English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50810310      Online Users : 669
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/35000
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35000


    Title: 影響長期性資產減損損失認列之決定性因素與其市場反應-以美國財務會計準則第144號公報為例
    Authors: 邱永昌
    Contributors: 洪叔民
    曹嘉玲

    邱永昌
    Keywords: 資產減損
    事件研究法
    實是性會計理論
    SFAS 144
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:31:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由於資產的減損會大幅影響會計盈餘與資產價值,且一般公認會計原則給予公司管理階層在資產減損的處理上有很大的彈性,因此長久以來,長期性資產減損的議題都吸引著經理人、會計資訊使用者、媒體、政府規範單位以及學術界的注意。美國財務會計準則委員會在2001年10月發佈了財務會計準則第142號與第144號公報來修正原本規範長期性資產減損的第121號公報,其中第144號公報主要規範的資產類別為非商譽類的長期性資產減損會計處理。雖然144號公報施行至今已有數年的時間,但與144號公報相關的實證研究極少,因此本文將時序拉回公司採用144號公報的首年度,分析公司認列長期性資產減損的決定性因素以及股票市場對公司資產減損宣告的反應。
    在公司認列長期性資產減損的決定性因素方面,實證分析結果顯示公司長期性資產減損之金額會受到公司之經濟因素(股票報酬、資產報酬率成長率)以及報導動機(總資產、盈餘平穩化、經理人變動)影響,由此可知公司認列資產減損的行為與動機除了包含144號公報內所規範的經濟因素外,尚包括傳統盈餘管理理論中所提出的報導動機。
    而在分析股票市場對公司資產減損宣告反應的研究中,先前的研究均是假設市場上對於資產減損的認列為非預期的,然而市場上對於資產減損損失的認列並非全然皆為非預期的,投資人亦有可能透過公開資訊的蒐集以及理性分析後會將預期資產減損損失考慮在投資策略中;因此本文利用迴歸模型預測,將長期性資產減損分為投資人預期與非預期兩種類型進行分析,以分別探討投資人對預期與非預期的資產減損宣告有何不同的反應。實證結果顯示,不論資產減損是否被投資人預期,股票市場對於資產減損的消息並沒有顯著反應。
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    李文智、楊孟萍、林嬋娟與蔡彥卿(1993),「實是性會計研究之假說與研究方法」,會計研究月刊,第97期,頁119-123。
    杜榮瑞、姜家訓與顏信輝譯(2000),會計與資訊系統,第1版,台北:遠流,譯自Shyam Sunder。
    沈中華與李建然(2000),事件研究法:財務與會計實證研究必備,第1版,台北:華泰。
    林嬋娟、蔡彥卿、李文智與楊孟萍 (1993),「實是性會計研究之發展背景與理論架構(上)」,會計研究月刊,第95期,頁144-47。
    林嬋娟、蔡彥卿、李文智與楊孟萍 (1993),「實是性會計研究之發展背景與理論架構(下)」,會計研究月刊,第96期,頁142-45。
    戚務君(1997),「訊息操弄與多類型工作對誘因機制之影響」,會計研究月刊,第139期,頁78-81。
    蕭燕錫(1994),「管理會計第五波-代理理論」,會計研究月刊,第103期,頁122-129。
    二、英文部份
    Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz (1972), Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
    Alciatore, M, C. C. Dee, P. Easton and N. Spear (1998), Asset write-downs: A decade of research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 17, 1-39.
    Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen, and L. W. Senbet (1981), An equilibrium analysis of debt financing under costly tax arbitrage and agency problems. The Journal of Finance, 36(3), 569-581.
    Bartov, E. (1993), The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation. Accounting Review, 68(2), 840-855.
    Bartov, E., F. Lindahl, and W. E. Ricks (1998), Stock price behavior around announcements of write-offs. Review of Accounting Studies, 3(4), 327-346.
    Beidleman, C. R. (1973), Income smoothing: The role of management. The
    Accounting Review, 48(October), 653-667.
    Bublitz, B. O. (1996), An empirical analysis of the impact of asset writedown disclosures on stockholder wealth. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(3), 32-45
    Bunsis, H. (1997), A description and market analysis of write-off announcements. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(9/10), 1385-1400.
    Coase, R. H. (1937), The nature of the firm, Economica, 4, 386-405.
    DeAngelo, L. E. (1988), Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10(1), 3-36.
    Dye, R. (1988), Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(2), 195-235.
    Elliott, J. and W. Shaw (1988), Write-off as accounting procedures to manage perception. Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 91-119.
    Elliott, J. and J. Henna (1996), Repeated accounting write-offs and the information contents of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 34 (supplement), 135-155.
    Fama, E. F. (1980), Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
    Fields, T. D., T. Z. Lys, and L. Vincent (2001), Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31(1-3), 255-307.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1975), Accounting for Contingencies. State of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Norwalk , CT: FASB.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1995), Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. State of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Norwalk , CT: FASB.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2001), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. State of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Norwalk , CT: FASB.
    Francis, J., D. Hanna, and L. Vincent (1996), Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 34 (supplement), 117-135.
    Healy, P. M. and J. M. Wahlen (1999), A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
    Heflin, F. and T. Warfield (1997), Managerial discretion in accounting for asset write-offs. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    Hepworth, S. R. (1953), Smoothing period income, American Accounting Association.
    Ijiri, Y. (1975), Theory of accounting measurement, Studies in Accounting Research, 10, 191-202.
    Jegadeesh, N. and S. Titman (1993), Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-92.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Matsunaga, S. and C. Park (2001), The effect of missing a quarterly earnings benchmark on the CEO’s annual bonus. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 313-332.
    Murphy, K. (1999), Executive compensation, Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 2485-2563.
    Reinstein, A. and G. H. Lander (2004), Implementing the impairment of assets requirements of SFAS No. 144: An empirical analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(3), 400-411.
    Riedl, E. J. (2004), An examination of long-lived asset impairments. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 823-851.
    Ronen, J. and S. Sadan (1981), Smoothing Income Numbers: Objectives, Means, Implications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Schipper, K. (1989), Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons
    3(December), 91-102.
    Sloan, R. G. (1996), Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289-315.
    Strong, J. S. and J. R. Meyer (1987), Asset writedowns: managerial incentives and security returns. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 643-661.
    Teoh, S. H., T. J. Wong, and G. R. Rao (1998), Are accruals during initial public offerings opportunistic? Review of Accounting Studies, 3(2), 175-208.
    Trueman, B. and S. Titman (1988), An explanation for accounting income smoothing, Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 127-139.
    Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman (1978), Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
    Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman (1986), Positive accounting theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman (1990), Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective, The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-157.
    Zucca, L. J. and D. R. Campbell (1992), A closer look at discretionary writedowns of impaired assets. Accounting Horizons, 6(3), 30-42.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    93355077
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355077
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35507701.pdf58KbAdobe PDF2769View/Open
    35507702.pdf86KbAdobe PDF2702View/Open
    35507703.pdf81KbAdobe PDF2744View/Open
    35507704.pdf111KbAdobe PDF2695View/Open
    35507705.pdf121KbAdobe PDF21405View/Open
    35507706.pdf212KbAdobe PDF22667View/Open
    35507707.pdf304KbAdobe PDF22044View/Open
    35507708.pdf240KbAdobe PDF21187View/Open
    35507709.pdf100KbAdobe PDF21065View/Open
    35507710.pdf73KbAdobe PDF21597View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback