Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35483
|
Title: | 「震變與突圍」―財團法人九二一震災重建基金會與政府住宅重建策略之比較 |
Authors: | 王俊凱 Wang,Chun-Kai |
Contributors: | 樓永堅 Lou,Yung-Chien 王俊凱 Wang,Chun-Kai |
Keywords: | 九二一地震 住宅重建 公設財團法人 行政法人 策略矩陣分析法 921 Earthquake residential reconstruction government-organized non-governmental organization(GONGO) administrative corporation strategic matrix analysis |
Date: | 2004 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 15:07:46 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 1999年台灣發生九二一地震之後,中央政府為因應災後重建需要,制定「九二一震災暫行條例」,並依法設置「行政院九二一震災災後重建推動委員會」負責重建事項之協調、審核、決策、推動及監督。其次再將中央政府所收震災捐款設立「財團法人九二一震災重建基金會」,聘任政府相關單位代表與民間社會人士組成董監事會共同管理基金。 財團法人九二一震災重建基金會為一公設的財團法人(GONGO),成立之初主要功能仍是在配合政府施政,並未因面對地震應變而有所調整。然而2000年台灣進行50年來首次的政黨輪替,卻也意外地改變了基金會的組織型態,以「議題導向、主動規劃」成為基金會新的思考方向,並在此基礎之上展開策略規劃。 本文主要以「策略矩陣分析法」對於基金會所推動的住宅重建策略進行分析,並以政府所推動相對之住宅政策作為比較基準(benchmark),透過實務上的驗證分析,說明在一個創新的組織型態下,確實能更為有效地處理「公共」議題,同時為「公設財團法人」或是「行政法人」的角色找出新的價值與定位。 Following Taiwan’s September 21 (921) Earthquake in 1999, the central government answered post-disaster reconstruction needs by drawing up the Temporary Statute for 921 Earthquake Reconstruction. On this basis it established the Executive Yuan 921 Earthquake Post-Disaster Recover Commission to address problems of co-ordination, policy approval and development, process advancement and overall supervision. In addition, it formed the 921 Earthquake Relief Foundation using donations received by the central government, while placing government representatives from applicable agencies as well as members of the public on a board of directors to manage the foundation’s funds.
The 921 Earthquake Relief Foundation was a “government-organized non-governmental organization” (GONGO). Its main function at the time of its formation was to coordinate with the government in the implementation of policy, but it was not able to adjust its role in the face of new contingencies. In 2000, however, Taiwan’s first transfer of political power in fifty years unexpectedly reshaped the foundation. Its line of thinking became “issue-oriented and planning-proactive,” and on this basis it began to be involved in strategic development.
This article uses strategic matrix analysis to investigate the residential reconstruction policy advanced by the foundation. With the corresponding residential policy advanced by the government as a benchmark, and using practical verification and analysis, it argues that an organization that has undergone change is indeed able to efficiently deal with “public” themes while at the same time seeking out new value and orientation in the role of a GONGO or the “administrative corporation.” |
Reference: | 中文書目: 江大樹、廖俊松。(2001)。府際關係與震災重建。台北:元照出版。 司徒達賢。(1995)。策略管理。台北:遠流出版。 司徒達賢。(2001)。策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法。台北:智勝文化出版。 吳崑茂。(2004)。台灣與日本震災住宅重建比較。台北:傳文文化出版。 吳思華。(2000)。策略九說。台北:臉譜出版。 阪神•淡路大震災復興誌。總理府。(2000),6卷,299頁。 花敬群。(2001)。九二一重建地區住宅需求與空餘屋媒合芻議。建築研究簡訊,32期。台北:內政部建築研究所。 官有垣、陸宛蘋。(2004)。政府暨準政府機構創設的非政府組織之治理分析:以台灣農業財團法人為例。第三部門學刊,第一期,127-168。 洪鴻智。(2004)。災後重建體系及其運作機制檢討與建制之研究。行政院災害防救委員會委託研究報告。 陳免。(2004)。國庫通財庫—秘密管道大搜查。商業周刊,853期。 陳新民。(2003)。新創「行政法人」制度:行政組織精簡的萬靈丹?國政研究報告。財團法人國家政策研究基金會。 蔡培慧。(2001)。商品化住宅與不平等發展下之九二一災後住宅重建困境與出路。世新大學社會發展所碩士論文。 鄭讚源。(2003)。從九二一大地震探討我國勸募活動之管理運用問題。九二一震災災後重建推動委員會委託研究。 蕭新煌、吳忠吉。(1992)。台灣區縣市文化基金會組織與功能之評估研究。行政院文化建設委員會委託研究計畫。 謝志誠。(2004)。九二一災後住宅重建政策分析。九二一地震五週年國一研討會。 謝志誠。(2002)。921震災重建基金會捐款運用報告。財團法人九二一震災重建基金會。 謝國興。(2001)。協力與培力:全國民間災後重建聯盟兩年工作紀要。全國民間災後重建聯盟。 謝國興、馮燕。(2000)。921震災捐款監督報告書。全國民間災後重建聯盟。 顧忠華。(2000)。台灣非營利組織的公共性與自主性。台灣社會學研究,第四期,145-189。 外文書目: Billis, D., 1993, Organizing Public and Voluntary Agencies. London: Routedge. Itsuki Nakabayashi & Taro Ichiko (2004), A Comparative Study of Built-up Area Reconstruction Measure and Strategy among Earthquake Disasters of Hanshin Awaji(Japan), East Marmara(Turkey), and 921 Chi-chi(Taiwan), Tokyo Metropolitan University Press. Kotler, P. (1984), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control(5th ed.), New York: Prentice Hall Inc.. McMillan, John (1992), Games, Strategies, & Managers, New York: Oxford University Press. Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press New York. Steinberg, Natalie (2001), Background Paper on GONGOs and QUANGOs and Wild NGOs, http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/role/intro/def/2001/0112wild.htm. Streeck, W& P. Schmitter(1985), Community, Market, State-and Associations? in Private Interest Government-Beyond Market and State, Beverly Hills:Sage. 網站: 政府改造工程:http://www.reform.nat.gov.tw/ 九二一基金會:http://www.921fund.org.tw/ 九二一重委會:http://portal.921erc.gov.tw/ 內政部營建署:http://www.cpami.gov.tw/921info/921info1_list.php 喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會:http://www.himalaya.org.tw/ 中時電子報:http://www.chinatimes.com/ 聯合新聞網:http://www.udn.com/ |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 91932010 93 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919320101 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|