Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34371
|
| Title: | 保健休閒產業智慧資本之規劃與管理
Study on intellectual capital planning and management of healthcare and recreation industry |
| Authors: | 劉展光
Liu, Chan-Kuang |
| Contributors: | 劉江彬
Liu,Paul
劉展光
Liu, Chan-Kuang |
| Keywords: | 智慧資本
專案管理
保健休閒產業
intellectual capital
project management
healthcare and recreation industry |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:37:44 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著生活品質的提升與科技的發展，人類對於保健休閒的需求與日俱增，如何活得更好、更健康已成為全球發展的趨勢之一。保健休閒產業的發展，不僅是人文與科技的匯流，也是提升人類生活品質的推手。在知識經濟下，智慧資本已成為企業創造競爭優勢的一切知識與能力的總合。保健休閒產業亦不例外，其牽涉的技術領域不僅廣泛且複雜，因此智慧資本的重要性更為突顯。本研究透過台灣保健休閒產業著名的案例，探討企業如何透過專案規劃與執行過程，將智慧資本規劃納入企業策略的佈局考量，提供企業智慧資本規劃與管理的參考，並希望藉此提升專案的成功率以及企業的競爭力。
本研究藉由七個台灣著名案例的研究，歸納出以下七點結論：
一、企業智慧資本可協助專案進行，企業也可透過專案的進行累積智慧資本。
二、企業智慧資本的四個不同構面(人力、關係、流程、創新)，在專案不同階段的存量明顯不同。
三、智慧資本的規劃可以透過專案的執行，與企業策略佈局作連結。
四、不同類型的企業對於專案智慧資本有不同的理解。
五、企業組織文化差異會影響智慧資本在專案過程中的重要性判斷。
六、保健休閒產業欠缺與資本市場的連結，造成難以估計智慧資本的價值。
七、保健休閒產業是個跨領域知識的整合，是人文、科技、藝術的匯流。
保健休閒產業已經成為體驗經濟的一部分，重視整體呈現的意境，並強調提供給顧客的感受，其基礎建設涵蓋的技術領域廣泛，舉凡資訊、生物科技、奈米技術、建設工程、藝術、醫學等，企業除了需要具備核心技術，如何有效的整合不同科技，並將之商品化成為市場領導的商品與服務，無疑是個嚴厲的考驗。因此，企業持續透過專案的進行將市場新機會或技術新應用轉換成新的商品或科技，藉此累積成企業的智慧資本含量；而新的科技與智慧資本又會成為下一個專案的技術輸入，形成一個源源不絕地累積與應用企業的智慧資本。
由於市場的瞬息萬變，產品或服務不斷推陳出新，企業的創新與否已是保健休閒產業能否成功的重要關鍵。如何營造組織的創新氛圍與前瞻想像力是許多企業當前的問題，而建立跨領域資源整合的機制，藉由專案導入前瞻創新的想像，融合跨文化與科技的要素，有助於創新的發生。企業的另一個重點則是國際合作，以及國際技術標準的接軌，透過加入國際性組織，可以吸取國外全球與跨文化營運的經驗，進而朝國際化的設計與服務。
雖然國內對於保健休閒產業的標準尚在摸索與建立，但政府必須擔任龍頭角色，協助跨領域的經營管理人才與產業專才的培植，搭配產業政策的推動，提升國際知名度。另一方面，則是加強保健休閒產業基礎建設與產業服務窗口的建置，並建立跨業合作機制與資金援助，提供一個讓產業自由發展的空間。
As an effort to improve quality of life and with the development of technology, people have more demand for healthcare and recreation. How to live better and healthier has become a universal trend. Development of healthcare and recreation not only plays a role in the integration of humanity and technology, but also a motivator to improve human life quality.
Under the stream of knowledge economics, intellectual capital has become sum of all knowledge and ability to create competitive advantage. The healthcare and recreation industry is never an exception and its related technology area is broad and complicated. Therefore, intellectual capital in each enterprise has become more critical. This study is based on several famous cases in Taiwan, to investigate how an enterprise incorporates the intellectual capital planning into its strategy map through project planning and execution. Furthermore, it also hopes to make a conclusion as a reference for other enterprises and to promote successful rate of a project and competitiveness ability.
This study can be generalized into seven conclusions, as follows:
1. Intellectual capital of an enterprise can help projects proceed, and an enterprise also accumulates its intellectual capital by executing projects.
2. The four different dimensions of intention of an enterprise’s intellectual capital, including human, relation, process, and innovation capitals change during different stages of a project.
3. An enterprise can incorporate intellectual capital planning into its strategy map through project planning and execution.
4. Different enterprises have different understanding about project intellectual capitals.
5. Organizational culture diversity of different enterprises affects its judgment on the importance of intellectual capital in the project management process.
6. It’s hard to calculate the value of intellectual capital without information on the relationship between healthcare and recreation industry and the capital market.
7. Healthcare and recreation industry is an integration of multiple knowledge areas, and also an influx of humanity, technology, and art.
Healthcare and recreation industry has become a part of experience economics, emphasizing on the conception of overall performance and its feeling provided to customers. The infrastructure of this industry is related to different technologies, including information technology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, architecture engineering, art, medicine… etc. An enterprise not only needs to own core technology, how to effectively integrate different technologies, further commercialize them to leading products, but services is also undoubtedly a severe challenge. As a result, enterprises continuously execute projects to transfer new market opportunities and new applications of technology into new products and services. It helps to accumulate intellectual capitals. On the other hand, new technologies and intellectual capitals become inputs of new projects, forming a never-ending accumulation and application of internal intellectual capitals.
Products and services proceed ceaselessly as the market needs change rapidly. Innovation ability has become one of the key successful factors, and how to create organizational innovation atmosphere, build pioneer imagination are problems many enterprises are facing at the moment. It is helpful to allow for innovation to happen by building up mechanism of cross-field resource integration, implementing pioneer imagination through projects, and fusing cross-cultural and technical factors. Another critical work is international cooperation. Enterprises will absorb foreign global and cross cultural operation by joining international organization to fit international design and service standards.
Although domestic healthcare and recreation industry direction is still not clear, and the industrial standards are not yet determined, government should play a leading role, including training cross field administrators and industrial professionals, promoting international reputation through industrial policy. On the other hand, improving healthcare and recreation industry infrastructure, building industrial service window and financial support, providing a space for free market are also helpful for industrial development. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
1、 王緯中 (1999)，《台灣軟體產業創新平台之研究》，政治大學
2、 邱正瀚 (2001)，《企業知識管理架構通用模式之初期探討研究》，臺灣大學
3、 李自平 (2000)，《我國醫療產業智慧資本之衡量》，義守大學
4、 林良陽 (2001)，《衡量研發機構智慧資本之研究—工研院光電所為例》，政治大學
5、 林燦螢 (2000)，《智慧資本發展模式之研究》，師範大學
6、 高婉容 (2001)，《網際網路公司核心智慧資本管理制度之探討》，政治大學
7、 許秀菁 (2003)，《探索創新智慧資本對新產品開發績效之影響-個案以製藥產業為例》，政治大學
8、 郭家蓉 (2001)，《智慧資本衡量模式探討》，政治大學
9、 曾耀泰 (2003)，《智慧資本角度探討公司科技價值-以宏廣動畫公司為例》，政治大學
10、 董碧玫 (2000)，《智能資本之衡量：以國內資訊電子產業為例》，中央大學
11、 廖翊閔 (2005)，《從甲馬創意看我國動畫事業智慧資本之建立與累積》，政治大學
12、 蔡佩君 (2003)，《新創事業的智慧資本建構與管理-以某醫工公司參與BOO 過程為例》，政治大學
13、 賴彥豪 (2000)，《智慧資本之評量與知識管理活動－兩個個案分析》，政治大學
14、 賴衍瑞 (2002)，《休閒產業電子商務營運績效之研究 --以台灣地區觀光旅館網站為例》，台灣師範大學
中文翻譯
15、 Edvinsson, L.＆Malone, M. S., “Intellectual Captial：realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower”，林大容譯，(1999)，《智慧資本-如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值》，麥田出版。
16、 James P. Lewis, 2002, “Fundamental of Project Management”, 葛迺駿譯 (2003)，《我懂了!專案管理》，經濟新潮社
17、 Jack J. Philips, Timothy W. Bothell, G. Lynne Snead, 2002, “The Project Management Scorecard: Measuring the Success of Project Management Solutions”,劉孟華譯，(2004)，《專案管理計分卡 – 評估專案管理解決方案的最佳策略工具》，臉譜出版社
18、 Ken Dychtwald, 1999, ”Age Power - How 21st Centry will be Ruled by the New Old”, 宋瑛堂譯，(2005)，《搶占2億人市場》，藍鯨出版社
19、 Linda Gorchels, “The Product Manager’s Handbook”, 戴維儂譯 (2005) ，產品經理的第一本書：完全剖析產品管理關鍵領域提升企業獲利率與競爭力》，美商麥格羅‧希爾
20、 Tom DeMarco, 1997, “The Deadline: A Novel About Project Management”, UMLChina翻譯組，(2004)，《最後期限 – 專案管理101個成功秘訣》，經濟新潮社
中文網頁
21、 永越健康管理中心網頁， http://www.eonway.com.tw/ (瀏覽日期：2006,5,2)
22、 江陵企業集團網頁， http://www.konglin.com.tw/business.htm (瀏覽日期：2006,5,18)
23、 如新公司網頁，http://www.nuskin.com.tw/ (瀏覽日期：2006,5,7)
24、 長庚生物科技股份有限公司網頁，http://www.cgb.com.tw/j2j0/cus/cus1/pdt/pdt_pdt_dtl_FLW3.jsp?pdid=FLW3
(瀏覽日期：2006,5,2)
25、 亞力山大亞爵会館網頁， http://www.aegius.com.tw/ (瀏覽日期：2006,6,1)
26、 聖恩全生涯事業網頁， http://www.sheng-en.com.tw/ (瀏覽日期：2006,5,13)
27、 iCare心活身心健康管理中心網頁， http://www.icareyou.com.tw/ (瀏覽日期：2006,5,28)
28、 康健網頁http://www.commonhealth.com.tw/lohas/index.asp (覽日期：2006,10,16)
29、 英文文獻
1、 Alavi, M. (1999), “Knowledge Management System：Issues, Challenges, and Benefits”, Communications of Association for Information System, Vol.1, Article 7, pp.1-37.
2、 Barsky, N. and Marchant, G. (2000), “The most valuable resource—measuring and managing intellectual capital”, Strategic Finance, Vol. 81, No. 8, Feb 2000, pp. 58-62.
3、 Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C., and Richardson, S. (2000), “Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1, No.1, 2000, pp. 85-100
4、 Bontis, N. (1999), “Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, 1999, pp. 433-462.
5、 Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory study that develops measures and models”, Management Decision, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1998, pp. 63-76.
6、 Booth, R. (1998), “The measurement of intellectual capital”, Management Accounting, Vol. 76, No. 10, Nov 1998, pp. 26-28.
7、 Brooking, A., Board, P. and Jones, S.(1998), “The predictive potential of intellectual capital”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 1/2/3, 1998, pp. 115-125.
8、 Bassi, L.J. (1997), “Harnessing the power of intellectual capital”, Training and Development, December, pp.25-30.
9、 Bell, C., R. (1997), “Intellectual capital”, Executive Excellence, Vol.14, No1,p.15.
10、 Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual capital, Boston, Mass: International Thomson Business Press.
11、 Bontis, N. (1996), “There’s a price on your head: Managing intellectual capit al strategically”, Ivey Business Quarterly, Vol.60, No. 4, Summer 1996, pp.40-47.
12、 Bontis, N. (1996), “There’s a price on your head：Managing intellectualcapital strategically”, Business Quarterly, summer, pp.41-47.
13、 Badaracco, J.L. (1991), The knowledge link, Boston：Harvard Business School Press
14、 Chris J. Robinson (2003), “The Animation Pimp: Chillax”, ANIMATION WORLD MAGAZINE, June 2003, Volume 8, Issue 03.
15、 Edvinsson, L. (1997), “Developing intellectual capital at Skandia”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 366-373.
16、 Housel, T.J.＆Arthur, H.B. (2001), “Measuring and Managing 181 knowledge”, New York: McGraw-Hill.
17、 IDC (2002), “2002 Taiwan Digital Content Industry Overview”.
18、 Nonaka, I. ＆ Noboru, K. (1998), “The Concept of Ba：Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation”, Californian Management Review, Vol40, no.3, pp. 40-54.
19、 Nahapiet ＆ Goshal (1998),“Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2
20、 Nonaka, I. ＆ Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company：How Japanese Company Foster Creativity and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, New York: Oxford University Press
21、 Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, Vol 5, no.1, pp.14-37.
22、 Peña, I. (2002) “Intellectual Capital and Business Start-Up Success”, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(2): 187.
23、 PMI (2004) , “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge Third Edition”
24、 Sullivan, P. H. (2000), “Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value”, New York: Wiley.
25、 Sullivan, P. H. (2000), “Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value”, New York: Wiley.
26、 Sullivan, P. H. (1998), “Profiting from Intellectual Capital - Extracting Value from Innovation”. New-York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27、 Sullivan, P. H. (1998), “Profiting from Intellectual Capital – Extracting Value from Innovation”, New-York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28、 Stewart, T. A. (1998), “Intellectual Capital, New York”: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
29、 Sveiby, K. E. (1997), “The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets”, San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
30、 Stewart, T. (1997), “Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations”, New York: Doubleday.
31、 Saint-Onge, H. (1996), “Tacit knowledge：The key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital,” Strategy＆Leadership, March/ April, pp.10-14.
32、 Stewart, T. A. (1994) , “Your company’s most valuable asset：Intellectual Capital , Fortune, October 3,pp.28-33.
33、 Stewart, T. A. (1994), “Your company’s most valuable asset：Intellectual Capital”, Fortune, October 3, pp.28-33.
34、 Teece, D. J. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, Chichester, Vol. 18, Iss. 7, P 509-533.
35、 Ulrich, D., (1998), “Intellectual Capital=Competence ×commitment,”Sloan Management Review, Vol.39, No.2, pp.15-26.
36、 Wiig, K. M. (1997), “Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management,” Long Range Planning, Vol.30, NO.3, PP.399-405. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
92359029
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923590291 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
