Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34389
|
| Title: | 泰國學生運動發展之研究(1973-1992) |
| Authors: | 陳志毅
Chen, Chih-Yi |
| Contributors: | 陳鴻瑜
Chen, Hurng-Yu
陳志毅
Chen, Chih-Yi |
| Keywords: | 泰國
學生運動
政治發展
群眾參與
民主化
Thailand
Student Movement
Political Development
Mass Participation
Democratization |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 10:08:08 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 中文摘要
本文主要的研究目的是要檢視泰國學生運動在1973∼1992年間泰國政治發展過程中所扮演的角色。相較於其它多數相關研究，本文不僅僅只是追溯時間序列上所呈現的事件，更要探究其後所代表的意涵與價值。同時，透過瞭解學生運動的興起、發展與轉型過程，來評估其對泰國民主化及市民社會力量增強所帶來的貢獻。
1973∼1992年的二十年間，泰國一共經歷了三次重要的民主轉型階段，同時也發生了三次大規模全國性群眾運動，分別是1973年的10月學運、1976年的第二次學運以及1992年的黑色5月事件。1973年的事件是起因於他儂(Thanom Kittikachon)政權施行威權統治，進而引發大規模政治抗議的結果，而此次由學生所領導的事件，可說是泰國大規模社會運動的濫觴；1976年的二次學運是針對軍方態度的跋扈及對群眾請求漠視的反動；1992年的5月運動則是要要求執政當局制定具有民主本質的憲法，同時也欲推翻未經民選過程卻出任首相的蘇欽達(Suchinda Kraprayoon)。
本文立基於這三個轉型階段與三個歷史轉折點，來探討以下議題：在什麼樣的政治機會下，導致了學運的興起、發展與轉型？其後的歷史背景與相關意涵為何？是什麼原因讓學生變成行動主義者，並且號召其它群眾參與政治？文化及思想意識如何影響學運的發展與轉型？學生運動如何影響泰國的政治發展？
本研究主要是利用政治發展理論（political development theory）來分析泰國學生運動與政治發展間的關聯性，進而探究其在泰國政治轉型中所扮演的角色為何。同時並觀察外在政治環境的變化，特別是軍方政權的態度與行為模式、學生動員群眾的方式，尤其是與其它組織的結盟策略以及運動帶給一般群眾的認知與文化思想信念等變數，來分析學生運動成功或失敗的原因。
透過運用政治發展理論對上述三個歷史轉型階段的分析，本文發現（1）、泰國學生運動扮演了社會力量代言人(agent)的角色，透過學生運動的努力，喚醒了弱勢階層長久以來遭受壓抑的政治意識，並影響中產階級對民主的觀念，最後造成了軍人脫離政治及民主化的落實。(2)、由學生運動所引發的「由下而上」(bottom-up)改革力量以及群眾運動，將是觀察泰國政治發展的重要指標，這種來自民間的政治參與，會是未來影響政府決策及督促政治發展的最重要力量。(3)、泰國學生運動的發展脈絡印證了政治發展理論中由變遷—進步的結果。透過激烈的革命手段來達成演化的目的，最終促成了國家政治體系的進步。
最後，本研究認為，在學生運動帶動下的市民社會抗爭獲得成功之後，其信心與力量都更為鞏固，同時人民已認知到集體力量的重要性，日後統治階層若想再藉由武力的方式來鎮壓民眾的聲音，恐將難以成功，而泰國的政治應該會更加朝向民主鞏固的路途邁進。
Abstract
This thesis examines the role of the Thai student movements in the political development process that took place in Thailand between 1973 and 1992. Most studies of the student movements in Thailand take the presence of a movement as something that can be traced simply through sequential events. Things occur and results materialize. This research has a different purpose: first, to explore not only what happened, but also how it happened. Second, to examine its emergence, development and transformation. Finally, to evaluate the contribution it has made to the expansion of civil society and democratization.
Here this research attempts to answer such questions as: what internal conditions facilitated the emergence and development of the movements and how? What was the historical context in which the movement emerged and how was the emergence related to this context? How and why were students able to become activists, and then recruit others so as to sustain a voluntary social formation? And how did the elements of culture and ideology affect the development and transformation? The main subjects of this research are three pro-democracy demonstrations: the student movement of 1973, the bloody October of 1976, and the May uprising of 1992.
The analysis of the Thai student movements is guided by political development theory to better understand the relationship between student movement and political development. Through this study, three conclusions have been drawn: (1) Thai student movement played the role as the agent of social force. Through its efforts, the political awareness of the civil society has thus been waken up, leading to the break down of the military. (2) Student movement brought about the “the bottom-up” reform forceand created the political space for mass participation. This kind of “bottom-up” reform force will be playing the leading role affecting government’s attitude and policies. (3) The Thai student movement verifies the hypothesis of the political development theory. Through drastic mass movements, it leads to a real progress of the political system.
A comparison of the three cases shows that the development and expansion of civil society led by student movements, and the success of mass struggle make people understand the importance of collective action. It would be a quite difficult thing for the ruling class using violent means to stifle people’s demands in the future, and Thailand will be getting closer to the goal of the consolidation of democracy. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
一、中文書籍專著
田弘茂、朱雲漢主編 (1997)，鞏固第三波民主，台北：業強出版社。
江炳倫 (1989)，亞洲政治文化個案研究，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
宋鎮照 (1996)，東協國家之政經發展，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
林若雩譯 (1999)，東南亞政治與發展，台北：韋伯文化事業出版社。
郭壽華 (1967)，泰國通鑑，台北：大亞洲出版社。
陳水逢 (1977)，東南亞各國的政治社會動態，台北：台灣商務印書館。
陳佩修 (1999)，泰國的軍人與文人關係，台北：國立政治大學政研所博 士論文。
陳鴻瑜 (1992)，政治發展理論，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
------ (2001)，東南亞政治論衡，台北：翰蘆圖書公司。
鄧丕雲 (1993)，八○年代台灣學生運動史，台北：台灣研究基金會。
國父全集編輯委員會編訂 (1989)，國父全集第一冊，台北市：國父全集編輯委員會。
顧長永 (1995)，東南亞政府與政治，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
二、中文期刊論文
宋鎮照 (1994)， 「泰國國家機關與社會階級關係之政治經濟分析」，問題與研究，33卷2期，頁43-55
李永幟 (1990)， 「市民社會與國家」，當代，第47期，頁29-38。
洪陸訓 (1997)， 「第三世界國家文武關係的理論—軍人干政因素之探討」，復興崗學報，第60期，頁1-60。
張耀秋 (1993)， 「泰國軍事政變後的國會選舉與政局展望」，問題與研究，32卷2期，頁46-61。
陳志毅譯 (2003)， 「從悲劇到喜劇:泰國政治改革之路」，海華與東南 亞研究，2003年，3卷4期，頁75-94。
陳佩修 (1996)， 「泰國政黨政治之發展及其特質」，東南亞季刊，第1卷第4期，頁82-98。
------ (1997)， 「泰國軍人與文人關係之演變」，東南亞季刊，2卷3期，頁65-86。
陳鴻瑜 (1993)， 「泰國的軍人與政治變遷」，東亞季刊，第24卷第3期，頁1-35。
------ (1994)， 「泰國君主政治之變遷」，問題與研究，第33卷第2期，頁25-41。
廖書賢 (1999)， 「泰國民間社會發展之研究」，東南亞區域研究通訊，第9期，頁102。
譚國安 (1999)， 「泰國政治改革的原因、理念和新憲法的內容」，東南亞季刊，第3卷第3期，頁1-13。
羅石圃 (1992)， 「泰國浴血政潮落幕後的政局展望」，問題與研究，第31卷第11期，頁41-50。
譚國安 (1999)， 「泰國政治改革的原因、理念和新憲法的內容」，東南亞季刊，3卷3期，頁1-13。
龔宜君、張景旭 (1997)， 「發展中的東南亞中產階級：對馬來西亞、印尼、泰國與菲律賓中產階級形成之評析」，東南亞研究論文系列，台北：中央研究院東南亞區域研究計劃。
三、英文書籍專著
Almond, G. A. and Sidney Verba (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Almond, G. A., Bingham Powell and Robert J. Mundt (1996), Comparative Politics: A Theoretical Framework. HarperCollins College Publishers.
Anek Laothamatas, Seksan Prasertkun, Ana Kanchanaphan and Birek Pathamasiriwat (1995), Critique of Thai Society. Bangkok: Amarin Press.
Anek Laothamatas, ed. (1997), Democratization in Southeast and East Asia. Chiangmai: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Bachrach, Peter and Areyeh Botwinick (1992), Power and Empowerment: A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Batson, Benjamin A. (1985), The End of the Absolute Monarchy in Siam. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Blanchard, Wendell (1958), Thailand: Its People, Its Security, Its Culture. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files, Inc.
Callahan, William A. (1998), Imagining Democracy: Reading “the Events of May” in Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Callahan, William A. (2000), PollWatching, Elections and Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Aldershot Brookfield, USA.
Cammack, Paul (1997), Capitalism and Democracy in the Third World. UK: Leichester University Press.
Chai-Anan Samudavanija (1982), The Thai Young Turks. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Chai-Anan Samudavanija, Kusuma Snitwongse, and Suchit Bunbongkarn (1990), From Armed Suppression to Political Offensive. Bangkok: Institute of Security and International Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Chula Chakrabongse (1960), Lord of Life. New York: Alvin Redman.
Cohen, Jean and Andrew Arato (1994), Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Crouch, Harold and Zakaria Haji Ahmad, eds., (1985), Military- civilian relations in South-East Asia. New York : Oxford University Press.
Eckstein, Harry (1992), Regarding Politics: Essays on Political Theory, Stability, and Change. CA: University of California Press.
Diamond, Larry and Marc F. Plattner, eds. (1996), Civil-Military Relations and Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Emerson, D.K. (1968), Students and Politics in Developing Nations. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Etzioni, Amitai (1968), The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: the Free Press.
Feuer, Lewis (1968), The Conflict of Generations. New York: Basic Book, Inc.
Girling, John L. S. (1981), Thailand: Society and Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Habbsky, Sandor (1976), Mass Society and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, D. G. (1955), A History of Southeast Asia. London: Macmillan.
Hewison, Kevin, ed. (1997), Political Change in Thailand – Democracy and Participation. New York: Routledge.
Higgott, Richard A. (1983), Political Development Theory. Kent: Croom Helm Ltd.
Hrien Srichan and Netr Poonwiwat (1974), The 1912 Rebellion. Bangkok: Charoenwit Press.
Jaturong Boonyarattanasoontorn and Gawin Chutima, eds. (1995), Thai NGOs: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy. Bangkok: Thai NGO Support Project.
Ji Ungpakorn (1996), The Struggle Against the Military for Thai Democracy. Murdoch University: Asia Research Center.
Jumbala, Prudhisan (1992), Nation-Building and Democratization in Thailand: a Political History. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Social Research Institute.
Kazuko, Tsurumi (1970), Social Change and the Individual. N. J: Princeton University Press.
Keyes, Charles F. (1987), Thailand: Buddhist Kingdom As Modern Nation-State. Boulder: Westview Press.
Klineberg, Otto (1979), Students, Values and Politics: A Cross-cultural Comparison. New York: The Free Press.
Koo, Hagen (1993), State and Society in Contemporary Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lee, Namhee (2001), Making Minjung Subjectivity: Crisis of Subjectivity and Rewriting History, 1960-1988. Ph.D. Dissertation of the University of Chicago.
LePoer, Barbara Leith, ed. (1989), Thailand: A Country Study. Washington D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Lerner, Daniel (1958), The Passing of Traditional Society. London: Free Press.
Likhit Dhiravegin (1992), Demi-Democracy: The Evolution of the Thai Political System. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Linz, J. L. and Alfred Stepan (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore VA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
LoGerfo, James Paul (1997), Civil Society and Democratization in Thailand, 1973-1992. Ph.D. Dissertation of the Columbia University.
Madrid, Robin (2001), Fundamentalists and Democracy: the Political Culture of Indonesian Islamic Students. Ph.D. Dissertation of the American University.
McAdam, Doug (1994), Collective Behavior and Social Movements : Process and Structure. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (1996), eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCargo, Duncan, ed. (2002), Reforming Thai Politics. Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
Manich Jumsai (1951), Compulsory Education in Thailand. Paris: UNESCO.
Marcuse, Herbert (1972), Counterrevolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marjorie A. Muecke (1980), “The Village Scouts of Thailand.” Asian Survey, April, pp. 422-423.
Melucci, Alberto (1995), The Process of Collective Identity; Social Movement and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moore, Barrington Jr., (1978), Injustice: the Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, N.J.: M. E. Sharp.
Morell, David and Chai-Anan Samudananija (1981), Political Conflict in Thailand: Reform, Reaction, Revolution. Cambridge, Mass: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain Press.
Oberschall, Anthony (1973), Social Conflicts and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker (1995), Thailand: Economy and politics. Bangkok: Asia Books & Oxford University Press.
Peterson G. R. and Piansiri Ekniyom (1974), Participation: A Constitutional History of Student Movement. Paperback: Pocketbook Edition.
Prachoom Chomchai (1965), Chulalongkorn the Great. Tokyo: the Center for East Asian Cultural Studies.
Prizzia, Ross and N. Sinsawasdi (1974), Thailand: Student Activitism and Political Change. Bangkok: Allied Printers.
Riggs, Fred W. (1966), Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Rule, J. B. (1988), Theories of Civil Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schlegel, John P. ed. (1977), Towards a Re-definition of Development. Pergamon Press, Paris.
Somsak Kosaisuk (1993), Labor Against Dictatorship. Bangkok: Labor Museum Project, Arom Pongpangan Foundation.
Sungsidh Piriyarangsan and Pasuk Phongpaichit (1993), The Middle Class and Thai Democracy. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Supachai Manutphaibun (1976), The Role of the Government and Labor Legislation in the Development of Thailand’s Industrial Relations System. Bangkok.
Suwit Yingworaphan (1977), Labor Administration in Thailand. Bangkok: Department of Labor, February.
Tanham, George K. (1974), Trial in Thailand. New York: Crane, Russak & Co.
Tarrow, Sidney (1994), Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles (1978), From Mobilization to Revolution. Mass: Adison-Wesley.
Thinapan Nakata (1974), The Problems of Democracy in Thailand: A Study of Political Culture and Socialization of College Students. Bangkok: Praepittaya International.
Touraine, Alain (1971), The May Movement: Revolt and Reform, translated by Leonard F. Mayhew. New York: Random House.
Van Praagh, David (1996), Thailand’s Struggle for Democracy. New York: Holmes & Meier Publisher, Inc.
Watson, Keith (1980), Educational Development in Thailand. Hong Kong: Heinemann Educational Books Limited.
Weatherbee, Donald (1970), The United Front in Thailand. Columbia: University of South Carolina.
Wilson, D. A., (1962), Politics in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wyatt, David K. (1969), The Politics of Reform in Thailand: Education in the Reign of King Chulalongkorn. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wyatt, D. K. (1984), Thailand: A Short History. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.
Zhang, Shaolin (1996), The Beijing Spring of 1989: the Rise and Fall of the Chinese Student Movement. Ph.D. Dissertation of York University (Canada).
Zimmerman, Robert F. (1978), Reflections on the Collapse of Democracy in Thailand. Occasional Papers Series No. 50.
四、英文期刊論文
Altbach P. G. and Patti Peterson (1976), “Movement Goals and Fortunes. Before Berkeley: Historical Perspectives on American Student Activism,” in Robert H. Lauer, ed., Social Movement and Social Change. Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 29-45。
Anderson, Ben (1977), “Withdrawal Symptoms: Social and Cultural Aspects of the October 6 Coup,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, September, pp.28-30.
Anek Laothamatas (1993), “Sleeping Giant Awakens? The Middle Class in Thai Politics.” Asian Review 7 (Fall): 78-125.
Anek Laothamatas (1997), “Development and Democratization: a Theoretical Introduction with Reference to the Southeast Asian and East Asian Cases.” In Anek Laothamatas, ed., Democratization in Southeast and East Asia. Chiangmai: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 1-20.
Baker, Gideon (1997), “Civil Society and Democracy: the Gap between Theory and Possibility,” Politics, vol. 18, no.2, pp. 81-87.
Boonsanong Punyodhyana (1975), “The Revolutionary Situation in Thailand.” Southeast Asian Affairs. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp.189-199.
Chai-Anan Samudavanija (1989), “Thailand: A Stable Semi-Democracy,” in Larry Diamond, Juan Linz, and Seymour M. Lipset, eds., Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp.309-310.
Chai-Anan Samudavanija and Suchit Bunbongkarn (1997), “Old Soldiers Never Die, They Are Just Bypassed: The Military, Bureaucracy, and Globalization,” in Hewison, Kevin, ed. Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London: Routledge.
Chai-Anan Samadavanija and Suchit Bunbongkarn (1985), “Thailand,” in Zakaria Haji Ahmad and Harold Crouch, eds., Military-Civilian Relations in South-East Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press, pp.111-112.
Elliot, David (1978), “The Socio-Economic Foundation of Modern Thailand,” in Andrew Turton, Thailand’s Roots of Conflict. Nottingham: The Russell Press, LTD., pp.21-25.
Gamson, William and Bruce Fireman (1979), “Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective,” in Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy, eds. The Dynamics of Social Movement. N.J.: Transaction, Inc.
Hewison, Kevin (1996), “Political Oppositions and Regime Change in Thailand,” in Political Oppositions in Industrializing Asia, edited by Garry Rodan. London: Routledge.
Howell, Jude (1998), “An Unholy Trinity? Civil Society, Economic Liberalization and Democratization in Post-Mao China.” Governance and Opposition, 2(1), pp.2-12.
Huntington, S. (1989), “Modernization and Corruption,” in Arnold J. Heidenheimer, Michael Johnston and Victor T. LeVine, eds., Political Corruption: A Handbook. Brunswick NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Israel, John (1976), “Movement Genesis and Direction: Reflections on the Modern Chinese Student Movement,” in Robert H. Lauer, ed., Social Movement and Social Change. Southern Illinois University Press, pp.7-28。
Ji Giles Ungpakorn (2002), “From Tragedy to Comedy: Political Reform in Thailand.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 191-205.
Jidbhand Kambhu (1973), “Thailand: Death of a Regime,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 82 (42), October, pp. 13-17.
Jumbala, Prudhisan and Chantana Banpasirichote (2001), “Thai Middle Classes: Between Class Ambiguity and Democratic Propensity, in Michael Hsiao, ed., Exploration of the Middle Classes in Southeast Asia. Taipei: Program for Southeast Asian Area Studies, Academia Sinica, pp. 381-414.
Kasian Tejapira (1996), “Globalizers vs. Communitarians: Post-May 1992 Debate among Thai Public Intellectuals.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Honolulu.
Lebra, T. S. (1976), “ Millenarian Movements and Resocialization.” in Robert H. Lauer, ed. Social Movement and Social Change. Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 127-143
Maneerat Mitprasat and Prudhisan Jumbala (1997), “Non-Governmental Development Organizations: Empowerment and Environment,” in Hewison, Kevin, ed. Political Change in Thailand – Democracy and Participation. New York: Routledge, pp. 195-217.
Mallet, Marian (1978), “Causes and Consequences of the October ’76 Coup,” in Andrew Turton, ed., Thailand: Roots of Conflict. Nottingham: The Russell Press LTD., pp.80-95..
McAdam, Doug (1986), “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism,” American Journal of Sociology. No1, pp.33-35.
Morell, David (1972), “Thailand: Military Checkmate,” Asian Survey 12(2), February, pp.156-170.
Neher, Clark D. (1992), “Political Succession in Thailand.” Asian Survey, Vol.32, No.7, July.
Niksch, Larry A. (1989), “Thailand in 1988: the Economic Surge,” Asian Survey, Vo.29, No.2, February, pp.165-171..
Pisan Suriyamongkol (1988), “Three-Pronged Democratic Polity: An Alternative Model for Current Thai Politics,” in Institutionalization of Democratic Political Process in Thailand. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press, pp.1-3.
Popkin, Samuel (1988), “Political Entrepreneurs and Peasant Movement in Vietnam.” in Michael Taylor, ed. Rationality and Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-70.
Prudhisan Jumbala (1974), “Towards a Theory of Group Formation in Thai Society and Pressure Groups in Thailand After the October 1973 Uprising,” Asian Survey, Vol. 14, No. 6, June, pp.530-540.
Prudhisan Jumbala (1987), “Interest and Pressure Groups,” in Somsakdi Xuto, ed. Government and Politics of Thailand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110-168.
Race, Jeffrey (1975), “Thailand in 1974: A New Constitution,” Asian Survey, Vol. 15, pp.159-162.
Race, Jeffrey (1975), “The January 1975 Thai Elections: Preliminary Data and Inferences,” Asian Survey, Vol. 15, pp.375-378.
Raja Segaran Arumgam, Patrick Low, and M. Rajaretnam (1973), “Thailand in the Seventies: Challenges of Stability and Security,” in M. Rajaretnam and Lim So Jean, eds., Trends in Thailand. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Rustow, D. A. (1970), “Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 3, pp. 330-350.
Sippanondha Ketudat (1976), “Higher Education in Thailand.” Bulletin of the UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia, Vol. 7, No.1, September, pp. 120-140.
Stifel, Laurence P. (1976), “Technocrats and Modernization in Thailand.” Asian Survey, Vo.16, pp.1180-1200.
Suchit Bunbongkarn (1992), “Thailand in 1991: Coping with Military Guardianship,” Asian Survey, Vol.32 No, 2, February, pp.130-142.
Sukhumbhand Paribatra (1993), “State and Society in Thailand.” Asian Survey, Vol.33, No.9, September, pp. 890-899.
Sukich Nimmanheminda (1970), “Higher Education in Thailand.” Journal of the National Education Council, January, pp.12-22.
Summy, Ralph (1992), “Democracy and Nonviolence,” Social Alternatives 12, no.2 July, pp.12-29.
Thaxton, Ralph (1974), “Modernization and Peasant Resistance in Thailand,” in Mark Selden, ed., Remaking Asia: Essays on the American Uses of Power. New York: Patheon.
Thongchai Winichakul (1995), “The Changing Landscape of the Past: New Histories in Thailand Since 1973.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, (March): pp.99-101.
Thongchai Winichakul (1999), “Thai Democracy in Public Memory: Monuments and Their Narrative,” paper presented at the 7th International conference on Thai Studies. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, July 4-8, pp. 1-15。
五、中文報章
中央日報
中國時報
自由時報
明報
星島日報
聯合報
六、英文報章
Bangkok Post
China News
South Chinese Morning Post
The Nation
Washington Post |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
中山人文社會科學研究所
90261018
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090261018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國家發展研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
