政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/35049
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50986007      線上人數 : 888
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/35049


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35049


    題名: 價格與品質之關係探討–以台灣市場為例
    Price-Quality Relationship in the Taiwan Market ppt
    作者: 張香玉
    Chang, Dolly
    貢獻者: 樓永堅
    Lou, Yung-Chien
    張香玉
    Chang, Dolly
    關鍵詞: 價格
    品質
    台灣
    消費者報導
    price
    quality
    Taiwan
    Consumer Report
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18 13:39:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 一般消費者常常會有「一分錢一分貨」的想法，但是價格是否真的能夠準確的反應出品質？本研究用使用民國79年11月至民國94年4月份的「中華民國消費者報導」中102種產品的產品測試結果，用以探討台灣市場上價格與品質之間的關係。研究結果顯示，價格並不能準確的反應品質，台灣市場上的品質價格相關平均值為0.189，而且不同產品之間的品質價格相關性都有大幅的差異。本研究也發現價格品質相關性的變異原因之一為產品的特性 - 搜尋品的品質價格相關性高於經驗品的品質價格相關性。而本研究所提出的其他三項解釋原因 – 產品耐久程度、價格變異、以及價格高低並不能顯著的解釋產品品質價格相關性的變異。此研究的結果顯示價格並不能代表品質，因此消費者在購買產品之前必須有更多的資訊，不能單以價格做為購買衡量標準。
    This paper uses 102 product category test results of the Chinese, Taipei Consumer Report from the period of November 1990 to April 2005 to examine the validity of price as a signal of quality in the Taiwan market. In other words, does price accurately reflect quality, and do consumers really get what they pay for? The findings of this study indicate that price is not a very good indication of quality in the Taiwan market, with an average correlation value of 0.189 and greatly varying levels of correlation across product categories. In terms of reasons for the varying correlation levels, product characteristic is a factor – search goods have a higher price-quality correlation than experience goods. Other factors proposed in this study including product durability and quality uncertainty (price range and price levels) do not significantly influence the correlation levels. The results of this study indicate that price is not a good indicator of quality and that consumers need to be informed on more than the price of products when making purchasing decisions.
    參考文獻: Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. [Electronic version]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488-500.
    Bodell, R. W., Kerton, R. R., & Schuster, R. W. (1986). Price as a Signal of Quality: Canada in the International Context. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9 (4): 431-444.
    Curry, D. J. & Faulds, D. J. (1986). Indexing Product Quality: Issues, Theory, and Results. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1): 134-145.
    Dardis, R. & Gieser N. (1980). Price and Quality of Durable Goods: Are They More Closely Related in the Seventies than in the Sixties? [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 4: 238-248.
    Dickson, P. R., Urbany, J. E., & Wilkie, W. L. (1989). Buyer Uncertainty And Information Search. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (2): 208-228.
    Faulds, D. J., & Lonial, S. C., (2001). Price-Quality Relationships of Nondurable Consumer Products: A European and United States Perspective. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 3 (1): 59-76.
    Finlay, J. L., Hackman, R., & Schwarz M.E. (1996). Price/Quality Associations Within the Consumer Goods Market in the United Kingdom. [Electronic version]. Multinational Business Review, 4 (2): 71-78.
    Friedman, M.P. (1967). Quality and Price Considerations in Rational Consumer Decision Making. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 1 (1): 13-23.
    Geistfeld, L.V. (1982). The Price-Quality Relationship-Revisited. [Electronic version]. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 16 (2): 334-346.
    Gerstner, E. (1985). Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality? [Electronic version]. Journal of Marketing Research, 22: 209-215.
    Hjorth-Andersen, C. (1984). The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (2): 708-719.
    Kolbe, R. H. & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2): 243-250.
    Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management (9th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. [Electronic version]. Human Communication Research, 28 (4): 587-604.
    Morris, R. T. & Bronson, C. S. (1969) The Chaos in Competition Indicated by Consumer Reports. [Electronic version]. Journal of Marketing, 33 (July): 26-43.
    Nelson, P. (1970). Information and Consumer Behavior. [Electronic version]. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2): 311 - 29.
    Oxenfeldt, A. R. (1950). Consumer Knowledge: Its Measurement and Extent. [Electronic version]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 32 (4): 300-14
    Riesz. P. C. (1979). Price-Quality Correlations for Packaged Food Products. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13 (2): 236-247.
    Salop, S. & Stiglitz J. (1977). Bargain and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion. [Electronic version]. Review of Economics Studies, 4: 493-510.
    Sproles, G. B. (1977). New Evidence on Price and Product Quality. [Electronic version]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 11 (1): 63-77.
    Steenkamp, E. M. (1988). The Relationship Between Price And Quality In The Marketplace. [Electronic version]. De Economist, 136 (4): 491-507.
    Stigler, G. (1961). The Economies of Information. [Electronic version]. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (3): 213-225.
    Tellis, G. & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Competitive Price and Quality Under Asymmetric Information. [Electronic version]. Marketing Science, 6 (3): 240-253
    Statistics of International GDP Growth By Country. International Financial Statistics Yearbook 2003. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from
    http://www.esds.ac.uk/international/support/user_guides/imf/ifs.asp.
    Statistics of Taiwan Key Economic Indicators. The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) of Executive Yuan. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from www.dgbas.gov.tw
    Yamada, Y. & Ackerman, N. (1984) Price-Quality Correlations in the Japanese Market. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 18 (2): 251-266.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    92355012
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550121
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55012101.pdf9KbAdobe PDF2764檢視/開啟
    55012102.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2944檢視/開啟
    55012103.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2913檢視/開啟
    55012104.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2757檢視/開啟
    55012105.pdf17KbAdobe PDF21018檢視/開啟
    55012106.pdf28KbAdobe PDF2892檢視/開啟
    55012107.pdf55KbAdobe PDF2856檢視/開啟
    55012108.pdf34KbAdobe PDF2861檢視/開啟
    55012109.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2828檢視/開啟
    55012110.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2828檢視/開啟
    55012111.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2759檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋