政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34945
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51330226      Online Users : 879
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34945


    Title: 企業網際網路之運用及市場導向程度對組織績效之影響探討
    Authors: 林孟暉
    Contributors: 張愛華
    林孟暉
    Keywords: 網際網路
    市場導向
    企業電子化
    組織績效
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:23:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去許多研究雖已得知企業市場導向程度與組織績效之正向關係，但鮮少有考慮在企業運用網際網路日益普遍的情況下。因此引發本研究欲藉由對國內公司的訪談及問卷調查來探討『網際網路』能給『市場導向』這觀念，帶來何種影響，以及最終對組織績效的影響為何。
    在考慮台灣產業特色之後，電子、資訊產業對於網路之運用起步較早，已具一定之成效，而電子、資訊廠商以製造業居多；此外，企業電子化需要投入較高資本，所以本研究選擇天下雜誌2003年5月所出的「台灣前1000大企業」中的台灣製造業前1000大企業以及服務業前500大中的資訊設備銷售與服務產業（47家）和資訊、通訊、ＩＣ通路產業（66家）為研究對象。利用SPSS 統計軟體進行敘述性統計分析、相關分析、因素分析、T 檢定、及複迴歸分析等來驗證本研究之假設。
    本研究之主要結果顯示：
    一、 企業網際網路的特性運用，除客製性外，即時性、互動性、跨域性、低溝通成本等特性與企業電子化程度存在著正向關係。
    二、 當不區分產業時，網際網路特性的運用與市場導向各構面間並無太多顯著之正相關，但在電子、資訊相關產業，在於網際網路特性的運用與市場導向各構面間則大部份都達顯著之正相關。
    三、 企業之市場導向程度與組織績效有正向關係存在。
    四、 網路特性「即時互動性」、「跨域客製性」對各個經營績效之間並不具有正向的關係存在。但在「電子、資訊產業」時，迴歸模型顧客滿意、員工組織承諾兩迴歸模式顯著。
    五、 企業在網際網路特性運用、市場導向程度與經營績效之關係探討，除財務績效之外，迴歸模型均達顯著，但即時互動性、跨域客製性與組織績效之關係不明顯。
    六、 當樣本為電子、資訊產業時，市場導向是網際網路特性之即時互動性對組織績效之員工組織承諾的中介角色。
    Reference: 國內文獻︰
    1. 朱文洋（民89），中小型醫院經營策略與營運績效之探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班論文。
    2. 吳明隆 (民89)，SPSS 統計應用實務，台北：松崗圖書公司。
    3. 呂錦珍、洪毓瑛譯(民88)，Webonomics：一個新名詞背後的無限商機，天下遠見出版公司；原著：Schwartz,E.I., Webonomics: Nine Essential Principles for Growing Your Business on the World Wide Web。
    4. 卓秀娟、陳佳伶譯(民86)，數位化經濟時代，中國生產力中心；原著：Don Tapscott,The Digital Economy。
    5. 林建煌（民83），策略組群、組織作為與績效關係研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系博士班論文。
    6. 范惟翔(民90)，顧客知識管理、市場導向與行銷績效之關係研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    7. 張英慧（民88），事業策略、績效評估及其成效之探討－以平衡計分卡觀點分析，淡江大學會計學系碩士班論文。
    8. 陳志遠(民89)，市場導向，市場知識策略管理，創業導向與經營績效之關係研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃書。
    9. 陳振燧與洪順慶(民84)，中小企業市場導向作為之研究，企銀季刊，18 卷 4 期，頁85-95。
    10. 陳淑芬(民89)，策略型態、市場導向、創新能力與績效關係之研究，雲林科技大學企業管理技術研究所，碩士論文。
    11. 黃俊英，多變量分析，臺北市，華泰文化事業有限公司，民國90年5月，第7版。
    12. 湯宗益、洪永旭，網際網路的運用對企業競爭優勢的影響，台北銀行月刊，第26卷，第十二期，頁60-73，民86年。
    13. 楊耀銘（民89），中小企業運用網際網路行銷效益之研究－交易成本觀點，東吳大學國際貿易系碩士論文
    14. 經濟部商業司電子商業自動化計畫，民86年6月
    15. 蔡明達(民89)，市場資訊處理程序與組織記憶對行銷創新影響之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    16. 盧俊成(民87)，網際網路的典範轉移暨網路市場與新經營模式之探索性研究，國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    17. 魏聖忠（民84），我國中小企業市場導向之研究，國立政治大學國際貿易系碩士論文。
    18. 魏聖忠（民91），當代行銷觀念新思維：市場導向理論的回顧與評價，管理評論 第二十一卷 第四期 PP.129∼153。
    國外文獻︰
    1. Afuah, A. and Tucci, C. L. (2000), Internet Business Models and Strategies, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York.
    2. Angehrn, A. (1997), “Designing Mature Internet Business Strategies: The ICDT Model,” European Management Journal, 15(4), pp. 361-369.
    3. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 1173-1182.
    4. Chen, C. H. (2002), “Integration and Comparison of Market Orientation Constructs,” Journal of Asia-Pacific Business. Binghamton: 2002. Vol.4, Iss.1; pp.33
    5. Cronin, B., Overfelt, K., Fouchereaux, K., Manzvanzvike, T., Cha, M. and Sona, E. (1994), “The Internet and Competitive Intelligence: A Survey of Current Practice,”International Journal of Information Management, 14(3), pp.240-222.
    6. Tapscott, D. (1996), The Digital Economy, McGrw-Hill
    7. Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, October 1994, pp.37-52.
    8. Day, George S. and Wensley, Robin (1988), “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority,” Journal of Marketing, 52(Apr.), pp.1-20.
    9. Deshpande, Rohit and Webster, Frederick E., Jr. (1989), “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining ther Research Agenda,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.53, January, pp.3-15.
    10. Drucker, Peter F. (1954), The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row
    11. e-Business Executive Report； 電子化企業 經理人報告；1999 11月
    12. Eccles, R. G. and Pyburn, P. J. (1992), “Creating A Comrprehensive System To Measure Performance,” Management Accounting 74(4), pp.41-44
    13. Feeny, D.F. (1990), “Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage with IT Information Management: The Strategic Dimension,” Oxford University Press, pp.98-117.
    14. Ghosh, S. (1998), “Making Business Sense of The Internet.” Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.126-135.
    15. Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (1996a), “Market Orientation and Innovation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, pp.93-103.
    16. Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (1998), “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, pp.30-45.
    17. Hesterbrink, C. (1999), E-business and EPR: Bringing two Paradigms together, Price Water house Coopers.
    18. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. (1997), “A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce,” The Information Society, Vol. 13, pp. 43-54.
    19. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer- Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, pp.50-68.
    20. Hooley, G., Cox T., Fahy J., Shipley D., Beracs J., Fonfara K. and Snoj B. (2000), “Market Orientation in the Transition Economies of Central Europe：Tests of the Narver and Slater Market Orientation Scales,” Journal of Business Research , 50,pp.273-285.
    21. Houston, Franklin S. (1986), “The Marketing Concept: What It Is and What It Is Not,” Journal of Marketing, 50(Apr.), pp.81-87.
    22. Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M. (1995), “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, pp.53-70.
    23. Hurley, Robert F. and G. Tomas M. Hult (1998), “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, July, 42-54. Iss. 11; pp.23-27.
    24. Jaworski, B. J. and Kohli, A. K. (1993), “Market Orientation：Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57(July), pp.53-70.
    25. Jaworski, B.J.and Kohli, A. K. (1996), “Market Orientation: Review, Refinement, and Roadmap,” Journal of Market Foucsed Management ,1(2), pp.119-135.
    26. Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A. B. (1997), Electronic Commerce: A Manager Guide, Addison- Wesley, Publishing Company, Inc.
    27. Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A. B. (1996), Frontiers of Electronic commerce, Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
    28. Kalakota, R. and Robinson, Marcia (1999), eBusiness: Roadmap for Success, Addison Wesley, May, pp.231-263.
    29. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996a.), “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action.” Boston. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
    30. Kerlinger, F.N. and Lee, H.B. (1999), Foundation of Behavioral Research, 4th Ed, Harcourt Inc.
    31. Kohli, A. K. and Jaworski, B. J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54(April), pp.1-18.
    32. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J. and Kumar, A. (1993), “MAEKOR：A Measure of Market Orientation,” Journal of Marketing Research ,Vol.ⅩⅩⅩ, pp.467-477.
    33. Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., Prentice Hall, Inc.
    34. Koushik, S. and Joodi, P. (2000), “E-business Architecture Design Issues,” IT Professional, May-June
    35. Kumar, Kamalesh(2001), “Market Orientation, Organizational Competencies and Performance：An Empirical Inveatigation of a Path-Analytic Model,” The International Business Conference, Decemember 2001, pp.371-376.
    36. Lancioni, R. A., Smith, M. F. and Oliva, T. A. (2000), “The Role of the Internet in Supply Chain Management,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.29, pp.45-56.
    37. Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, Gregory (1996), “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orienationa Construct and Linking It to Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135-172.
    38. Maggiolini, P. (1988), Information Management: the Strategic Dimension, New York: Oxford University Press
    39. Mavondo, Felix T. and Farrell, Mark A. (2000), “Measuring Market Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Marketers and Consumer Marketers?” Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), pp.223-244.
    40. McKenna, R. (1995), Relationship Marketing- Successful Strategy for the Age of the Customer, Addison-Wesley, MA.
    41. Mehta, R., Sivadas and Eugene, A. (1995), “Direct Marketing on the Internet: An Empirical Assessment of Consumer Attitudes.” Journal of Direct Marketing, Vol.9 Iss. 3, pp.21-32.
    42. Narver, J. C. and Slater, S. F. (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, October, pp.20-36.
    43. Narver, J. C. and Slater, S. F. (2004), “Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New Product Success,” The Journal Of Product Innovation Management, New York: Sep. Vol. 21, Iss. 5, pp. 334-347.
    44. Nolan, R. L. (1992), “Managing by Wire,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.71, No.5, pp.122-132.
    45. Oczkowski, E.and Farrell, M.A. (1998), “Discriminating Between Measurement Scales Using Nonnested Tests and Two-stage Least Squares Estimators: The Case of Market orientation,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 15, pp.349-366.
    46. Pelham, A. M. (2000), “Market Orientation and Other Potential Influences on Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Small Business Management, pp.48-63.
    47. Peterson, R. A., S. Balasubramanian & Bart J. Bronnenberg (1997), “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25, No.4, pp.329-346.
    48. Prakash, A. (1996), “The Internet as a Global Strategic IS Tool.” Information Systems Management, Summer, pp.45-49.
    49. Rayport, J. F. and Sviokla, John J. (1995), “Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 75-85.
    50. Rayport, J. F.and Sviokla, John J. (1997), “Competing in Two Worlds: The Marketplace and the Marketspace.” Harvard Business Review, pp.16-65.
    51. Richard, P. V. (1999), “E-business in the Forest Products Industry,” Forest Products Journal, Madison, pp.12-21.
    52. Ries, Al and Trout, Jack (1985), “Marketing Warfare,”Marketing Communications, Vol. 10,
    53. Ruekert, Robert W. (1992), “Developing a Market Orientation: An Organizational Strategic Perspective,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.9, January, pp.225-245.
    54. Senn, J. A. (1996), “Capitalizing on Electronic Commerce.” Information Systems Management, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, pp.15-24.
    55. Shapiro, Benson P. (1988), “What the Hell Is ‘Market Oriented’?” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 (6), pp.119-125.
    56. Slater, Stanley F. and Narver, John C. (2000), “The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: A Balanced Replication,” Journal of Business Research, 48(1), pp.69-73.
    57. Stroeken, Jan H. M.(2000), “Information Technology, Innovation and Supply Chain Structure,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.20,pp.156-176.
    58. Szuprowicz, B. (1998): Extranet and Intranet: E-Commerce Business Strategies for the Future, Charleston, SC: Computer Technology Research Corp.
    59. Vickery, S. (1991), “A Theory of Performance Competence Revisited,” Decision Science, Vol.3, pp.635-643.
    60. Von Versen, Kraus (1998), “The Three Commercial Functions of the Internet,” Electronic Markets, 8(4): 25-29.
    61. Webster, Frederick E., Jr. (1988), “The Rediscovery of the marketing Concept,” Business Horizons, 31(May-Jun.), pp.29-39.
    62. Widdifield, R. and Grover, V. (1995), “Internet & the Implications of the Information Superhighway for Business.” Journal of Systems Management, May/June, pp.16-65.
    63. Min, Soonhong, Seokwoo Song and James S. Keebler (2002), “An Internet-Mediated Market Orientation (IMO): Building a Theory,”Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. Statesboro: Spring 2002. Vol. 10, Iss. 2; pp. 1-11.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    90355021
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090355021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administation] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35502101.pdf75KbAdobe PDF21120View/Open
    35502102.pdf220KbAdobe PDF22094View/Open
    35502103.pdf281KbAdobe PDF21132View/Open
    35502104.pdf781KbAdobe PDF2926View/Open
    35502105.pdf80KbAdobe PDF2973View/Open
    35502106.pdf110KbAdobe PDF21551View/Open
    35502107.pdf43KbAdobe PDF2928View/Open
    35502108.pdf151KbAdobe PDF23389View/Open
    35502109.pdf83KbAdobe PDF2808View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback