政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35170
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51208927      Online Users : 900
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/35170


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35170


    Title: 影響跨公司合作創新的因素之研究－融合知識基礎觀點與組織學習觀點
    Authors: 鄭景華
    Contributors: 湯宗益
    鄭景華
    Keywords: 吸收能力
    合作能力
    知識整合能力
    知識整合機制
    知識整合創新能力
    跨公司合作
    組織創新績
    absorptive capacity
    cooperative competency
    knowledge integration capability
    knowledge integration mechanism
    knowledge integration and innovation capability
    inter-firm collaboration
    nnovation performance
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 14:21:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在持續創新的需求下，跨公司合作已成為企業整合應用知識，創新求變的重要策略。本文融合知識基礎觀點和組織學習觀點，指出跨公司合作所帶來的組織創新績效，係因合作夥伴知識整合的結果。因此研究的目的除了要實證知識整合與組織創新績效的關係外，主要在發展一個理論架構，說明影響跨公司合作創新的因素，及這些因素之間的關係。在研究設計上，本文係以我國高科技產業、資訊服務業及金融服務業做為問卷調查的對象，將所收集的資料透過探索性分析與驗證性分析兩階段檢定本文所提出之量測模式與研究假說，結果得到下列結論：
    1. 跨公司合作為企業所帶來的創新績效，可以用知識整合的觀點來解釋，當企業知識整合能力越好，跨公司合作創新績效會越好。
    2. 知識整合能力受到企業知識吸收能力的影響，吸收能力係企業先前知識的蓄積量，以及應用這些知識的能力之綜合。
    3. 知識整合能力亦受到企業與夥伴合作的能力之影響，合作能力包括企業與夥伴建立信任關係，以及溝通、協調的能力。
    4. 知識特質受知識整合機制的中介而影響創新績效，跨公司合作所帶來組織的創新績效，主要不受合作所牽涉知識之外顯╱內隱與複雜性特質的影響，必須應知識特質的不同而採取適當的整合機制後，才能因知識整合而產生創新績效。
    5. 吸收能力、合作能力與知識整合機制是相互影響的因素，三者形成企業知識整合創新能力的主要構面，是企業追求跨公司合作創新必須重視的要素。
    Inter-firm collaboration has been an important strategy for firms to integrate and apply knowledge among their partners in order to obtain innovation performance under uncertainty circumstances. This study combining the knowledge based view and the organizational learning perspective, considers the innovation performance improvement as the result of knowledge integration. Besides examining the relation between innovation performance and knowledge integration, the purpose of this study is to find the factors influencing inter-firm collaboration performance and the relationships among these factors. The data collecting from Taiwan’s high-tech, information service and finance industry were used in the exploratory and confirmatory phases to evaluate the instruments and test the hypotheses. The conclusions are listed as below:
    1. The innovation performance gaining from inter-firm collaboration can be considered as the result of knowledge integration. While the knowledge integration capability of a firm is better, the firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations will be better too.
    2. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is influenced by the absorptive capacity of the firm. And the firm’s absorptive capacity derives from the firm’s prior knowledge accumulation and the capability to apply their knowledge.
    3. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is also influenced by their cooperative competency. The cooperative competency is composed of three interrelated facets: trust, communication and coordination.
    4. Firm’s innovation performance in an inter-firm collaboration doesn’t directly influenced by the explicit/tacit and complexity characteristics of the knowledge which appeared in the collaboration. To produce innovation performance, knowledge with different characteristics should be integrated by suitable integration mechanisms.
    5. Absorptive capacity, corporative competency and knowledge integration mechanism construct firm’s “knowledge integration and innovation capability”, which is important to firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文部分
    1. 方世杰 (民88)，產研研發聯盟之廠商特質、技術移轉特性、互動機制與績效之研究，管理學報，第十六卷，第四期，633-659。
    2. 方世杰、林麗娟、鄭仲興(民89)，合作研發之組織學習與績效的研究—以參與工研院科技專案之廠商為例，科技管理學刊，第五卷，第三期，105-133。
    3. 吳思華(民87)，知識流通對產業創新的影響，第七屆產業管理研討會，國立政治大學，1-42。
    4. 吳思華(民90)，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：臉譜文化公司。
    5. 呂鴻德、朱倍瑩(民91)，高科技與服務業知識整合機制與知識移轉績效比較之研究，經法社制論叢，第二十九期，29-54。
    6. 李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍(民87），臺灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究，科技管理學刊，第三卷，第一期，37-80。
    7. 林文寶(民90)，技術知識特性、整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究，國立成功大學企業管理學系之未出版博士論文。
    8. 張紹勳(民90)，研究方法，台中：滄海書局。
    9. 劉常勇(民88)，知識管理與企業發展，劉常勇管理學習知識庫，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/paper/paper23.doc。
    10. 蔡明田、莊立民、劉春初(民91)，組織創新衡量之研究，產業論壇，第三卷，第二期，83-105。
    11. 蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(民90)，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係，管理學報，第十八卷，第四期，525-566。
    12. 簡俊成(民91)，外部知識移轉過程—合作關係與吸收潛力角色之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。
    英文部分
    1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3, 425-456.
    2. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029-1037.
    3. Almedia, P., Song, J. and Grant, R. M. (2002). Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building, Organization Science, 13(2), 147-161.
    4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization, Behavior, 10, 123-167.
    5. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J. and Wojcik, T. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418-431.
    6. Andaleeb, S. S. (1992). The trust concept: Research issues for channels of distribution,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 11, Jagdish, N. Sheth, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    7. Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributer firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.
    8. Anderson, M. (1995). The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from Canadian aerospace industry, Economic Geography, 71, 187-200.
    9. Arku, G. (2002). Collaboration in industry: Empirical findings among small electronics manufacturing firms in the Greater Toronto Area, GeoJournal, 57(4), 301-312.
    10. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1992). Inward technology licensing as an alternative to international R&D in new product development: An conceptual framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 156-167.
    11. Bastos, P. (2001). Inter-firm collaboration and learning: The case of the Japanese automobile industry, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(4), 423-441.
    12. Becerra-Fernandez I. and Sabherwal R. (2001). Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Sum., 23-55.
    13. Beckett-Camarata, E. J., Camarata, M. R. and Barker, R. T.(1998). Integrating internal and external customer relationships through relationship management: a strategic response to a changing global environment, Journal of Business Research, 41, 71-81.
    14. Beveren, J. V. (2002). A model of knowledge acquisition that refocuses knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management. 6(1), 18-22.
    15. Blau, J. R. and McKinley, W. (1979). Idea, complexity, and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219.
    16. Brown, J. S. (1991). Research That Reinvents the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 102-111.
    17. Burgess, B .H. (1989). Industrial Organization, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
    18. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
    19. Currall, S. C. and Inkpen, A. C. (2002). A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 479-495.
    20. Daft, R. L. (1989). Organization Theory and Design, West, St, Paul.
    21. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
    22. Davenport, T. H. and Glaser, J. (2002). Just-in-time-delivery comes to knowledge management, Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 107-111.
    23. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge：How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press.
    24. De Boer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex, Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.
    25. Demsetz, H. (1991). The theory of the firm revisited, in William & Winter(eds.) The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
    26. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
    27. Dougherty, D. and Bowman, E. H. (1995). The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation, California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.
    28. Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, Harper-Collins.
    29. Drucker, P. (2002). The discipline of innovation, Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95-101.
    30. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
    31. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
    32. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New Century Publishing Company.
    33. Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 78-91.
    34. Gold, A., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
    35. Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science, 7(4), 375-388.
    36. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, 109-122.
    37. Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration, Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings, 17-21.
    38. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    39. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
    40. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999). What`s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
    41. Hoch, D. J., Roeding, C. R., Purkert, G., Lindner, S. K. and Muller, R. (2000). Secrets of Software Success, McKinsey & Company, Inc.
    42. Huizing, A., Koster, E. and Bouman, W. (1997). Balance in business reengineering: An empirical study of fit and performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 93-118.
    43. Iansiti, M. and West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products, Harvard Business Review, 75(3), 69-79.
    44. Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Learning, knowledge acquisition, strategic alliances, European Management Journal, 16(2), 223-229.
    45. Inkpen, A. C. (2000). A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 775-781.
    46. Inkpen, A. C. and Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures , Organization Science, 9(4), 454468.
    47. Inkpen, A. C. and Ross, J. (2001). Why do some strategic alliances persist beyond their useful life?, California Management Review, 44(1), 132-149.
    48. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B. and Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based knowledge management, Journal of International Management, 19, 121-139.
    49. Johnston, R. and Gibbons, GM. (1975). Characteristics of information usage in technological innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 22, 27-34.
    50. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (2000). LISREL VI, Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods (7th ed.). Mooresville, IN, Scientific Software.
    51. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
    52. Katz, R., Rebentisch, E. S. and Allen, T. J. (1996). A study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97-105.
    53. Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress and outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547-555.
    54. Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure, Journal of Business Research, 8, 225-245.
    55. Kimberly, J.R., and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations, Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
    56. Kleiner, A. and Roth, G. (1997). How to make experience your company`s best teacher, Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 172-177.
    57. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
    58. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
    59. Kuada, J. (2002). Collaboration between developed and developing country-based firms: Danish-German experience, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(6), 538-557.
    60. Kumar, K. and Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems, MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279-300.
    61. Lane, P. J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
    62. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.
    63. Litter, D., Leverick, F. and Wilson, D. (1998). Collaboration in new technology based product markets, International Journal of Technology Management, 15(1,2), 139-159.
    64. Lukas, B. A. and Bell, S. J. (2000). Strategic market position and R&D capability in global manufacturing industries: implications for organizational learning memory, Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 565-574.
    65. Macdoland, S. (1994). Formal collaboration and informal information flow, International Journal of Technology Management, 7(1), 49-60.
    66. Madhavan, R. and Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1-12.
    67. Malone, T. W. and Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination and how it help design coorperative work system? Conference on Computer –Supported Cooperative Work, 357-370.
    68. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, New York: Wiley.
    69. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-149.
    70. Mohr, J. J. and Sengupta, S. (2002). Managing the paradox of inter-firm learning: the role of governance mechanisms, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 282-301.
    71. Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
    72. Mowyer, D. S., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
    73. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review,
    74. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    75. Nonaka, I., Reinmoller, P. and Toyoama, R. (2001). Integrated information technology systems for knowledge creation, in Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. ed., Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press, 827-846.
    76. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    77. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transcation cost examination of interfirm cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
    78. Quinn, B. J. (1999). Strategic outsourcing: knowledge capabilities, Sloan Management Review, Sum, 9-21.
    79. Scott, J. E., (2000). Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 81-113.
    80. Sena and Shani, (1999). Intellectual capital and knowledge creation—Towards an alternative framework, in Knowledge Management Handbook, by J. Liebowitz, New York.
    81. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline- the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
    82. Simon, H. A. (1973). Applying information technology to organization design, Public Administration Review, 33, 268-278.
    83. Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.
    84. Smilor, R. W. and Gibson, D. V. (1991). Technology transfer in multi-organizational environment: The case of R&D Consortia, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 3-13.
    85. Stata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: the key to management innovation, Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 64-73.
    86. Steensma, H. K. (1996). Acquiring technological competencies through interorganizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 267-286.
    87. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
    88. Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (l994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537-556.
    89. Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: Transaction Pub.
    90. Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and technological antecedents of knowledge acquisition and learning, R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.
    91. Tripsas, M. 1997. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 6, 341-377.
    92. Tyler, B. B. (2001). The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 1-27.
    93. von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
    94. Zahra, A. S. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
    95. Zammuto, R. F. and O`Connor, E. J. (1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies` benefits: the roles of organization design and culture, Academy of Management Review, 17(4),701-728.
    96. Zirger, H. S. and Maidique, M. A. (1990). A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science, 36(7), 867-883.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    86356503
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086356503
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35650301.pdf44KbAdobe PDF21032View/Open
    35650302.pdf70KbAdobe PDF21234View/Open
    35650303.pdf65KbAdobe PDF21153View/Open
    35650304.pdf119KbAdobe PDF21090View/Open
    35650305.pdf194KbAdobe PDF21900View/Open
    35650306.pdf203KbAdobe PDF21478View/Open
    35650307.pdf133KbAdobe PDF23820View/Open
    35650308.pdf336KbAdobe PDF241426View/Open
    35650309.pdf191KbAdobe PDF24645View/Open
    35650310.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21543View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback