政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35410
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51227704      Online Users : 929
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35410


    Title: 市場進入策略與營運策略之動態性研究-以資訊軟體產業為例
    Foreign Market Entry Strategies & Dynamics of Operation Strategies-The Case of Firms in the Software Industry
    Authors: 黎遠駿
    Li,Francis
    Contributors: 于卓民
    Yu,Chwo-Ming
    黎遠駿
    Li,Francis
    Keywords: 海外市場
    進入策略
    營運策略
    資訊軟體
    動態性
    Foreign Market
    Entry Strategies
    Operation Strategies
    Software Industry
    Dynamics
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:57:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著全球經濟和社會發展需求的變化，資訊產業的全球性結構調整日益明顯，由硬體主導型的發展轉為向軟體和服務主導型發展。經濟全球化為我國軟體產業發展提供了難得的機遇，我國軟體產業要積極參與國際分工，就必須走向世界，但是在走向世界的同時，也必須仔細思考什麼才是自己國際化的目的、自己企業內部的核心資源是什麼、做好自己的國際化策略或戰略的準備嗎？也因此在國際化動作中，如何選擇正確的海外市場進入策略就顯得格外重要，要採用怎樣的進入策略與企業核心資源、國際化策略、企業服務內容與產品等等之間的關係與互動已不是單純不變的環結，而是隨著市場變動不停變化的，也因此動態性調整就成為一個很重要的課題。
    在眼前的日常生活當中，什麼事情已經都脫離不開資訊。也因此作為資訊產業核心的軟體及資訊服務產業，已成為新世紀全球的第一大產業。IDC 在2005年9月的研究報告中顯示全球資訊服務產業在 2003年產值已高達6410億美元，爾後年平均成長率一直保持在 5-9% 之間，可以說是一片欣欣向榮的氣象，到去年 2005年整個產值達到 7400億美元，預期到 2009 年，整個資訊服務產值將到 9250億美元，這也意味著繼工業大革命後的另一個新經濟時代的到來。
    在整個產業成長中，又以亞太地區成長最大，從 2003-2009 CGAR 達 9.7%，遠超過全球平均 CGAR 6%。我國因具備良好資訊基礎設施、具備與華人相同語言、文化背景、接近並熟悉亞太市場、充裕資金與高階經營人才、與西方的技術合作經驗、豐富的 PC 軟硬體整合經驗等。充分顯示台灣軟體產業在競爭的市場環境中比起歐美資訊大廠已率先佔據極佳位置。
    因此本研究就以進入策略的學術理論做為基礎，再結合個案公司實務上軟體業海外發展經驗，整合一套適於軟體產業的海外市場進入策略供企業參考。以研究結論來看，資訊軟體業因為產品與服務的特性關係，較易偏向採用較高承諾度的資源投入方式，將營業拓展至海外市場；除此之外，在地化的深耕發展也是必需要走的一條路，而且因為隨著地主國市場的投入，對地主國市場的熟悉度也會漸漸增加，也因此會在地主國市場進行一系列動態性的營運策略調整。這裡所謂的營運策略，不僅僅只是產品策略或市場策略，甚至整個市場的進入策略也會隨之調整，譬如說由獨資的進入策略轉變為合資的模式。
    As today’s global economic and social development needs continue to change，the Information industry’s global economic requirement change has gradually become more obvious；shifting from a hardware-driven type of development，to software and service-lead development。Economic globalization has brought along excellent opportunities to the development of our national software industries；to actively participate one’s software industry in the international division of labor，one will have to proceed toward the outer world；meanwhile，one must also carefully consider the purpose of one’s internationalization，the core resources of one’s inner enterprise，and whether one is prepared with a proper internationalization strategy。Consequently， knowing how to correctly select suitable foreign markets and entry strategies to be incorporated into the strategy is exceptionally critical in the process of internationalization，and in addition to that，the decision as to how the foreign markets should enter into the strategy，the enterprise’s core competence，internationalized strategy，the service content and product of the enterprise and etc. ，the relationship and interactivity between the each are no longer simple and invariable connections；instead，they are now constantly varied in accordance with the market change，and as a result, dynamic adjustment has became a very important topic today。
    In today’s society，our everyday lives have become inseparable from the information technology；therefore，as being the core of information industries，software and information service have become one of the worlds top main industries of the new century。In August，2005，research from IDC have shown，that the global information service industries’ industrial output value in 2003 has increased up to 6410 billion USD；from then on，the output value has successfully maintained an annual average rate of 5-9%。Apparently，that was the sign of a long-term prosperity，as last year (2005) the output value has boosted up to 7400 billion USD。Predictions have been made that the value will continue to rise dramatically in the years to come，and in 2009，the output value for information service industries will reach a height of 9250 billion USD；this also meant the arrival of the age of new economics after the industrial revolution。
    Within the whole industrial development in general，the Asia Pacific area stand to have the most rapid growth，with a CGAR rate of 9.7% from the year 2003-2009，which highly exceeded the world average rate of the CGAR of 6%。The reason for our outstanding industrial development is basically due to our possession of a good information infrastructure，similarity of the language and cultural background in Asia, familiarity toward the Asia Pacific market，abundant funds and talented individuals with high management skills，and our rich background experiences with the western technical collaboration，PC hardware and software integrations and etc。These qualities all demonstrated that apparently，in today’s competitive market，Taiwan software industries have already exceeded many of Europe and America’s top information manufacturers。
    The following study will use the academic theories for the process of foreign market entry strategies as the fundamental base，and on top of that，the practical aspect based on personal experiences of software industry’s foreign market developments；these will be combined into a set that is applicable to software industries for the foreign market entry strategies，suitable for enterprises’ reference。
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    IDC，「全球軟體市場規模及預測」，2005年4月19號。
    IDC，「中國軟體市場2005-2009年預測與分析」，2005 年。
    IDC，「國際數據資訊」，2004年11月29號。
    于卓民 (2000) ，國際企業環境與管理，台北：華泰文化事業。
    于卓民, 曾浩岳（1997），「台灣廠商出口活動之研究－國際化階段及其影響因素」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    王凱 (2005)，「資訊軟體發展現況與趨勢」，台北：資策會資訊市場情報中心。
    方至民 (2000)， 企業競爭優勢，台北： 前程企管。
    司徒達賢 (1995)，「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
    艾瑞市場咨詢（iResearch）(2005)，「2004年中國網路安全研究報告」。
    全球高科技產業研究資料庫 (2001)，我國軟體產業環境概論，台北：資策會資訊市場情報中心與工研院電子所聯合出版。
    李宗原 (2002)，「服務業海外市場進入模式選擇之研究~以台商投資大陸之實證分析」。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
    李蘭甫（民83），國際企業論，台北：三民書局。
    何華倫（2002），「大陸台商資源組合類型對經營績效之影響— 進入策略與組織能力之干擾效應」，大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
    吳青松（1999），國際企業管理－理論與實務，台北：智勝文化事業。
    吳思華 (2000)， 策略九說： 策略思考的本質，台北：臉譜。
    吳讚庭（2003），「交易成本、制度環境、國際化經驗』對海外進入模式與經營績效之影響-台商赴海外投資之實證研究」。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    周書正 (2002) ，「資源基礎觀點探討台商歐洲子公司之經營-以宏碁法國公司為例」，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    周意智，「中小企業國際化及多角化歷程與人力資源策略分析－ 以台灣保長企業為例」，國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    姚子龍 (2003)，「台商進入中國大陸市場時機與模式之研究-以台商食品業為例」，中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    張東隆 & Philips D. Grub (1991)，「台灣資訊業廠商國際化競爭策略之探討」，台灣經濟金融月刊，第27卷，第11期，頁 34-44。
    張峻源譯，Cateora and Graham 原著（民88），國際行銷學，台北：西書出版社。
    鼎新電腦公司 「93年年報」
    葉郁芬（1993），「台灣廠商在東協五國之市場進入策略與國際化過程之研究」，國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。

    二、 英文部分
    Anderson, E. & Gatignon, H. (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions”, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(Fall), pp. 1-26.
    Atherton, A. and Sear, L. (1997), “Working within the Global Economy: Insights into the Internationalisation Process in the North East England”, Paper presented to the 27th efmd European Small Business Seminar, Rhodes.
    Aulakh, Preet S. and Masaaki Kotabe (1997), “Antecedents and Performance Implications of Channel Integration in Foreign Markets”, Journal of International Business Studies 28 (1), pp. 145 - 175.
    Barkema H.G. & Vermeulen, F. (1998), “International Expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal 41, pp. 7-26.
    Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management (March), pp. 99-120.
    Bartlett, Christopher & Sumantra Ghoshal (1987), “Tap your subsidiaries for global reach”, Harvard Business Review, 64(6), pp. 87-94.
    Bartlett & Sumantra Ghoshal. (1991), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
    Bilkey, Tesar G. (1977), “The export behavior of smaller Wisconsin manufacturing firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, 9, pp. 93-98.
    Birkinshaw, J. M. and N. Hood (1998), “Multinational subsidiary development: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies”, Academy of Management Review 23, pp. 773-795.
    Bridoux, Flore, (2004), “A Resource-based Approach to Performance and Competition: An Overview of the Connections between Resources and Competition”, IAG Working Paper, pp. 8.
    Brooke, Michael Z. (1986), International Management: A Review of Strategies and Operations, London: Hutchinson.
    Buckley, P. J., Newbould, G.D., & Thurwell, J. (1979), “Going international—the foreign direct investment behavior of small UK firms”, Proceedings of Annual Meeting of European International Business Association, Uppsala, Sweden, December, pp. 72-87.
    Cavusgil, S. T.(1980), “On the Internationalization Process of Firms”, European Research, 8, pp. 273-281.
    Chadwick，M. & Vandermerwe，S. (1989),“The Internationalization of Services”, The Service Industries Journal, pp. 79-93.
    Chang S-J.& Rosenzweig PM. (2001), “The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 747-776.
    Chatterjee, S.& Wernerfelt B. (1991), “The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence”, Strategic Management Journal 12, pp. 33-48.
    Chung, Henry. F. L. & Enderwick, Peter (2001), “An Investigation of Market Entry Strategy Selection: Export vs. Foreign Direct Investment Modes: A home-host Country Scenario”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 18 (4), pp. 443 - 460.
    Clark, Timothy & Derek S. Pugh (2001), “Foreign Country Priorities in the Internationalization Process: a Measure and an Exploratory Test on British Firms”, International Business Review 10, pp. 285-303.
    Conner, K., & Prahalad, C., (1996), “A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism”, Organization Science, 7(5), pp. 477-501.
    Contractor，F.J. & Kundu，S.K. (1998),“Model Choice in a World of Alliances： Analyzing Organization Forms in the International Hotels Sector”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29（2）, pp. 325-358.
    Cuervo-Cazurra Alvaro & Miguel Ramos, (2002), “A Resource-Based Teleological Analysis Of The Internationalization Process”, pp. 6-11.
    Cyert R, March J. (1963), A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Davidson，W.H. (1982),“The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity：Country Characteristic and Experience Effect”, Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 9-22.
    Dunning, John H. (2000), “The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity”, International Business Review 9, pp. 163 - 190.
    Dunning (1998), “Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor?”, Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1), pp. 45 - 66.
    Dunning (1995), “Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism”, Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3), pp. 461 - 491.
    Dunning (1988),“The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions”, Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1), pp. 1 - 31.
    Dunning (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests”, Journal of International Business Studies 11 (1), pp. 9 - 31.
    Dunning (1977), “Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach”, in The International Allocation of Economic Activity, O. Bertil et al., eds. Proceeding of Noble Symposium held in Stockholm, London: Macmillan.
    Dunning (1958), American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry, London: Allen and Unwin.
    Eicher. Theo & Kang, Jong Woo (2002), “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment or Acquisition: Optimal Entry Modes for Multinationals”, University of Washington.
    http://faculty.washington.edu/te/papers/eicherkang.pdf.
    Eriksson, K.; Johanson, Jan; Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. (1997), “Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process”, Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, pp. 337-360.
    Erramilli，M.K. (1990),“Entry Mode Choice in service Industries”, International Marketing Review,（Summer）, pp. 50-62.
    Erramilli, M. Krishna & Rao C.P. (1993), “Service Firms’ International Entry- Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction Cost Analysis Approach”, Journal of Marketing, 57(3), pp. 19-38.
    Florin Juan & Alphonso O Ogbuehi.(2004), “Strategic Choice In International Ventures: A Contingency Framework Integrating Standardization and Entry-Mode Decisions”, Multinational Business Review, Vol 12, Iss. 2, pp. 83.
    Forsgren, M.(2002), “The Concept of Learning in the Uppsala Internationalization Process Model: a Critical Review”, International Business Review 11, pp. 257-277.
    Gomes-Casseres, B. (1989), “ Ownership Structures of Foreign Subsidiaries”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , pp. 1-25.
    Green, Paul C. (1999), Building Robust Competencies: Linking Human Resource Systems to Organizational Strategies, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 23.
    Gregory E. Osland, Taylor Charles R. & Shaoming Zou (2001),“Selecting international modes of entry and expansion”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning 19/3, pp. 153-161.
    Hennart, Reddy S. (1997), “The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of Japanese investors in the United States”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 1-12.
    Herrmann, Pol & Deepak K. Datta (2002), “CEO Successor Characteristics and the Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: An Empirical Study”, Journal of International Business Studies 33 (3), pp. 551 - 569.
    Hill, Charles, W., Hwang, Peter, & Chan Kim. (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode”, Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 117-128.
    Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm: a model ofknowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of
    International Business Studies, 8, pp. 23-32.
    Johanson, J. & Weidersheim-Paul, F. (1975), “The Internationalization of the firm: four
    swedish cases”, Journal of Management Studies, 12, pp. 305-322.
    Jonach, Ronald S., & Sommerlatte Tom, (1999), The Innovation Premium: How Next-
    Generation Companies are Achieving Peak Performance and Profitability , MA: Perseus Books.
    Kim, W.C & Hwang，P. (1992),“Global Strategy and Multinationals’ Entry Mode Choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring, pp. 29-53.
    Kogut & Singh, H. (1988), Entering the United States by Joint Venture：Competitive Rivalry and Industry Structure, Chapter 14, Contractor and Lorange, pp. 241-251
    Kogut & Zander, U. (1993), “Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4), pp. 625-645.
    Kumar, V. & Velavan Subramaniam (1997), “A Contingency Framework for the Mode of Entry Decision”, Journal of World Business 32 (1), pp. 53 - 72.
    Levesque, Moren & Dean A. Shepard. (2002), “Entrepreneurs’ choice of entry strategy emerging and developed markets”, Journal of Business Venturing, 5219, pp. 1-26.
    Levitt (1976), “The Industrialization of Service”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 65-74.
    Madhok Anoop (1998), “The Nature of Multinational Firm Boundaries: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities and Foreign Market Entry Mode”, International Business Review 7, pp. 259 - 290.
    Maignan, I & Lukas, B.A. (1997), “Entry Mode Decisions: The Role of Managers’ Mental Models”, Journal of Global Marketing, 10(4), pp. 7-22.
    Malnight TW. (1995), “Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp. 119-131.
    Mata J, Portugal P. (2000), “Closure and divestiture by foreign entrant: The impact of entry and post-entry strategies”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 549-562.
    Melin L. (1992), “Internationalization as a strategy process”, Strategic Management Journal, (Winter Special Issue), pp. 99-118.
    Nakos, George & Keith D. Brouthers (2002), “Entry Mode Choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27 (1), pp. 47 - 64.
    Nelson RR (Ed.). (1993), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
    Palenzuela Valentin Azofra & Alfredo Martinesz Boillo, (1999), “Transaction costs and bargaining power; Entry mode choice in foreign markets”, Multinational Business Review; Spring, pp. 62-75.
    Paloma Sánchez & Cristina Chaminade(1999), “ Case Study Research Application To The Analysis Of Intangibles”, Autonomous University of Madrid, pp. 5 – 12
    Rasheed, H. S., (2005), “Foreign Entry Mode and Performance: The Moderating Effects of Environment”, Journal of Small Business Management, Milwaukee:Vol 43, Iss. 1, pp. 41,
    Root, F.R.(1994), Entry Strategies for International Markets, Lexington Books, Washington, DC.
    Rugman AM & Verbeke A. (1992), “A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23, pp. 761-771.
    Sohn, J. (1994), “ Social knowledge as a control system: a proposition and evidence from the Japanese FDI behavior”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 295-324.
    Stopford, John M. & Wells, Louis T. (1972), Managing the multinational enterprise , London : Longman.
    Tallman, S. & Yip, G. (2001), “Strategy and the multinational enterprise”, In Rugman, A. M. & Brewer, T. L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international business, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997), “ Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, pp. 509-533.
    Van de Ven, A. H. (1992), “Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note”, Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer Special Issue), pp. 169-188.
    Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. (1995), “Explaining development and change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 29, pp. 510-540.
    Vernon R. (1966), “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics (May), pp. 190-207.
    Vernon R. (1979), “The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, pp. 255-267.
    Welch LS & Luostarinen, R. (1988), “Internationalization: Evolution of a concept”, Journal of General Management, 14, pp. 34-55.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal 5, pp. 171-180
    Westney ED, Zaheer S. (2001), “The multinational enterprise as an organization”, In Rugman A. M. & Brewer, T. L. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of international business, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Wind, Yoram & Howard Perlmutter （1977）, “On the identification of frontier issues in international marketing”, Journal of World Business, Winter, pp. 131-139.
    Woodcock, C. P., Beamsih, P., & Makino, S. (1994), “Ownership-based Entry Strategies and International Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), pp. 253-272.
    Yin, Robert K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods , second edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Young, Stephan, J. Hamill, C. Wheeler & J. R. Davies (1989), International Market Entry and Development: Strategies and Management, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Young, S., Huang C-H & McDermott M. (1996), “Internationalization and competitive catch-processes: Case study evidence on Chinese multinational enterprises”, Management International Review, 36, pp. 295-314.
    Zhao, Xuemin & Reinhold Decker (2004), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Cognitions from Empirical and Theoretical Studies”, pp. 13-17.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    92932530
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092932530
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93253001.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2756View/Open
    93253002.pdf81KbAdobe PDF2732View/Open
    93253003.pdf89KbAdobe PDF2786View/Open
    93253004.pdf150KbAdobe PDF21020View/Open
    93253005.pdf440KbAdobe PDF2896View/Open
    93253006.pdf386KbAdobe PDF23337View/Open
    93253007.pdf155KbAdobe PDF21344View/Open
    93253008.pdf1223KbAdobe PDF24754View/Open
    93253009.pdf212KbAdobe PDF21567View/Open
    93253010.pdf228KbAdobe PDF21199View/Open
    93253011.pdf114KbAdobe PDF21433View/Open
    93253012.pdf1416KbAdobe PDF21517View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback