Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34343
|
| Title: | OEM/ODM廠商轉型自有品牌經營之行銷通路建構歷程研究–以明基電通為例
A STUDY ON MARKETING CHANNEL BUILDING PROCESS OF OEM/ODM COMPANIES IN TRANSFORMATION TO OBM |
| Authors: | 林子正 |
| Contributors: | 吳豐祥
林子正 |
| Keywords: | 自創品牌
行銷通路
動態能力
組織學習
OBM
Marketing Channel
Organizational Learning
Dynamic Capability |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:30:10 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 回顧近50年來台灣的產業發展歷程，自1980年進入資訊電子產業以後，經濟發展始開始呈現高度成長。時至2004，台灣主要硬體產品在海內外總產值達到684億美元，高居全球前五位，並預估2006年可達到800億美元。我國資訊電子產業自80年代初期乃是以OEM（Original Equipment Manufacturing）代工的方式開始發展，憑藉著廉價的勞力及土地等生產要素，達到低成本的製造優勢；然而近年來，台灣選擇專業代工的風險已開始逐漸顯現。隨著資訊產品發展成熟，普及率增加，品牌廠商為了提高市場佔有率，也開始進入以價格競爭的階段；此外，當初具有之成本優勢也隨著中國大陸經濟體的興起以及勞動成本、土地成本等上升而日漸消失，因此台灣資訊電子廠商走向微笑曲線兩端的趨勢已經無法避免。
有鑑於上述的產業發展現況，近年來學術界對於自有品牌相關議題的研究也愈發重視。然而，過去的研究重點往往放在自有品牌的發展策略、關鍵成功因素等策略層面或理論層面的探討，對於建立自有品牌實務歷程的研究則著墨較少。在自創品牌的相關研究中，除了眾多學者多認為行銷通路建立為自創品牌關鍵成功因素之外，宏碁集團創辦人施振榮也曾特別指出：「建立品牌過程中，通路的建立是重點」，故本篇論文針對自創品牌關鍵成功因素之一的「行銷通路建構歷程」進行研究。本研究透過個案研究的方式，針對國內資訊電子業建立自有品牌上較具成功經驗之企業 － 明基電通（BenQ）加以深入探討，期能得到新的啟發，並供實務界參考，為台灣的產業升級做出貢獻。
本研究首先透過相關文獻的探討，瞭解可作為分析通路建構歷程之相關文獻，包括「自有品牌建立」、「通路理論」、「動態能力」、「組織學習」等相關理論，並透過個案公司訪談以及次級文獻蒐集獲得個案公司資訊，最後分析個案公司 之通路建構歷程。本研究之發現如下：
1. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業，其通路建構歷程會先進行行銷（通路）部門的組織設計與改造、運作流程設計、以及行銷通路人員的招募等前置作業
2. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業在建立自有品牌產品之行銷通路時，其自有品牌產品線與其代工產品關連性愈高，則通路建構歷程愈易於進行，且通路績效表現愈佳
3. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業於通路建構歷程中，會致力於進行雙迴圈學習及高階學習，並建立新的價值觀及規範，以提升通路建構及通路管理之成效
4. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業於通路建構歷程中，若能夠在創造學習外取得新的知識來源或他人的通路經驗以進行模仿學習，則有助於通路建構績效之提升
5. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業於通路建構歷程中，若能夠透過跨產品線、跨市場地區的行銷通路相關人員進行定期交流聚會與知識分享，則有助於通路建構績效之提升
6. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業，若能夠將通路建構歷程中所取得的知識及經驗進行資料庫之建構，則有助於通路建構績效之提升
7. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業，若其組織具有較高的組織彈性以及較快的回應能力，則有助於通路建構績效之提升
8. 由OEM/ODM轉型自有品牌經營之企業於通路建構歷程中，若於目標市場擁有足夠的市場性資產（如商譽）、結構性資產（如製造能力、供應鏈管理），則有助於通路建構績效之提升
9. 企業在建構國際通路時，其通路策略及通路管理作法上會視各國市場特性之不同而有所不同
10. 企業在建構國際通路時，其相關通路建構之主要決策權若由各地子公司掌握，則有助於企業通路建構及通路管理之成效
11. 企業在建構國際通路時，若能夠使用在地人力資源，則有助於通路建構之進行
The electronic industry first developed in Taiwan in 1980s by OEM operation. But with the strong challenge from China and the pressure of price competition, the risk of OEM/ODM business model is growing higher and higher nowadays. Given this industry condition, academic and industrial filed are paying more attention to those issues about transformation from OEM/ODM to OBM. Nevertheless, “Building Marketing Channel”, which is one critical factor in the transformation process, is neglected among others. Therefore, this research focuses on the practical building process of marketing channel, not only aims to trigger the following studies on this issue, but also like to find some insights into the marketing channel building process and help the industry to succeed in the transformation from OEM/ODM to OBM.
Compare to other studies that more focus on the “Channel Strategy” or channel itself, this research focuses on an issue that rarely be touched by researchers. For that reason, this research is more an “Exploratory Research” essentially. This research adopts “Case-Study Method”, looks into the marketing channel building process by interviewing with personnel of case company and reading second-hand materials about the case company, then derives findings and conclusions by analysis the building process with the framework of “Dynamic Capability” and “Organizational Learning”
Findings of this research could be divided into three major subjects, following list each of the three subjects and the implication of it.
1. Features of marketing channel building process of OEM/ODM companies
in transformation to OBM
Marketing channel building process of OEM/ODM companies in transformation to OBM should be initiated by designing the marketing related function and organization structure
2. Marketing channel building process and “Organizational Learning”
Companies in transformation to OBM should engage in “Double-loop Learning” to enhance the result of marketing channel building process
3. Marketing channel building process and “Dynamic Capability”
Companies in transformation to OBM should improve capabilities of “Process” and “Position” categories to enhance the result of marketing channel building process
For industry practice, this research suggests that companies should endeavor to obtain necessary knowledge, create as many sources of learning as possible, and also design an effective organizational learning system in the marketing channel building process. In the other hand, companies should also improve their dynamic capabilities with the new knowledge in the whole process, especially in “Process” and “Position” categories. For academic field, since the major limit of this research is the lack of inferential reliability with single-case method, this research suggest following researchers to conduct further research on this topic with multi-case or quantitative method and verify the findings and conclusions of this research. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
博碩士論文
1. 王振光（民92），〈組織學習機制對動態能力的影響〉，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
2. 余雅文（民92），〈企業動態能力之探究與衡量〉，國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文
3. 吳悅萍（民94），〈探討吸收能力、整合能力對持久性競爭優勢影響之研究－動態能力觀點〉，屏東科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
4. 李晉求（民89），〈知識管理活動中資訊科技與組織因素如何提升組織動態能力之研究〉，暨南國際大學國際企業研究所碩士論文
5. 林宏偉（民74），〈出版業配銷通路之研究〉，中國文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
6. 林卿雯（民90），〈台灣資訊業廠商自創國際品牌績效之因素探討〉，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
7. 林雄川（民82），〈工業產品通路策略與通路選擇之研究─以塑膠產業為例〉，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
8. 林靜宜（民90），〈知識移轉與動態能力的關係研究－台灣資訊電子廠商觀點〉，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
9. 胡若堯（民83），〈自創品牌關鍵成功因素之研究〉，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
10. 范垂仁（民90），〈資訊科技基礎建設對國際企業動態能力之強化功能〉，暨南國際大學國際企業研究所碩士論文
11. 張志堅(民89)，〈動態能力管理與競爭互動之研究〉，義守大學/管理科學研究所碩士論文
12. 張錫元（民83），〈通路結構之決策─台北地區鞋廠內銷市場為例〉，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
13. 許興豪（民89），〈技術知識特質、組織平台情境與組織動態能力之研究─以工研院光電所為例〉，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文
14. 陳重任（民86），〈台灣企業邁入自有品牌之企業策略與設計參與研究〉，國立成功大學工業設計所
15. 陳學怡（民81），〈新企業建立配銷通路之研究〉，中國文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
16. 黃蕙娟（民79），〈臺灣企業國際上自創品牌策略之研究〉，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
17. 褚喻欣（民93），〈學習導向、資訊科技、知識基礎動態能力與組織績效間之關係探討〉，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文
18. 趙瑜平（民92），〈以動態能力探討企業競爭優勢之研究－以汽車零組件產業為例〉，中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文
19. 劉欣靜（民86），〈台灣廠商自創品牌之決策過程─以交易成本理論為分析架構〉，國立政治大學國際貿易學研究所碩士論文
20. 歐維秋（民93），〈市場導向、資訊科技、市場基礎的動態能力與組織績效間關係之探討〉，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文
21. 鄭家樑（民87），〈大陸內銷市場通路組合決策之探析-上海地區台商之個案研究〉，國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文
22. 鄭筱芸（民94），〈動態能力之前置因素與後續效果之探討〉，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
23. 盧韋斯（民85），〈組織學習的理論性探究〉，國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文
24. 賴義龍（民89），〈台灣軟體產業技術知識網路和組織動態能力研究：以趨勢科技公司為例〉，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文
期刊、研究報告及會議論文
1. 中華經濟研究院（民92），「如何提升產業價值鏈延伸至品牌及通路之策略」，經濟部工業局九十二年度推動企業營運總部計畫研究報告，頁5
2. 李小娟（民78）年，「產品的第二生命」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第十二卷第二期，頁41-43
3. 張愛華（民87），「高科技企業策略型態、行銷導向與績效之關聯」，行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究報告
4. 陳更生、林唐裕(民78)，「OEM？還是自創品牌？」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第134期，頁44-48
5. 黃思明（民83），「台灣物流業者的類型與核心管理技術」，物流管理系列學術研討會暨座談會，頁5
圖書
1. 方世榮（民85），《行銷學》，三民書局出版
2. 王睦舜 (民87)，《國際行銷學》，考用出版社出版，頁255
3. 林建煌（民89），《行銷管理》，智勝文化事業出版，頁337
4. 施振榮（民93），《宏碁的世紀變革》，天下文化出版，頁189
5. 施振榮（民94），《全球品牌大戰略─品牌先生施振榮觀點》，天下文化出版
6. 翁景民、胡同來譯（民91），《行銷通路》，華泰文化出版
7. 張紹勳（民90），《研究方法》，滄海出版社出版，頁303-304
8. 張紹勳（民93），《研究方法》，滄海出版社出版，頁293
9. 許士軍(民73)，《管理學》，東華書局。
10. 郭昆謨（民76），《國際行銷》，初版，三民出版社出版
11. 黃俊英（民89），《行銷研究概論》，第三版，華泰文化出版
12. 董旭英、黃儀娟譯（民89），《次級資料研究法》，弘智文化出版
13. 劉仁傑（民90），《讓競爭者學不像》，遠流出版社出版
14. 魏啟林（民82），《策略行銷》，時報文化出版
二、英文部分
1. Aaker, D.A (1996), Building Strong Brands, New York, Free press
2. Anderson, Erin & Coughlan, Anne T. (1987), “International Entry Expansion Via Indepedendent or Integrated Channel of Distribution”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, Jan. pp.71-82
3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Mass, Addison Wesley
4. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. & Mead, M. (1987), “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information System”, MIS Quarterly, September, pp.369-374
5. Berman, Barry (1996), Marketing Channels, New York, John Wiley and Sons
6. Bierly, P.E. & Chakrabarti, A.K. (1996), “Technological Learning, Strategic Flexibility, and New Product Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.43, No.4
7. Bowersox, Donald J. & Cooper, M. Bixby (1992), Strategic Marketing Channel Management, New York, McGraw-Hill
8. Bowersox, Donald J., Cooper, M. Bixby, Lanbert, Douglas M., Taylor, Donald A. (1980), “Management in Marketing Channels”, N.Y., McGraw-Hill, pp.192-196
9. Briggs, Charles (1986), Learning How to Ask, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
10. Bucklin, Louis P., Ramaswamy, Venkatram & Majumdar, Sumit K. (1996), “Analyzing Channel Structures of Business Markets via the Structure-Output Paradigm”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Amsterdam
11. Calvert, G. S. Mobley & Marshall, L. (1994), “Grasping the Learning Orgnizationa”, Training 48, no.6, 38-43
12. Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E. (1984), “Toward A Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems”, Academy of Management Review, 9, pp.284-295
13. Dixon, N. M. (1994), The Organizational Learning Cycle: How We Can Learn Collectively, Hampshire, England, Gower
14. Doyle, P. (1990), Building Successful Brand: The Strategic Options, Journal of Consumer Marketing, pp.5-20
15. Duncan, R. & Weiss, A. (1979), “Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, pp.75-123
16. Duncan, R. B. (1974), “Modifications in Decision Structure in Adapting to the Environment: Some Implications for Organizational Learning”, Decision Sciences, pp.705-725
17. Eisenhardt, K. & Martin, J. (2000), “Dynamic Capability: What are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121
18. Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. (1985), “Organizational Learning”, Academy Of Management Review, 10(4), pp.803-813
19. Frazier, G. L. (1999), “Organizing and Managing Channels of Distribution”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol27, No.2, pp.226-240.
20. Fulmer, R. M. (1994), “A model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn”, Planning Review, 22(3), pp.20-26
21. Gaski, John F. （1984）, “The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.48（3）, pp.9-21
22. Hahn, Mini & Chang, Dae R. (1992), “An Extended Framework for Adjusting Channel Strategies in Industrial Markets”, The Joural of Bussiness & Industrial Markets, 7(2)
23. Hammersley, M. (1992), What’s Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Exploration, London, Routledge
24. Hedberg, B., (1981), “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn”, in Nystrom, P. & Starbuck, W. , Handbook of Organizational Design, New York, Oxford University Press
25. Helfat, C. E. (1997), “Know-How and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation：The Case of R&D”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360
26. Hitt M. A., Lei, D. & Bettis, R. A. (1996), “Dynamic Core Competence Through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context”, Journal of Management, 22(4), 549-569
27. Huber, George P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The contributing Processes and the Literatures”, Organizational Science, February, pp.88-115.
28. Jain, S. C. (1990), Marketing Planning and Strategy, 3rd ed., Cincinnati Ohio, South-Western
29. Jelinek, M. (1979), Institutionalizing Innovations: A Study of Organizational Learning Systems, New York, Praeger
30. Kim, D. H. (1993), “The Link Between Individual and Organizational Learning”, Sloan Management Review, Fall,37–50
31. Kolter, P., (1994), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 8th ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall
32. Kotler, P., (1997), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th ed., N.J.: Prentice Hall
33. Kumar, Nirmalya, Louis Stern, & Ravi, Achrol (1992), “Assessing Reseller Performance From the Perspective of the Supplier”, Journal of Marketing Research, 29 May, 238-53
34. Levitt, B. & March, J. G. (1988), “Organizational Learning”, Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340
35. Lielien , Gray L. (1979), “Advisor 2：Modeling Marketing Mix Dexision Fro Industrial Product”, Management Science, Vol. 25, Feb, pp.191-204
36. Lin, M. Y. & Lai Hwa Chang (2003), "Determinants of Habitual Behavior for National and Leading Brands in China", Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 94-107
37. Luo, Y. (2000), “Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion”, Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378
38. Lyles, M. A. (1992), Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firm, MIR Special Issue, pp.85-97
39. March, J. G. & Olson, J. P. (1979), Ambiguity and Choice in Organization, Oslo, Universitetsforlaget
40. Maxwell, Joseph (1996), Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
41. Meyers, Patricia W. (1990), “Non-Liner Learning in the Technological Firms”, Research Policy, 19(2): pp.97-115
42. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, (2nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
43. Mishler, E. G. (1986), Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
44. Mohr, J. & Spekman, P. （1994）, “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques”, Strategic management Journal, Vol.15, pp.135-152
45. Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J. & Gould, J. M. (1995), “Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems”, Sloan Management Review, 36, pp.73-85
46. Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5(1): pp.14-37
47. Petroni, A. (1998), “The Analysis of Dynamic Capabilities in a Competence-Oriented Organization”, Technovation, 18(3), 179-189
48. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York, Free Press
49. Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, New York, Free Press, P12-189
50. Prahalad, C. K. & Bettis, R. A. (1986), “The Dominant Logic: A new Linkage Between Diversity and Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485-501
51. Ragin, Charles (1987), The Comparative Method, Berkeley, University of California Press, pp.69-164
52. Robson, C. (1993), Real World Research: a Resource For Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, Oxford, Blackwell
53. Rosenbloom, B. (1987), Marketing Channels: A Management View, 3rd ed., N.Y., The Dryden Press, pp.143-146
54. Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline-the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York, Publishing Doubleday
55. Shweder, R. A. (1980), Fallible Judgment in Behavioral Research, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
56. Simon, H. A. (1953), “Birth of an Organization: The Economic cooperation Administration”, Public Administrative Review, 13(4), pp.227-236
57. Stern, L. W. & El-Ansary, A. I. (1992), Marketing Channels, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall
58. Stern, L. W., El-Ansary, A. I. & Brown J. R. (1989), Management In Marketing Chnnels, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall
59. Stern, L. W., EL-Ansary A.I. & Couhglan A.T. （1996）, Marketing Channel, 5th ed., New Jersey, Prentice Hall
60. Stern, L. W. (1971), “Channel Control and Interorganization Management”, in Moller, William G. & Wilemoned, David L., Marketing Channels: A System View point, Homewood, Illinois, Richard D. Irwin, pp.309-401
61. Stewart, David W. & Kamins, Michael A. (1993), Secondary Research: Information Sources and Methods, 2nd Ed., Sage Pubns
62. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533
63. Verona, G. and Ravasi, D. (2003), “Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 577-606
64. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180
65. Wick, C. W. （1993）, The Learning Edge: How Smart Managers and Smart Companies Stay Ahead, New York, McGraw-Hill
66. Yin, Robert (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
67. Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. (2002), “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities”, Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351
三、網站
1. 明基電通網站 http://www.benq.com.tw
2. 經濟部國貿局台灣品牌網站 http://www.brandingtaiwan.com.tw |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
93359039
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093359039 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
