Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34370
|
| Title: | 台灣半導體智慧工廠系統整合創新平台之研究
The Study of Taiwan Semiconductor Intelligent Manufacturing IT System Innovation |
| Authors: | 盧元慶 |
| Contributors: | 溫肇東
Wen, Chao-tung
盧元慶 |
| Keywords: | 半導體製造
系統整合
智慧工廠自動化
技術知識特質
組織結構特質
創新平台
semiconductor manufacturing
system integration
intelligent fab automation
characteristics of technological knowledge
characteristics of organization structure
innovation platform |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:37:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 論文摘要
台灣半導體產業協會（2005）對台灣主要IC公司營運狀況所做的調查統計結果所發表「台灣半導體產業對國家的貢獻」研究報告顯示：IC產業無論在產值、營運附加價值、創匯收入、投資、政府投資獲利、所帶動的週邊效益…等，都有穩定到持續成長之表現，為台灣深具競爭力之產業。在先進半導體製造技術進步之下，「智慧工廠自動化」技術成為半導體製造廠商的核心能力的重要部分。根據資策會市場情報中心的1998年分析研究，「智慧工廠自動化」系統技術創新屬於「系統整合」類型的軟體創新。
本研究主要採用文獻探討以及個案訪談作為主要的研究方法，先藉由文獻探討建立起論文整體之架構以及相關理論之說明定義所需探討之研究變項，之後再透過台灣半導體製造標竿企業的六個系統整合專案訪談加以實證。本研究以研究「系統整合專案類型」、「技術知識特質」、與「組織架構特質」對「系統整合創新平台」的關聯，來探討台灣半導體智慧工廠系統整合軟體開發的管理作為，說明所觀察現象的具體意義，以及背後的思考邏輯。而可得到以下初步之研究結論：
一、系統整合專案類型與技術知識特質
1.不同的系統整合專案類型，有不同的技術知識特質。製程發展攸關類型專案，技術知識的多元性較高。資訊系統改造類型專案，技術知識的內隱性較低、多元性較低、標準化程度較高、路徑相依程度較高。
2.製程發展攸關專案在不同階段可能因應技術開發標的不同，會有不同的技術知識特質。早期發展階段將現有的作業流程「自動化」，所以技術知識內隱性為較低。在後期發展階段以採用新技術使系統「智慧化」，所以技術知識內隱性為較高。
二、技術知識特質與系統整合的創新平台
3.系統整合專案的技術知識的內隱程度差異，使外部知識的來源有所差異。系統整合專案的技術知識的內隱程度愈低，外部知識的來源愈傾向專業廠商。系統整合專案的技術知識的內隱程度愈高，外部知識的來源愈傾向大學等研究機構。
4.系統整合專案的技術知識的多元程度愈高，使用者參與程度愈傾向「共同開發」。多元程度愈低，使用者參與程度愈傾向「交付模式或是隔牆交易」。
三、組織結構特質與系統整合的創新平台
5.台灣半導體製造業隨著組織正式化的程度提高，傾向將跨部門的整合溝通活動，予以正式的組織化。這些組織的成員也是來自各個知識領域。
6.在台灣半導體製造企業內的正式組織與臨時性的專案組織之間，選擇「虛擬組織」結構以吸收、創造、積蓄、與擴散重要的跨部門技術知識。
四、其他發現
7.整合跨部門知識領域來創造出新的知識，進而由新知識來創造出新的軟體系統。
8.製程發展攸關類型系統整合專案之技術知識內隱程度愈低，使用者需求定義書對於專案的成功就愈重要。反之，技術知識內隱程度愈高，使用者需求定義書對於專案的成功就愈不相關。
關鍵字：半導體製造、系統整合、智慧工廠自動化、技術知識特質、組織結構特質、創新平台
Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association (2005) delivered a report “The national contribution of Taiwan semiconductor industry”, which claimed that IC industry is very critical to Taiwan economic growth and a very competitive industry in the world. In 2004, Taiwan was the first in IC foundry industry with more than 70% market share, the second large cluster of IC design houses with market share 28.2%, and the third in the DRAM industry in the word.
In recent years, “Intelligent Fab Automation” technology has become the crucial component of the core competence of nanotechnology IC manufacturing. Based on the software classification of 1998 Institute for Information Industry, “Intelligent fab automation” is one kind of “System Integration” computer software innovation. It includes the advanced Manufacturing Execution System (MES), Advanced Process Control (APC), Advanced Material Handling System (AMHS), equipment automation systems, Engineering Data Analysis (EDA), and etc. “Intelligent fab automation” builds up the proprietary manufacturing capability.
This thesis attempts to take an exploratory study of the relationship between characteristics of system integration project, characteristics of technological knowledge, characteristics of organization structure, and innovation platform on the benchmark semiconductor company in Taiwan. This thesis adopts reference and case study as the main research approach. It sets up the thesis whole structure by reference and relevant theories to define the factors. Afterward, to demonstrate the thesis structure by interview six system integration software projects of that company. There are primary figures found in the thesis：
1.The relationship between characteristics of system integration projects and characteristics of technological knowledge
a)Different kinds of system integration projects have different characteristics of technological knowledge. The manufacturing-process relevant system development projects associate with high degree of technology diversity. The IT system reengineering projects associate with low degree of technology diversity and manufacturing technology advance.
b)The manufacturing-process relevant system development project consists of different development stages that have different technology development targets. In the early stage, the development target is procedure automation with codified technology knowledge. In the later stage, it turns to intelligent system with tacit technology knowledge.
2.The relationship between characteristics of technological knowledge and innovation platform
a)Different kinds of system integration projects have different types of project organizations. The IT system reengineering projects tend to adopt the “Function Team” to operate, but the manufacturing-process relevant projects tend to adopt a team type between the “Heavyweight Team” and the “Lightweight Team”.
b)The IT system reengineering projects are not different from the manufacturing-process relevant projects in their joint problem resolution ways. They both tend to adopt “Experiments and Prototypes”. Projects with higher degree of tacit technology knowledge tend more to adopt prototypes and experiments to resolve problems jointly.
c)System integration project with codified technology knowledge tend to collaborate with professional software house. However, those projects with tacit technology knowledge tend to collaborate with research institutes, such as university labs.
d)Projects with higher technology diversity require more the end-user management and IT management to conduct the project vision together, and project team will consists of more different kinds of skills. Project manager tends to hire a manager with T-type or A-type management skills.
e)Degree of technology diversity determines degree of user engagement in development. Projects with high degree of technology diversity tend to engage user in the joint development mode. Projects with low degree of technology diversity tend to engage user in the “Offering Mode”.
f)All project teams tend to share knowledge internally through the “project meeting” regularly.
g)If there is no sound industry standard, Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company tends to define its own internal standard in order to reduce development cost.
3.The relationship between characteristics of organization structure and innovation platform
a)High degree of organization formalization associates with the effort to formalize the communication and coordination activities across organizations.
b)High-Tech manufacturing company tends to establish the virtualized organization before a formalized organization to absorb, create, accumulate, and diffuse cross-function technology knowledge.
c)High degree of organization formalization associates with “structural” intenal knowledge sharing sessions.
4.Others
a)New technology knowledge development leads to new system development.
b)URD (User Requirement Definition) document becomes less important for the new system development projects, which associate with tacit technology knowledge. So does for project success.
There are primary recommendations for managers in the relevant high-tech manufacturing industries:
a)Understand that characteristics of technology determine technology innovation behaviors.
b)Develop the manufacturing-process relevant technogies in the step-by-step approach - “procedure standardization”, “procedure automation”, and “intelligent system”.
c)Encourage prototyping and experiements.
d)Practively develop leaders with diversed skills.
e)Follow or build the internal technology standards.
f)Establish the dedicated organization to absorb, create, accumulate, and diffuse cross-function technology knowledge.
g)Choose the software development model carefully.
Keywords: semiconductor manufacturing, system integration, intelligent fab automation, characteristics of technological knowledge, characteristics of organization structure, innovation platform |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
1.王亨佳（2004），使用者社群創新協作平台建構之研究-以數位內容產業為例，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
2.王育民（1995），台灣軟體專案模式之建構，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
3.王美音譯（1998），Dorothy Leonard-Barton 著，「知識創新之泉—智價企業的經營」，遠流出版社。
4.王緯中（1998），台灣軟體產業創新平台之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
5.台積電晶園雜誌編輯部（2005），「台積人動起來－APC專案組織」，2005.9 晶園雜誌十四期。
6.台灣半導體產業協會（2005），「台灣半導體產業對國家的貢獻」。
7.李仁芳（1999），「產權結構、專質性知識與管理統治效能之探索」，台灣產業研究（一）管理資本在台灣，遠流出版社。
8.李仁芳（1990），「管理心靈」，商略印書館。
9.李仁芳、賴建男＆賴威龍（1997），「臺灣IC 設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究」，1997 年科技管理研討會。
10.李田樹譯，C.K. Prahalad & Gary Hamel (1990), Harvard Business Review, June 1990，「建立公司的核心競爭力」， 世界經理文摘。
11.李偉傑（1996），半導體之工程資料分析與診斷系統，工業工程研究所，國立清華大學碩士論文。
12.李憲璋（2002），大學實驗室組織平台與知識流通之研究─以八間光電領域之實驗室為例，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
13.吳豐祥（1998）「資訊軟體產品開發之典範—以趨勢科技為例」，1998中華民國科技管理年會暨論文研討會論文集。
14.涂瑞德（1998），技術知識特質、產品開發團隊與組織動態能耐關係之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
15.徐健銘（2003），高科技中小企業產品創新與知識管理之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
16.張家祥（2004）， 我國遊戲軟體開發模式之知識創造與智慧財產權管理，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
17.陳重嘉（2005），軟體公司知識創造與能耐積蓄之平台建構，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
18.黃大倫（2001），半導體製程良率提升專家系統之失效模式與效應&晶圓允收測試異常分析，工業工程研究所，國立清華大學碩士論文。
19.許銘舜（2003），線上遊戲產品特性與創新組織平台之研究--以台灣自製遊戲廠商為例，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
20.菊地正典著，陳連春譯 （2001），「透視半導體」，建興出版社。
21.曾繁絹，李德竹（1997），「專家系統淺論，資訊科學與技術專題論輯」，文華書館。
22.曾憲雄、黃國禎、江孟峰、蔡昌均、林耀聰 （2003），「專家系統導論/工具/應用」，文魁，2003 年2月。
23.楊子江、王美音譯（1997），Nonaka, I And H. Takeuchi (1995), “The Knowledge Company”,「創新求勝：智價企業論」，遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
24.塗瑞德（1998），技術特質、產品團隊特性與組織動態能耐關聯之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
25.廖佑宗（1999），技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究-以化工所為例，輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
26.蔡銘進（2005），「半導體技術的奈米之路」，《科學發展》2005年9月，393期，6～11頁。
27.劉昱岑（2004），台灣生物科技公司創新行為之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1.Clark, K. B. & Wheelwright, S. C. (1992),”Organizing and Leading Heavyweight Development Teams”, Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality, NY, Free Press.
2.Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (1998), “Excerpt of Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Harvard Business School Press.
3.Dosi, G. (1982), “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories”, Research Policy, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 147-162.
4.Fiorletta, C. (2004), Capabilities and lessons from 10 years of APC success, Solid State Technology, February 2004.
5.John McGehee, John Hebley, and Jack Mahaffey (1994), The MMST Computer-Integrated Manufacturing System Framework, IEEE Transactions on semiconductor manufacturing, Vol. 7, No. 2, May 1994.
6.Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations, New York: The Free Press.
7.Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, November-December: 96-104.
8.Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
9.Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of "Ba": Building a foundation forknowledge creation. California Management
10.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
11.Robbins, S. P. (1989), Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
12.Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Printice-Hall.
13.Teece, D. J. (1996), “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 31: 193-224.
14.Utterback, J. M.（1994）,“Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation”, Boston (MA): Harvard University Press.
三、網站部分
1.林則孟, 林大欽（2000），「晶圓處理製程介紹」，清華大學工工所。www.semilink.com.tw/info/fabri.htm。
2.張文貴（2006），「軟體技術文件指引手冊」，中華民國資訊軟體協會。http://www.cisanet.org.tw/doc/。
3.黃志濤，蘇林慶（2004），「先進製程控制技術發展現況及未來」，南亞科技。www.tsia.org.tw/industry/Monograph/先進製程控制技術發展現況及未來.doc。
4.International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (2003), Semiconductor Industry Association, 2003, available at http://public.itrs.net.
5.James Moyne (2004)，「邁向晶圓廠整廠性的先進製程控制」，《半導體科技》No.47, 2004/9. http://www.arconet.com.tw/ssttpro/tech/tech_1.asp?idxid=400#
6.Mark LaPedus (2005), Intel tips “intelligent fab automation”, 12/02/2005 EE Times. http://www.eet.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=174900359
7.T公司網站，2006/4/30， http://www.tsmc.com/chinese/a_about/a01_profile/a01_profile.htm.
8.T公司2004年報（2005）, http://www.tsmc.com/download/ir/annual_report/index_c.htm. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
92359028
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923590281 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
