English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50969935      Online Users : 943
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34691


    Title: 影響台灣單親家戶住宅租擁選擇因素之探討
    Authors: 許嘉銘
    Hsu , Chia-Ming
    Contributors: 吳文傑
    wu , Jack
    許嘉銘
    Hsu , Chia-Ming
    Keywords: 租擁選擇
    恆常所得
    單親家戶
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 10:56:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文利用民國89年戶口及住宅普查與家戶收支調查報告等資料來分析影響台灣單親家戶住宅租擁選擇之因素。我們先以家戶收支調查報告資料中之經濟戶長年齡、教育年限、性別與職業別等因素估算出恆常所得方程式,然後再將它與戶口及住宅普查資料結合,去估計普查資料中各家戶的恆常所得水準。我們發現恆常所得對單親男性家戶及女性家戶擁屋傾向的影響係數分別大約為0.048及0.026。且恆常所得對單親男性與女性家戶的影響會隨著所得級距的提高而愈顯著。在單親男性家戶樣本裡,中所得級距的單親男性擁屋傾向是最高的;但在所得級距最高的單親女性樣本中,恆常所得才是影響住宅租擁的顯著變數。亦即,單親女性的所得必須要高於某個程度時,所得的增加才會提高其擁屋的傾向。另外,戶內人口數愈多選擇租屋的機率反而會愈高;家計單位流動性愈高者租屋的傾向也愈高。單親家戶擁屋的機率隨著房屋住宅的房間數、廳數、總樓層數及總樓地板面積而增加,但隨著住宅的屋齡而減少。相較於非都會區,都會區租屋的機率會較高。
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    行政院主計處普查局八十九年戶口及住宅普查專題分析
    吳俊賢(2002),「家戶住宅選擇模型及家戶競爭模型之實證比較分析」,成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
    林祖嘉(1994),「台灣地區住宅需求與租買選擇之聯合估計」,《政大學報》,68,頁183-200。
    陳建良、張郁鶴(2000),「住宅租擁、世代組成與家計儲蓄間關係之探討-以台灣家計收支調查為對象的分析」,《住宅學報》,第九卷第二期,頁99-124。
    薛立敏、陳綉里(1997)「台灣一九八O年代住宅自有率變化之探討」,《住宅學報》,第六期,頁27-48。
    謝文盛(2000),「公共支出、租稅收入與住宅市場之研究」,政治大學經濟所博士論文。
    謝文盛、林素菁(2000),「租稅效果對住宅租買選擇影響之分析」,《住宅學報》,第九卷第一期,頁1-17。
    二、英文部分
    Borjas, G. J. (2002), “Homeownership in immigrant population,” Journal of Urban Economics,52, pp.448-476.
    Bourassa, S. C. (2000), “Ethnicity, Endogeneity, and Housing Tenure Choice,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,20:3, pp.323-341.
    Coulson, N. E. (1999), “Why Are Hispanic-and Asian-American Homeownership Rates So Low?: Immigration and Other Factors,” Journal of Urban Economics,45, pp.209-227.
    Deng, Y., S.L. Ross, S.M. Wachter (2003), “Racial differences in homeownership: the effect of residential location,” Regional Science and Urban Economics,33,pp.517-566.
    Edin, P.A. and P. Englund (1991), “Moving costs and housing Demand: Are recent movers really in equilibrium?,” Journal of public Economics,44, pp.299-320.
    Fu, Y. (1991), “A model of Housing Tenure Choice:Comment,” American Economics Review,81 No.1, pp381-384.
    Gabriel, S., G. Painter (2003), “Pathways to Homeownership: An Analysis of the Residential Location and Homeownership Choices of Black Household in Los Angeles,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,27:1, pp.87-109.
    Henderson, J. V. and Y. M. Ioannides (1983), “A Model of Housing Tenure Choice,” American Economics Review,73 NO.1, pp.99-113.
    Henderson, J. V. and Y. M. Ioannides (1987), “Owner Occupancy: Investment vs. Consumption Demand,”Journal of Urban Economics,21, pp.228-241.
    Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (1981), “An Empirical Investigation of Alternative Approaches to Estimating the Equilibrium Demand for Housing,” Journal of Urban Economics,9, pp.97-105.
    Ioannides, Y. M. (1979), “Temporal Risks and the Tenure Decision in Housing Markets,”Economic Letters,4, pp.293-97.
    Mills, E. S. (1990), “Housing Tenure Choice,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,3, pp.232-331.
    Ortalo-Magne, F. and S. Rady (2002), “Tenure choice and the riskiness of non-housing consumption,” Journal of Housing Economics,11, pp.266-279.
    Painter, G. (2000), “Tenure Choice with Sample Selection: Differences among Alternative Samples,” Journal of Housing Economics,9, pp.197-213.
    Painter, G., L. Yang and Z. Yu (2003), “Heterogeneity in Asian American Home-ownership: The Impact of Household Endowments and Immigration Status,” Urban Studies,40 NO.3,pp.505-530.
    Painter, G., S. Gabriel, D. Myers (2001), “Race, Immigration Status, and Housing Tenure Choice,” Journal of Urban Economics,49, pp.150-167.
    Roland, A. and V. Pravin (1978), “Life Cycle Consumption and Ownership,” Journal of Economic Theory,18, pp.35-58.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    91255011
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091255011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    25501101.pdf10KbAdobe PDF2690View/Open
    25501102.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2741View/Open
    25501103.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2908View/Open
    25501104.pdf27KbAdobe PDF2700View/Open
    25501105.pdf354KbAdobe PDF2742View/Open
    25501106.pdf156KbAdobe PDF21053View/Open
    25501107.pdf92KbAdobe PDF21058View/Open
    25501108.pdf24KbAdobe PDF2750View/Open
    25501109.pdf831KbAdobe PDF2982View/Open
    25501110.pdf23KbAdobe PDF2830View/Open
    25501111.pdf26KbAdobe PDF2804View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback