Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34647
|
| Title: | 公開的秘密—從網路日記看網路上的公開與私密
Open Secret-The Publicness and the Privateness of the Online Diary |
| Authors: | 廖思逸 |
| Contributors: | 黃厚銘
廖思逸 |
| Keywords: | 日記
網路日記
愛情國小
公私領域
秘密
自我揭露
陌生人
戲劇理論
自我展演
中間地帶
online diary
public and private
Love School
secrecy
self-disclosure
Simmel
Goffman
Meyrowitz |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 10:49:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在大多數人的日記經驗中，藏匿、上鎖、被偷窺後的憤怒總是如影隨形，因為所有說不出與不能說的秘密，都被寄情於日記之中。然而隨著網路普及，越來越多的基本生活需求可藉由網路滿足後，傳統的紙本日記也開始轉以網路作為記載與儲存的媒介，成了任何人都可公開遊賞的園地。<br>本文基於研究者本身在網路日記社群三年來的親身書寫參與經驗，以「愛情國小」作為主要研究場域，除了以日記作為文本分析的對象外，並深入訪談重度使用者以及退用者，以瞭解使用者如何處理既公開又私密的網路日記書寫。本文自日記在東西方的歷史發展出發，先行定位私密在日記中扮演的角色，再輔以從社會心理學層面對秘密本質的探討，來重新探討公開與私密的問題。最後以Goffman分析日常生活之人際互動的戲劇理論為本，佐以社會學中的陌生人理論，解析人們如何在公開的網路日記裡進行表演，其間的變與不變。<br> 顛覆了傳統紙本日記之私密形式的公開網路日記，之所以能為日記書寫者接受或喜愛，無非是它既能滿足日記書寫的基本需求，同時又能在日記書寫之餘創造與他人社交互動的樂趣。雖然紙本日記「自我忠實紀錄」之要素，必須仰賴將他人隔離的秘密形式才得以達成，但日記書寫者仍是企圖向日記中想像的對象揭露公開，解決秘密無處可訴的焦慮。而網路日記不僅隔離了現實生活中的親友熟人，更進一步為日記書寫者帶來了能提供積極聆聽，並能給予回應互動的具體觀眾。這些網路上似近實遠、似遠實近的陌生人，讓網路日記書寫者願意公開與之分享私密自我，並且無須擔憂網路日記紀錄的後台面向會對現實生活之前台演出造成破壞。換言之，網路日記既有公開面對觀眾、在意觀眾反應的前台特性，亦有自現實生活前台角色解放、呈現私密自我的後台性質，實則為一結合了公開與私密、前台與後台之「私密自我的展演」的中間地帶。因此，網路日記書寫者只能透過訊息管道的操弄與分寸拿捏，隨著與不同觀眾間親疏遠近的關係變化，揭露不同層面或程度的私密，且更進一步控制與不同觀眾間的心理距離。
Diaries, on which personal matters are inscribed, are defined as a literary form that is written for oneself and therefore are kept privately, some even locked up, to avoid prying. However, the privateness, the distinguishing characteristic of diaries, has abated since the prevalent internet has become one of the media of storing content of diaries. The study is to investigate how diary writers coping with the conflict between the privateness and publicness in online diaries.<br>This study is based on the personal online diary writing experience of the author for three years in "Love School" ( http://love.youthwant.com.tw), the field of this study. The interviews with nine persons, including heavy users and dropouts that had ever been indulgent in Love School, are the main qualitative analysis material with some online diaries for textual analysis.<br>Beginning from exploring the changes in the nature of diaries both in eastern and western history, the study proceeds with probing to the characteristic of secrecy to comprehend that diaries inherently are both public and private. Moreover, Goffman`s theory of human interaction in daily life and Simmel`s of strangers offer steppingstones to detail the features—interacting and sharing intimacy with others unknown—of writing diaries on public internet.<br>Briefly speaking, the prevailing phenomenon of online diaries reveals that making diaries public can satisfy the needs of recording private life and of social contact simultaneously. Despite that traditional diary is kept away from anyone to ensure frankness, all the diary writers indeed still reveal themselves in it to some object(s), real or imaginary. Online diaries not only can exclude, if writers want, people who know them in person, but also bring in the unlimited audience with real feedback. Since the audience is composed of strangers, somehow far enough not to reach online diary writer`s everyday life but virtually close to see his/her innermost, the online diary writer doesn`t have to be anxious about the destruction of frontstage performances in everyday life, caused by backstage behaviors in diary being revealed. In other words, online diary is a frontstage as well as a backstage, that is, a middle region, where the division of the public and private is blurred. In online diaries, diary writers are able to disclose private selves hidden from frontstage role playing while audience¹s gaze and applause, absent in backstage, is all around. To reconcile the conflict between publicness and privateness, online diary writers master in manipulating information accesses and discretion. Therefore, they can disclose different aspects and degrees of privacy to various audiences according to various relationships, and can be the dominators subsequently to control psychological distances between them. |
| Reference: | About Diarist.Net. (2001/02/07). Diarist.Net Retrieved April 07, 2005, from http://www.diarist.net/about/
Amazon.com. Editorial Reviews of "A Book of One`s Own: People and Their Diaries". Retrieved 11/07, 2004, from http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1886913021/qid=1126609497/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-2267036-2495105?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
Bailey, J. (2002). From Public to Private: The Development of the Concept of the "Private". Social Research, 69(1), 15-31.
Biography. (2004). Encyclopædia Britannica Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service. Retrieved 07/03, 2004, from http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=119382
Bok, S. (1989). Secrets : On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Vintage Books.
Bryant, A. (2004). Pepys, Samuel Encyclopedia Americana Grolier Online. Retrieved 06/17, 2004, from http://ea.grolier.com
Burke, C. (2000). Personal Recollection. The online diary history project Retrieved 06/19, 2005, from http://www.diaryhistoryproject.com/recollections/1995_01_03.html
Burke, C. (2004/05/30). Carolyn`s Diary republished. Carolyn`s Diary Retrieved 01/29, 2005, from http://diary.carolyn.org/
Burnard, P., & Morrison, P. (1992). Self-disclosure : A Contemporary Analysis. Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, Vt.: Avebury.
Corcoran, P., & Spencer, V. (2000). Introduction: Revealing Disclosure. In P. Corcoran & V. Spencer (Eds.), Disclosures. Brookfield, VM: Ashgate
Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
Diary. (2004). Encyclopædia Britannica Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service. Retrieved 07/03, 2004, from http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=30779
Fuller, J. (1999). 孤獨是迷人的--艾蜜莉狄瑾蓀的秘密日記 (吳玲, Trans.). 台北市: 智達國際傳訊文化.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NY: Anchor Books.
Hall, J. (1994/01/27). Original Links of Justin`s Home Page. Justin`s Links Retrieved 01/17, 2005, from http://www.links.net/vita/web/start/original.html
Harrison, C. (2002). Urge, Bug, Gift. A Writer`s Diary Retrieved 05/04, 2004, from http://www.cynthiaharrison.com/mt-archives/000016.html
Hughes, R. E. (2004a). Autobiography. Encyclopedia Americana Grolier Online. Retrieved 06/17, 2004, from http://ea.grolier.com
Hughes, R. E. (2004b). Diary. Encyclopedia Americana Grolier Online. Retrieved 06/17, 2004, from http://ea.grolier.com
jeph. (2003/07/21). bbs個人版. 音謀筆記 Retrieved 11/29, 2004, from http://jeph.小晰circus.net/archives/004180.html
Jourard, S. M. (1968). Disclosing Man to Himself. Princeton, N.J. ; New York: Van Nostrand.
KapRaz. (2005/02/01). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/02, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200197654&ckm=11200
Lee, T. (2000). Personal Recollection. The Online Diary History Project Retrieved 06/19, 2005, from http://www.diaryhistoryproject.com/recollections/1995_09_02.html
Lofland, L. H. (1973). In A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space. New York: Basic Books.
Matthews, W. (2004). Evelyn, John. Encyclopedia Americana Grolier Online. Retrieved 06/17, 2004, from http://ea.grolier.com
Mellen, K. (2000/08/04). Dear Everyone... The Austin Chronicle Retrieved 06/19, 2005, from http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2000-08-04/screens_feature.html
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. NY: Oxford University Press.
Ozawa, R. K. (2001/08/04). Journal vs. Weblog. Diarist.Net Retrieved 06/18, 2005, from http://www.diarist.net/guide/blogjournal.shtml
Patterson, D. (1997/01/01). Why web journals suck. nobody knows anything Retrieved 06/19, 2005, from http://www.nobody-knows-anything.com/websuck.html
Perrot, M. (Ed.). (1987). From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War (Vol. IV). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Pinhanez, C. (1994/12/11). Open Diary of Dec. 11th 94. Retrieved 05/04, 2004, from http://persona.www.media.mit.edu/cgi-bin/Exhibit1010/makeExhibit.perl?Pinhanez.83
Pinhanez, C. (1995/09/20). Open Diary of Sep. 20 1995. Retrieved 05/04, 2004, from http://persona.www.media.mit.edu/cgi-bin/Exhibit1010/makeExhibit.perl?Pinhanez.83
Prost, A., & Vincent, G. (Eds.). (1987). Riddles of Identity in Modern Times (Vol. V). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Schutz, A. (1976). Colleted Papers (Vol. 2). The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
secret. (2004). Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary MERRIAM-WEBSTER ONLINE Retrieved 11/19, 2004, from http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile Transformations of `Public` and `Private` Life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107-125.
Siebenschuh, W. R. (2004). Autobiography. Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia Grolier Online. Retrieved 06/17, 2004, from http://ea.grolier.com
Simmel, G. (1906). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (K. H. Wolff, Trans.). NY: The Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1971a). Sociability. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel on the Individuality and Social Forms (pp. 127-140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simmel, G. (1971b). The Stranger. In On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings (pp. 143-149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turkel, G. (1992). Dividing Public and Private: Law, Politics, and Social Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Warren, C., & Laslett, B. (1977). Privacy and Secrecy: A Conceptual Comparison. Jounal of Social Issues, 33(3), 43-51.
Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Wilcos, H. (1992). Private Writing and Public Function: Autobiographical Texts by Renaissance Englishwomen. In S. P. Cerasano & M. Wynne-Davies (Eds.), Gloriana`s face : women, public and private, in the English Renaissance New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
YODA. (2004/04/16). 我與愛小. 2005/06/13, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200093178&ckm=6350
六字箴言. (2004/04/06). 我與愛小. 2005/06/19, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200121634&ckm=550
日記. (1997). 漢籍全文資料庫 中央研究院漢籍電子文獻. Retrieved 11/12, 2004, from http://www.sinica.edu.tw/ftms-bin/ftmsw3?ukey=-2026209237&rid=-6
月亮葉子. (2004/04/08). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/13, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200113353&ckm=2450
王家茗. (2001). 網路書寫動機與意義之探索--以「明日報個人新聞台」為例. 世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文, 台北.
可愛的YY. (2004/04/27). 我與愛小. 2005/06/13, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200103895&ckm=9300
星之淚痕. (2004/04/25). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/13, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200082887&ckm=8750
夏瑞紅. (2005/03/28). Xletter. Retrieved 08/03, 2005, from http://blog.chinatimes.com/xletter/
渚零. (2004/04/28). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/13, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200051612&ckm=A
寒星. (2004/04/08). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/13, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200019232&ckm=2350
黃厚銘. (2001). 虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任. 國立台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文, 台北.
萩風若晴. (2004/04/08). 我與愛小. Retrieved 06/11, 2005, from http://love.youthwant.com.tw/event_200404/view.php?t=&v=&stud_id=200187626&ckm=2250
網景公司. (2005). 大英百科全書 大英線上繁體中文版. 2005/08/17, from http://wordpedia.eb.com/tbol/article?i=083455
諸橋轍次. (1957). 大漢和辭典 (Vol. 卷五). 日本: 大修館.
薛怡青. (2001). 台灣BBS使用者之自我揭露、名片檔自我呈現自願與暱稱認知之初探. 國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文, 新竹.
謝宛蓉. (2003). 自我、書寫、網路：網路個人媒體自我書寫的意義初探. 國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文, 台北市.
蘇彥豪. (1998). 網路空間的公共與私密—以TANet女性主義BBS站為例. 國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文, 嘉義. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
90254002
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902540021 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
