政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35194
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113160/144130 (79%)
Visitors : 50753972      Online Users : 711
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/35194


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35194


    Title: 問題權變模型在電子商務的應用
    Authors: 張懷民
    Contributors: 傅豐玲
    張懷民
    Keywords: 問題權變模型
    電子商務
    結果嚴重度
    社會共識
    網路行銷道德議題
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:24:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在1990年代中期，因為個人電腦和網路伺服器通訊科技能力的迅速發展以及電子商務的興起 (Marshall, 1999)，讓網路行銷道德成為社會大眾討論的焦點，更引發電子商務中道德議題的爭論。因此本研究參考Jones (1991)問題權變模型，並依據相關實證研究加以修正；另一方面，則是採用電子商務中交易安全、財產權、隱私權、不實廣告等道德議題驗證此模型，分別為『買賣證劵股票』、『音樂下載』、『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』、『假的見證人背書』等四情境，以瞭解社會大眾對其議題之觀點、決策過程以及其影響因素。透過線上問卷調查蒐集樣本，共收到1016份有效問卷，其中『假的見證人背書』情境255份、『音樂下載』情境253份、『買賣證劵股票』情境249份、『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』情境259份。
    由各情境之情境清楚及情境可想像的平均數、標準差來驗證各情境之可讀性，以平均數高、標準差低表示結果較佳，其研究結果顯示上述四個情境皆在水準以上；並以因素分析法將道德強度萃取出「潛在損害」、「社會壓力」二因素，統計結果顯示四情境皆具有結構效度。但在道德強度方面，以『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』、『假的見證人背書』二情境之道德強度較高，並且在道德決策過程 (道德認知、道德判斷、道德意圖)等變項的表現上，回巻者的回答均呈現出一定的道德水準；在道德強度二因素(「潛在損害」、「社會壓力」)以及二變項(「結果嚴重度」、「社會共識」)與道德決策之相關與預測分析方面，亦呈現出顯著正相關與解釋力之結果，而道德認知與道德判斷、道德判斷與道德意圖則是具有正向相關之關係與解釋力。
    然而就個人與組織權變變數對道德認知、道德判斷、道德意圖的干擾效果來看，相對主義在『音樂下載』與『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』二情境中僅對於道德判斷或道德意圖發揮影響力，而在『假的見證人背書』與『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』二情境中，理想主義對道德決策三階段均產生顯著之影響；並且在『假的見證人背書』與『郵件未以「密件附本」傳送』二情境中，企業組織所制定的獎懲制度會影響道德決策各階段。但在四情境中，人口 (性別、年齡、教育程度、職位、工作年資、年薪、網路行銷經驗)與組織(員工數、產業類型)統計變數對於道德決策過程之道德性高低，並不具有顯著的干擾效果。
    Reference: 中文部分
    1. 林杏子、何瑞峰、黃立文、陳政德、顏郁人、林麗紅、柯玲琴，「資訊倫理」，初版，華泰出版，西元2001年3月。
    2. 吳琮璠、謝清佳，「資訊管理---理論與實務」，2000年5月四版，智勝出版。
    3. 戚國雄，「資訊時代的議題 -- 兼談網路倫理」，應用倫理研究通訊，第5期，民國87年1月，頁12 - 18。
    4. 葉保強，『色情電子商務的「網罪」』，應用倫理研究通訊，第15期，民國89年7月，頁35-37。
    5. 袁世樽，「行銷人員行銷道德決策過程之研究」，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國87年6月。
    6. 陳宗平，「評定不實廣告方法之研究」，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國89年7月。
    7. 汪宜正，「數位音樂對唱片公司與音樂產業影響之探索性研究」，台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，民國90年6月。
    8. 劉志豪，「網際網路證劵交易詐欺之研究」，中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文，民國90年7月。
    9. 周伯恆譯，「倫理學入門（Gensler, H. J. 原著）」，韋伯文化，民國88年4月。
    10. 榮泰生，「網路行銷：電子商務實務篇」，初版，五南出版，民國89年。
    11. 傅豐玲、顏小娟，「資訊服務廠商行銷道德決策過程研究」，資管評論，第11期，民國91年，即將出版。
    12. 洪瑞敏，「科技介入服務接觸之研究----以美髮服務業為例」，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國90年6月。
    13. 黃俊英，「多變量分析」，第七版，中國經濟企業研究所，民國89年。
    14. 賴香菊、鄧宴如、吳芬滿、丁源宏、黃瑜峰、吳春池，「MP3對傳統唱片經營模式影響之研究」，第五屆台灣企業個案研討會論文集，國立高雄第一科技大學管理學院，民國89年。
    英文部分
    1. Akaah, I. P. “Influence of Deontological and Teleological Factors on Research Ethics Evaluations,” Journal of Business Research (39), 1997, pp. 71-80.
    2. Applegate, L. M., McFarlan, F. W. and McKenny J. L. “Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases,” 5th ed., McGraw-Hill International Editions, 1999.
    3. Banerjee, D., Cronan, T. P. and Jones, T. W. “Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics,” MIS Quarterly 22(1), 1998, pp. 31-60.
    4. Barach, J. A. “The Ethics of Hardball,” California Management Review (27:2), 1985, pp. 132-139.
    5. Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E. “Ethical Theory and Business,” 2nd ed., Prentice hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1983.
    6. Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J. and Tuttle, M. “A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making,” Journal of Business Ethics (6), 1987, pp. 265-280.
    7. Burger, J. M. Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A metaanalysis of the defensive- attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90: 496-512.
    8. Bush, V. D., Venable, B. T. and Bush, A. J. “Ethics and Marketing on the Internet: Practitioners’ Perceptions of Societal, Industry and Company Concerns,” Journal of Business Ethics (23:3), 2000, pp. 237-248.
    9. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K.M. and Wadsworth, L. L. “The Impact Of Moral Intensity Dimensions On Ethical Decision Making: Assessing The Relevance Of Orientation,” Journal of Managerial Issues (XIV:1), 2002, pp. 15-30.
    10. Dabholkar, P. A. "Consumer Evaluations in New Technology-Based Self-Service Options: An Investigation of Alternative Models of Service Quality," International Journal of Research in Marketing (13:1), 1996, pp. 29-51.
    11. Davis, M. A., Johnson, N. B. and Ohmer, D. G. “Issue-Contingent Effects of Ethical Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison,” Journal of Business Ethics (17), 1998, pp. 373–389.
    12. DeConinck, J. B. “How Sales Managers Control Unethical Sales Force Behavior,” Journal of Business Ethics (11), 1992, pp. 789-798.
    13. Eining, M. M. and Christensen, A. L. “A Psycho-Social Model of Software Piracy: The Development and Test of a Model,” in Dejoie, R., Fowler, G. and Paradice, D. (eds.), Ethical Issues in Information Systems (Boyd & Fraeser Publishing Company, Boston, MA), 1991.
    14. Ferrell, O. C. and Gresham, L. G. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing (49), Summer 1985, pp. 87-96.
    15. Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G. and Fraedrich, J. “A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing,” Journal of Macromarketing (9:2), 1989, pp. 55-64.
    16. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Boston: Addison- Wesley, 1975.
    17. Fiske, S.T. and Taylor, S. E. Social Cognition, Random House, New York, 1984.
    18. Ford, R. C. and Richardson, W. D. “Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature,” Journal of Business Ethics (13), 1994, pp. 205-221.
    19. Forsyth, D. R. “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (39:1), 1980, pp. 175-184.
    20. Forsyth, D. R. “Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies,” Journal of Business Ethics (11:5, 6), 1992, pp. 461-470.
    21. Forsyth, D. R. Moral Attribution and the Evaluation of Action, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Florida, 1978.
    22. Frankena, W.K. “Ethics, ” Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1963
    23. Frey B. F. “The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context,” Journal of Business Ethics (26), 2000, pp. 181-195.
    24. Fritzsche, D. J. “An examination of marketing ethics: Role of the decision maker, consequences of the decision, management position, and sex of the respondent,” Journal of Macromarketing (8:2), 1988, pp. 29-39.
    25. Fritzsche, D. J. and Becker, H. “Ethical behavior of marketing managers,” Journal of Business Ethics (2), 1983, pp. 291-299.
    26. Fu Linda, Fong- Ling, Lin Yi- Ling and Jou Jacob Y. H. “Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making of Marketing Professionals- A Comparison of America and Taiwanese Marketers,” PanPacific Management Review (3:1), 1999, pp. 79-94.
    27. Garrett, T. M. Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1966.
    28. Guy, M. E. Ethical Decision Making in Everyday Work Situations, Greenwood Press, Inc., 1990.
    29. Harrington, S. J. “A Test of a Person- Issue Contingent Model of Individual Ethical Decision Making in Organizations,” Journal of Business Ethics (16), 1997, pp. 363-375.
    30. Harrington, S. J. “The Effect of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denial of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgments and Intentions,” MIS Quarterly, September 1996, pp. 257-278.
    31. Hosmer, L. T. “The Ethics of Management,” Irwin, 1987.
    32. Hunt, S. D. and Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. “Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXX (February, 1993), 78-90.
    33. Hunt, S. D. and Vitell, S. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics,” Journal of Macromarketing (6:1), 1986, pp. 5-16.
    34. Jones, E. E., and McGillis , D. “Correspondent Inferences and the Attribution Cube: A Comparative Appraisal,” In New Directions in Attribution research (Vol. 1), Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W J. and Kidd, R.F (Eds.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, ,1976, pp. 389-420.
    35. Jones, T. M. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue- Contingent Model,” Academy of Managerial Review (16:2), 1991, pp. 366-395.
    36. Kant, I. Foundation of the Metaphysic of Morals, tr, to Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, H. J. Paton, trans., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948.
    37. Khosrow- Pour, M. and Herman, N. “Critical issues of Web- enabled technologies in modern organizations,” The Electronic Library (19:4), 2001, pp. 208-220.
    38. Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequences: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    39. Kohlberg, L. 1976. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive- development approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues: 31-53. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    40. Kohlberg, L. The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press., 1981.
    41. Laczniak, G. R. “Framework for Analyzing Marketing Ethics,” Journal of Macromarketing, 5 (Spring), 1983, pp. 7-17.
    42. Laczniak, G. R. and Inderrieden, E. J. “The Influence of Stated Organizational Concern upon Ethical Decision Making,” Journal of Business Ethics (6:4), 1987, pp. 297-307.
    43. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L. and Mansfield, P. “A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business,” Journal of Business Ethics (25:3), 2000, pp. 185-204.
    44. Marshall, K. P. “Has Technology Introduced New Ethical Problems?,” Journal of Business Ethics (19:1), 1999, pp. 81-90.
    45. Mason, R. O. “Applying Ethic to Information Technology Issues,” Communications of the ACM (38:12), 1995, pp. 55-57.
    46. Mason, R. O. “Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age,” MIS Quartely (10:1), 1986, pp. 5-12.
    47. Mehta, M. D. and Plaza, D. “Content analysis of pornographic image available on the Internet”, The Information Society (13:2), 1997, pp. 153 – 161.
    48. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
    49. Morris, S. A. and McDonald, R. A. “The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Business Ethics (14), 1995, pp. 715-726.
    50. Murphy, P. and Laczniak, G. R. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers,” Review of Marketing, 1981, pp. 251-266.
    51. Paollilo, Joseph P. G. and Vitell, S. J. “An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personnel, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making,” Journal of Business Ethics (35), 2002, pp. 65-74.
    52. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice.Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
    53. Rest, J. R. 1984. The major components of morality, In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 24-38), New York: Wiley.
    54. Rest, J. R. 1986. Moral Development Advances in research and theory, New York: Praeger.
    55. Ross, W. D. The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
    56. Sama, L. M. and Shoaf, V. “Ethics on the Web: Applying Moral Decision- Making to the New Media,” Journal of Business Ethics (36), 2002, pp. 93-103.
    57. Schlenker, B. R. & Forsyth, D. R. “On the Ethics of Psychological Research,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (13), 1977, pp. 369-396.
    58. Simpson, P. M., Banerjee, D. and Simpson, C. L. ”Softlifting: A Model of Motivating Factors,” Journal of Business Ethics (13:6), 1994, pp. 431-438.
    59. Singer, M. S. “The role of subjective concerns and characteristics of the moral issues in moral considerations,” British Journal of Psychology (89), 1998, pp. 663-679.
    60. Singer, M., Mitchell, S. and Turner, J. “Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgments: Its Relationships with Whistle- Blowing and Need- for- Cognition,” Journal of Business Ethics (17), 1998, pp. 527-541.
    61. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J. and Kraft, K. L. “Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision- Making of Marketing Professionals,” Journal of Business Research (36), 1996, pp. 245-255.
    62. Smith, H. R. and Carroll, A. B. “Organizational Ethics: A stacked deck,” Journal of Business Ethics (3), 1984, pp. 95-100.
    63. Stead, B. A. and Gilbert, J. “Ethical Issues in Electronic Commerce,” Journal of Business Ethics (34), 2001, pp. 75-85.
    64. Tan, Soo- Jiuan “Strategies for reducing consumers’ risk aversion in Internet Shopping,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing (16:2), 1999, pp. 163-183.
    65. Thiroux, J. P. Ethics: Theory and Practice, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995.
    66. Thong, James Y.L. and Yap, Chee- Sing “Testing an Ethical Decision- Making Theory: The Case of Softlifting,” JMIS 15(1), 1998, pp. 213-237.
    67. Trevino, L. K. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person- Situation Interactionist Model,” Academy of Managerial Review (11:3), 1986, pp. 601-607.
    68. Velasquez, M. Business Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1982.
    69. Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. and Singhapakdi, A. “Marketing Norms: The Influences of Personal Moral Philosophies and Organizational Ethical Culture,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (21:Fall), 1993, pp.331-337.
    70. Weaver, K. M. and Ferrell, O. C. “The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Beliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners,” in Contemporary Marketing Thought, Barnett Greenberg and Danny N. Bellenger, eds. Chicago: American Marketing, 1977.
    71. Weber, J. “Influences upon Managerial Moral Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences,” Human Relations (49:1), January 1996, pp.1-22.
    72. Weber, J. “Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas,” Human Relations (43), 1990, pp. 687-702.
    73. Whetton, D. A. and Cameron, K. S. Developing Management Skill, 2nd ed., Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.: New York, 1991.
    74. Zey- Ferrell, M. and Ferrell, O. C. “Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Human Relations (35:7), 1982, pp.587-604.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    90356042
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090356042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35604201.pdf63KbAdobe PDF2696View/Open
    35604202.pdf111KbAdobe PDF2784View/Open
    35604203.pdf120KbAdobe PDF2738View/Open
    35604204.pdf140KbAdobe PDF2954View/Open
    35604205.pdf353KbAdobe PDF24215View/Open
    35604206.pdf249KbAdobe PDF21673View/Open
    35604207.pdf358KbAdobe PDF2928View/Open
    35604208.pdf159KbAdobe PDF21054View/Open
    35604209.pdf157KbAdobe PDF21189View/Open
    35604210.pdf230KbAdobe PDF2908View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback