政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35263
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113160/144130 (79%)
Visitors : 50751733      Online Users : 570
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/35263
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35263


    Title: DSL訂價之探討:由產品特性觀點及政策觀點
    Authors: 羅亦斯
    Contributors: 管郁君
    陳鴻基

    羅亦斯
    Keywords: DSL
    寬頻
    快樂訂價法
    搭售
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:35:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: DSL是寬頻上網的方式之一。以技術而言,不論是在寬頻滲透率、寬頻總使用人口數、寬頻成長率,DSL領先其他替代性科技。但是,DSL的研究除了顧問公司定期收集各國產品及分析市場規模外,很少有研究對不同國家的DSL進行比較,並且找出差異性,其原因在於資料過於分散,且要對各國的市場有深入觀察。本研究即嘗試克服上述困難,以橫斷面研究為起始點,並收集美國、英國、台灣三國資料,由兩種角度分析DSL的訂價:首先是透過產品特色觀點,也就是快樂訂價法,將DSL價格,拆解成基本元件再組合,以找出影響價格的主要特色,並比較三國主要特色異同。第二個觀點起源於DSL販售價格常有價格長期不變,但內容大幅度變動的情況;而且隨著IPTV、衛星電視、VoIP的技術成熟,ISP的獲利來源,逐漸朝加值服務轉移,但這種現象並未同時出現於DSL普及率高的國家。有部份原因是各國的區域迴路政策,區域迴路開放程度落後的國家,其DSL銷售內容以基礎特色為賣點;區域迴路開放度高的國家,其DSL販售內容除了基礎特色外,加值服務(搭售)也成為DSL銷售內容的主力。
    此外,本研究結果也顯示區域迴路販售所導致的加值服務差異化,其時間優勢無法持續太久,因為擁有線路所有權的電信業者會在有限時間內,迎頭趕上。但是區域迴路開放有助於DSL加值服務的引進與多元化已在本研究取得支持性證據。
    DSL is one of primary broadband technologies to household users, and it is also in significant in terms of global broadband penetration rate, the number of subscribers, and the growth rate. Except for commercial institutes’ research periodically collecting data and analyzing the trend of market, there are few studies comparing cross-country DSL services since data are scattered on numerous ISPs’ web pages, and a comparison standard is not easy to establish. This study attempts to settle the problem of cross-country comparison. Initially, based on three representative countries’ data, DSL service price is disassembled into fundamental service characteristics in terms of hedonic pricing, and the primary service characteristics for specific country are located. But the primary characteristics have not been unchanged for years, even DSL service price remains stable, and with emergence of new broadband applications, such as IPTV, satellite TV, and voice over IP, ISPs’ profit profile has shifted from fundamental service characteristics, like speed and the number of IP address, to value-added service. However, this change on ISPs’ profit profile does not apply to each country with high DSL penetration rate. Our finding reveals that policy determines the focus of DSL service marketing. For those countries that ignore local loop unbundling policy, their DSL service marketing simply centers on fundamental characteristics; for those countries that emphasize local loop unbundling policy, their DSL service marketing focus on both fundamental characteristics and value-added services.
    This study also indicates that the advantage of first mover for ISPs without wires benefited from local loop unbundling policy will not remain since incumbent telecoms also operate ISPs will soon catch up in a period from six months to one year. However, this study has demonstrated that local loop unbundling policy could facilitate the introduction and diversification of value-added service on DSL offering.
    Reference: ACI-FIND. (2004a). The number of xDSL subscribers reaches over 3 millions. Retrieved April 26, 2005, from http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/howmany_disp.asp?id=89
    ACI-FIND. (2004b). Taiwan`s broadband status quo for household market Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/howmany_disp.asp?id=91
    Allison, K., & Garrahan, M. (2008, January 21). Digital delivery breaks out of bit-part film role. Financial Times, p. 15.
    Angwin, J. (2005, June 8). AOL`s plan to move content to free site is a risky reversal. Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
    AT&T et.al. v Iowa Utilities Board et.al. (U.S. Spreme Coiurt 1999).
    Baltas, G., & Freeman, J. (2001). Hedonic price methods and the structure of high-technology industrial markets: an empirical analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 599-607.
    Baranes, E., & Bourreau, M. (2005). An economist`s guide to local loop unbundling. Communications and Strategies(57), 13-31.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Basu, A., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (2003). Indirect network externality effects on product attributes. Marketing Science, 22(2), 209-221.
    Bauer, J. M. (2005). Unbundling policy in the United States. Communications & Strategies(57), 59-82.
    Bauer, J. M. (2006). From static efficiency to innovation focus: The turnaround of U.S. unbundling policy. In P.
    Baake & B. Preissl (Eds.), Local loop unbundling and bitstream access: regulatory practice in Europe and the U.S. (pp. 150-175). Berlin: Deutsches Institute fur Wirtschaftsforschung.
    Benkard, C. L., & Bajari, P. (2005). Hedonic price indexes with unobserved product characteristics, and application to personal computer. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23(1), 61-75.
    Berndt, E. R. (1991). The measurement of quality change: constructing a hedonic price index for computers using multiple regression methods. In The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary (pp. 127-131). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
    Bertolucci, J. (2005). CNET editor`s review for SBC Yahoo DSL. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/SBC_Yahoo_DSL/4505-6539_16-31533949-2.html
    Bijl, P. W. J. d., & Peitz, M. (2005). Local loop unbundling in Europe: Experience, prospects and policy challenges. Communications and Strategies(57), 33-57.
    Blood, D. O., & Ngiam, K.-M. (2008). A focus on filters: latest developments in MGM v. Grokster. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 20(2), 7-12.
    Borg, K. (1997). Busy signal becomes new Internet anthem. Computer Technology Review, 17(6), 1-3.
    Boulding, W., & Purohit, D. (1996). The price of safety. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(1), 12-25.
    Bourreau, M., & Dogan, P. (2005). Unbundling the local loop. European Economic Review, 49, 173-199.
    Brynjolfsson, E., & Kemerer, C. F. (1996). Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Science, 42(12), 1627-1647.
    Carroll, S. (2003). Choices, choices ; surprisingly, given all the hype surrounding broadband, not everyone who gets it finds it worthwhile. PC Magazine, 22(2), 84.
    Cathey, J. M., & Wiggins, C. E. (2002). Broadband: new speeds, new risks. Strategic Finance, 83(9), 38-43.
    Cava-Ferreruela, I., & Alabau-Munoz, A. (2006). Broadband
    policy assessment: A cross-national empirical analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 30(8-9), 445-463.
    Cave, M. (2006). Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment. Telecommunications Policy, 30(3,4), 223-237.
    Cavusoglu, H., & Raghunathan, S. (2007). Selecting a customization strategy under competition: Mass customization, targeted mass customization, and product proliferation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(1), 12-28.
    Chaffraix, K. (2005). Bye-bye dial-up: broadband ubiquity chugging right along. TechWeb, 1.
    Cole, R., Chen, Y. C., Barquin-Stolleman, J. A., Dulberger, E., Helvacian, N., & Hodge, J. H. (1986). Quality-adjusted price indexes for computer processors and selected peripheral equipment. Survey of Current Business, 66(1), 41-50.
    Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-580.
    Court, A. T. (1939). Hedonic price indexes with automotive example. In The Dynamics of Automobile Demand (pp. 99-117). Detroit, MI: General Motors.
    Covad Co. v. FCC, No. 05-1095 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
    CSTB. (2002a). Broadband policy and regulation. In Broadband: bring home the bits (pp. 167-215). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
    CSTB. (2002b). Technology options and economic factors. In Broadband: bring home the bits (pp. 120-166). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
    Distaso, W., Lupi, P., & Manenti, F. M. (2006). Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and emperical evidence from the European Union. Information Economics and Policy, 18(1), 87-106.
    Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67, 297-308.
    Dowell, G. (2006). Product line strategies of new entrants in an established industry: Evidence from the US bicycle industry. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 959-979.
    Ein-Dor, P. (1985). Grosch`s law re-revisited: CPU power and the cost of computation. Communications of the ACM, 28(2), 142-151.
    FCC. (1999). UNE Remand Order (Vol. 15 Fcc Rcd 3696, 3699): Federal Communications Commission.
    FCC. (2004). Federal communications commission releases data on high-speed internet access services. Washington, D. C.: Federal Communications Commision.
    FCC. (2005). High-speed service for Internet access - status as December 31, 2004. Washington, D. C.: Federal Communications Commision.
    Franzblau, A. N. (1958). A primer of statistics for non-statisticians. New York: Harcourt.
    Frieden, R. (2005). Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States. Telecommunications Policy, 29(8), 595-613.
    Gagnaire, M. (2003). Unbundling characteristics and alternative technologies. In Broadband local loops for high-speed Internet access (pp. 45-77). Norwood, MA: Artech House.
    Gallaugher, J. M., & Wang, Y.-M. (2002). Understanding network effects in software markets: evidence from web server pricing. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 303-327.
    Gandal, N. (1994). Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. The Rand Journal of Economics, 25(1), 160-170.
    Gaskin, J. E. (2004). Broadband bible (Desktop edition ed.): John Wiley & Sons.
    Gorp, A. F. v., Maitland, C. F., & Hanekop, H. (2006). The broadband Internet access market: The changing role of ISPs. Telecommunications Policy, 30(2), 96.
    Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Ththam, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multiple regression analysis. In Multivariate Data Analysis (pp. 141-216). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Hancock, B. (2000). Home PC`s targeted by hackers Computers & Security, 19(5), 387-388.
    Hearn, T. (2004). Broadband surges. Multichannel News, 25(37), 40.
    Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2004, May 30). The broadband difference: how online Americans` behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home. Retrieved Oct. 12, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband_Report.pdf
    Huh, S., & Kwak, S.-J. (1997). The choice of functional form and variables in the hedonic price model in Seoul. Urban Studies, 34(7), 989-998.
    Hurlimann, A., & Suter, P. (2005). The Arthur D. Little global broadband report 2005. Zurich: Arthur D. Little.
    InfoCom. (2007, May 4). The UK still lags behind regarding local loop unbundling. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://www.infocom-de.com/pressarchives/press_040507.html
    Iowa Utilities Board v. FCC (8th Cir. 1997).
    Johnson, B. (2005, March 31). Online: Making up for lost time: The race to revolutionise Britain`s broadband services has finally begun, which means better deals for customers. The Guardian, p. 24.
    Kang, Y. M. (1989). Computer hardware performance: Production and cost function analyses. Communications of the ACM, 32(5), 586-593.
    Kang, Y. M., & Ein-Dor, P. (1989). Comments on "Attributes of the performance of central processing units: A relative performance prediction model"--comment/reply. Communications of the ACM, 32(2), 256-259.
    Klapper, D. (2005). An econometric analysis of product variety impact on competitive market conduct in consumer goods markets. OR Spectrum, 27(4), 583-601.
    Lafrance, R., & Schembri, L. (2002). Purchasing-power parity: Definition, measurement, and interpretation. Bank of Canada Review, 27-33.
    Lancaster, K. (1990). The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Science, 9(3), 189-206.
    Lynch, B. D., Raghav, H., & Lin, W. T. (1990). Economic analysis of micorcomputer hardware. Communications of the ACM, 33(10), 119-129.
    Massey, D., & Jackson, B. (2005). Welcome to the bell system memorial. Retrieved January 1, 2006, from http://www.bellsystemmemorial.com/index2.html
    McGinity, M. (2002). Broadband to go. Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 21-24.
    Megbolugbe, I. F. (1989). A hedonic index model: the housing market of Jos, Nigeria. Urban Studies, 26, 486-494.
    Metz, C. (2004). ISPs; when it comes to broadband Internet service providers, familiarity is clearly breeding contempt. PC Magazine, 23(23), 118.
    Mueller, K., & Johnson, T. (2005a). UK broadband market monitor: Point Topic.
    Mueller, K., & Johnson, T. (2005b, September 20). World broadband statistics Q2 2005. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.point-topic.com/contentDownload/dslanalysis/world%20broadband%20statistics%20q2%202005.pdf
    Mueller, K., & Johnson, T. (2005c). World broadband statistics Q3 2005. Retrieved December 27, 2005, from http://www.point-topic.com/contentDownload/dslanalysis/world%20broadband%20statistics%20q3%202005.pdf
    Nerlove, M. (1995). Hedonic price functions and the measurement of preferences: The case of swedish wine consumers. European Economic Review, 39, 1697-1716.
    OECD. (2006). OECD broadband statistics to June 2006. Retrieved September 21, 2007, from http://www.oecd.org/document/9/0,2340,en_2649_34223_37529673_1_1_1_1,00.html#Data2005
    Ofcom. (2004a). The communications market 2004. London: Ofcom.
    Ofcom. (2004b, April 28). Strategic review of telecommunications - phase 1 consultation document. Retrieved April 9, 2007, from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/telecoms_review1/telecoms_review/tcoms_rev.pdf
    Oh, S., Ahn, J., & Kim, B. (2003). Adoption of broadband Internet in Korea: The role of experience in building attitudes. Journal of Information Technology, 18(4), 267.
    Openreach. (2006, December 18). Shared MPF. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from http://www.openreach.co.uk/orpg/pricing/llu/downloads/ORPL_LLU_Smpf.htm
    Openreach. (2007, February 9). Full MPF. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from http://www.openreach.co.uk/orpg/pricing/llu/downloads/ORPL_LLU_Mpf.htm
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research--A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
    OTA. (2007). Telecommunications adjudicator update for February 2007. London: OTA.
    Parkin, M. (2003). Utility and demand. In Economics (pp. 149-166): Pearson Education.
    Point-topic. (2005). DSL worldwide directory (11th Edition). London: Point Topic.
    Point-topic. (2006a). DSL worldwide directory (12th Edition). London: Point Topic.
    Point-topic. (2006b, December 13). IPTV. Retrieved September 16, 2007, from http://point-topic.com/content/bmm/profiles/bmmiptv061212.htm
    Point-topic. (2007a). Broadband worldwide directory (13th Edition). London: Point Topic.
    Point-topic. (2007b). Broadband worldwide directory (14th Edition). London: Point Topic.
    Polykalas, S. E., & Vlachos, K. G. (2006). Broadband penetration and broadband competition: evidence and analysis in the EU market. Info : the Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 8(6), 15-31.
    Rao, H. R., & Lynch, B. D. (1993). Hedonic price analysis of workstation attributes. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 95-102.
    Richardson, T. (2004, June 29). BT`s DSL market share carries on falling. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/29/bt_dsl_share/
    Richtel, M., & Belson, K. (2005a, April 4). Increasingly, the Bells see their future on a screen. New York Times, p. C.4.
    Richtel, M., & Belson, K. (2005b, October 31). To battle the telephone giants, small Internet providers choose Wi-Fi as a weapon. New York Times, p. C.4.
    Riddel, M. (2001). A dynamic approach to estimating hedonic prices for environmental goods: an application to open space purchase. Land Economics, 77(4), 494-512.
    Robert, W. C., & Leonard, W. (2006). The failure of competitive entry into fixed-line telecommunications: Who is at fault? Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2(1), 113-148.
    Sarrel, M. D. (2005). Network; many households that have multiple PCs and a single broadband connection already have home networks. PC Magazine, 24(1), 122.
    Sarrell, M. D. (2003). Networking ; if you have just one broadband connection for multiple PCs, why not network them? PC Magazine, 22(2), 84.
    Shin, D. H. (2007). Socio-technical analysis of IPTV: A case study of Korean IPTV. Info: the Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 9(1), 65-79.
    Skouras, T., Avlonitis, G. J., & Indounas, K. A. (2005). Economics and mraketing on pricing: How and why do they differ? Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(6), 362-374.
    Song, J.-A. (2004). South Korea top for online gaming. Financial Times, p. 19.
    Sonus. (2006). Local loop unbundling: White paper. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.sonusnet.com/contents/brochures/Local_Loop_Whitepaper.pdf
    Speta, J. B. (2000). Handicapping the race for the last mile: a critique of open access rules for open access rules for broadband platforms. Yale Journal on Regulation, 17(1), 39-91.
    Triplett, J. E. (1986). The economic interpretation of hedonic methods. Survey of Current Business, 66(1), 36-40.
    United States Telecom Association v. FCC (D.C. Cir. 2002).
    Uzumeri, M., & Sanderson, S. (1995). A framework for model and product famility competition. Research Policy, 24, 583-607.
    Vanier, F. (2008). Broadband tariff benchmark report: Q4 2007. London: Point Topic.
    Waterman, D. (2007). The effects of technological change on the quality and variety of information products. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(8), 587-594.
    Waugh, F. V. (1928). Quality factors influencing vegetable prices. Journal of Farm Economics, 10(2), 185-196.
    WEF. (2005). Global competitiveness report 2005-2006. Retrieved December 26, 2005, from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Global_Competitiveness_Reports/Reports/GCR_05_06/Composition_of_the_Growth_Competitiveness_Index
    Whalley, J. (2006). Local loop unbundling and the strategic review of telecommunications in the United Kingdom. In P. Baake & B. Preissl (Eds.), Local loop unbundling and bitstream access: regulatory practice in Europe and the U.S. (pp. 122-149). Berlin: Deutsches Institute fur Wirtschaftsforschung.
    Wieland, K. (2005). Naked ambitions. Telecommunications International, 39(9), 34.
    Wray, R. (2004, November 19). BT to play fair or face break-up. The Guardian, p. 25.
    Wu, I. (2004). Canada, South Korea, Netherlands and Sweden: Regulatory implications of the convergence of telecommunications, broadcasting and Internet services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(1), 79-96.
    Zhang, M., & Tseng, M. M. (2007). A product and process modeling based approach to study cost implications of product variety in mass customization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(1), 130-144.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    91356505
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913565052
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    56505201.pdf49KbAdobe PDF21098View/Open
    56505202.pdf78KbAdobe PDF21318View/Open
    56505203.pdf109KbAdobe PDF21273View/Open
    56505204.pdf179KbAdobe PDF21147View/Open
    56505205.pdf457KbAdobe PDF21209View/Open
    56505206.pdf587KbAdobe PDF21227View/Open
    56505207.pdf355KbAdobe PDF21199View/Open
    56505208.pdf308KbAdobe PDF21252View/Open
    56505209.pdf659KbAdobe PDF21256View/Open
    56505210.pdf394KbAdobe PDF21153View/Open
    56505211.pdf413KbAdobe PDF21166View/Open
    56505212.pdf76KbAdobe PDF21504View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback