Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34625
|
| Title: | 小型養護機構社工員專業角色發展歷程之初探
The Development of social workers’ professional role in small-scale nursing home |
| Authors: | 林易沁 |
| Contributors: | 呂寶靜
林易沁 |
| Keywords: | 社工員
專業角色
長期照顧
小型養護機構
social worker
role |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 10:46:17 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著高齡社會的來臨、85歲以上之「老老人」人數增長，具有長期照護需求者亦隨之增加；在眾多長期照顧資源中，目前以小型養護機構的所提供的服務量最為多，可見此種機構類型在長期照顧領域中的重要性。由於長期照顧機構間競爭激烈及評鑑期待等因素，使得服務品質成為目前小型養護機構發展的目標；社工員專業功能的發揮對於機構服務品質提升多有助益，但社工員的任用或許因為法源不足、成本考量、機構人員認識不足等因素沒有受到同等的重視，亦形成社工員高流動率與聘僱不易等問題。目前對於此研究對象的相關研究甚少，無法對於此種現象進行瞭解，且不能解答筆者過去一年多兼職工作經驗中所產生的疑慮，因而本研究以小型養護機構社工員為研究對象，探討其專業角色的發展歷程。本研究之目的如下：（1）試圖了解小型養護機構社工員在機構內的工作職責；（2）這些角色如何學習、建構與發展之歷程；（3）社工員的角色認知與其它工作人員角色期待磨合的過程；（4）此段過程中的各式影響因素；（5）期待本研究能使政策制定者、社工教育的學者及實務工作者關注社工員在小型養護機構內奮鬥的辛酸，並提出改善社工員所處情境之建議。
本研究因為過去相關研究甚少、據探索性研究特質、以生命經驗作為探索焦點及重視研究參與者觀點等因素採用質性研究典範，使用深度訪談方式蒐集資料，並以樣版式方法進行分析，在研究過程中亦有處裡研究倫理及信、效度等議題。本研究之研究結果為：（1）社工員於小型養護機構內的工作職責為「與個案一起工作」、「與家屬一起工作」及「與機構一起工作」；（2）專業角色發展歷程大致可歸納為兩主軸，其一為「角色不明確->學習」，初入機構時，多數社工員會感到角色不明確，而出現不知所措、挫折感、壓力、沒有成就感與緊張害怕等情緒，其運用正式教育訓練與非正式觀察模範、蒐集資訊、反思學習等方式進行社工員角色扮演、認識角色組成員、病理知識、組織運作資訊等相關學習，但由於機構內正式訓練不足、非正式學習並無相同專業之指導者，所以社工員紛紛表達需求督導支持；（3）專業角色發展歷程的第二主軸為「角色衝突->因應」，社工員對自己專業角色有所認知，進入機構後，部份機構主管因為對社工員專業角色認識不清、人力聘用不足、較不熟悉電腦操作等因素，對社工員有較高的行政角色期待，而引發角色衝突困境，令社工員感到抗拒、排斥、不滿、專業角色不被重視、想要離職、掙扎或對主管的角色期待產生疑惑等負面情緒，若干社工員以工時不足為由與機構主管溝通協調捍衛自己對於專業角色的認知，但多數仍不敵機構主管的期待而妥協接受機構主管角色期待，成為機構內的行政人員或社工兼任行政人員，在同時扮演兩種角色或捨棄原有專業角色轉而扮演自己不熟悉的角色之情況下，社工員會出現角色負荷過度的問題，並對自己專業成長沒有信心、付出收益不等值及引發自責等負面情緒。但仍有些社工員能運用說服的技巧、堅定拒絕的態度、事先避免等策略來堅持自己所認知的專業角色；（4）在上述的兩個主軸的影響因素中，社工員個人的人力資本、社會支持與自我認同會使得社工員較能堅持專業角色，同樣地組織內機構主管的學習經驗、接觸社工員的經驗也會讓機構主管較為清楚了解社工員的工作角色；但社工員重視人際合諧、畏懼權威等個人特質，會讓社工員妥協接受機構主管的角色期待，而機構內學習資源不足、社工員兼職工作身分等因素會阻礙社工員資訊之取得，機構內無行政專責人員、機構專業分工不清之文化，則會令機構主管對於社工員產生角色期待；除了個人與組織層次之助、阻力之外，社會環境層次中，規範小型養護機構的法規及評鑑項目等亦對於社工員專業角色發展有所影響；（5）學習是小型養護機構社工員專業角色發展歷程之核心機制，貫穿了「角色不明確->學習」主軸，也與角色衝突、因應策略息息相關，更是左右此歷程發展之重要因素。最後，研究者亦有針對上述研究結果之相關議題進行深入討論，並提出數點建議期待研究成果有較為實質的貢獻。
With the approach of aged society and the growing number of senior citizens over 85, people with the needs of long-term care is also on the increase. Currently, among all the long-term care resources, the amount of service provided by small-scale nursing home is the largest. Therefore, we can realize the significance of such type of facilities in the field of long-term care. However, due to factors like the keen competition and the expectations of evaluation among long-term care facilities, the quality of service has become the goal of small-scale nursing home. The realization of social workers’ professional roles is beneficial to the enhancement of the service quality of facilities. Nevertheless, probably because of reasons such as the insufficient laws, the consideration of cost, and the insufficient knowledge of staff, the employment of social workers is not equally emphasized, and thus causes problems like the high mobility of social workers and the difficulty in hiring social workers. Since there are few related studies on social workers, I could not understand such phenomena and there is no answer to the problems raised from my part-time experience. Hence, studying social workers, this study aims to explore the developing process of the roles. The purposes of this study are as follows: first, understanding the duties of social workers in small-scale nursing home; second, the way social workers learn and construct roles as well as their developmental process; third, the role identification of social workers and the process they conciliate with the role expectations from other staff; fourth, the various influencing variables during the process; fifth, the hope that this study could make policy-makers, scholars in social worker education field and practician concern the hardship and struggle that social workers encounter in small-scale nursing home, and provide suggestions for improving the conditions of social workers in these workplaces.
As a result of elements like few related studies, studies with exploratory features focusing on life experience and on the viewpoints of participants, this study adopts the qualitative paradigm, collects data with in-depth interviewing, and explains with the template analysis style. The study also deals with certain issues like ethics, reliability, and validity during the process. There are 5 findings in this study. First, the duties of social workers in small-scale nursing home include “working with the client,” “working with the family,” and “working with the facility.” Second, the developmental process of professional roles can generally be divided into 2 categorizes. One is “from uncertain role to learning.” At the beginning, most social workers feel uncertainty about the role and emotions like loss, frustration pressure, lack of achievement, nervousness and fear occur. With formal educational training, informal observing model, collecting data, and reflective learning, they learn through the role play of the social workers, knowing group members, pathological knowledge, and information about the running of organizations. Nevertheless, owing to insufficient formal training in the facility and no advisor with the same expertise for informal learning, social workers turn to supervisors for help one after another. Third, the other category is “from role conflicts to solutions.” After social workers realize their professional roles and work in facilities, due to facts like insufficient understanding of the professional roles of social workers, insufficient staff, and unfamiliarity of using computers, part of managers in facilities hold higher expectations of administrative roles on social workers, and thus causes social workers the dilemma of role conflicts and negative emotions like resistance, refusal, disaffection, despise of professional roles, resignation, struggle, or doubts about the role expectations from managers. Several social workers negotiate with the managers for the reason of insufficient working time to defend their recognition on professional roles. However, most of them still compromise and accept such role expectations. They become the administrative staff or social worker and part-time administrative staff. Under the circumstances of playing 2 roles at the same time or giving up the previous professional roles and turning into a less familiar role, social workers suffer from overload, become not confident in their professional development, feel inequality between devotion and reward, and have negative emotions like reproving themselves. Yet, some workers employ strategies like techniques in persuasion, firm refusing attitude, and prevention in advance to insist on the professional role in their mind. Fourth, among the variables in the 2 categories, the personal human capital of social workers, social support, and self-identification enable social workers to persist in their professional roles. By the same token, the learning experience of institute managers and their experience of contacting social workers also make managers understand the role of social workers better. Nonetheless, characteristics like emphasis on interpersonal harmony and fear of authority lead social workers to compromise and accept the role expectations of facility managers, while factors like lack of learning resources in the facility and the part-time role of social workers prevent social workers from access to information. The lack of full-time administrative staff and the culture of vague division of work in the facility cause facility managers to hold role expectations on social workers. In addition to the encouragement and obstruction from the personal and organizational level, in terms of social environmental level, the laws and evaluation items that regulate small-scale nursing home also affect the social workers professional role development. Fifth, learning is the core mechanism of the process of social workers’ professional role development in small-scale nursing home. It not only penetrates the category of “from uncertain role to learning,” but also is closely related to role conflicts and responding strategies. Moreover, it is the important element that affects the development of this process. At last, the researcher also has a deep discussion in terms of related issues about the results and proposes several suggestions in the hope that the results could have practical contributions. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文
內政部，2007，人口年齡分配統計資料，查詢日：2007/3/30（http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp）
內政部，2007，老人長期照護、養護及安養機構概況，查詢日：2007/6/30
（http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/）
內政部，2000，《社會工作辭典》，臺北市：內政部社區發展雜誌。
中華民國長期照護專業協會，2002，《老人安、養護、長期照護機構營運指南》。
中華民國老人福利推動聯盟，2004，《老人安、養護、長期照護機構社工人員操作手冊》。
王潔媛，2006，〈社工專業與小型養護機構文化之連結與磨合〉，老人長期照顧機構內社工專業之角色與效能全國研討會。
王心聖，2002，《資深安寧社會工作者專業認同發展歷程之敘說性硏究》，台北：輔仁大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
王麗容，1980，《我國社會工作專業認同與專業滿足之研究》，台北：國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
王秋絨，1981，《國民中學組織環境對教師角色壓力的影響》，國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王瑞琪，2001，《學校人事人員角色衝突之研究：以台北市國民小學為例》，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
王勇智，鄧明宇譯，Catherine Kohler Riessman著，2003，《敘說分析》，台北市：五南。（Catherine Kohler Riessman, 1993, Narrative analysis. Qualitative Research Methods Series 30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ）
尤幸玲，1993，《醫務社會工作參與醫療團隊及其角色關係之研究》，私立東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
行政院主計處，2005，《社會指標統計年報》。
呂建國、孟慧，2002，《職業心理學》，台北：揚智。
宋鎮照，1997，《社會學》，台北：五南。
宋冀寧、宋麗玉，2001，〈社會福利機構服務品質相關因素探討之研究－以老人自費安養護機構為例〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，5(2)，頁175-222。
李政賢譯， Catherine Marshall, Gretchen B. Rossman著，2006，《質性硏究 : 設計與計畫撰寫》，臺北市：五南。（Catherine Marshall, Gretchen B. Rossman, 1999, Designing qualitative research 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.）
李華璋，2001，《諮商人員專業認同歷程分析研究》，國立師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文。
杜瑛秋，2004，《婚暴社工員陪同出庭過程的專業角色與功能之探討》，天主教輔仁大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花，2005，〈質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析〉，《身心障礙研究》，3-2，頁122-136。
林思妙，1993，《從認知評估、因應方式看國中教師因應的工作壓力歷程》，國立師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林榮春、黃百麟，2005，〈台北市老人安養護機構經營管理與策略之研究〉，《
社區發展季刊》，第110期，頁340-350。
林萬億，2002，《當代社會工作》，台北：五南。
林義男譯，Donald Light, Jr., Suzanne Keller合著，1988，《社會學》，台北市：巨流。（Donald Light, Jr., Suzanne Keller, 1989, Sociology: a brief edition. McGraw-Hill）
林靈宏譯，1992，《組織行為學》，台北市：五南。
胡幼慧，1996，《質性研究：理論、方法與本土女性研究實例》，台北：巨流。
涂筱菁，2005，《老人安養護、長期照護機構社會工作者工作困擾影響因素》，私立慈濟大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
高申春，2001，《人性輝煌之路—班杜拉的社會學習理論》，台北市：貓頭鷹出版。
莫藜藜，1998，《醫務社會工作》，台北市：桂冠。
退輔會退輔會，2007，榮民就養統計資料，查詢日：2007/3/30（http://www.vac.gov.tw/files/cxls/4homecare5.xls）
許維素，1998，《輔導教師專業角色發展歷程之研究》，台北：國立師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳奎林，2005，《精神醫療社會工作專業角色與困境探討 : 實務工作者的觀點》，台北市：國立陽明大學衛生福利硏究所碩士論文。
陳釗文，2005，《公立國民中學兼任行政職務教師角色衝突及因應策略之硏究 : 以臺中縣為例》，台北市：私立銘傳大學教育硏究所碩士論文。
陳鴻銘，1995，《國民小學教師之角色衝突與因應策略之研究》，國立台北師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
陳豔紅，2001，《國民小學女性主管角色衝突與調適過程》，國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
曾茂禎，1989，《醫療從業人員對醫務社會工作態度之研究》，私立東吳大學社會學研究所社會工作組碩士論文。
黃源協，1999，《社會工作管理》，台北市：揚智文化。
黃麗雯譯， Benjamin F. Crabtree, W. L. M著，2002，《質性方法與硏究》，台北：韋伯文化。（Benjamin F. Crabtree, W. L. M, 1999, Doing qualitative research. London : Sage）
萬育維譯，2004，《老人照護工作—護理與社工的專業合作》，台北：洪葉。
楊培珊，2000，〈機構式失智症照顧中社會工作的執行〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，4-1，頁199-236。
楊培珊、王潔媛、江明璇，2005，〈推動「小型老人養護機構社工服務方案」經驗分析〉，《社區發展季刊》，110，頁321-339。
劉台雲，1991，《台北地區就業母親角色衝突及其因應方法之研究》，國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
劉台山、許麗雪、陳蕙婷、陳麗敏、吳佳芳、徐士淇，2006，〈台北市安養護暨長期照護機構評鑑制度修訂對中、小型機構經營者的影響—以人事、設備成本、空間設備成本為例〉，《台灣老人保健學刊》，Vol.2，No.1。
劉蓉錠，2004，《國內高中職觀光科教師角色衝突與因應策略之研究》，私立靜宜大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
潘淑滿，2003，《質性研究：理論與應用》，台北市：心理。
蔡文輝，1990，《社會學理論》，台北：三民。
蔡承志譯，Shaun Tyson& Tony Jackson著，1996，《組織行為》，台北市：桂冠。
蔡明家，2000，《中小企業業務人員角色衝突型態、來源與因應之研究》，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛，2001，《組織文化 員工層次的分析》，台北：遠流。
衛生署，1998，《老人長期照護三年計畫》。
戴國良，2004，《組織行為學》，台北：五南。
簡正鎰，2005，〈進行質性訪談研究有關倫理議題之探討〉，《輔導季刊》，41-1：頁47-57。
簡春安，1995，《台灣省已未立案養護機構評估報告》，南投：台灣省社會處。
簡春安、鄒平儀，2004，《社會工作研究法》，台北：巨流。
簡春安，1992，〈社會工作與質化研究法〉，《當代社會工作學刊》，2：頁13-32。
蘇秋莉，1977，《醫師對於社會工作者的態度研究》，國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文
Agresta, J. (2006). "Job satisfaction among school social workers: the role of interprofessional relationships and professional role discrepancy." Journal of social service research 33(1): 47-52.
Ashforth, B. E., Saks, Alan M.,& Lee, Raymond T. (1998). "Socialization and newcomer adjustment : the role of organizational context." Human Relations 51(7): 897-926.
Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, David M.,&.Saks, Alan M. (2007). "Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning integrating socialization models." Journal of vocational behavior 70: 447-462.
Bandura (c1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Chao, G. T., O Leary-Kelly, Anne M, Wolf, Samantha, Klein, Howard J, Gardner, Philip D. (1994). "Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences." Journal of Applied Psychology 79(5): 730-743.
Chung, B. G., & Schneider, Benjamin (2002). "Serving multiple master: role conflict experienced by service employes." Journal of services marketing 16(1): 70-87.
Clarke, E. (2001). "Role conflicts & coping strategies in caregiving-symbolic interactionist view." Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Service 39(1): 28-36.
Cowles LA&Lefcowitz MJ. (1992). " Interdisciplinary expectations of the medical social worker in the hospital setting." Health & Social Work 17(1).
Filstad, C. (2004). "How newcomers use role models in organiztional socailization." Journal of workplace learning 16(7/8): 396-409.
Fogarty, T. J., & Dirsmith, Mark W. (2001). "Organizational socialization as instrument and symbol: An extended institutional theory perspective." Human resource development quarterly 12(3): 247-265.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, Judith Tedlie (2004). "Coping: pitfalls and promise." Annual review of psychology 55: 745-774.
Folkman, S. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1984). "Stress, appraisal, and coping". New York : Springer Publishing Company.
Griffin, A. E. C., Colella, Adrienne, & Goparaju, Srikanth (2000). "Newcomer and organiztional socailization tactics: an interactionist perspective." Human resource management 10: 453-474.
Hall, D. T. (1972). "A model of coping with role conflict: the role behavior of college educated women." Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 471-786.
Hardy, M. E., & Conway, Mary E. (1978). Role theory : perspectives for health professionals. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hartman, A. (1991). "Social work-in-situation " Social work 36(3): 195-196.
Katz, D., & Kahn, Robert Louis (c1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, Wiley.
Keaveney, S. M., & Nelson, James E. (1993). "Coping with organizational role stress: intrinsic motivational orientation, perceived role benefits, and psychological withdrawal." Journal of the Academy of Marketing science 21(2): 113-124.
Lait, J., & Wallace,Jean E. (2002). "Stress at work : A study of organizational-professional conflict and unmet expectations." Relations in dustrielles / Industrial Relations 57(3): 463-487.
Lubinescu, E. S. (2002). Organizational socialization and a new system: the beginning of a profession, the pennsylvania state university. Doctor of philosophy.
Maanen, J. V. (1978). "People processing: strategies of organizational socialization." Organizational Dynamics 7(1): 19-36.
Mitchell, A. M., Jones, G. Brian, & Krumboitz, John D. (1979). Social learning and career decision making Cranston, R.I., the Carroll Press.
Ortqvist, D., Drnovsek, Mateja,& Wincent, Joakim (2007). "Entrepreneurs` coping with challeng role expections." Baltic Journal of management 2(3): 288-304.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, Calif., Sage.
Saks , A. M., Uggerslev, Krista L.,& Fassina ,Neil E. (2007). "Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model." Journal of vocational behavior 70: 413-446.
Taylor, M. F., & Bentley, Kia J. (2005). "Professional Dissonance : Colliding Values and Jobs Tasks in mental health practice." Community Mental Health Journal 41(4): 469-480.
Taylor, M. F. (2007). "Professional Dissonance a Promising concept for clinical social work." Smith College Studies in Social work 77(1): 89-99.
Thomas, E. J., & Biddle, Bruce J. (1966). Role theory : concepts and research. New York, Wiley.
Tidd, S. T., & Friedman, Raymond (2002). "Conflict style and coping with role conflict: An extension of the uncertainty model od work stress." International Journal of conflict management 13(3): 236-257.
Van Sell, M., Brief, Arthur P.,& Schuler, Randall (1981). "Role Conflict and role ambiquity; integration of the literature and directions for future research." Human Relations 34 (1): 43-71.
Vancouver, J. B. (1996). "Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes." Behavioral Science 41(3): 165-205.
Wanous, J. P., Reichers,Arnon E., & Malik,S. D. ( 1984). "Organizational socialization and group development: toward an integrative perspective." The academy of management review 9: 670-682. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
93254018
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093254018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
