English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51089356      Online Users : 853
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34349


    Title: 航空產業對溫室效應的影響與改善對策
    Authors: 葉清發
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    葉清發
    Keywords: 溫室效應
    航空產業
    排放交易
    國際合作
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:31:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2007年諾貝爾和平獎頒給了美國前副總統高爾和聯合國跨政府氣候變遷小組(IPCC),表揚他們致力於全球氣候變遷的議題。2005年2月「京都議定書」正式生效,目的在削減二氧化碳等六種溫室氣體的排放量,國際航空並未列在削減溫室氣體的範圍,但委由國際民航組織(ICAO)負責國際航空溫室氣體排放減量,這顯示在「聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)」架構外,以產業合作模式來削減溫室氣體在政治上是可行的。飛機引擎將二氧化碳、氧化氮、碳氫化合物、水蒸氣、硫酸鹽、煙塵顆粒直接排放於大氣中,這些噴射物和大氣的成分產生複雜的化學變化,改變大氣的成分,所排放的高溫水氣在對流層凝結為飛行雲和卷雲,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據和溫室效應有關。國際航空既有「京都議定書」不須限制溫室氣體排放的法律基礎,且大部分排放的廢氣尚缺乏影響溫室效應的科學證據以致航空產業對削減溫室氣體排放量的行動並不積極,但航空的旅客每年以約5%的速度成長,航空未來是廢氣排放增加最快的產業。在歐美國家積極進行大氣科學的研究以了解溫室效應的成因,台灣近日宣佈將加入全球最大的溫室效應氣體觀測平台MOZAIC,航空產業有必要採取負責的行動減緩溫室氣體排放量。
    本研究主要蒐集國內外相關的學術研究資料,波音公司的環保政策及公司專業人員的意見,歸納出航空產業改善溫室效應的對策,並以英航為個案,探討其以排放交易體系及碳補償體系改善溫室氣體排放的實效來驗證其可行性,最後探討在ICAO架構下,航空產業如何循序漸進的進行溫室氣體減量的國際合作。本研究旨在回答下列問題:
    1. 航空產業對溫室效應的影響?
    2. 航空產業在科技面、營運操作面、經濟政策面可以減緩溫室氣體排放的對策有哪些?哪一個對策成本較低,較有效?
    3. 航空產業相關的企業組織中,誰最適合做為溫室氣體排放負責的實體?
    4. 以利害關係人的觀點,評估經濟政策面的解決方案在經濟面的衝擊為何?
    5. 在ICAO的架構下如何進行航空產業溫室氣體減量的國際合作?
    本研究得到的結論如下:
    1. 經由航空科技的研發,是削減溫室氣體排放量的根本方法,因為它有利於所有利害關係人,但新一代的航空科技研發通常需要10-15年以上的時間,以及充滿不確定性,所以在短、中期不是削減溫室氣體排放的有效方法。
    2. 改善航管系統及飛航操作的方法在法律、技術及經濟上所面臨的挑戰比較小,在短、中期就可以減少8-18%燃油的消耗,不過長期而言,不足以抵消航空產業每年成長所增加的廢氣排放量。
    3. 排放交易體系是以市場機制運作的碳交易市場,航空產業在開放式的排放交易體系可用最低的減緩成本達到排放減量目標。排放交易體系經過英航實際運作證明它是可行的方法,既可以達到減量的目標又不會妨礙航空產業的成長。
    4. ICAO是1944年依據芝加哥公約成立的,它的會員國適用”無差異原則”,聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)的會員國適用”共同但有差異的責任”,所以京都議定書也只對Annex I的國家限制溫室氣體排放量。在會員國不同意單方面擴展排放交易體系下,ICAO要求在雙方同意下才能將他國的航班併到自己的排放交易體系,這使得歐盟在2012年企圖單方面擴展排放交易體系到所有進出歐盟的航班變得不大可能,這對歐盟積極推動溫室氣體減量的行動是一項挫折。
    5. 飛機引擎所排放的廢氣,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據會造成溫室效應。這種缺乏科學證據的氣候協商在國際間很難達成共識,所以在ICAO及IATA的排放交易體系都只建議限制二氧化碳的排放量,但二氧化碳只佔航空器排放廢氣的37%,這種溫室氣體的限制並不具環境的有效性。
    6. 全球暖化已成為全球矚目的議題,各國紛紛採取「節能減碳」措施,台灣也不例外,京都議定書顯然不能有效解決溫室效應問題。在2012年後替代的新合約必定增加溫室氣體限制的國家及產業,也有可能包含航空產業。航空公司可以從參與碳補償體系、和政府簽署自願環保合約、參與其他產業的自願排放交易體系,先取得碳市場的交易經驗,日後可在UNFCCC或ICAO的架構下承諾溫室氣體排放減量。
    In 2007, the Nobel Peace prize was awarded to the former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore and the IPCC for their great efforts in global climate change issue. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16, 2005; this treaty assigns mandatory emission limitations for the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) to the signatory nations. International aviation GHG emissions are not included in Kyoto Protocol, as it will be addressed through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) according to Article 2.2 of the Kyoto Protocol. This indicates that it is politically agreed upon to use a sector-based approach to limit GHG emission beyond the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
    During flight, aircraft engines emit carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, water vapor, hydrocarbons and particles. These emissions alter the chemical composition of the atmosphere in a variety of ways. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft in flight are still under investigation for their impact on global climate change. Passenger airlines growth is anticipated to increase about 5% annually, so the aviation industry is expected to be the fastest growing emissions contributor in the future. Therefore, the aviation industry should take responsible actions to alleviate GHG emission. For exploring the root cause of global climate change, European and American scientists are leading the investigation of the atmosphere, and the government of Taiwan recently announced they will support MOZAIC in their observation of the north Pacific atmosphere.
    This research is performed by reviewing the articles published by researchers, the briefing material from aircraft manufacturer and the expertise from companies. The conclusions are that the methods are useful to alleviate GHG emission for aviation industry. Meanwhile, British Airways was selected to be the case study to verify their implementation of environmental policy. Finally, an approach under ICAO is being introduced for the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emission through global collaboration. This study is to answer the following questions:
    1. What is the environmental impact by the emissions from the aviation industry?
    2. What methods are available from technology, flight operations and economic policies to alleviate GHG emission? Which one is more economic and effective?
    3. Who is the accountable entity in the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emissions?
    4. What is the impact on economics by the method of implementation of economic policies to alleviate GHG emissions based on the stakeholders’ viewpoints?
    5. How does the aviation industry collaborate globally to alleviate GHG emissions under ICAO?
    The conclusions from the research are as follows.
    1. The basic method for the aviation industry to resolve GHG emissions is by the use of new fuel or engine technologies. Normally, it takes 10 to 15 years to pioneer new technologies for aviation with uncertainty, so it is not an effective method in short and mid term to alleviate GHG emissions.
    2. The improvement of air traffic management and flight operation presents little difficulty in law, technologies and economics to alleviate GHG emissions. This method can reduce 8-18% of fuel comsumption in short and mid term, but it can not offset the growing emissions by air traffic annually.
    3. The Aviation Industry can reach the lowest alleviation cost to meet emissions target by open emission trading scheme. Emission trading is not only environmentally effective, but also does not hinder the growth of aviation industry in the future.
    4. The ICAO, the state members apply to the principle of non-discrimination, however the UNFCCC, the state members apply to the principle of common but differential responsibility. The Kyoto Protocol just restricts the GHG emissions for Annex I countries. ICAO is obliged to request the integration of foreign operators in the emission trading scheme “under a mutually agreed basis”.
    5. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft are under investigation for their impact on environment. The emission of carbon dioxide is only 37% of all emissions by aviation industry. The ICAO and IATA only recommend to restrict carbon dioxide emissions, so it is not environmentally effective.
    6. The following treaty after 2012 should involve more countries and industries for GHG emission restriction, and the aviation industry might be involved in the new treaty. Therefore, airlines should seek the opportunity to participate voluntarily in the carbon trading market to gain experience in this strategy. Then, airlines can commit to reduce GHG emission under UNFCCC or IACO in the future.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    1. 朱淑娟報導,6月20日聯合報,”環保署:買賣碳權要先建立制度”.
    2. 李儒哲,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(上)”,pp.1-7,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(下)”,pp.1-7, 2007年11月26日取自:
    http://www.taxresearch.org.tw/publishcation/specialtopic/topic_121.htm
    3. 高國珍報導,6月3日聯合報,”監控全球溫室效應 台灣加入”.
    4. 彭浩偉 (2007),”歐盟擬將民航機納入碳管制 美帶頭嗆聲”,pp.154-155,商業周刊1038期.
    5. 楊少強 (2007),”未來溫度未必會上升”,pp.104,商業周刊1015期.
    6. 蔡勳雄 (2008),”台灣地區因應地球暖化之能源政策”,2008年6月30日取自:http://www.lib.tut.edu.tw/lecture_siew/970512/siew13.ppt
    7. 魏國棟,”氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具:文獻回顧”,pp.1-58,2007年11月5日取自:
    http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/econ/TEI/Ejournal/39.1/390102.pdf
    8. 無名氏 (2007),”經濟蝴蝶效應”,pp.100-106,商業周刊1013期.
    9. 無名氏 (2007),”新能源投資成效繫於各國碳價水準”, pp.142-144,商業周刊1020期.
    一、英文部分
    1. Aimee Turner, David Learmount (2007),”Environment Special report: Green Wars;Cost of Waiting”, Flight International ,pp.24-31.
    2. Andrew Sentence (2003),”Address climate change – the way ahead for aviation”,2008年4月30取自:
    http://www.heathrowairport.com/assets/B2CPortal/Static%20Files/AndrewSentance13October03.pdf
    3. Anne Paylor (Feb.2007),”A Fair Trade?”,Air Transport World(ATW), pp.40-42.
    4. Anthony Concil (2007),”Key Priorities for Developing next Generation ATM systems”,2008年3月10日取自:
    http://www1.iata.org/pressroom/speeches/2007-02-13-01
    5. Arthur Andersen (2001),”Emissions trading for Aviation”,pp. 1-42,2008年5月5日取自:
    http://www.iata.org/NR/ContentConnector/CS2000/Siteinterface/sites/mgr/file/final_report.pdf
    6. Ben Van Houtte (2004),“The Single European Sky”,Skyway 32, 2008年12月17日取自:
    http://www.eurocontrol.int/epr/gallery/content/public/docs/sky_spr_p08.pdf
    7. Bertram Spector (Apr 1992),”International Environmental Negotiation: Insights for Practice, Executive Report (ER-21)”, International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA),2007年 10月30日取自:
    http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/ER-92-021.pdf
    8. Brendan Sobie (Jul 2008),”Air France steps up eco drive”,Airline Business.
    9. Brian Pearce, Chief Economist,”2007 marks the peak of the cycle – the outlook has become more challenging”,IATA.
    10. David Daggett, Gerhard Seidel, Robert McKinley, Robert Plencner (2001),”Airplane Technologies to Reduce Jet Fuel Use”, SAE World Aviation Congress, Document No.:2001-01-2985.
    11. David Daggett, Robert Hendricks, Rainer Walther, Edwin Corporam (2007),”Alternate Fuels for use in Commercial Aircraft”, The Boeing Company.
    12. Giovanni Bisignani,”IATA industry-wide strategy to address climate change”,IATA, 2008年4月23日取自:
    http://www.iata.org/NR/rdonlyres/80F7AA1C-2CE1-40B0-A2D5-C9AE38259AC2/0/4153400Climatechangeflyer4.pdf
    13. Guy Norris, Geoffey Thomas, Mark Wagner, and Christine Forbes Smith, “Boeing 787 Dreamliner – flying redefined”, pp.42-43, pp.50-52, The Boeing Company.
    14. James Randall Kahn and Dina Franceschi (2005),”Beyond Kyoto: A tax-based system for the global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, pp. 1-9, Ecological Economics,2007年12月26日取自:
    http://www.greeneconomics.net/ClimateTax.pdf
    15. Kati Kulovesi & Katja Keinanen,“Long-term climate policy:internation Legal aspects of a sector-based approach”, pp.1-14, 2008年2月5日取自: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=29397&lan=fi
    16. Kevin Baumert, Timothy Herzog and Jonathan Pershing,”Navigating the numbers:Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy”,pp.1-67,pp.110-119, World Resources Institute, 2007年12月1日取自:
    http://archive.wri.org/publication_detail.cfm?pubid=4093
    17. Mike Hung, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA,”Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum”, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA.
    18. Peter Gwynne (Apr 1975),“The Cooling World”,Newsweek,2008年5 月29日取自: http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm
    19. Per Noren (2008),”Boeing Environmental Strategy”, The Boeing Company.
    20. Phil Chapman (Apr 2008),“Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age comth”,PP.1-2, 2008年5月29日取自: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.html
    21. Tale/artikkel (Apr 2007), “No reason for international aviation and maritime transport to be excluded from a new climate regime”, 2008年7月17日取自:
    http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dep/politisk_ledelse/Tidligere-statssekretarer-og-radgivere/Henriette_Westhrin/taler_artikler/2007/--No-reason-for-international-aviation-a.html?id=484638
    22. Thilo Kunzemann (2007),”Trade or Tax?How to get rid of greenhouse Geas”, pp.1-5,Allianz Knowledge Partnersite, 2008年2月10日取自:
    http://knowledge.allianz.com/en/globalissues/energy_co2/co2_reduction/emission_trade_or_tax.html
    23. 無名氏,”Air Transport portal of the European Commission Traffic Management”, 2007年10月1日取自:
    http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/traffic_management/sesame/index_eu.htm
    24. 無名氏 (Junt,2007),“Analysis of the EC Proposalto Include Aviation Activities in the Emissions Trading Scheme”, Emst & Young – York Aviation,2007年11月10日取自:
    http://files.aea.be/downloads/impact_assessment.pdf
    25. 無名氏,”BA green scheme failed to take off””,2008年4月23日取自: http://news.bbc.co.uk/l/hi/uk_politics/6447229.stm
    26. 無名氏, ”British Airways 2004/2005 Corporate Responsibility Report”; Foreword PP.1-2 ; Overview pp.1-3 ; Respecting the environment pp.1-5. 2008年4月26日 取自: http://www.britishairways.com/travel/corpresp05fwd/public/en_cn
    27. 無名氏,“British Airways Launches Carbon Offset Scheme”, PP. 1-2, IEMA International news 072-Sep 15,2005,2008年4月23日取自:
    http://iema.net/news/envnews?aid=6958
    28. 無名氏 (Nov 2004),”Climate cooperation beyond 2012, Report on a Government assignment on future international climate cooperation”, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5428.2007年11月2日取自:
    http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/620-5428-7.pdf
    29. 無名氏 (2006),”CSR case studys- British Airways”, Article 13 and CBI, 2008年4月20日取自:
    http://www.article13.com/CBI/CBI_CSR_Case_Study_BA_March_06.pdf
    30. 無名氏, ”Emissions Trading – What the UK Emissions Trading Scheme Has Taught Us”,Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair (DEFRA),2008年4月10日取自: http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/presentation_emissions_trading.ppt#264,1,Emissions Trading
    31. 無名氏,”Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15日取自
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_trading
    32. 無名氏,”EU clean air strategy”,2007年8月9日取自
    http://envirovaluation.org/index.php/2005/10/14/p2152
    33. 無名氏,”European Union Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15 日取自: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Emission_trading_Sceme
    34. 無名氏 (Mar/Apr 2006) ”flying further for less blended winglets and their benefits”, Airline Fleet & Maintenance Management,2007年10月28日取自:
    http://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com/news/pdf/news/AF42_APB.pdf
    35. 無名氏 (Feb/Mar 2008), “Fuel: how can we reduce consumption?” pp.40-43,Aircraft Commerce, Issue No. 56.
    36. 無名氏, “Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in the EU25”,2008年7月18日取自:
    http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2006_6/en/
    37. 無名氏 (Feb 2007),”Guidance Emission Trading for Aviation”, ICAO CAEP 7th meeting presented by the ETTF Rapporteurs,2008年2月3日取自:
    http://www.tc.gc.ca/AviationCivile/Internationale/OACI/comites/pdf/working/Jan-29-07/CAEP7_WP37.pdf
    38. 無名氏 (2007) , “IPCC Global Warming Report”,American Library Publishers,2008年5月20日取自:
    http://www.amlibpub.com/essays/ipcc-global-warming-report.html
    39. 無名氏,ICAO Environmental Report 2007,2008年1月20日取自:
    http://www.icao.int/icao/en/env/pubs/env_report_07.pdf
    40. 無名氏,”Kyoto Protocol” 2007年 8月14日取自:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kyoto_protocol
    41. 無名氏,”Nature: Agency Blocked hurricane report”,USA Today,2007年8月28日取自:
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-hurricane-report_x.htm
    42. 無名氏 (2007),”Policy options for mitigation in aviation”, prepared by CRA International.
    43. 無名氏 (2007),”Report on Voluntary Emissions Trading for Aviation (VETS Report)”,2007年12月10日取自:
    http://www.icao.int/env/vets_report.pdf
    44. 無名氏,”Royal Commission Environmental Pollution – The Environmental Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight”,2007年8月20日取自:
    http://www.rcep.org.uk/aviation/av12-txt.pdf
    45. 無名氏,”The Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol: Emission Trading, the Clean Development Mechanism and Join Implementation”,2008年5月21日取自:
    http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/mechanisms/items/1673.php
    46. 無名氏,”UK Emission Trading Scheme”,2008年4月21日取自:
    http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/emission_trading_scheme.htm
    47. 無名氏,”What is Global Warming?”,National Geographic, 2007月7月20日取自: http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/environment/global-warming/gw-overview.html?
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    94932100
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094932100
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    210001.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2764View/Open
    210002.pdf79KbAdobe PDF2808View/Open
    210003.pdf104KbAdobe PDF2984View/Open
    210004.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2730View/Open
    210005.pdf94KbAdobe PDF2982View/Open
    210006.pdf172KbAdobe PDF21123View/Open
    210007.pdf561KbAdobe PDF22124View/Open
    210008.pdf126KbAdobe PDF21076View/Open
    210009.pdf252KbAdobe PDF22247View/Open
    210010.pdf209KbAdobe PDF21916View/Open
    210011.pdf171KbAdobe PDF21206View/Open
    210012.pdf182KbAdobe PDF22106View/Open
    210013.pdf172KbAdobe PDF21398View/Open
    210014.pdf117KbAdobe PDF21392View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback