政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35193
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51194604      Online Users : 965
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/35193
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35193


    Title: What should financial companies know before implementing customer-oriented personalization
    金融業在設計顧客導向個人化前應有之認知
    Authors: 林嘉宇
    Lin, Chia-yu (Michelle)
    Contributors: 管郁君
    Eugenia Huang
    林嘉宇
    Lin, Chia-yu (Michelle)
    Keywords: 個人化
    客製化
    顧客關係管理
    金融
    銀行
    Personalization
    Customization
    CRM
    Financial services
    Banking
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:24:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在目前競爭激烈的商業環境中,個人化服務逐漸受到重視,並被公司視為增加競爭力的利器。此篇論文首先釐清個人化與客製化之間的關係,再將個人化相關的應用、技術及設計方法做一個基礎性的探討。

    由於 “顧客” 是個人化的重心,此研究以三階段的Delphi研究方法探究哪些因素會影響顧客對於個人化服務的評價。許多個人化相關的研究是以公司的角度為出發點,但此研究則是以顧客的觀點來看台灣金融業的個人化服務。研究的兩個重點為:(1) 顧客對於台灣金融業目前的個人化服務評價為何?(2)台灣金融業在個人化服務方面最需要改進的部份為何?

    研究結果顯示,顧客是以一個cost-benefit viewpoint來評量企業所提供的個人化服務。對顧客而言,costs包括隱私上的損失及推銷和廣告所可能帶來的困擾。而benefits的主要來源則是好又準確的個人化服務。針對金融業來說,好又準確的個人化服務便是對個人需求經過精確的量身訂做後的資訊,在最適當的時間、地點以適當的管道提供給顧客。

    研究結果也顯示,目前台灣金融業的個人化服務仍需要很大的努力與改進。此研究也整理出三個建議:(1)在個人化的過程中給顧客更多的掌控權;(2)尊重顧客的隱私權;(3)提供真正量身訂做的個人化服務,而不是把個人化當作推銷的藉口。
    Personalization is gaining increasing popularity among enterprises that strive to win a competitive edge by knowing and serving their customers better. This paper begins with an examination of the interdependency and inseparability between personalization and customization. An overview of personalization applications, technologies, and design techniques is then presented.

    As `customer` is the theme of personalization, criteria that affect customers` acceptance and evaluation of personalization initiatives are then explored using a 3-stage Delphi method. Differed from many researches that examine personalization through the corporate / implementer`s lenses, this study looks at personalization practices in Taiwan`s financial industry – from a customer perspective. For such purpose, a financial personalization model is constructed from a customer standpoint. Two main questions to explore are: (1) how well do customers think personalization is being implemented in Taiwan`s financial industry, and (2) which areas are in desperate need for improvements.

    Research results reveal that customers evaluate personalization efforts from a cost-benefit viewpoint. Potential costs include concession in privacy and concerns of possible promotion annoyance. On the other end of the scale, the main source of benefits is good and accurate personalization. In the case of financial industry, good personalization means precisely tailored information delivered at the right time and place.

    Unfortunately, the research also shows that currently the costs outweigh the benefits. Three suggestions are proposed: (1) give customers more control in the personalization process, (2) respect customers’ privacy, and (3) offer customers truly tailored information instead of an excuse to annoy customers with unwanted promotions.
    Reference: REFERENCES
    Allen, C., “Personalization vs. Customization,” Allen.Com, http://www.allen.com/cgi-bin/gt/tpl_page.html,template=1&content=26&nav1=1&
    ABA Bank Marketing, “A new way of segmenting customers,” ABA Bank Marketing, Vol. 34, Iss. 8, Oct 2002, p. 40
    Berg, T., Janowski W., and Sarner, A., “Personalization: customer value beyond the web,” Gartner, 10 Sep 2001.
    Bernstein, M. and Claps, C., “Web personalization – possibilities, problems, and pitfalls,” Gartner, 17, Sep 1999.
    Best’s Review, “Customers want less data, more value, observer says,” Best’s Review, Vol. 101, Iss. 12, pp.18.
    Bodie, Z., Kane, A., and Marcus, A.J., Perrakis, S., Ryan, P.J., Investments, 3rd Canadian edition (Tronoto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000): pp. 27-56.
    Bookbinder, J.H., Imada, S.J., Lynch, M., “The future of logistics in Canada: A Delphi-based forecast,” Logistics & Transportation Review, Vol.30, Iss.1, pp.95-112.
    Brown, S. A., Customer Relationship Management: A Strategic Imperative in the World of e-Business, (Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd., 2000): pp. 24-27.
    Bruno, M. “At last, banks get top marks,” U.S. Banker, Vol. 111, Iss. 2, Feb 2001, p. 22.
    Cingil, I. and Dogac, A., “A broader approach to personalization,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, Iss. 8, Aug 2000, pp. 136-142
    Ciolli, R. and Giltner, R., “Rx for segmentation,” Banking Strategies, Vol. 75, Iss. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, pp. 43-50.
    Clarke, S., “How to apply IT to CRM projects.” Marketing, Jan 25, 2001, p. 35
    Colkin, E., “Personalization tools dig deeper,” Information Week, Iss. 852, Aug 27, 2001, pp. 49-50
    Coner, A., “Personalization and customization in financial portals,” Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, Mar 2003, pp. 498-504.
    Cooley, R., Mobasher, B., and Srivastava, J., “Automatic personalization based on Web usage mining,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, Iss. 8, Aug 2000, pp. 142-152.
    Dalton, Gregory, “Personalizing online data raises privacy concern,” InformationWeek, Iss. 686, p.40.
    Delbecq, A.L., Gustafsson, D.H., Van de Van, A.H., Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes (Scott-Foreman and Co., Glenview, Illinois. USA, 1975).
    Drucker, P. F., Managing in the next society (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002).
    Famulla, R., “Centering on Service,” Banking Strategies, Vol. 75, Iss. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, pp. 98-106
    Fruin, J., “What is CRM?” Infotech Update, Iss. 2, Mar/Apr 2001, pp.5-6.
    Green, P. L., Johnson, M., and Williams, A. “The world’s best banks 2002,” Global Finance, Vol. 16, Iss. 9, Oct 2002, pp. 24-48.
    Grzywacz G., Jacques, P.,”Banking on middle America,” LIMRA`s MarketFacts Quarterly, Vol. 21, Iss. 3, Summer 2002, pp. 110-115.
    Harney, J., “The value of personalization in customer management,” E-Doc, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, May/Apr 2002, pp. 24-26.
    Helle, M.R.,Reijonwn, M.,Mannermaa, J.P., “Using a Delphi survey to assess the value of pharmaceutical process validation part 1: Survey methodology,”
    Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, Apr 2003, Vol.15, Iss. 4, pp. 43
    Janowski, W., Sarner, A., “Personalization: Process vs. Technology,” Gartner, 27 Feb. 2001.
    Jensen, R.E., Xiao, J.Z., “Customized financial reporting, networked databases, and distributed file sharing,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, pp.209-222
    Jiang, P., “Customization value in the electronic marketplace,” PhD dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2002.
    Kambil, A. and Nunes, P.F., “Personalization? No thanks,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, Iss. 4, Apr 2001: pp. 32-34.
    Kemp, T., “Personalization isn’t a product – new emphasis on biz processes,” Internet Week, Iss. 864, Jun 4, 2001: pp. 52
    King, M., Linden, A., MacMillan, D., Sarner, A., “Wireless web data services: personalize or perish,” Gartner, 20 March, 2001.
    Klinkerman, S. “Segmentation’s Elusive Payoff,” Banking Strategies, Vol. 77, Iss. 1, Jan/Feb 2001, p. 56.
    Kramer, J., Noronha, S., Vergo, J., “A user-centered design approach to personalization,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, Iss. 8, Aug 2000, pp. 44-49
    Landolt, S. C., “Preemptive service,” Credit Union Management, Vol. 25, Iss. 6, Jun 2002, pp. 26-30
    Linden, A., “Where should web-usage mining and personalization stop?” Gartner, 29 Nov 2002.
    Levinson, M., “Getting to know you,” CIO Magazines, Vol. 15, Iss. 9, Feb 15, 2002, p. 76.
    Maoz, M., “Personalization Strategies are critical to reassure wary customers,” Gartner, 4 Oct 2001.
    Malhotra, P, “More Bankers Expressing A Distaste for CRM Concept,” American Banker, Vol. 167, Iss. 185, Sep 26, 2002, p.12.
    Middlemiss, J., “IT challenges,” Wall Street & Technology, Mar 2003, p.45.
    New York Times, “Think Rich, Vote Rich, Get Rich” Late Edition (East Coast) New York, N.Y.: Jan 15, 2003, Section A, p. 20.
    Personalization Consortium, “Survey finds few consumers unwilling to provide personal information to web marketers in exchange for better services,” Personalization consortium, http://www.personalization.org/, April 5, 2000.
    Reichheld, F. F., Rigby, D. K., Schefter, P., “Avoid the four perils of CRM,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, Iss. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 101-109.
    Rice, V., “Online banking: the new deal,” PC Week, Vol. 16, Iss. 45, Nov 8, 1999, p. 59.
    Riecken, D., “Personalized views of personalization,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, Iss. 8, Aug 2000, pp. 26-29.
    Riecken, R.C., Wells, N., Wolfers, J., “Finance with a personalized touch,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, Iss. 8, Aug 2000, pp. 31-34..
    SAS, Implementing the Customer Relationship Management Foundation – Analytical CRM, 2000.
    Saunders, L., “Follow the Money,” Forbes, Vol. 150, Iss. 10, Oct 26, 1992, pp. 138.
    Schneider, I., “Getting to know you,” Bank Systems & Technology, Vol. 38, Iss. 10, Oct 2001, pp. 20-24.
    SIGIA-L, Archives of the SIG Discussion Group,
    http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/0012/0005.html, Fri Dec 01 2000
    Stoneman, B., “Mixed signals,” Banking Strategies, Vol. 75, Iss. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, pp. 33-40.
    Trotsky, J., “One and done,” Banking Strategies, Vol. 75, Iss. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, pp. 16-22.
    方琇怡, “金控公司資訊整合-幫你賺錢還是賺你的錢?” TechVantage, Iss. 23 November 2002, pp. 40-49.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    90356041
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090356041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35604101.pdf51KbAdobe PDF2952View/Open
    35604102.pdf55KbAdobe PDF2851View/Open
    35604103.pdf59KbAdobe PDF21148View/Open
    35604104.pdf60KbAdobe PDF2952View/Open
    35604105.pdf65KbAdobe PDF2995View/Open
    35604106.pdf249KbAdobe PDF22415View/Open
    35604107.pdf95KbAdobe PDF21166View/Open
    35604108.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2972View/Open
    35604109.pdf115KbAdobe PDF2949View/Open
    35604110.pdf80KbAdobe PDF2971View/Open
    35604111.pdf73KbAdobe PDF2934View/Open
    35604112.pdf82KbAdobe PDF21261View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback