政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34278
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51237812      Online Users : 950
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34278


    Title: 未分配盈餘加徵百分之十營利事業所得稅對企業創新活動影響之實證研究
    The Impact of Additional 10% Surtax on Undistributed Surplus Earnings on Enterprises` Innovation
    Authors: 李秀玉
    Contributors: 金成隆
    李秀玉
    Keywords: 未分配盈餘加徵百分之十營利事業所得稅
    兩稅合一
    創新活動
    additional 10% surtax on undistributed surplus earnings
    the imputation tax credit system
    innovation
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:13:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國所得稅法自民國八十七年一月一日開始實施兩稅合一制度。這原本是政府一項消除重複課稅的美意，但是仍受到多方批評。其爭議點就在於「未分配盈餘加徵百分之十營利事業所得稅」這項配套措施的實施。許多專家學者認為，對企業的未分配盈餘課稅，不利於企業內部資金的累積，進而影響其創新活動的投入與產出。而財政部卻持有不同的看法。
    基於上述爭議，本研究以迴歸模式探討「未分盈餘加徵百分之十營利事業所得稅」制度的實施，對企業創新活動的影響。經實證結果發現：
    1.對企業未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅，確實會影響企業資本形成，降低其創新活動。因此，為求稅制良善，促進國家經濟發展，政府對於稅制之設計應謹慎為之。
    2.以高科技產業和傳統產業比較，高科技產業由於兩稅合一未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅制度的實施，其創新活動較制度實施前縮減，且縮減程度明顯大於傳統產業。此結果顯示，高科技產業顯然可謂新稅制下的最大受害者。因此，對高科技產業之未分配盈餘加以課稅，無疑是形成其創新活動的絆腳石、增加其營運上的風險。政府對此情況，應予正視。
    3.以融資受限公司和融資未受限公司比較，兩稅合一之未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅制度對融資受限公司之影響不大。經分析樣本特性，發現融資受限公司的獲利能力較差，因此租稅課徵對於其所造成的影響較低。因此可推論，獲利能力差之融資受限公司的創新活動受到非租稅因素的影響比租稅因素來得大。

    關鍵字：未分配盈餘加徵百分之十營利事業所得稅，兩稅合一，創新活動
    In response to the public concern, Taiwan has adopted the imputation tax credit system since January 1st, 1998. Although the new tax reform can eliminate double taxation, the implementation of additional 10% surtax on undistributed surplus earnings has engendered lots of comments. Based on the disputations resulted from the new tax system, we conduct an empirical research analyzing the impacts of the implementation of additional 10% surtax on undistributed surplus earnings on the enterprises’ innovation. The empirical results in this research can be summarized as follows:
    1. Imposing 10% surtax on corporate undistributed surplus earnings has adverse effect on capital accumulation, in turn leading to reduction in incentive of enterprises to conduct innovative activities.
    2. Compared to the traditional industry, adverse effect of this new system is more profound for firms in the high-tech industry. The results indicate that high-tech industry is the major victim under the new tax reform. Therefore, imposing additional 10% surtax on high-tech industry will be an obstacle to enterprises’ growth and increase its operating risks.
    3. Compared to unconstrained firms, we find out that the new tax system have less effects on constrained firms. Owing to considering the poor profitability, we can infer that non-tax factors have greater influence on the innovation of constrained firms relative to tax factors.

    Key words: additional 10% surtax on undistributed surplus earnings, the imputation tax credit system, innovation
    Reference: 王建棟，2003，兩稅合一稅制對資本投資與股利政策影響之實證研究，中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    王雅慧，1998，高科技產業員工績效評估制度特性之研究，國立臺灣科技大學管理技術研究所企業管理學程未出版碩士論文。
    何添義，1999，談兩稅合一與未分配盈餘，中國稅務旬刊，第1731期：11-17。
    李煥仁，1995，我國機械工業總論，中華民國機械工業年鑑，台灣經濟研究院。
    金成隆、林修葳與紀信義，2004，專利權的價值攸關性：從企業生命週期論析，管理學報，第21卷，第2期：175-197。
    金成隆與陳俞如，2005，公司治理與專利權：台灣新興市場，管理學報，已接受文章。
    林世銘，1997，兩稅合一立法應仔細考量，中國稅務旬刊，第1654期：11-12。
    林世銘，2002，兩稅合一前後產業租稅環境與經營績效之比較，財稅研究，第34卷，第3期：64-78。
    林華德與謝長宏，1984，所得稅政策與台灣經濟發展，財稅研究，第16卷，第2期：10-30。
    吳秀娟，2000，企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究－以我國資訊電子業為例，國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    財政部，1996，兩稅合一擬議方案及說明，稅務會計月刊，第20期：4-11。
    莊靜宜，2000，高科技產業與傳統產業從業人員工作壓力與工作滿足之比較研究，國立成功大學工業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    康家禎，1996，研究發展支出決定因素之實證研究－國際競爭因素之考量，東吳大學企業管理系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    孫震，1996，台灣科技產業之發展，1996海峽兩岸暨香港地區經貿研討會之專題報告。
    郭明秀，2000，高階經營團隊與組織運作、競爭優勢、競爭策略及經營績效之關係研究－傳統產業與高科技產業之比較，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    張福淙，2000，兩稅合一應取消未分配盈餘課稅規定，中國稅務旬刊，第1767期：13-14。
    黃智群，2002，兩稅合一對公司股利政策之影響－傳統產業與高科技產業比較，國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    葉玉慧，2003，專利權、創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究－以研發投資宣告為例，國立成功大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文。
    葉金成與王秀美，1999，兩稅合一對企業盈餘、資金結構與稅負之影響－以某製造業為例，新埔學報，第17期：449-471。
    葉秀鳳，2001，兩稅合一與租稅優惠對高科技產業公司股利政策之影響，國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    溫士賢，2003，研發、廣告與人力支出和企業價值關聯性之探討，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    詹湧銘，1998，兩稅合一對高科技事業之影響，實用稅務，第278期：50-53。
    蔡宏明，1999，我國高科技產業發展面對的挑戰與因應對策，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，第5卷，第1期（6月）：88-110。
    蔡蕙安與陳致綱，2002，研究發展外溢效果對廠商成本結構之影響－臺灣高科技產業之實證分析，經濟論文叢刊，第30卷，第2期：175-204。
    趙育培，2001，取消保留盈餘稅負提高投資誘因，國家政策論壇，第1卷，第8期：124-125。
    趙敏希，2000，新稅制對高科技產業影響之研究－以兩稅合一及促產條例分析，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    聞勛琪，2004，無形資產與研發投入對企業績效之影響－以平面顯示器產業為例，國立交通大學科技管理學程碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    歐進士，1998，我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究，中山管理評論，第6卷，第2期：357-386。
    闕河士、菅瑞昌與黃旭輝，2000，研究發展密集度與專利對股票績效影響－以台灣上市公司為例，產業管理學報，第1卷，第1期（4月）：257-268。
    Austin, D. 1993. An event study approach to measuring innovative output: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 83: 253-258.
    Boretsky, M. 1982. The Threat to U.S. High Ttechnology Industries: Economic And National Security Implications. International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
    Breitzman, A., P. Thomas, and M. Cheney. 2002. Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: Techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R&D Management 32 (Junuary): 1-10.
    Enis, C. R. and B. Ke. 2003. The impact of the 1986 tax reform act on income shifting from corporate to shareholder tax bases: Evidence from the motor carrier industry. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (March): 65-87.
    Davis, L. A. 1982. Technology Intensity of U.S. Output and Trade. International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
    Deng, Z., B. Lev and F. Narin. 1999. Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Jouranal 55 (May/June): 20-32.
    Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-Capitalist. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
    Edvinsson, L. and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital-Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Roots. New York: Harper Business.
    Gul, F. A. 2001. Free cash flow, debt-monitoring and managers’ LIFO/FIFO policy choice. Journal of Corporate Finance 7(June): 475-492.
    Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe and M. Trajenberg, 1998. Market value and patent citations: A first look. Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, Brandeis University and Tel Aviv University-The Eitan Berglas School of Economics.
    Hill, R.C., E. G. William and G. J George. 2001. Undergraduate Econometrics. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Hirschey, M., V. J. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 1998. Value relevance of nonfinancial information: The case of patent data. Working paper. University of Kansas.
    Johanson, U., M. Martensson and M. Skoog. 2001. Mobilizing change through the management control of intangibles. Accounting Organizations and Society 26 (July/August): 715-733.
    Kalafut, P. C. and J. Low. 2001. The value creation index: Quantifying intangible value. Strategy & Leadership 29 (May): 9-15.
    Lanjouw, J. O. and S. Mark. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators, The Economic Journal 114:441-465.
    Leonard, W. N. 1971. Research and development in industrial growth. Journal of Political Economy 79 (March/April): 232-255.
    Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization and value relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (Fabruary): 107-138.
    Lehn, K. and A. Poulsen. 1989. Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. The Journal of Finance 44(July):771-787.
    Lunn, J. 1989. R&D, concentration and advertising: A simultaneous equations model. Managerial and Decision Economics 10 (June): 101-105.
    Moriarty, R. T. and T. J. Kosnik. 1989. High-tech marketing: Concepts, continuity, and change. Sloan Management Review 30 (Summer): 7-18.
    Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (July): 575-592.
    Odagiri, H. 1983. R&D expenditures, royalty payment, and sales growth in Japanese manufacturing corporations. Journal of Industrial Economic 32 (December): 61-71.
    Ozkan, N. 2002. Effects of financial constraints on research and development investment: An empirical investigation. Applied Financial Economics 12 (November): 827-834.
    Riggs, E. H. 1985. Managing High-Tech Companies. Van Nostrano Reinhold. N.Y.
    Schankerman, M., and A. Pakes. 1986. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economin Journal 97:1-25.
    Scherer, F. M. 1965. Corporate inventive output, profit, and growth. Journal of Political Economy 73 (August): 290-297.
    Schumpeter, J. A. 1947. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
    Seethamraju C. 2000. The value-relevance of trademarks. Working paper. New York, NY.
    Shane, H. 1993. Patent citations as an indicator of the value of intangible assets in the semiconductor industry. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A patent for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics 21(January):172-187.
    Zeitz, J. and B. Fayissa. 1994. The impact of exchange rate changes on investment in research and development. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34 (2): 195-211.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    92353055
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923530551
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    53055101.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2692View/Open
    53055102.pdf19KbAdobe PDF2690View/Open
    53055103.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2755View/Open
    53055104.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2680View/Open
    53055105.pdf31KbAdobe PDF2947View/Open
    53055106.pdf29KbAdobe PDF21099View/Open
    53055107.pdf260KbAdobe PDF21276View/Open
    53055108.pdf2601KbAdobe PDF2837View/Open
    53055109.pdf19KbAdobe PDF2642View/Open
    53055110.pdf74KbAdobe PDF2877View/Open
    53055111.pdf46KbAdobe PDF21128View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback