政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35628

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35628

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50822285 線上人數 : 462

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 公共行政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/35628

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35628

題名:	我國中程施政計畫策略規劃之研究－以行政院體育委員會為例
作者:	林敏鈺 Lin, Min-Yu
貢獻者:	詹中原林敏鈺 Lin, Min-Yu
關鍵詞:	策略規劃中程施政計畫體育
日期:	2002
上傳時間:	2009-09-18 15:32:26 (UTC+8)
摘要:	許多國家在面臨劇變的政經環境時，民眾亦相對要求增加公共服務，而為尋求解決之道，則推行政府再造運動作為改革基礎，以提升政府機關施政績效目標，除將預算制度作為主要的改革重心外，並結合中程策略計畫制度，強調以組織整體的目標為導向，以績效評估為手段，要求公共組織應建立公共策略規劃暨績效預算的中程計畫架構。本研究旨在探討各國採用公共策略規劃應用在體育機關時，所制定的流程以及計畫方式，並分析我國推動中程施政計畫之背景與現況，瞭解策略規劃理論的定義與模式，並以體育機關相關人員對中程計畫制度之意見，提出適合我國行政院體委會中程施政計畫之運作方式與計畫內容，供未來領導者管理之參考。本研究採取文獻探討法及深度訪談法，首就各國中程計畫制度及策略規劃理論進行探討分析，再對行政院整合性機關、體育相關機關等人員進行訪談，以實地蒐集個案方面的資料，包括機關的願景與目標、計畫擬訂過程、相關配套措施及內部支持程度，除對策略規劃理論作進一步的建議，並對行政院體育委員會中程施政計畫規劃作業提出具體改善措施。本研究發現：（一）願景建構階段：應蒐集國內外相關體育資料，召開小組會議撰擬體育白皮書，作為訂定中程施政計畫之依據，而高階領導者應傾全力支持組織願景，並具備協調溝通的能力。（二）內外在環境分析階段：為善加運用體育團體等外在豐富資源，應就各類利害關係者進行評估，瞭解機關面臨的機會與威脅，另應就組織內部的資源、現行策略與成果進行評估，鑑定組織本身的優缺點。（三）策略制定階段：整合各類策略目標、對各項計畫排列優先順序、邀集相關人員組成規劃小組。（四）策略執行階段：進行各項計畫之追蹤管考、落實跨組織之合作機制、有效運用各種人力資源，形成夥伴關係。（五）策略評估階段：訂定可衡量組織績效指標的方法、擬訂具體指標確實改善組織缺失。最後，綜合各國中程計畫制度經驗、策略規劃理論模式與相關機關對中程計畫制度的看法，為行政院體育委員會中程計畫制度作業提出建議。
參考文獻:	壹、中文部分一、書籍司徒達賢　民84　策略管理，台北：遠流出版公司。江明修　民87　公共行政學研究方法論，台北：著作自刊。江岷欽、林鍾沂　民84　公共組織理論，台北：國立空中大學。行政院研究發展考核委員會民88 研考三十－行政院研究發展考核委員會成立三十週年專輯，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民89　行政院所屬各機關中程施政計畫作業說明會，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民91a 行政院所屬各機關施政績效評估作業手冊，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民91b 中央政府機關組織基準法草案說帖，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民91c 行政院功能業務與組織調整暫行條例草案說帖，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民91d 中華民國政府組織與工作，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。行政院國家科學委員會民91 政府科技計畫概算編製暨審議作業手冊，台北：行政院國家科學委員會。行政院體育委員會民88 第一次全國體育會議實錄，台北：行政院體育委員會。民89　體育白皮書，台北：行政院體育委員會。詹中原主編民89 新公共管理－政府再造的理論與實務。台北：五南圖書出版公司。休斯（Hughes, O. E.）著民88　公共管理新論（Public Management and Administration, 2nd ed.）（林鍾沂、林文斌譯），台北：韋伯文化出版社。（原作1998出版）胡幼慧民86　質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流圖書公司。佩潔（Padgett, D. K.）著民89 質化研究與社會工作（Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research Challenges and Rewards）（王金永、李易蓁、李婉萍、邱慧雯、許如悅、陳杏容、梁慧雯、劉昭君、簡憶鈴、蘇英足），台北：洪葉文化事業有限公司。張進德　民88 企業預算及利潤：理論與實務。台中：企業大學文教基金會。楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園編著民83　社會及行為科學研究法。台北：台灣東華書局有限公司。二、學位論文曾煥寧民89　策略規劃之探索性研究－以精省為例，私立東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。黃一秀民89 婚姻暴力之受虐婦女求助歷程之探討，私立東海大學社會學系研究所碩士論文。葉淑芬民89　財團法人文教基金會策略管理之研究，私立大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。三、期刊丘昌泰民88 強化地方政府的策略規劃功能，研考雙月刊，23期3卷，頁26-34。韋端民86 論如何有效推動中程計畫預算作業制度，研考雙月刊，21卷5期，頁3-9。張允玲民89　計畫績效評估與其在計畫作業中之應用，研考雙月刊，24卷4期，頁54-60。孫本初、劉坤億、范祥偉民89　英、紐、澳、美四國政府再造經驗對我國的啟示，考銓，24期，頁2-32。陳靜夫　民83 策略規劃與組織發展，今日合庫，20卷4期，頁69-78。黃朝盟民89a公共策略規劃暨績效預算－從美、澳的執行經驗建立適當之評估架構，理論與政策，14卷1期，頁23-41。民89b 公共策略管理之適當模式－哈佛企業政策、策略聯盟、競爭力分析…還是其他，中國行政評論，9卷4期，頁1-34。黃榮護、蕭元哲、曾詮宸民84　公共策略管理，空大行政學報，4期，頁175-204。四、網路資源行政院研考會民90　先進國家之中程施政計畫制度，台北：行政院研考會，上網日期：民90年7月8日。World Wide Web: http://www.rdec.gov.tw/govpakt/show.asp?id=e0102 貳、英文部分一、書籍 Blumenthal, J. M. 1993 Candid reflections of a businessman in Washington. In J. L. Perry & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management: public and private perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield. Bryson, J. M. 1995 Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (Rev.ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bryson, J. M., Freeman, R. E., & Roering, W. D. 1986 Strategic planning in the public sector: Approaches and directions. In B. Checkoway (ed.), Strategic perspectives on planning practice. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books. Dahl, R. A. & Lindblom, C. E. 1953 Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: HarperCollins. Flynn, N. 1997 Public sector management(3rd ed), London: Prentice-Hall. Freeman, R. E. 1984 Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman Press. Joyce, P. 1999 Strategic management for the public services. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press. Mintzberg, H. 1994 The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press. Mockler, R. J. 1995 Strategic management: The beginning of a new era. In D. E. Hussey (Ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons. Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. 1992 Strategic management of public and third sector Organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Hughes, O. E. 1998 　Public management and administration: An introduction (2nd ed.), London: Macmillan Press. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1995 Performance auditing and the modernization of government. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Press. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. 2000 Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Porter, M. 1980 Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. 1985 Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press. Power, M. 1997 The audit society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Rainey, H. C. 1991 Understanding and managing public organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Ranson, S. & Stewart, J. 1994 Management for the public domain. London: Macmillan. Roberts, N. C. 1993 Limitations of strategic action in bureaus. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Public management: The state of the art (pp.153-172). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Roeber, R. J. C. 1973 The organization in a changing environment. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts. Smith, R. J. 1994 Strategic management and planning in the public sector. London: Longman. Wamsley, G. L. & Zald, M. N. 1973 The political economy of public organizations. Lexington, Mass.: Heath. 二、期刊 Ansoff, H. I. 1980 Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131-148. 1991 Strategic management in a historical perspective. International Review of Strategic Management, 2(1): 3-69. Berry, F. S. & Wechsler, B. 1995 State agencies’ experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 12(2), 159-168. Bettinger, C. & Albro, W. 2001 Strategic planning that computes. Bank Marketing, 33(8) , 27-31. Boyne, G. 2001 Planning, performance and public services. Public Administration, 79(1), 73-88. Brooks, A. 2001 Flexible strategies. Supply Management, 6(16), 41. Broom, C. A. 1995 Performance-based government models: Building a track record. Public Budgeting and Finance, 15(4), 3-17. Brunner, M. E. 2001 Strategic plans Clearly mark the path to success. Rural telecommunications, 20(4), 62. Chaffee, E. E. 1985 There modes of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98. Chandler, H. L. 2002 Living your strategic plan. Association management, 54(2), 16. Early, S. 1990 Issues and alternatives: Key to FMC’s strategic planning system. Planning Review, 3, 26-33. Franklin, A. L. 2001 Serving the public interest? Federal experiences with participation in strategic planning. American Review of Public Administration, 31(2), 126-138. Fredrickson, J. & Mitchell, T. 1984 Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 399-423. Hood, C. 1991 A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. Lefkowith, D. 2001 Lefty’s corner: Effective strategic planning. Management Quarterly, 42(1) 7-11. Melkers, J. & Willoughby, K. 1998 The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58, 66-73. Noyes, T. E. 1985 The evolution of strategic planning at signode.” Planning Review, 9, 10-13. Oliver, R. W. 2001 Real-time strategy: What is strategy, anyway? Journal of Business Strategy, 22(6), 7. O’neil, M. A. 2001 A simple, effective approach to the strategic planning process. Journal of Business Strategy, 62(3), 3-5. Perry, J. L. & Rainey, H. G. 1988 The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182-201. Poister, H. T. & Streib D. G. 1994 Municipal management tools from 1976 to 1993: An overview and update. Public Productivity and Management Review, 18(4), 121-122. 1999 Strategic management in the public sector: Concepts, models, and processes. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(3), 308-325. Prescott, J. E. & Smith, D. C. 1989 The largest survey of the ‘leading edge’ competitor intelligence managers.” Planning Review, 3, 6-13. Purcell, T. 2001 Strategic planners lead the pack. Journal of accountancy, 192(6), 26-30. Rainey, H. C., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. 1976 Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-244. Thiel, S. V. & Leeuw, F. L. 2002 The performance paradox in the public sector. Public performance & management review (25)3, 267-281. 三、網路資源 Australia Sports Commission 2002 ASC Strategic Plan 2002-2005 [Report posted on the World Wide Web].Australia: Author. Retrieved Oct 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ausport.gov.au/asc/corpdocs/ascstrat.html Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2001 A Sporting Future for All [Report posted on the World Wide Web]. UK: Author. Retrieved Nov 14, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.culture.gov.uk/sport/sporting_future.html 2001 A Sporting Future for All: The Government’s Plan for Sport [Report posted on the World Wide Web]. UK: Author. Retrieved Nov 14, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.culture.gov.uk/sport/govt_plan.html 2001 A Sporting Future for All: Action Plan [Report posted on the World Wide Web]. UK: Author. Retrieved Nov 14, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/sport_igap_intro.pdf Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 2001 Backing Australia’s Sporting Ability: A More Active Australia [Report posted on the World Wide Web].Australia: Author. Retrieved Nov 14, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dcita.gov.au/Article/0,,0_1-2_14-3_490-4_105331,00.html Sport Canada 2002 Canadian Sport Policy [Report posted on the World Wide Web].Canada: Author. Retrieved Oct 14, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca/progs/sc/pol/pcs-csp/index_e.cfm 2002 Implementation of Federal-Provincial/Territorial Priorities For Collaborative Action 2002-2005 [Report posted on the World Wide Web].Canada: Author. Retrieved Oct 14, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/sc/pubs/fptsc/index_e.cfm
描述:	碩士國立政治大學公共行政研究所 86256024 91
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086256024
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[公共行政學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
25602401.pdf		13Kb	Adobe PDF2	878	檢視/開啟
25602402.pdf		18Kb	Adobe PDF2	746	檢視/開啟
25602403.pdf		15Kb	Adobe PDF2	764	檢視/開啟
25602404.pdf		61Kb	Adobe PDF2	1463	檢視/開啟
25602405.pdf		96Kb	Adobe PDF2	1365	檢視/開啟
25602406.pdf		87Kb	Adobe PDF2	13159	檢視/開啟
25602407.pdf		42Kb	Adobe PDF2	2021	檢視/開啟
25602408.pdf		116Kb	Adobe PDF2	1377	檢視/開啟
25602409.pdf		64Kb	Adobe PDF2	1009	檢視/開啟
25602410.pdf		28Kb	Adobe PDF2	1275	檢視/開啟
25602411.pdf		119Kb	Adobe PDF2	879	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋