Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34263
|
| Title: | 研發取得策略的績效意涵：理論與證據
Performance Implications of R&D Sourcing Strategy: Theory and Evidence |
| Authors: | 陳玉麟 |
| Contributors: | 吳安妮
Wu,Anne
陳玉麟 |
| Keywords: | 研發取得策略
研發多樣化
專利
取得外部技術的經驗
研發人力資本
不同種類的研發人員
公司績效
交易成本經濟
Supermodularity模型
R&D sourcing strategy
R&D diversity
Patent
Prior experience of external source
R&D human capital
Diverse types of R&D experts
Transaction cost economics
Supermodularity model |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:10:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討研發取得策略，情境因子，研發人力資本，與公司績效之間的關聯性。藉由理論模型的推導與實務訪談研發中心主管來發展假說，進而以混合資料模型(pooled data models)與橫斷面資料模型來進行實證分析。主要結果為：當公司的研發多樣化程度較高，專利權數目較少，公司較可能採取內外部研發並進策略(R&D hybrid strategy)，而非完全內部研發策略(make strategy)。最重要地，過度/低度的外部研發取得(under-/over-external R&D sourcing)對於公司績效有負/正向影響。相較於會計績效，此效果對市場績效的影響尤其顯著。同時，研發取得策略對於公司績效的影響，取決於公司的研發人力資本。相較於採取完全內部研發策略的公司，為了吸收外來的異質技術，採取內外部研發並進策略的公司較可能聘任不同研發種類的研發人員；而如此的研發取得策略與研發人力資本契合將進而改善會計與市場績效。本研究的發現與交易成本理論與supermodular理論一致。如同預期，相較於橫斷面資料模型，本研究的實證分析在混合資料模型較為顯著。
The association between performance and R&D sourcing strategy in relation to contextual variables and R&D human capital is determined by the analytical model coupled with field interviews with directors or managers in R&D centers. Capitalizing on a unique database of the 2001-2003 Taiwan Industry R&D Investment Survey containing more detailed information available on the R&D activities to verify this association, the researcher tests the empirical results by cross-sectional and pooled data models. The findings are that an innovating firm will prefer to implement the R&D hybrid strategy when the higher degrees of R&D diversity and fewer counts of patents are exhibited. Perhaps most importantly, this study shows compelling evidence that over-/under-external R&D sourcing affects negatively/positively a firm’s performance. This effect is more significant in the market-based performance (Tobin’s q and average two-year Tobin’s q) than accounting-based performance (ROS and ROA). Moreover, the associations between R&D sourcing strategy and a firm’s performance are contingent on the use of R&D human capital. Innovative firms with the R&D hybrid/make strategy are more/less prone to employee diverse types of R&D experts to absorb the coming external knowledge, and such alignment between R&D sourcing strategy and R&D human capital thus improves both accounting- and market-based performance. The results are consistent with both transaction cost paradigms that discriminating alignment of transactions with strategy leads to more efficient outcomes, and the supermodularity model that a firm’s performance is a function of coherent alignment between strategy and structural elements of an organization. As predicted, these effects are noticeable and more pronounced in the pooled data model than in the cross-sectional design. |
| Reference: | 1.Aghion, P., and J. Tirole. 1994. The Management of
Innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
November.1185-1209.
2.Aiken, M., S. B. Bacharach, and J. L. French. 1980. The
Organic Organization and Innovation. Sociology. 5 63-82.
3.Allen, T. 1986. Organizational Structure, Information
Technology and R&D Productivity. IEEE. Transactions on
Engineering Management. 33 212-217.
4.Amabile, T. M. 1996. Organizational Learning: Creativity
in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of
Creativity. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
5.Bajari, P., and S. Tadelis. 2001. Incentives versus
Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.
RAND Journal of Economics. 32 (3) 387-408.
6.Baker, G., and T. Hubbard. 2003. Make Versus Buy in
Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design, and Information.
American Economic Review. 93 (3) 551-572.
7.Basberg, B. 1987. Patents and the Measurement of
Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature.
Research Policy. 16 131-141.
8.Bayus, B., G. Erickson, and R. Jacobson. 2003. The
Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the
Personal Computer Industry. Management Science. 49 (2)
197-210.
9.Becker, B., and B. Gerhart. 1996. The Impact of Human
Capital on Organizational Performance: Progress and
Prospects. Academy of Management Journal. 39 779-801.
10.Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004.
Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance. Research Policy. 33
1477-1492.
11.Bessen J. 2003. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of
Complex Technologies. Working Paper.
12.Burns, T., and G. Stalker. 1967. The Management of
Innovation. London: Tavistock.
13.Capon, N., J. Farley, and S. Hoenig. 1990. Determinants
of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Management
Science. 36 (10) 1143-1159.
14.Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. R&D Cooperation
and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. 1
American Economic Review. 92 (4) 1196-1184.
15.____________, M. Colombo, P. Garrone, and R. Veugelers.
2005. The Impact of M&A on the R&D Process: An Empirical
Analysis of the Role of Technological- and Market-
Relatedness. Research Policy. 34 195-220.
16._____________, and R. Veugelers. 2006. Complementarity
in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External
Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D.
Management Science. 52 (1) 68-83.
17.Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters
in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press,
Cambridge MA.
18.Chen, C. J., and S. J. Tsai. 2005. The Effect of
Knowledge Sourcing, Knowledge Management, and Knowledge
Type on the Innovation Performance-An Organizational
Learning Perspective. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review. 13
(2) 389-416.
19.Chen, Y. L., and C. T. Tsai. 2005. The Association
between Technology Development Investment and Production
Efficiency in Taiwan: Using Stochastic Frontier
Approach. Chiao Da Management Review. 25 (2) 211-233.
20.Chiang, C. M, H. N Hsieh, C. H. Su, and Y. T. Cheng.
2002. The Methodology and Sampling for Pilot Study of
Innovation Survey in Taiwan Area. Management Review of
Fu Jen Catholic University. 9 (3) 111-138.
21.Chien, C. C., and C. Horng. 2003. A Study of External
Knowledge Transfer: An Example for Manufacturing
Companies Listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over-the-
Counter Markets. Journal of Management. 20 (5) 929-964.
22.Cho, H., and V. Pucik. 2005. Relationship between
Innovativeness, Quality, Growth, Profitability, and
Market Value. Strategic Management Journal. 26 555-575.
23.Chu, Y., and M. Hsu. 2002. R&D Input Comparison in
Taiwan with Main Economic System. National Policy Forum.
2 (4) 1-10.
24.Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. in idem. The
Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
25.Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and
Learning: the Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal. 99
569-596.
26.____________________________. 1990. Absorptive Capacity:
A New Perspective in Learning and Innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly. 17 178-184.
27.__________, and S. Klepper. 1996. A Reprise of Size and
R&D. The Economic Journal. 106 July 925-951.
28.__________, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2000.
Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability
Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or
not). NBER Working Paper 7552. Cambridge. MA.
29.Colombo, M., and G. Paola. 1996. Technological
Cooperative Agreements and Firm’s R&D Intensity. A Note
on Causality Relations. Research Policy. 25 (6) 923-932.
30.Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavior Theory
of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. N. J. Prentice-Hall.
31.Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-
Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.
Academy of Management Journal. 34 (3) 555-590.
32.D’ Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. Cooperative
and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.
American Economic Review. 75 (5) 1133-1137.
33.De Bondt, R. 1997. Spillovers and Innovative Activities.
International Journal of Industrial Organization. 15 (1)
1-28.
34.Dougherty, D., and C. Hardy. 1996. Sustained Product
Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming
Innovation-to-Organization Problems. Academy of
Management Journal. 39 (5) 1120-1154.
35.Dreyer, B., and K. Grønhaug. 2004. Uncertainty,
Flexibility, and Sustained Competitive Advantage.
Journal of Business Research. 57 (5) 484-494.
36.Dushnitsky, G., and M J. Lenox. 2005. When Do Firms
Undertake R&D By Investing In New Ventures? Strategic
Management Journal. 26 (10) 947-965.
37.Dutta, S., M. Bergen, and J. B. Heide. 1995.
Understanding Dual Distribution: the Case of Reps and
House Accounts. Journal of Law, Economics &
Organization. 11 (1) 189-204.
38.Einhorn, B., M. Kovac, P. Engardio, D. Roberts, F.
Balfour, and C. Edwards. 2005. Why Taiwan Matters.
BusinessWeek Online. May 16.
39.Eisenhardt, K. M., and J. A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic
Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management
Journal. 21 1105-1121.
40.Ernst, D., and J. Bamford. 2005. Your Alliances Are Too
Stable. Harvard Business Review. June. 133-141.
41.Ernst, H. 2001. Patent Applications and Subsequent
Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-Series Cross-
Section Analyses on the Firm Level. Research Policy. 30
143-157.
42.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations Governing
Application of Tax Credit to Profit-seeking Enterprise
Shareholders of Private Institutions with Respect to R&D
Investments and Elite Training.
43.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations of Promoting
the Industry Upgrading.European Commission.
1996. Oslo Manual.1-92.
44.Fang, S. C, J. L. Lin, and C.F. Chiu. 2003. Knowledge
Creation and Technology Transfer Performance of the Firm
Participating in the Consortia: Integrating Social
Capital and Economical Interaction Perspective.
Management Review. 22 (3) 123-148.
45.___________and______. 2005. Organizational Learning,
Social Capital and Technology: An Empirical Study on
Firms Participating in the Consortia. Journal of
Management. 22 (3) 295-315.
46.Galia, F., and, D. Legros. 2004. Complementarities
between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence from French.
Research Policy. 33 1185-1199.
47.___________________. 2005. Research and Development,
Innovation, Training, Quality and Profitability:
Evidence from French. Working Paper. 1-23.
48._________. 2005. A Creativity Lab for Taiwan.
BusinessWeek Online. May 16.
49.Gallini, N. T. 1984. Deterrence By Market Sharing: A
Strategic Incentive for Licensing. American Economic
Review. 74 (5) 931-941.
50.Geringer, M., S. Tallman, and D. Olsen. 2000. Product
and International Diversification Among Japanese
Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 21
(5) 51-80.
51.Geroski, P., S. Machin, and J. Van Reenen. 1993.The
Profitability of Innovating Firms? RAND Journal of
Economics. 24 (2) 198-201.
52.Giannakas, K. 2002. Infringement of Intellectual
Property Rights: Causes and Consequences. Amer. J. Agr.
Econ. 84. May 482-494.
53.Gottfredson, M., R. Puryear, and S. Phillips. 2005.
Strategic Sourcing: From Periphery to the Core. Harvard
Business Review. February. 132-139.
54.Gourieroux , C., A. Montfort, E. E. Renault, and A.
Trognon. 1987. Generalized Residuals. Journal of
Econometrics. 35 143-159.
55.Green, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Third Edition.
New York: Macmillian Publishing.
56.Grindley, P. C., and D. J. Teece. 1997. Managing
Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in
Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management
Review. 39 (2) 1-34.
57.Grinstein, A., and A. Goldman. 2006. Characterizing the
Technology Firm: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy.
35 121-143.
58.Gulati., R. 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The
Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in
Alliances. Academy of Management Journal. 38 85-112.
59.________. 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategic
Management Journal. 19 293-317.
60.________. P. R. Lawrence, and P. Puranam. 2005.
Adaptation in Vertical Relationships. Strategic
Management Journal. 26 (5) 415-441.
61.Haksever, C., R. G. Murdick, B. Render, and R. S.
Russell, 1990. Service Management and Operations (second
edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc. 217-226.
62.Hall, B. H. 1999. Innovation and Market Value. NBER
Working Paper 6984, National Bureau of Economic
Research, Cambridge (Mass.).
63.________, and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. The Patent Paradox
Revisited: An empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S.
Semiconductor Industry. RAND Journal of Economics. 32
(1) 101-128.
64.________., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market
Value and Patent Citation. RAND Journal of Economics. 36
(1) 16-38.
65.Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for Competence and Inter-
Partner Learning within International Strategic
Alliances. Strategic Management Journal. 12 83-103.
66.Hamm, S. 2005. Does R&D spending deliver results.
BusinessWeek Online. October 11.
67.Heide, J. B. 2003. Plural Governance in Industrial
Purchasing. Journal of Marketing. 67 (4) 18-29.
68.Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn. 1996. Scale, Scope, and
Spillovers: the Determinants of Research Productivity in
Drug Discovery? RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (1) 32-59.
69.Hernan, R. P. L. , and G.. Siotis. 2003. An Empirical
Evaluation of the Determinants of Research Joint Venture
Formation. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 51 75-89.
70.Himmelberg, C., and B. Peterson. 1994. R&D and Internal
Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech
Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics. 76 38-
51.
71.Huang, C. M., S. C. Fang, and W. C. Chen. 2000. The
Research of Factors Influencing Organizational
Technology Innovation Performance. Proceedings of the
National Conference on Management of Technology.
72.Huang, J. C. 2003. Human Capital Investment System,
Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: A
Test of Alternative Forms of Fit. Management Review. 22
(1) 99-126.
73.Huang, S. C. 2002. The Co-Evolution of Technologies and
Institutions: A Comparison of Taiwanese Hard Disk Drive
and Liquid Crystal Display Industries. R&D Management.
32 (3) 179-190.
74.Ittner, C., W. Lanen, and D. Larcker. 2002. The
Association between Activity-Based Costing and
Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Accounting
Research. 40 711-726.
75.________, D. Lacker, and R. Taylor. 2003. Performance
Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in
Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations and
Society. 28 715-741.
76.Jacobides, M., and S. Billinger. 2005. Designing the
Boundaries of the Firm: from ‘‘Make, Buy or Ally’’ to
the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture. Working
Paper. 1-47.
77.Jensen, M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow,
Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic
Review. 76 323-29.
78.Joseph, K., and M. Kalwani. 1998. The Role of Bonus Pay
in Sales Force Compensation Plans. Industrial Marketing
Management. 27 147-159.
79.Joskow, P. 1991. The Role of Transaction Cost Economics
in Antitrust and Public Utility Regulatory Policies. The
Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 7 53-83.
80.Jung, S., and K. Y. Imm. 2002. The Patent Activities of
Korea and Taiwan: A Comparative Case Study of Patent
Statistics. World Patent Information. 24 303-311.
81.Kale, P., H. Singh, and H. Perlmutter. 2000. Learning
and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic
Alliances: Building Relational Capital. Strategic
Management Journal. 21 (3) 217-237.
82.Kamien, M., and Z. Israel. 2000. Meet Me Halfway:
Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity.
International Journal of Industrial Organization. 18 (7)
995-1012.
83.Kanter, R. 1983. The Changemasters. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
84.Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge.
MA: MIT Press.
85.Kim, W. R. 2005. Outsourcing Becomes More Complex.
Information System Management. 22 (2) 89-90.
86.Kimberly, J., and Evanisko, M. 1981. Organizational
Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizational
and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of
Technological and Administrative Innovations. Academy of
Management Journal. 24 689-713.
87.Klein, P. G. 2004. The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons
from Empirical Studies. Working Paper.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=529962.
88.Klette, T. J. 1996. R&D, Scope Economics, and Plant
Performance. RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (3) 502-522.
89.Lai, S. B., and S. P. Chen. 1998. The Study of R&D
Resources and R&D Portfolio: An Empirical Study for
Taiwan Pharmaceutical Industry. Management Review. 17
(1) 1-20.
90.Lang, L. H., and R. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend A
Innouncements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Cash Free
Hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics. 181-191.
91.Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. Protecting
Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms
Handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics. 42 45-74.
92.Lee, W. R., W. C. Chao, and M. C. Wu. 2000. Partner
Selection Determinants and Alliance Performance: An
Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Information Firms.
Management Review. 19 (3) 1-24.
93.Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis, 1996. The Capitalization,
Amortization and Value-Relevance of R&D. Journal of
Accounting and Economics. 21 107-138.
94.Liebeskind, J. P. 1996. Knowledge, Strategy, and the
Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17 93-
107.
95.Lin, S. 2002. Experience of Industrial Technology R&D
and Innovation Performance in Taiwan. Technology
Pioneer. 86 12-16.
96.Lucas, R. E. 1993. Making a Miracle. Econometrica. 61
251-272.
97.Makadok., R. 2003. Doing the Right Thing and Knowing the
Right Thing to Do: Why the Whole is Greater Than the Sum
of the Parts. Strategic Management Journal. 24 1043-
1055.
98.Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990a. The Economics of
Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and
Organization. American Economic Review. 80 511-528.
99._____________________. 1990b. Rationalizability,
Learning and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic
Complementarities. Econometrica. 58 1255-1278.
100._____________________. 1995. Complementarities and Fit
Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in
Manufacturing. American Economic Review. 19 179-208.
101.Miravete, E., and J. Pernis. 2006. Innovation
Complementarity and Scale of Production . The Journal of
Industrial Economics. 54 1-29.
102.Mishina. Y., T. G. Pollock, and J. F. Porac. 2004. Are
More Resources Always Better For Growth? Resource
Stickiness in Market and Product Expansion. Strategic
Management Journal. 25 1179-1197.
103.Mol, M. 2005. Does being R&D Intensive Still Discourage
Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Research
Policy. 34 571-582.
104.Morton, K., E. , and I. Zang. 1992. Research Joint
Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review. 82
(5) 1293-1306.
105.Mowery, D., and C. Oxley. 1995. Inward Technology
Transfer and Competitiveness: The Role of National
Innovation Systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19
67-93.
106.Nahm, J. 2004. Open Architecture and R&D Incentives.
The Journal of Industrial Economics. 52 (4) 547-568.
107.Nelson, R. R., and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary
Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA [etc.] Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press.
108.Nohria, N. 2005. Feed R&D - or Farm It Out? Harvard
Business Review. July-Aug. 17-28.
109.Oxley, J. E. 1997. Appropriability Hazards and
Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost
Approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.
13 (2) 387-409.
110._________. 1999. Institutional Environment and the
Mechanisms of Governance: the Impact of Intellectual
Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firm
Alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization. 38 (3) 283-309.
111._________., and R. C. Sampson. 2004. The Scope and
Governance of International R&D Alliances. Strategic
Management Journal. 25 (8/9) 723-750.
112.Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig. 1981. Economies of
Scope. American Economic Review. 71 268-272.
113.Parmigiani, A. 2004. Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An
Investigation on Concurrent Sourcing. Working Paper. 1-
45.
114.Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.
Oxford University Press: Oxford.
115.Pisano, G. P. 1989. Using Equity Participation to
Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnology
Industry. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.
5 (1) 109-126.
116.__________. 1990. The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An
Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35
(1) 153-176.
117.Poppo, L., and T. Zenger. 1998. Testing Alternative
Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-based,
and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions
in Informantion Services. Strategic Management Journal.
19 (9) 853-877.
118.Qian, G., and L. Lee. 2003. Profitability of Small-and
Medium-Sized Enterprises in High-Tech Industries: the
Case of the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management
Journal. 24 881-887.
119.Rosenkopf, L., and A. Nerkar. 2001. Beyond Local
Search: Boundary Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in
the Optical Disc Industry. Strategic Management Journal.
22 (3) 287-306.
120.Rouvinen. P. 2002. Characteristics of Product and
Process Innovators: Some Evidence from the Frinnish
Innovation Survey. Applied Economics Letters. 9 575-580.
121.Sampson, R. C. 2004. The Cost of Misaligned Governance
in R&D Alliances. The Journal of Law, Economics, &
Organization. 20 (2) 484-526.
122.Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth.
Harvard University Press.
123.Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and
Democracy. New York. Harper and Brothers.
124.Shelanski, H. A., and P. G.. Klein. 1995. Empirical
Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and
Assessment. The Journal of Law, Economics, &
Organization. 335-361.
125.Siggelkow, N. 2002. Misperceiving Interactions among
Complements and Substitutes: Organizational
Consequences. Management Science. 48 (7) 900-916.
124.Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, Slack and Risk-Taking
in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Management
Journal. 29 562-585.
125.Sinha, D. K., and M. A. Cusumano. 1991. Complementary
Resources and Cooperative Research: A Model of Research
Joint Ventures among Competitors. Management Science. 37
(9) 1091-1106.
126.Smith, K. G., C. J. Collins, and K. D. Clark. 2005.
Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and
the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology
Firms. Academy of Management Journal. 48 (2) 346-357.
127.Steensma, H. K., and K. G. Corley. 2000. On the
Performance of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: the
Interaction between Partner Interdependence and
Technology Attributes. Academy of Management Journal. 43
(5) 1045-1067.
128.Stokey, N. L. 1988. Learning by Doing and the
Introduction of New Goods. Journal of Political Economy.
96 701-711.
129.Tadelis, S. 2002. Complexity, Flexibility and the Make-
or-Buy Decision. American Economic Review 92 (2) 433-437.
130.Taylor, R., and K. Ulrich. 2001. Product Variety,
Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis
of the U.S. Bicycle Industry. Management Science. 47
(12) 1588-1604.
131.Topkis, D. M. 1978. Minimizing a Submodular Function on
a Lattice. Operations Research. 26. 305-321.
132.Tratjenbreg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent
Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of
Economics. 21 172-187.
133.Tsai, K. 2004. The Impact of Technological Capability
on Firm Performance in Taiwan’s Electronics Industry.
Journal of High Technology Management Research. 15 183-
195.
134.Tsai, M. T., Y. S. Liao, and Y. T. Lin. 2000. A Study
of Technology Acquiring Strategy in High-Technology
Industries. Chinese Management Review. 3 (2) 1-15.
135.Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-
organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and
Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and
Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 44 (5) 996-
1004.
136.Ulrich, K. T., and D. J. Ellison. 2005. Beyond Make-
Buy: Internalization and Integration of Design and
Production. Production and Operations Management. 14 (3)
315-330.
137.Vanhaverbeke, W., G. Duysters, and N. Noorderhaven.
2002. External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or
Acquisitions: Analysis of the Application-Specific
Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science. 13
(6) 714-733.
138.Vassolo, R., J. Anand, and T. Folta. 2004. Non-
Additivity in Portfolios of Exploration Activities: A
Real Options-Based Analysis of Equity Alliances in
Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal. 25 1045-
1061.
139.Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D Expenditures and
External Technology Sourcing. Research Policy. 26 (3)
303-315.
140.___________., and B. Cassiman. 1999. Make and Buy in
Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian
Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy. 28 63-80.
141.Walker, B., and D. Weber. 1984. A Transaction Cost
Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions. Administrative
Science Quarterly. 29 373-391.
142.Westney, E. D. 1988. Domestic and Foreign Learning
Curves in Managing International Cooperative Strategies.
In F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.) Cooperative
Strategies in International Business. 339-346. Lexington
MA: Lexington Books.
143.Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies:
Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York. Free
Press.
144.______________. 1985. The Economics and Sociology of
Organization: Promoting a Dialogue. In George Farkas and
Paula England. eds., Industries, Firms, and Jobs:
Sociological and Economic Approaches. New York: Plenum
Press.
145.Wright, P. M., and W. R. Boswell. 2002. Desegregating
HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human
Capital Research. Journal of Management. 28 247 – 276.
146.Wu, J. Z., and C. F. Chou. 2004. Intellectual Property
Rights Protection and Economic Efficiency. Academia
Economic Papers. 32 (2) 335-361.
147.Wu, R., and H. Y. Lin. 2001. International
Competitiveness of Taiwan`s Industrial R&D and
Innovation. The Conference on Measurng and Evalutaing of
Industrial R&D and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based
Economy. Taipei.
148.Wuang, M. S., and Y. Y. Li. 2003. A Research on
Supplementary Strategy for Technology Gap in the
Technology Innovation Process – A Case Study of
Biotechnology Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Management
and Systems. 10 (4) 441-447.
149.Young, A. 1991. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic
Effects of International Trade. Quarterly Journal of
Economics. 106 369-406.
150.Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A
Review, Re-conceptualization, and Extension. Academy of
Management Review. 27 (2) 185-203.
151.Zhao, H., X. Tong, P. K. Wong, and J. Zhu. 2005. Types
of Technology Sourcing and Innovative Capability: An
Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms. The
Journal of High Technology Management Research. 16 209-
224.
152.Ziedonis, R. 2004. Don’t Fence Me In: Fragmented
Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition
Strategies of Firms. Management Science. 50 (6) 804-820.
153.Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998.
Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S.
Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review. 88
290-360. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
90353501
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903535011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
