政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34870
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51046873      Online Users : 982
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34870


    Title: 臺北市區公所溝通績效之研究:Pandey & Garnett公部門溝通績效模型之探討與驗證
    A Study of Communication Performance in District Offices, Taipei City: An Inquiry and Verification on Pandey & Garnett’s Model of Public Sector Communication Performance
    Authors: 陳建樺
    Chen, Chien Hua
    Contributors: 吳瓊恩
    陳建樺
    Chen, Chien Hua
    Keywords: 臺北市區公所
    溝通績效
    官樣文章
    組織文化
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 15:08:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺北市區公所為臺北市政府的派出機關,立於第一線提供市民各項服務,其服務績效之良窳,對於市府的整體績效影響甚大,如何提升區公所溝通績效,進而促進區公所的組織績效,為研究者從事本研究的動機之一。再者,本研究理論架構主要是參考Pandey & Garnett(2006)所提出的「公部門溝通績效模型」。研究者審閱國內相關文獻,目前尚無學者就該理論模型進行全面實證研究,因此研究者乃以臺北市區公所的溝通績效來探討與檢證該模型,此為本研究的動機之二。
    本研究以臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員為研究對象,除採文獻探討法以建構本研究之架構與研究假設外,並採問卷調查法,內容包括公務人員個人基本資料、機關特性量表與溝通績效量表三部份之問卷為研究工具。以分層隨機抽樣臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員706位,回收有效問卷589份,分別以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森(Pearson)積差相關、多元逐步回歸等統計分析方法,考驗研究假設,回答研究問題,據以提出結論與建議。
    本研究主要發現如下:
    一、在機關特性認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員大致同意其所屬機關的目標定義明確,其同仁亦普遍重視任務與目標的達成,並且在達成目標的過程中,人員的凝聚力與士氣是重要的;在本機關對外發布消息時,重視依特定程序來進行。
    二、在溝通績效認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員在與同仁間的溝通上常能獲得相當助益,包括產生有效的行動方案與困難的解決,在對外的績效上提供公眾所需的服務及快速回應公眾的要求。
    三、上述兩者在個人背景變項上的差異分析:男性公務人員對採購官樣文章認知程度較女性公務人員高;隨著年齡的增加,年長者的個人的閱歷較年輕者為豐富,對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;學歷低者對機關的認同感較高;年資較深者對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;薦任公務人員在機關特性及其關懷員工構面的認知程度上高於委任公務人員;主管人員在內部溝通績效的認知上較非主管人員高。
    四、機關特性對溝通績效的預測力方面:以關懷員工構面最高,顯示公務人員對感受到機關對其關懷的程度越高,則其對溝通績效的認知程度也越高。
    最後,根據結論提出若干建議供臺北市區公所調整機關特性的策略與方向、提升溝通績效之參考以及後續研究之具體建議。
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    王保進(1999),視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,臺北:心理出版社。
    吳明隆(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,臺北:知城數位科技。
    吳瓊恩(2006),行政學,增訂三版,臺北:三民。
    邱皓政(2005),量化研究方法(二):統計原理與分析技術,臺北:雙葉書廊。
    許南雄 編著(2000),行政學術語,增訂三版,臺北:五南。
    許道然(2001),公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
    張潤書(1998),行政學,臺北:三民。
    劉毓玲 譯(1993),(D. Osborne & T. Gaebler 原著),新政府運動,臺北:天下文化。
    陳千玉 譯(1996),(E. H. Schein原著),組織文化與領導,臺北:五南。

    二、英文部分
    Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Beck, C. E. (1999). Managerial communication: Bridging theory and practice. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    ------------------ (1993). “A theory of government ‘red tape’ ,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 3(3), pp.273,303.
    Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
    Downs, C. W., Clampitt, P. G. & Pfeiffer A. L. (1988). “Communication and organizational outcomes,” in G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication, Norward, NJ: Ablex. pp.171-211.
    Eisenberg, E. M. & Riley, P. (2000). “Organizational culture,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of administrative communication : Advances in theory, research, and methods,Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.291-322.
    Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
    Falcione, R. L., Sussman, L. & Herden, R. P. (1987). “Communication climate in organizations,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.195-227.
    Garnett, J. L. (1992). Communicating for results in government : A strategic approach for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    -------------------- (1997). “Administrative communication: Domains, threats, and legitimacy,” in J. L. Garnett ,& A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administration communication, New York: Marcel Dekker. pp.3-20.
    Gianakis, G. & Wang, X.(2000). “Decentralization of the purchasing function in municipal government: A national survey,” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management , 12(3), pp.421-440.
    Gortner, H. F., Mahler, J. & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.
    Grunig, J. E. (1992). “Symmetrical systems of Internal communication,” in J. E. Grunig(ed.), Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp.531-576.
    -------------------- (1997). “Public relations management in government and business,” in J. L. Garnett & A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administrative communication, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp.241-284.
    -------------------- & Grunig, L. A. (2000). “Public relations in strategic management and strategic management of public relations: Theory and evidence from the IABC excellence project,” Journalism Studies, 1(2), pp.303-321.
    Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior, utilizing human resources, 3rd. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Hodgetts, R. M. (1982). Management: Theory, process and practice. N.Y.: The Dryden Press.
    Holzer, M. (ed.) (1992). The public productivity handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
    Huseman, R. C. & Miles, E. W. (1988). “Organizational communication in the information age: Implications of computer-based systems,” Journal of Management, 14(2), pp.181-204.
    Jablin, F. M. (1987). “Formal organizational structure,” in F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts , & L. W. Porter(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication : An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp.389-419.
    ----------------- & Putnam, L. L. (eds.)(2000). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    -------------------------------------------, Roberts, K. H. & Porter, L. W. (eds.)(1987). The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
    Johnson, D. W. (1972). Reaching Out. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, 2nd. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Khademian, A. M. (2002). Working with culture: The way the job gets done in public programs. Washington,DC: CQ Press.
    Lewis, P. V. (1975). Organizational communications: The essence of effective management. Columbus, OH: Grid.
    Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    McPhee, R. & Poole, M. S. (2000). Organizational structure and configurations, in F. M. Jablin and L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, pp.503-543.
    Miller, D. (1987). “Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance,” Academy of Management Journal , 30(1), pp.7-32.
    Narayanan, V. K. & Raghu N. (1993). Organization theory: A strategic approach. Boston, MA: Irwin, Inc.
    Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1992). Strategic management of public and third-sector organization: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco:Jossey-Wesley.
    Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. MA: Addison-Wesley.
    O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G. & Berner, M. (2003). Research methods for public administrators,4th. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd..
    Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
    Pandey, S. K. (1995). Managerial perceptions of red tape. Unpublished PhD dissertation , Syracuse University.
    --------------------(2003). National administrative studies project(NASP-II) : A national survey of managers in state health and human service agencies. Candem, NJ: Rutgers University.
    --------------------& Garnett, J. L. (2006). “Exploring public sector communication performance: Testing a model and drawing implication,” Public Administration Review, Jan/Feb 2006, pp.37-51.
    -------------------- & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4) ,pp.779-799.
    -------------------- & Scott, P. G. (2002). “Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts measures,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), pp.553-580.
    --------------------& Welch, E. W. (2005). “Beyond stereotypes: A multistage of managerial perceptions of red tape,” Administration & Society, 37(5), pp.542-575.
    Pearson, C. A. (1992). “Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site,” Human Relations,45(9), pp.905-936.
    Pincus, D. J. & Rayfield, R. E. (1989). “Organizational communication and job satisfaction: A metaresearch perspective,” in B. Dervin , & M. J. Voigt, Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp.183-208 .
    Quinn R. & McGrath M. (1985),“The Transformations of Organizational Cultures,” in P. J. Frost et al.(eds.), Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp.326-327.
    Rainey, H. G. (1983). “Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals and individual Roles,” Administration & Society, 15(3), pp.207-242.
    --------------------(1993). “A theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations,” in J. L. Perry(ed.), Research in Public Administration, 2, pp.121-166.
    -----------------------(2003). Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, Inc.
    Schneider, B. & Snyder, R. A. (1975). “Some relationships between Job satisfaction and organizational climate,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), pp.318-328.
    Scott, P. G. & Pandey, S. K. (2000). “The influence of red rape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation,” Journal of policy analysis and management, 19(4), pp.615-633.
    Sethia, N. K. & Van Glinow, M.A. (1985). “Arriving at four cultures by managing the reward systems,” in R. Kilmann et al.(eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisio, CA: Jossey-Bass, P. 104.
    Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration, N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.
    Shrader, C. B., Lincoln J. R. & Hoffman, A. N. (1989). “The network strutctures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form,” Human Relations , 42(1), pp.43-46.
    Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization, 2nd. N.Y.: Macmillan.
    ------------------ (1964). “On the concept of organizational goal,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(1), pp.1-22.
    Stone, E. F. (1976). “The moderating effect of work-related values on the job scope-job satisfaction relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance ,15(2), pp.147-167.
    Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
    Yammamarino, F. J. & Naughton, T. N. (1988). “Time spent communicating: A multiple level approach,” Human Relations ,41(9), pp.655-676.
    Zammuto, R. F. & Krakower, J. Y. (1991). “Quantitative and qualtitative studies of organizational culture,” Organizational Change and Develop, 5(2), pp.83-114.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    94921054
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921054
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    105401.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2696View/Open
    105402.pdf66KbAdobe PDF2732View/Open
    105403.pdf79KbAdobe PDF2711View/Open
    105404.pdf76KbAdobe PDF2636View/Open
    105405.pdf42KbAdobe PDF2694View/Open
    105406.pdf62KbAdobe PDF2907View/Open
    105407.pdf149KbAdobe PDF2882View/Open
    105408.pdf271KbAdobe PDF21593View/Open
    105409.pdf262KbAdobe PDF2890View/Open
    105410.pdf263KbAdobe PDF2809View/Open
    105411.pdf157KbAdobe PDF2832View/Open
    105412.pdf71KbAdobe PDF21013View/Open
    105413.pdf137KbAdobe PDF2713View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback