政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35316
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51598833      Online Users : 103
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35316


    Title: 公司治理與轉投資行為 - 以威盛電子為例
    Corporate Governance and Equity Investment - Taking VIA Technologies as An Example
    Authors: 施銘賢
    Shih, Albert Min-Hsien
    Contributors: 周行一
    Chou, Edward
    施銘賢
    Shih, Albert Min-Hsien
    Keywords: 公司治理
    轉投資
    大股東
    股東權益
    透明度
    控制權
    投票權
    corporate governance
    equity investment
    controlling shareholder
    shareholder right
    transparency
    control right
    voting righht
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:43:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    一九九七年東亞金融風暴起因之一即為公司治理不佳,其影響所及至數年後仍餘波蕩漾,而根據2000年6月麥肯錫顧問公司所做的全球投資人意見調查發現,有高達80%的美國投資人願意多付18%的價格來買良好公司治理企業的股票;自2001年底以來,美國「恩隆」(Enron)與「世界通訊」(WorldCom)等弊案又陸續爆發,其中所暴露的公司治理問題,讓世人驚覺這已是全球企業刻不容緩的議題,並亟思未來如何防止類似事件之發生。
    公司治理經緯萬端,但都與如何確保資金提供者的投資能夠獲得應有的報酬有關。據此,公司治理的重要議題之一即為如何使小股東的權益不受內部人(即大股東與管理者)的侵犯;尤其在當今大企業紛紛進行事業轉投資之際,大股東常身兼轉投資事業之經營者,如何確保外在投資人(小股東與債權人)應得的報酬,並兼顧其他利害關係人的利益,為公司治理中實際且有趣之課題。我國大股東往往基於營運效率、自身利益與控制權的考量,會做出許多便宜行事卻不利公司治理的行為,如轉投資事業與母公司之間的透明度不足、大股東交叉持股或持有間接股權、所有權與經營權不分、母公司與轉投資事業之間可能的利益衝突、乃至於大股東個人風格等,這些大股東在轉投資事業中的角色定位與公司治理間的相互關係是本論文論述之重點。同時,為了加強研究的深度與實證性,作者特別藉由個案公司的實際案例來驗證文獻上的觀點,結論所得與研究相符合,並更能增添對企業經營之變化多端與不易控制之親身體驗。
    本文最後並討論世界銀行、OECD及我國所規範之公司治理架構,希望公司治理能實際有助於我國企業之轉投資行為。因為制度的設計與執行若能加強公司治理與監督管理者的行為,當能強化公司競爭力,此乃公司治理積極面的貢獻。
    Abstract
    One of the reasons for the East Asia 1997 financial crisis is because of the careless corporate governance. The impact of this financial crisis actually has had deep and board affection even afterward. According to one investigation by Mckinsey & Company in June 2000, there are about 80% of global investors who are willing to pay 18% extra money to buy those stocks belong to companies have better corporate governance. On the other hand, starting from the end of year 2001, the successive collapse of Enron, WorldCom, and other USA companies has exposed the serious and urgency about corporate governance. It makes people in worldwide enterprises realize how significant the corporate governance is and try to avoid similar events occurred.
    Although corporate governance has many aspects, it all related to how to secure the deserved return of the capital providers. Accordingly, one of the important topics of corporate governance is to protect the minority shareholder rights from being invaded by the insiders (controlling shareholders and top executives). This topic become even more important especially when controlling shareholders are also top executives of the equity-invested companies. Thus, how to secure the investors’ (minority shareholders and creditors) rights is an interesting and practical issue of corporate governance.
    Controlling shareholders in Taiwan are used to manage firms based on their own convenience such as the efficiency of operation, interest of themselves, and control rights, instead of considering corporate governance. This attitude, however, will easily result in some negative behaviors such as the lack of transparency between mother company and her equity investment, cross holding or private holding of controlling shareholders, indifferences between ownership and management, the potential interest impact between mother company and equity investment, and even the affection of firms’ performance by the characteristics of controlling shareholders. This thesis emphasize in the above correlation between corporate governance and equity investment. We also examine a real firm’s case to enhance its conviction.
    This thesis also discusses the corporate governance structure of World Bank, OECD, and Taiwan. It is the author’s hope that corporate governance can be practically useful for a firm’s performance as its aggressive contribution.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    1. 「透明度特別企劃」,會計研究月刊第200期,2002年7月號
    2. 朱應舞,會計研究月刊 203期,2002年10月號,p46~47
    3. 「財測實質審閱六公司有話要說」經濟日報,2002年7月19日
    4. 「亞洲財務長」(CFO Asia)雜誌,2002年2月號,「亞洲最佳年報排行專題」
    5. 周行一、劉璞,「投資學的世界」,2001年3月,天下遠流出版
    6. 方平煌,「高階管理者的人格特質、領導風格對內控制度執行成效 之影響研究」,成功大學EMBA論文,民國91年
    7. 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,「公司治理與評等系統」,商智文化,2002年11月初版
    8. 王智慧,「台灣公司買回自己股票的財富效果及其決定因素之實證研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文,民國91年
    9. 鄭桂蕙,「公司買回庫藏股之資訊內涵: 投資人觀點」,國立政治大學會計系,民國91年
    10. 林任達,「台灣高科技及非高科技企業跨國購併宣告對股票報酬與財務績效影響研究」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民91
    11. 劉敬業,「臺灣公開發行公司交叉持股行為之探索」,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文,民國89年
    12. 呂彥慧,「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係–以台灣新上市公司為例」,中山大學財務管理碩士論文,民國88年
    13. 陳漢唐,「台灣上市公司轉投資活動與股價關連性之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國86年
    14. 魏早啟,「上市公司董監事特性與經營績效之研究」,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文,民國85年
    15. 楊俊中,「股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究」,國立台灣大學會計系碩士論文,民國86年
    16. 楊麗弘,「台灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效研究」,長庚大學管理研究所碩士論文,民國87年度
    17. 陳德純,「企業改革法制建構之比較法探討」,東吳大學法律學系研究所碩士論文,民國91年度
    18. 「王雪紅專訪」,天下雜誌雙月刊,2003年三月一日第270期
    19. 莊素玉,「陳文琦專訪」,遠見雜誌,2001年7月1日
    20. 柯林斯(Jim Collins), 「從A 到A+(good to great)」,遠流,2002/9
    21. 李明成,先探雜誌1154期,P.85-86,2002年5月10日
    二、英文部分
    1. ”Designed by Committee”,2002/6/15,Economist Newspaper Limited, London
    2. Claessens, Simeon Djankov, Larry H.P.Lang, Feb. 1999, “The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics
    3. Claessens, Simeon Djankov, Joseph P.H. Fan, and Larry H.P. Lang, Dec. 2002, “Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings”, The Journal of Finance
    4. Fiona Haddock, Oct 2002, “ Enron? Been there, done that“, Asia Money
    5. La Porta, Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, April 1999, “Corporate Ownership around the world”, The Journal of Finance
    6. La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 2000, “Investor protection and corporate governance”,Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3-27
    7. La Porta, Florencio Lopez-De-Silances, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, June 2002, “Investor protection and corporate valuation”,The Journal of Finance
    8. Malek Lashgari, Mar 2003, “ Corporate governance: A theoretical perspective“,Journal of Academy of Business
    9. Michael S Gibson, Mar 2003, ”Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging market?”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
    10.Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1988, Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315
    11. Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny, 1986, “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control”,Journal of Political Economic; Vol.94, no.3;
    12.Shleifer, Robert Vishny, November 1997,“The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons ”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 112, Issue 4
    13.The Economist, “Survey: Capital punishment”, London, Sep 14, 2002
    14.Wolfenzon, Daniel, 1999, “A theory of pyramidal structures”, Manuscript, Harvard University
    三、網站部分
    1. 全國博碩士論文資訊網
    http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/theabs/1/
    2. DaimlerChrysler AG(德國戴姆勒賓士與美國Chrysler Corp.)
    http:/www.daimlerchrysler.com/index_e.htm
    3. 西文資料檢索ProQuest 資料庫
    http://140.119.115.36/ttslink/webdb.asp?num=proquest
    4. 中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心
    http://www.otc.org.tw/c_index.htm
    5. 台灣證券交易所
    http://www.tse.com.tw/home.htm
    6. 威盛電子網站
    http://www.viatech.com.tw
    7. 經濟部公司登記資料庫http://www.moea.gov.tw/~doc/ce/cesc1110.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    89932123
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089932123
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93212301.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2907View/Open
    93212302.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2916View/Open
    93212303.pdf19KbAdobe PDF21017View/Open
    93212304.pdf23KbAdobe PDF21283View/Open
    93212305.pdf23KbAdobe PDF21091View/Open
    93212306.pdf78KbAdobe PDF21877View/Open
    93212307.pdf62KbAdobe PDF23912View/Open
    93212308.pdf196KbAdobe PDF29009View/Open
    93212309.pdf59KbAdobe PDF21379View/Open
    93212310.pdf23KbAdobe PDF21163View/Open
    93212311.pdf52KbAdobe PDF21264View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback