ Lindsay, Valerie (1983). Intergovernmental Management: Perspective from Human Services Problem Solving at the Local Level. Public Administration Review. 43(3), 227-237.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ McGuire, Michael (1998).Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 8(1), 67-91.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ McGuire, Michael (1999). Managing in Network Settings. Policy Studies Review. 16(1), 18-41.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ McGuire, Michael (2001). Big Questions in Public Network Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 11(3), 295-326.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ McGuire, Michael (2003). Collaborative Public Management. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, Robert ＆ McGuire, Michael (2004). Another Look at Bargaining and Negotiating in Intergovernmental Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 14(4), 495-512.
Aldrich, H. ＆ Whetten, D. A.(1981). Organization Sets, Action Sets and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity. In P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck(eds). Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1, Ch.17. London: Oxford University Press.
Alkadry, Mohamad G . ＆ Tower, Leslie E .（2006）. Unequal Pay: Th e Role of Gender. Public Administration Review. 66(6), 888-898.
Alter, Catherine ＆ Hage, Jerald (1993). Organizations Working Together. London: SAGE Publications.
Aneshensel, Carol S. (2002). Theory Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences. Pine Forge.
Arbuckle, James L.(2006). Amos 7.0 User’s Guide. Spring House, PA: SPSS Inc.
Babbie, Earl(2000).The Practice of Social Research. 7th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Babbie, Earl(2000). Survey Research Methods. 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bardach, Eugene(1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Barzelay, Michael ＆ Armajani, Babak J. （1992）. Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Visioon for Management in Government. Los Angeles,Cal.: University of California Press, Ltd.
Benson, Kenneth J.(1975). The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy. Administrative Science Quarterly. 20(2), 229-249.
Berry, Frances S. ＆ Brower, Ralph S. (2005). Intergovernmental and Intersectoral Management: Weaving Networking, Contract Out, and Management Roles into Third Party Government. Public Performance ＆ Management Review. 29(1), 7-17.
Berry, Frances ＆ Berry, William (1990). State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review. 84(2),395-415.
Berry, Frances ＆ Berry, William (1992). Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity. American Journal Political Science. 36(3), 715-742.
Berry, Frances S, Brower, Ralph S., Choi , Sang Ok, Goa,Wendy Xinfang, Jang, Hee Soun, Kwon, Myungjung ＆ Word, Jessica (2004).Three Traditions of Network Research: What the Public Management Research Agenda Can Learn from Other Research Communities. Public Administration Review. 64(5), 539-552.
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren ＆ O’Leary, Rosemary(2006). Conclusion: Parallel Play, Not Collaboration: Missing Questions, Missing Connections. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 161-167.
Blom-Hansen, Jens（1997）. A New Institutional Perspective on Policy Networks. Public Administration.75(4), 669-693.
Bolland, John M. ＆ Wilson, Jan V. (1994). Three Faces of Integrative Coordination: A Model of Inter-Organizational Relations in Health and Human Services. Health Services Research. 29(3), 341-366.
Borgatti, Stephen P. ＆ Foster, Pacey C.(2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management. 29(6), 991-1013.
Bowman, Ann O`M.(2004). Horizontal Federalism: Exploring Interstate Interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.14(4), 535-546.
Bryson, John M., Crosby, Barbara C. ＆ Stone, Melissa Middleton(2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 44-55.
Burt, Ronald S.(1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42(2),339-365.
Byrne, Barbara M.(2001). Structural Equation Modeling With Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Chatterjee, Samprit, Hadi, Ali S. ＆ Price, Bertram(2000). Regression Analysis By Example. 3rd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley ＆ Sons, Inc.
Chiles, Todd H. ＆ McMackin, John F.(1996). Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, Trust, and Transaction Cost Economics. Academy of Management Review. 21(1), 73-96.
Choi, Sang Ok (2005). Network Analysis of Workforce Development Programs. Tallahassee, FL: Reuben O’D. Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University.
Cohen, Louis, Minion, Lawrence ＆ Morrison, Keith (2003). Research Methods in Education. 5th ed., New York, NY : Routledge Falmer.
deBruijn, Johan A. ＆ Heuvelhof, Ernst F. ten (1995). Policy Networks and Governance. In David L. Weimer(ed.). Institutional Design. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
DeHart-Davis, Leisha, Marlowe, Justin ＆ Pandey, Sanjay K . (2006).Gender Dimensions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review. 66(6), 873-887.
de Vaus, David(2001). Research Design in Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Feiock, Richard C.(ed.). Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Frederickson, H. George（1996）.Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement
with the New Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 56(3), 263- 270.
Frederickson, H. George(1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Frederickson, H. George(1999). The Repositioning of American Public Administration. PS: Political Science and Politics. 32(4), 701-711.
Frederickson, H. George ＆ Smith, Kevin B. (2003). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Gumnor Hill, Oxford: Westview Press.
Gage, Robert W.(1984). Federal Regional Councils: Networking Organizations for Policy Management in the Intergovernmental System. Public Administration Review. 44(2), 134-145.
Gerring, John(2001). Social Science Methodology: A Critical Framework. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Granovetter, Mark(1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 18(6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, Mark(1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology.91(3), 481-510.
Gray, Barbara(1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gray, Barbara(2000). Assessing Inter-Organizational Collaboration: Multiple Conceptions and Multiple Methods. In David Faulkner and Mark de Rond(eds.). Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues(pp.243-260). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gruber, Judith(1987). Controlling Bureaucracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gujarati, Damodar N.(2003). Basic Econometrics. 4th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Gulick, Luther (1937). Notes on the Theory of Organization. In Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick (eds.). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
Guy, Mary E. ＆ Newman, Meredith(2004).A Women’s Jobs, Men=s Jobs: Sex Segregation and Emotional Labor. Public Administration Review. 64(3), 289-298.
Hatry, Harry P.(1999). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
Hellriegel, Don, Slocum, John W. ＆ Woodman, Richard W.(1986). Organizational Behavior. 4 th ed. New York: West.
Henry, N.(2002). Is Privatization Pass？ The Case for Competition and Emergence of Intersectoral Administration. Public Administration Review. 62(3), 347-377.
Heinrich, Carolyn J. ＆ Lynn, Laurence E. Jr. (2000). Means and Ends: A Comparative Study of Empirical Methods for Investigating Governance and Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 11(1), 109-138.
Huxham, Chris(1996). Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Interorganizational Effectiveness through Meta-Strategy. Management Decision. 30(3), 50-56.
Huxham, Chris ＆ Vangen, Siv(2000). Ambiguity, Complexity, and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration. Human Relation, 53(6), 771-801.
Immergut, Ellen M.(1992).Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isett, Kimberley Roussin ＆ Provan, Keith G. (2005). The Evolution of Dyadic Interorganizational Relationships in a Network of Publicly Funded Nonprofit Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 15, 149-165.
Jennings, Edward T., ＆ Ewalt, Jo Ann G. (1998). Interorganizational Coordination, Administrative Consolidation, and Policy Performance. Public Administration Review. 58(5), 417-428.
Johnson, Janet Buttolph ＆ Reynolds, H. T. (2005). Political Science Research Methods. 5th edi. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Jordan, A. Grant(1990a). Sub-Government,Policy Communities and Networks: Refilling the Old Bottles. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2(2), 319-338.
Jordan, A. Grant(1990b). Policy Community Realism versus New Institutional Ambiguity. Political Studies. 38, 470-484.
Kagan, Sharon I.(1993). Integrating Services for Children and Families. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keast, Robyn, ＆ Brown, Kerry (2002). The Government Service Delivery Program: A Case Study of the Push and Pull of Central Government Coordination. Public Management Review. 4(3), 1-21.
Keast, Robyn, Mandell, Myrna P., Brown, Kerry, ＆ Woolcock, Geoffrey (2004). Network Structures Working Differently and Changing Expectations. Public Administration Review. 64(3), 363-371.
Kettl, Donald F.(2006). Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 10-19.
Kline, Rex B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd edition. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kickert, Walter J. M., Klijn, Erick-Hans, ＆ Koppenjan, Joop E. M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks. London: Sage Publications.
Krackhardt, David(1990). Assessing the Political Landscape Structure, Cognition, and Power Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(2), 342-369.
Lakatos, Musgrave(ed.). (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Combridge University Press.
Lipsky, Michael(1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lorrain, Francios ＆ White, Harrison C. (1971). Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1(1), 49-80.
Lowndes,Vivien(1996). Varieties of New Institutionalism :A Critical Appraisal. Public Administration. 74(2), 181-197.
Lubell, Mark, Schneider, Mark, Scholz, John ＆ Mete, Mihriye (2002). Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. American Journal of Political Science. 46(1), 48-63.
Lynn, Laurence E.(1981). Managing the Public’s Business: The Job of the Government Executive. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Mandell, Myrna P.(1988). Intergovernmental Management in Interorganizational Networks: A Revised Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration. 11(4), 393-416.
Mandell, Myrna P.(1990). Network Management: Strategic Behavior in the Public Sector. In Robert W. Gage ＆ Myrna P. Mandell(eds.). Strategic for Managing Intergovernmental Policies(pp. 29-53). New York: Praeger.
Mandell, Myrna P.(1994). Managing Interdepedencies through Program Structures: A Revised Paradigm. American Review of Public Administration. 24(1), 99-121.
Mandell, Myrna P.(1999). Symposium: The Impact of Collaborative Efforts. Policy Studies Review. 16(1), 4-47.
Mandell, Myrna P.(ed.).(2001). Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Marsh, David (ed.).(1998).Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham, Philadelphia:Open University.
Marsh, David ＆ Rhodes, A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. London: Oxford University Press.
Mattessich, Paul W. ＆ Monsey, Barbara R.(1992). Collaboraiton- What Makes It Work. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
Mayntz, Renate(1993). Modernisation and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks. Knowledge and Policy. 6(1), 3-16.
McCurdy, Howard E.＆ Cleary, Robert E.(1984). Why Can’t We Resolve the Research Issue in Public Administration? Public Administration Review. 44 (1), 49–55.
McGuire, Michael(2002). Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It. Public Administration Review. 62(5), 599-609.
McGuire, Michael(2006a). Intergovernmental Management: A View from the Bottom. Public Administration Review. 66(5), 677-679.
McGuire, Michael(2006b). Collaborative Public Management: Asessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 33-43.
Meier, Kenneth J. ＆ O’Toole, Laurence J.(2001). Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 11(3), 271-293.
Meier, Kenneth J. ＆ O’Toole, Laurence J. (2002). Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 12(5), 629-643.
Meier, Kenneth J. ＆ O’Toole, Laurence J. (2003). Public Management and Educational Performance: the Impact of Managerial Networking. Public Administration Review. 63(6), 689-699.
Meier, Kenneth J. ＆ O’Toole, Laurence J. (2005). Managerial Networking: Issues of Measurement and Research Design. Administration ＆ Society. 37(5), 523-541.
Meier, Kenneth J., Mastracci, Sharon H .＆ Wilson, Kristin(2006). Gender and Emotional Labor in Public Organizations: An Empirical Examination of the Link to Performance. Public Administration Review. 66(6), 899-909.
Menzel, Donal(2006). The Katrina Aftermath: A Failure of Federalism or Leadership？Public Administration Review. 66(6), 808-812.
Mitchell, J. Clyde(1969). The Concepts and Use of Social Network. In J. Clyde Mitchell(ed.). Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Newcomer, Kathryn E. ＆ Triplett, Timothy(2004). Using Surveys. In Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry ＆ Kathryn E. Newcomer(eds). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation(p.257-p.291). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Oakerson, Ronald J. ＆ Parks, Roger B.(1989). Local Government Constitutions: A Different View of Metropolitan Governance. American Review of Public Administration. 19(4), 279-294.
Oliver, Christine (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Direction. Academy of Management Review. 15, 241-265.
Olson, Mancur(1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor(1999). Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Paul Sabatier(ed.). Theories of the Policy Process(pp. 35-72). Boulder, CO: Westview.
O’Toole, Laurence J.（1995）. Rational Choice and Policy Implementation: Implications for Interorganizational Network Management. American Review of Public Administration.25(1), 43-57.
O’Toole, Laurence J.(1997a). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 57(1), 45-52.
O’Toole, Laurence J.(1997b). Implementing Public Innovations In Network Settings. Administration ＆ Society. 29(2), 115-138.
O’Toole, Laurence J.(2000). Fiscal Aspects of Intergovernmental Relations. In Laurence J. O’Toole(Ed.). American Intergovernmental Relations(pp. 191-195). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
O’Toole, Laurence J. ＆ Meier, Kenneth J. (1999). Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 9(4), 505-526.
Paulson, Steven K.(1985). A Paradigm for the Analysis of Interorganizational Networks. Social Networks. 7, 105-126.
Perry, James L. ＆ Thomson, Ann Marie(2004). Civic Service: What Difference Does It Make? Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Powell, Walter W.(1990). Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings(eds). Research in Organizational Behavior 12(pp.295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Provan, Keith G., ＆ Milward, H. Brinton (1991). Institutional-Level Norms and Organizational Involvement in a Service-Implementation Network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1(4), 391-417.
Provan, Keith G., ＆ Milward, H. Brinton (1995a).A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40(1), 1-33.
Provan, Keith G. ＆ Milward, H. Brinton (1995b). Do Networks Really Work？ A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Network. Public Administration Review. 61(4), 414-423.
Provan, Keith G., ＆ Milward, H. Brinton (2001). Do Networks Really Work？ A Framework for Evaluating Public Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review. 61(4), 400-409.
Provan, Keith G. ＆ Sebastian, Juliann G.(1998). Network Within Networks: Service Link Overlap, Organizational Cliques, and Network Effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal. 41(4), 453-463.
Provan, Keith G., Veazie, Mark A., Staten, Lisa K. ＆ Teufel-Shone, Nicolette I. (2005). The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships. Public Administration Review. 65(5), 603-613.
Raab, Jőrg, ＆ Milward, H. Brinton (2003). Dark networks as Problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 13(4), 413-440.
Rainey, Hal G.(2003).Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Richardson, Jeremy ＆ Jordan, A. Grant(1979). Governing under Pressure. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Ring, Peter Smith ＆ de Ven, Andrew H. Van(1994). Development Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationship. Academy of Management Review. 19(1), 90-118.
Robbins, Stephen P. (1980). The Administrative Process. Englewond Cliffs, NJ: Prentive Hall.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1999). The Need for Better Theories. In Paul A. Sabatier(ed.). Theories of the Policy Process(pp.3-17). Boulder, Co: Westview.
Sabatier, Paul A. ＆ Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: an Advocacy Coalition Approaches. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Salancik, Gerald R.(1995). Wanted: A Good Network Theory of Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40, 345-349.
Sharpf, Fritz W.(1978). Interorganizational Policy Studies: Issues, Concepts, and Perspectives. In Kenneth I. Hanf and Fritz W. Scharpf(Eds.). Interorganizational Policy Making Limits to Coordination and Central Control(pp.345-370). London, Sage.
Schlager, Edella(1999). A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Process. In Paul Sabatier(ed.). Theories of the Policy Process (pp.233-260). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Schneider, Mark, Teske, Paul ＆ Mintrom, Michael (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneider, Mark, Scholz, John, Lubell, Mark, Mindruta, Denisa ＆ Edwardsen, Matthew (2003). Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science. 47(1), 142-157.
Selden, Sally Coleman, Sowa, Jessica E. ＆ Sandfort, Jodi(2006). The Impact of Nonprofit Collaboration in Early Child Care and Education on Management and Program Outcomes. Public Administration Review. 66(3), 412-425.
Singleton, Royce A. ＆ Straits, Bruce C.(2005). Approaches to Social Research. 4th edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Steven Rathgeb(1995). Social Capital, Community Coalitions, and the Role of Institutions. Durham, NC: Duke University, Sanford Institute of Public Policy.
Sobeick, Joanne(2003). Comparing Policy Process Frameworks: What do They Tell us about Group Membership and Participation for Policy Development？ Administration ＆ Society. 35(3), 350-374.
Streib, Gregory ＆ Roch, Christine(2005). Strengthening Public Administration Research: Identifying Boundaries and Horizons. Journal of Public Administration. 28(1), 37–55.
Thatcher,Mark(1988).The Development of Policy Network Analysis: from Modest Origins to Overarching Frameworks. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 10(4),389-416.
Thomson, Ann Marie ＆ Perry, James L.(2006). Collaboration Process: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review. 66(special issue), 20-32.
Weiner, Myron E.(1990). Human Services Management. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Wise, Charles R.(2006). Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive Management What’s Missing? Public Administration Review. 66(3), 302-318. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
90256501
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090256501 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
