Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34248
|
| Title: | 企業實施員工認股權制度與公司治理機制之關聯性研究 |
| Authors: | 曾偉倫
Tseng,Wei-Lun |
| Contributors: | 鄭丁旺
Cheng, Ting Wong
曾偉倫
Tseng,Wei-Lun |
| Keywords: | 員工認股權
公司治理
股權結構
董事會組成特性
employee stock option
corporate governance
ownership structure
composition of board members |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:07:36 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 員工認股權之發行，可降低企業代理成本，並達激勵員工之效果。過去研究指出，公司股權結構及董事會組成特性的不同，將對員工認股權獎酬政策產生影響。據此，本研究以員工認股權證發行比例及員工認股權價值，作為衡量員工認股權獎酬指標，並以民國九十年至九十五年間發行員工認股權之台灣上市櫃公司為樣本，探討員工認股權與公司治理間之關聯性。實證結果顯示如下：
一、董監事持股率與員工認股權獎酬無顯著關係。
二、經理人持股率與員工認股權價值呈顯著負相關。
三、內部董事持股率與員工認股權證發放比例及價值皆具有顯著正相關，並與後者呈先增後減之倒U型關係。
四、機構投資人持股率與員工認股權證發行比例呈顯著負相關，與價值呈顯著正向關係。
五、董事會規模與員工認股權證發放比例及價值皆呈顯著正相關。
六、董事長兼任總經理及獨立董事席次比例皆對員工認股權價值具顯負相關。
Employee stock option plans are often used to alleviate agency cost and to serve as a tool for motivation. Previous studies have indicated that different ownership structure and composition of board members have impact on employee stock option compensation policy. Accordingly, this study used the ratio of stock option granted to the common shares outstanding and the market value of the total option shares granted as the indication of stock option compensation to test whether employee stock option plans are related in some way to corporate governance. Sample firms are selected from listed companies in Taiwan Stock Exchange and OTC firms granting stock options during the period of 2001 to 2006.
Empirical results are as follows:
1.There is no significant relationship between the percentage of stock holdings of board members and employee stock option plan.
2.The percentage of top management stock holdings is negatively associated with the market value of employee stock option with statistical significance.
3.Internal directors’ stock holding ratio is positively associated with the employee stock option ratio and market value. Specifically, the relation between the internal directors’ stock holding ratio and the market value of the employee stock option is convex.
4.The institutional investors’ stock holding ratio is negatively associated with employee stock option ratio but positively associated with market value of employee stock option.
5.The board size is positively associated with both the ratio and market value of the employee stock option.
6.Both the duality of Chairman/CEO and the percentage of independent directors are negatively associated with the market value of employee stock option. |
| Reference: | （中文部分）
王文宇，2006，公司法論，台北：元照出版公司
王玉珍，2002，股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
王瑋琦，2005，實施員工認股權制度公司之特質探討，國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
王繼和，2004，公司治理機制與經營績效之關係研究：以台灣上市櫃公司為例，國立雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
方珮馨，2005，員工分紅配股對公司價值與創新績效之影響：兼論公司治理調節效果，國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
巫素玫，2001，影響員工分紅入股高低之因素及宣告時市場反應，私立東海大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
林子欽，2002，員工分紅入股影響因素之分析，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
林君玲，1998，企業財務危機預警資訊之研究--考慮公司監理因素，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
林揚舜，2004，員工分紅稀釋效果與企業經營策略之關係－以台灣上市電子公司為研究對象，私立東吳大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
科瑞‧羅森、約翰‧凱斯、馬丁‧史陶巴斯（Corey Rosen, John Case and Martin Staubus），員工才是好股東，大師輕鬆讀，第149期（10月）。
張心怡，2004，股票選擇權獎酬、風險承擔誘因與CEO持有意願，國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
張明峰，1991，股權結構對公司績效影響之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
許富強，2005，員工認股權證宣告效果與公司特質分析，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
許琇婷，2001，員工分紅政策與公司特性及績效關連性之研究--以台灣上市資訊電子業為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
張倫綺，2005，公司治理與員工認股權獎酬，私立朝陽科技大學會計研究所碩士論文。
葉銀華、邱顯比，1996，「資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究：代理理論」，台大管理論叢，第七卷第二期（8月）， 57-89頁。
歐盈潔，2006，影響員工分紅配股比率因素：兼論機構投資人的調節效果，國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
歐淑卉，2003，員工分紅配股對上市公司績效之影響，國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
劉宴辰，1992，從代理理論觀點探究股權結構董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究－上市公司之實證分析，私立淡江大學管理科學研究所管理科學組碩士論文。
(英文部分)
Barnhart, S. W. and S. Rosenstein. 1998. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review 33: 1-16.
Berle, A. and G. C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, NY: MacMillan.
Bizjak, J., J. Brickley, and J, Coles. 1993. Stock based incentive compensation and investment behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics16: 349-372.
Black, F. and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, No.3: 637-654.
Bushee, B. J. and C. F. Noe. 2000. Corporate Disclosure Practices, Institutional Investors, and Stock Return Volatility. Journal of Accounting Research 38: 171-202.
Clinch, G. 1991. Employee compensation and firms’ research and development activity. Journal of Accounting Research 29(Spring): 59-78.
Core, J. E., R. W. Holhausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51(March): 371-406.
________. and Guay, W. R. 2001. Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics 61(2): 253-287.
Coughlan, A. T., and R. M. Schmidt. 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 43-66.
Dalton, D. R. and Kesner, I. F. 1987. Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: An International Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 18: 33-42.
Ding, D.K. and S. Qian. 2001. Causes and effects of employee stock option plans: Evidence from Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal(May): 563-599.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13: 1-36.
DeFusco, R., Zorn, T., and Johnson, R. 1991. The association between executive stock option plan changes and managerial decision making. Financial Management 20: 36-43.
Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory of agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1): 49-64.
Fama, E. 1980. Agency Problems and the theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 88(April): 288-307.
______. and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
Gaver, J. J. and K. M. Gaver. 1993. Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 125-160.
______________________. 1995. Compensation Policy and the Investment Opportunity Set. Financial Economics 24: 19-32.
Han K. C. and D. Y. Suk. 1998. The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence. Review of Financial Economics 7: 143-155.
Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(December): 3-43.
Haugen, R. A. and L. W. Senbet. 1981. Resolving the agency problems of external capital through option. Journal of Finance 36 (June): 629-647.
Hartzell, J. and L. Starks. 2003. Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance 58(6): 2351-2374.
Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach. 1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20: 101-112.
Ittner, C. D., R. A. Lambert, and D. F. Larker. 2003. The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34(January): 89-127.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior-
Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial and Economics 3(October): 305-360.
__________. and R. Ruback. 1983. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
__________. and K. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(April): 225-264.
__________. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control system. Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.
Kedia, S. and A. Mozumdar. 2002. Performance impact of employee stock options. Working Paper, Harvard University and Boston University.
Lipton, M. and J. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48(1): 59-77.
McConnell, J. and Servaes. 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics 27(October), 595-612.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38(June): 163-184.
Miller, M. H. and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business 34: 411-433.
Morck. R., A. Shleier, and R.W. Vishny. 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Patton, A. and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why won’t directors rock the boat. Harvard Business Review 65(6): 10-18.
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
Ryan, H. E. and R. A. Wiggins. 2002. The influence of Firm- and Manager-Specific Characteristics on the Structure of Executive Compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 101-123.
Singh, H. and F. Harianto. 1989. Management-Board Relationships, Takeover Risk, and the Adoption of Golden Parachutes. Academy of Management Journal 32:7-24.
Sharma, V. D. 2004. Board of Director Characteristics, Institutional Ownership, and Fraud: Evidence from Australia. A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2): 105-117.
Smith, C. and R. Watts. 1992. The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation Policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 263-292.
Stulz, R. M. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights, financial policies, and the market for the corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25-54.
Wan, K. M. 2004. Managerial compensation when managers are principals. Corporate Ownership and Control 1: 106-121.
Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
Yermack, D. 1995. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39(October): 237-269.
Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of Directors and corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrated Model. Journal of Management 15: 291-334. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
94353052
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353052 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
