Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35390
|
| Title: | 企業重組分立策略對企業價值的影響 |
| Authors: | 黃義軒
Huang,Stevens |
| Contributors: | 吳啓銘
黃義軒
Huang,Stevens |
| Keywords: | 重組
分立
企業評價
企業重整
Restructuring
Spinoff
Corporate Valuation |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 14:54:12 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 1980年至今，是企業併購與重組的年代，許多企業集團進行了繁複的併購與重組活動，經學者20年的研究，企業併購活動能創造新的成長機會及提高企業價值，已不徨多論。而企業重組的價值創造活動就少有研究。
企業重組活動包括廣義的分立與撤資二種。撤資是消極的行為，是減少損失或獲利後退出的行為。廣義的分立，包括 (1) 單純式分立:將公司的部分資產或業務分割並獨立成為子公司， (2) 另立子公司:結合公司內部資源並加上外部資源而成立子公司， (3) 入主: 以取得別家公司股權，先實質控制該公司並結合公司資源來成立子公司。企業集團透過分立進行重組活動遠比併購頻繁。
從重組分立的價值創造結果來分析重組策略的關鍵成敗因素，是本研究的重點。本研究以台灣主要的電子資訊企業集團為例，分析1980年以來，電子資訊企業集團進行企業分立的重組行為時所創造的價值。從財務評價的實證數據來分析分立的重整活動，是否為企業帶來成功的結果，即創造了母子公司價值及使股票累積投資報酬率增加。
本研究也針對有形及無形資產的轉移情況及高層經理人及董事會的變化來分析企業價值的變化與高層人力資源改變的關係。
當企業成長至集團的規模時，就會產生新的資源利用與分配的問題，集團執行長的工作就不再是行銷或產品發開，而是資源使用的分配；毋庸置疑，只要資源分配得當，企業重組分立活動會是企業集團組織創造新價值的捷徑。
本研究也發現台灣企業集團，在進行分立公司的重組過程中，公司擁有或新創設一個子公司，共並使該公司成為上市(櫃)公司後，亦可創造驚人價值，分立子公司只要取得母公司少許資源，亦在3-10年內可創造巨大價值。
國外亦有研究顯示，在重組分立子公司的過程中，就算母公司的價值實際上沒有改變，而子公司卻產生了新的且獨立的市場價值；投資人普遍認為，子公司除了享有企業集團的資源協助，亦增加了價值能見度。投資人易於分析子公司各種營運活動所帶來的企業價值變化。而財務評價結果亦發現子公司也易於因決策快速及營運彈性而創造新價值。上述三種分立方式均可創造不同的價值，價值的創造的關鍵即在於資源分配的恰當與否。
本研究以分析財務評價的數據結果，計算公司價值的變化並進一步根據公開資訊分析分立策略的關鍵成功因素；並反向分析數據與重組過程中的高層經理人的調度變化及有形資產及無形資產的轉移之間的關聯性。並據以建立十三項命題。
Since 1980 till 2005, the eve of M&A and Restructuring, So many companies initiated the complicated activities of M&A and Restructuring. Through the pass 20 years studies by scholars, they found, the growth opportunity and enhance the corporate value are been creating. But, the research of “Restructuring” is no so many. The generic meaning of the “Corporate Restructuring” will include: Spinoff and Disinvestment. The disinvestments are the behavior of passive decision, for reduction the loss or exiting after profit. The generic “Spinoff” include: (1) Pure Spinoff: separate the business unit or asset unit and build up new subsidiary. (2) New Subsidiary: combine the external capital or resource to build up new subsidiary. (3) Acquisition and then Control: Acquire external share and real control the company through organization change and board members change, then combine the parent company resource become a true subsidiary. The group of business to restructure the business through “Spinoffs” is much more than M&A.
To study the key success factors of “Business Restructuring” through the value - creation of “Spinoffs” is one of the key points of the dissertation.
The base of the dissertation is the “Subsidiary of the Electronic-Information Group in Taiwan”. Analyzing the results of valuation from the “Spinoffs” from 1980 till 2005. To study the Financial Valuation through empirical results of “Spinoffs” and try to confirm the “Spinoffs” is successful or not. That is, the valuation of both parents and subsidiaries were enhanced or not, or the accumulation return of investment of them were enhanced or not.
The dissertation will study the real condition of the transfer of tangible and Intangible Assets and the change of top management and board members. Analyzing the relation of the change above and the corporate value.
As the corporate grow to the scale of group, will produce the new issues of resource distribution and utilization. The responsibility of the CEO of group is not the marketing or product development area, but the resource distribution. Of course, if the decision-making of resource distribution is proper, the “Spinoffs” will be the royal road of the creation of “New Value”.
The dissertation had found the process of “Spinoffs” – own or build up a new subsidiary and make it IPO (initial public offering). It will create amazing value. Subsidiaries just transfer a few resources from parent, and then create mass value in 3 to 10 years.
The dissertation had found the process of “Spinoffs”- although the value of the parents company has no change, but the subsidiaries still create the new and alone market value the same. The investors ideal is, subsidiaries through “Spinoffs” will enjoy the supporting from parents. The subsidiaries had improved the transparency of operation. Investors are easy to analyze the change of value from their business operation. The financial evaluation had found the subsidiaries had speed up the decision-making process and more decision flexibility.
The 3 kinds of “Spinoffs” can create different value. The key point of the value creation is the proper resource distribution.
The dissertation will base on the results of financial valuation to evaluate the change of companies’ value, and base on the public information to analyze the key success factor of “Spinoffs”.
The dissertation will reverse to check the relation of the top-management change and the assets transfer (include tangible and intangible assets). The final proposition had been built the 13 propositions through the dissertation conclusion. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文部分:
Christina Chen，1999年10月，「專談美國思科系統公司總裁約翰•沈佰爾斯談高科技企業併購」，68-75。
王建賀，1998年，「融資行為與資本結構關聯之實證研究-以台灣半導體為例」。
王萬成與高祥□，2002年，「裁決性應計項目、衍生性金融商品與盈餘平穩化」，財務金融學術研究討會。
中華民國產業關聯表，行政院主計處，2003年。
司徒達賢著，組織診斷與組織發展，台北商略圖書公司，1981年。
司徒達賢著，策略管理，遠流出版公司，2000年。
司徒達賢等著，台灣企業經營的衝擊與再發展，台北中華徵信所，1978年。
朱丕正，1999年，「台灣高科技公司融資模式」，元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
伍忠賢著，企業購併理論與實務，新陸書局，2000年出版。
李建然、廖益興與廖秀美，2003年，「董事會結構特徵與盈餘管理」，美西太平洋大學未出版論文。
李美華譯，社會科學研究方法，時英，1998年出版。
吳冬友、楊玉坤著，統計學，五南書局，2002年6月出版。
吳思華著，策略九說，麥田，1996年出版。
吳啓銘著，企業評價-個案實證分析，智勝文化事業有限公司，2000年出版。
洪明洲編譯，現代競爭分析，華泰書局，1999年出版。
周行一、劉璞合著，投資學的世界，天下，2002年出版。
唐春金，2004年，「台灣公司治理與盈餘管理關聯性之實證研究」。
柯承恩，2000年，「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議」，會計研究月刋，第173期與第174期，75-81與79-83。
相葉宏二著，透析企業價值組合策略， 遠流出版事業股份有限公司，2000年出版。
孫梅瑞，2000年，「國內上市公司從事公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究」。
黃柏農，1998年，「台灣的股價與總體變數間的關係」，證券市場發展季刋，第十卷，第四期，89-109。
陳隆麒著.當代財務管理，華泰文化事業公司，1999年出版。
陳永昌， 1999年，「台灣電子業產業融資政策與總體經濟因素、公司價值之相關性研究」，中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論。
葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩等著，公司治理與評等系統，商智文化，2002年出版。
薛敏正與林嬋娟，2003年，「自由現金流量與盈餘管理關聯性之研究」，台灣管理學刋，第3卷第1期，151-168。
劉平文著，經營分析與企業診斷，華泰書局，1994年出版。
蘇裕惠，2001年，「由公司監理之角度思考企業價值報導體系之強化」。
謝靜宜，2001年，「資產重組-追蹤股之研究」，政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
謝明俊，1999年，應用經濟加值於績效管理，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
二、 英文部分:
Arnold, T. and J. James., “Finding Firm Value without a Pro Forma Analysis.” Financial Analysts Journal, 2000,Vol.56, No. 3:77-84.
Born, Jeffery A., and Victoria B. McWilliams, “Shareholder Responses to Equity-for-Debt Exchange Offers: A Free-Cash-Flow Interpretation,” Financial Management, 22, Winter 1993, 00. 19-20.
Copeland, Thomas E., and Won Heum Lee, “Exchange Offers and Stock Swaps-New Evidence,” Financial Management, 20, Autumn 1991, pp. 34-84.
Cusatis, Patrick J., James A. Miles, and J. Randall Woolridge, “Restructuring Through Spinoffs-The Stock Market Evidence”, Journals of Financial Economics, 33, 1993, pp 293-311.
Clark, Kent, and Eli Ofek, “Mergers as a Means of Restructuring Distressed Firms: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, December, 1994, pp. 541-555.
Elton, Gruber, “Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis”, 1995. pp. 101-194
EVA. The Real Key to Creating Wealth, Al Ehrbar, John Wiley, 1998. pp. 79-244
Gupta, Atul, and Leonard Rosenthal, “Ownership Structure, Leverage, and Firm Value: The Case of Leveraged Recapitalizations,” Financial Management, 20 Autumn 1991, pp. 69-83.
Griffin J.M. and Karolyi G.A., “Another look at the role of the industrial structure of markets for international diversification strategies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 1998, pp. 351-373.
Healy, Paul, and Kishna Palepu, “Earnings and Risk Changes Surrounding Primary Stock Offers,” Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 1990, pp. 293-311.
Healy, Paul, and Kishna Palepu, “The Challenges of Investor Communication: The Case of CUC International, Inc., “Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 1995, pp. 111-140.
Hershey, M. and V. J. Richardson, and S. Scholz, “How Foolish Are Internet Investor?”, Financial Analysts Journals, 2000, Vol. 56,No 1:62-69.
Hite, Gailen, and James E. Owers, “Security Price Reactions Around Corporate Spin-Off Announcements,” Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 1983, pp. 409-436.
Hubbard S.T., “The Impact of Overseas Listing On Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Dow Jones Stock Exchange”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1999, Vol. 18, pp111-120.
Introduction to Business & Valuation, Palepu, Bernard, & Healy, 1997.
Investment Valuation, Aswath Damodaran, 1996. pp. 54-210.
James Rosenfeld, ”An Examination of the Stock Return and Operating Performance of Sponsored Spin-offs”, 2003. pp. 101-224.
Jeffery S. Abarbanell and Brian J. Bushee. “Abcdrmal Returns to a Fundamental Analysis Strategy”,1998. pp.90-311.
Kellogg, D. and J.M. Charnes. “Real-Options Valuation for a Biotechnology Company.” Financial Analysts Journal, 2000, Vol. 56, No. 3:76-84.
Klein, April,James Rosenfeld, and William Beranek, “The Two Stages of an Equity Carve-Out and the Price Response of Parent and Subsidiary Stock”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 1991, 12,pp 449-460.
Markides, C.C. and I. Christopher, “Shareholder Benefits from Corporate International Diversifications “ Evidence from U.S. international Acquisitions, ” Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, pp. 343-366.
Nagar, V., D. Nanda, & P. Wysocki, “Discretionary Disclosure and Stock-Based Incentives”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003, 34, 1, pp. 283-309.
Palliam & Z. Shalhoub, “The Phenomenology of Earnings Management within the Confines of Agency Theory”,International Journal of Value-Based Management, 2003,16, 1,.pp. 75-88.
Porter, M.E., “From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1987,pp. 43-59.
Rappaport, Alfred and Mark L, Sirower, “Stock or Cash?” The Trade-Offs for Buyers and Sellers in Mergers and Acquisitions,” Harvard Business Review, November-December 1999, pp. 147-158.
Richardson V.J., & J.F. Waegelein, “The Influence of Long-Term Performance Plans on Earnings Management and Firm Performance”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2002, 18, 2, pp.161-183.
Saudagaran, S.M., “An Empirical Study of Selected Factors Influencing The Decision to List on Foreign Stock Exchanges”, Journal of International Business Studies,1988, pp 53-60
Schipper, Katherine, and Abbie Smith, ”Effects of Recontracting on Shareholder Wealth”, 1983。
Schlarbaum, G. G. and Miller, Anderson, Sherrerd, “Valuation Models and Financial Statement Analysis”, AIMR publications, p. 4-17.
Schwartz, E. S. and M. Moon., “Rational Pricing of Internet Companies.” Financial Analysts Journal, 2000, Vol. 56, No. 3:62-75.
Slovin, Myron B., Marie E. Sushka, and Steven R. Ferraro, “A Comparison of the Information Conveyed by Equity Carve-Outs, Spin-Offs, and Asset Sell-Offs,” Journals of Financial Economics, 37(1), January 1995, pp. 89-104.
Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, Weston, et al., 1998.
Thomas J. Chemmanura,An Yanb,”A theory of corporate spin-offs”, 2003.
Toeh S.H., I. Welch, & T.J. Wong, “Earnings Management and the Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings:, Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 1998, 1, 63-99.
Vermaelen, Theo, “Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signaling: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 1981, pp. 139-183.
Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free Press, 1975, pp. 132-175.
Wruch, Karen Hopper, “Financial Distress, Reorganization, and Organizational Efficiency,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, October 1990, pp. 419-444.
Weston, Siu, Johnson, ”Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance”, Journal of Financial Economics , 2003, pp. 177-189.。
Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others don’t, Jim Collins, , 2003,
Yeh, Y-H., Lee, T-S., & T. Woidtke, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan” International Review of Finance, 2001, 2, 1&2, pp. 21-48.
Yeo, G.H.H., P.M.S. Tan, K. W. Ho, & S. Chen, “Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2002, 29, 7&8,1023-1046. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
91932710
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091932710 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
