Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34828
|
| Title: | 政務官與決策制定~行政院部會首長決策行為之研究~ |
| Authors: | 許張傳
HSU, CHANG-CHUAN |
| Contributors: | 鄭興弟
許張傳
HSU, CHANG-CHUAN |
| Keywords: | 政務官
政策環境
公共政策
決策程序
officials with portfolio
political environment
public policy
decision-making process |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 15:16:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 政務官面對急速變遷的環境，必須洞察時代的脈動，妥為因應，才能永續發展組織的業務。因此，不論工作計畫的擬定、問題的解決、或危機處理，必須掌握先機，蒐集資訊，並運用決策模型，縝密分析後採取行動，才能達到預期的目標，而正確的決策，對於機關業務的推動，更具關鍵性的影響。
本研究主要採取文獻探討、比較分析、深度訪談等研究方法。為能更深入了解我國政務官決策之方法、過程及面臨之困境，本研究參考決策相關理論，諸如，認知性決策過程、理性選擇、結構式溝通、利益團體、影響決策過程因素、政治系統過程等問題設計訪談題綱，並抽樣分別向行政院所屬相關部會，如法務部、經濟部、教育部、大陸委員會、勞工委員會、青年輔導委員會、蒙藏委員會等機關首長深度訪談，從其決策經驗及實案分析，以了解其決策之模型，並避免本研究流於理論之空談。
本研究發現：一、政務官在決策前，對於政策都能充分理解。二、政務官的決策方式，都有採用有限理性模型。三、政務官的決策方法，都有採用群體決策。四、政務官對於利益團體的活動，都認為有其必要性。五、政務官認為影響其決策的因素，可歸納為時間的壓力、輿論的反應、預算的通過、高層意見、立法院、法律限制等。六、政務官對於國內的政治生態環境皆能適應。
根據文獻探討及深度訪談發現，本研究提出以下建議，作為政務官決策之參考：一、理解政策問題。二、確定政策目標。三、建構備選方案。四、設定篩選準則。五、爭取政策支持。六、監督政策執行。
Government officials especially for those who are responsible for ministerial portfolio have to make decisions in response to the constantly changing environment. Hence, it requires takes excellent foresight, good data mining skills, superior strategic models and deliberate analysis to draft plans, solve problems, and deal with the crisis. Making the right decision serves as the key factor in the process of successful governance.
In this research, the author applies the methods of literature review, comparative analysis, and in-depth interview in order to understand the decision-making process, decision methods, as well as decision dilemma confronting ministerial officials with portfolio. Further more, this research uses relevant decision -making theories, such as cognitive decision process, rational choice, structured communication, and factors affecting decision-making process, such as interest groups & political system process. Based on the parameters of literature review, the author designs the outlines of interviews and selects ministerial officials with portfolio from the ministry of justice, ministry of economic affairs, ministry of education, mainland affairs council, national youth commission, and Mongolian and Tibetan affairs commission and conducts in-depth interviews.
There are several important findings derived from our 〝empirical〞case studies. First, before a government official makes his decision, he has a full grasp with the policy issue. Second, the decision models of government officials are mostly based on limited-rational model. Third, government officials often make decisions based on group consensus. Fourth, government officials think it is necessary to take opinions of interest groups into account. Fifth, government officials spend a lot of time in response to public pressure, budget & legal constraints demands of Legislative Yuan and in fathoming the attitudes of higher authorities before they make their decisions. Sixth, most government officials are quite accustomed to the political environment.
According to our literature review and in-depth interviews, this study makes the following suggestions before a government official makes his or her policy decision. First, fully comprehend the content and implications of a policy. Second, set an objective for the policy. Third, keep a substitute project on hand. Forth, set criteria or standards for policy implementation. Fifth, to garner for support from government and related actors. Sixth, monitor the execution of a policy. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
王進來，2000，高雄市政府機關首長領導行為之研究，國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文。
左潞生，1981，行政學，台北：三民書局。
任德厚，1995，政治學，台北：作者自刊。
朱志宏，1999，公共政策，台北：三民書局。
吳定，1999，公共政策辭典，台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
吳庚，2003，行政法之理論與實用（增訂七版），台北：作者自刊。
吳瓊恩，1996，行政學，台北：三民書局。
李延祝，1988，政務官責任之研究，私立中國文化大學法律研究所碩士論文。
林紀東，1994，行政法，台北：三民書局。
林基源，1999，決策與人生－現代化決策的應用，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
林鍾沂、柯義龍、陳志瑋譯（Michael Hill著），2003，現代國家的政策過程，台北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
胡幼慧，1996，多元方法：三角交叉檢視法，台北：巨流圖書公司。胡幼慧主編，1996，質性研究－理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流圖書公司。
胡慧瑩，1998，「焦點團體法對促進社會工作專業研究實務性之探究」，《社區發展季刊》，81：282-292。
翁岳生，2000，行政法與現代國家，台北：翰蘆出版社。
涂懷瑩，1999，行政法原理，台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
張明敏等譯（David Gergen著），2002，美國總統的七門課，台北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。
張英陣、彭淑華，1996，「從優勢的觀點論單親家庭」，《東吳社會工作學報》，2：227-271。
張家洋，1996，行政法，台北：三民書局。
張家惠，1987，我國政務官甄選之研究－民國三十九年至七十五年，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
張潤書，1998，行政學，台北：三民書局。
張學海，2000，我國政務官懲戒問題之研究，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
陳恆鈞、王崇斌、李珊瑩譯（Charles E. Lindblom & Edward J. Woodhouse著），2001，最新政策制定的過程，台北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
陳相君，2000，政務官與事務官的經濟分析，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
陳新民，2000，行政法學總論，台北：作者自刊。
陳德禹，1996，行政管理，台北：三民書局。
陳德禹，2001，問題分析與決策，台北：作者自刊。
黃瑪利，1975，我國政務官懲戒制度之研究，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
詹中原，2003，危機管理－個案分析，台北：神州圖書出版有限公司。
鄒文海，1971，政治學，台北：三民書局。
管歐，1978，中國行政法總論，台北：作者自刊。
劉唯玉，1991，「質的研究法之探討」，《國立成功大學社會科學學報》，4：295-316。
劉淑華，2003，資訊政策決策者在電子化政府中的責任－以縣市政府為例，私立東海大學公共事務碩士學程碩士論文。
潘淑滿，2002，質性研究－理論與應用，台北：心理出版社。
鄭興弟，1999，「政策規劃新方法之探析」，《法政學報》，第九期，頁1-41。
鄭興弟，2003，政策規劃：理論與方法，台北：商鼎文化出版社。
蕭武桐，2002，公務倫理，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
謝臥龍，1997，「優良國中教師特質之德懷分析」，《教育研究資訊》，5（3）：14-28。
鍾漢清等譯（Herbert A. Simon著），1999，管理行為－管理型組織中決策過程的研究，台北：華人戴明學院。
韓應寧譯（Ray. M & Myers. R著），1990，創意革命，台北：天下文化出版社。
簡進國，2002，政務人員政治活動限制問題之研究－兼論我國政務人員法草案，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
羅志淵，1976，美國政府及政治，台北：正中書局。
二、英文部分
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision：Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown and Company.Barber, James David. 1985. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Barnard, Chester I. 1938. The Function of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Berg, B. L. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom. C. E. 1963, A Strategy of Decision Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press.
Carey, M. A. 1994. “The Group Effect in Focus Group: Planning, Implementing, and Interpreting Focus Group Research”. In Morse, J.M (Ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage publications.
Cuhls, Kerstin & Knut Blind. 2001. “Foresight in Germany: The Example of Delphi ’98 or: How can the Future be Shaped”. International Journal of Technology Management, 21, pp.767-780.
Dror, Yehezkel. 1964. “Muddling through-“science” or inertia?”, Public Administration Review, 24, pp.7-153.
Dror. Yehezkel. 1968. Public Policymaking Re-examined, San Francisco, Calif: Chandler.Dror, Yehezkel. 2002. Capacity to Govern: A Report to the Club of Rome. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass,
Dye, Thomas R. 1976, Policy Analysis: What Government Do, why They Do It, and What Different It Makes. Alamaba: University of Alamaba Press.
Dyke, Vernon Van. 1968. “Process and Policy as Focal Concepts in Political Research” in Austin Ranney, ed. Political Science and Public Policy. 23-40. Chicago: Markham.
Easton, D. 1953. The Political System, New York: Knopf.
Easton, D. 1965a. A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
Easton, D. 1965b A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Etzion, A. 1967. ‘Mixed-scanning: a “third” approach to decision-making’, Public Administration Review, 27, pp.385-92.
Friedrich, Carl, J. 1963. Man and His Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Friend, John & Hickling, Allen. 1987. Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. New York: Pergamon Press.
Hrebenar, Ronald J. & Ruth K. Scott. 1990. Interest Group Politics in America, 2nded. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,p238.Kahn, Herman & Anthony J. Weiner. 1967. A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty years, N. Y.: Macmillan Publishing.
Kahn, Herman. 1978. World Economic Development: Projections for 1978 to the year 2000. Boulder. COLO: Westview Press, Inc..
Lasswell, Harold, and Kaplan, A. 1950. Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The science of muddling through”, Public Administration Review, 19, pp.78-88.
Lindblom, C. E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy, New York: Free Press.
Lindblom, Charles E & Edward J. WoodHous. 1993. The Policy-Making Process, Prentice Hall Inc., a Simon & Schuster Company.
Linstone, Harold & Murray Turoff. 1975. The Delphi Methods: The Critiques and Applications. N. Y.: Addison-Wesley.
Linstone, Harold. & Murray Turoff. 1979. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. N.Y.: Addison-Wesley.
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy, New York: Russell Sage.
Mitroff, Ian I & Mason, Richard O. 1981. Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory Cases and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons: Inc. 1981.
Mitroff, James R. Emshoff, & Killmann, Ralph H. 1979. “Assumtional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem-solving.” Management Science. 25.pp.583-593.
Morgan. D. L. 1996. “Focus group”. In Hagan, J. & Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, 22:129-152.
Peter, Ayton. Ferrell William R. & Stewart Thomas R. 1999. Commentaries on “The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis”, International Journal of Forecasting, 15. Oct 1999. pp.377-381.
Ranney, Austin. 1968. “The Study of Policy Content: A Framework for Choice” in Austin Ranney. Ed., Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago: Markham. 3-22.Ripley, Randall B. & Grace A Franklin, 1987. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Chicago, Ill. : Dorsey Press.
Schoemaker, PJH. & Comelius Van der Heijden 1992. “Integrating Scenario into Strategic Planning at Royal Dutch / Shell”. Planning Review. 20.3 May-June, 1992.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1972. Public Administration: Policy-Making in Government Agencies. Chicago: Markham.
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Administrative Behavior (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan.
Simon, Herbert A. 1997. “Administrative Behavior-A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization”, New York: Free Press.
Simon, Herbert A. 1997. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p198.
Snyder, Richard C. 1987. International Comparisons of the Distribution of Household Wealth, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Sorensen, Theodore C. 1963. Decision Making in the White House. New York: Columbia University Press.
Steven, Wheelwright & Markridakis, Spyros. 1980. Forecasting Methods for Management. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 1980. pp. 4-12.
Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
Stewart. J. M. 1994. “Future State Visioning Technique at National Rebber Company “, Planning Review Vol. 22＃2. Mar.-Apr. 1994. pp.20-27.
Tichy, Gunther. 2001. “The decision Delphi as a tool of technology policy-the Austrian experience”. International Journal of Technology Management, 21. pp.756-766.
Wack, Pierre. 1985. “Shooting the Rapids”, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. 1985. p.150.
報紙資料
聯合報，民國九十一年十二月二日，第二版。
中國時報，民國九十三年二月二十八日，第四版。
中國時報，民國九十三年五月二十七日，第二版。
聯合晚報，民國九十三年五月二十六日，第四版。
網際網站
世界衛生組織 http://www.who.int/en
行政院衛生署疾病管制局 http://www.cdc.gov.tw
法務部 http://www.moj.gov.tw
經濟部 http://www.mdea.gov.tw
教育部 http://www.edu.tw
行政院大陸委員會 http://www.mac.gov.tw
行政院勞工委員會 http://www.cla.gov.tw
行政院青年輔導委員會 http://www.nyc.gov.tw
蒙藏委員會 http://www.mtac.gov.tw
全國博碩士論文資訊網 http://datas.ncl.edu.tw |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
91921068
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091921068 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
