政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34220

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34220

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51107001 Online Users : 881

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/34220

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34220

Title:	會計師執行財務報表查核時偵出舞弊責任的認知研究
Authors:	廖基宏 Liao,Chi-Hung.
Contributors:	馬秀如廖基宏 Liao,Chi-Hung.
Keywords:	透鏡模型舞弊會計師責任 fraud lens model
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2009-09-18 09:02:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	每當重大舞弊案件發生時，社會大眾常將矛頭指向負責財務報表查核的會計師，認為會計師並沒有負起他（她）應負的責任，在國際上，如安隆案(Enron)、世界通訊（Worldcom）的隱瞞虧損、線上時代華納（AOL Time Warner）的虛報廣告營收等等事件皆是如此；在我國，也有赫赫有名的博達等案。會計師的專業與超然獨立的立場，使得簽證功能得到資訊使用者的信任，對投資大眾而言，亦提供一層重要的保障。然而，會計師所提供之合理確信並非絕對之保證，一旦因為某些無法控制之因素造成企業失敗，相關利害關係人無可避免地會將矛頭指向會計師，因此跟隨而來的訴訟將對會計師造成相當大的損失，而利害關係人與會計師的認知差距即為造成訴訟的關鍵因素。本研究先探討會計師查核舞弊的責任為何?再進一步研究財務報表使用者與會計師間，對於會計師執行財務報表查核時，偵測舞弊責任的認知，同時研究不同人之間，是否存有認知差距。本研究採透鏡模型觀念，針對學過及未學過審計學的人進行問卷調查，研究結果發現：受試者皆認為會計師負有偵測管理舞弊的責任，財務報表使用者與會計師之間的認知，雖然使用的線索相同，但線索使用的程度仍有不同。關鍵字：舞弊、會計師責任、透鏡模型 Every time when there is serious fraud, the public will accuse the audit accountant for not taking the responsibility he/she should take. Internationally, there are Enron and Worldcom concealed their loses, AOL Time Warner overstated their commercial revenues. In Taiwan, there are also cases like procomp. Due to the profession and independence of accountants, the public trusts the opinion they issued toward the financial statements. However, the assurance that the audit accountant provides is highly but not absolute guarantee. Once there is some incontrollable factors lead to business failure, the interested party will blame the audit accountants. Therefore, the follow-up lawsuit will cause a lot loses to the accountant. The gap between interested party and accountant will be the key point to the lawsuit. The study tries to analyze the viewpoints of the interested party and accountants toward the accountant duty of inspecting fraud when auditing financial statements. The study uses questionnaire, taking national university graduated and college students as objects, and discuss by the framework of lens model. The study concluded that all the interviewee think that the audit accountant has the responsibility to examine the fraud. As to the perception of interested party and accountants, on the other hand, though the interest party and accountant own the same clues, they use them to different extent.
Reference:	中文部分杜榮瑞，1998，行為會計研究之回顧：問題與典範，中山管理評論，第六卷第二期：293-330。 ______、蘇裕惠，1993，審計上的政策捕捉研究－透視模型之應用（上），會計研究月刊，第98期：106-110。 ______、______，1993，審計上的政策捕捉研究－透視模型之應用（中），會計研究月刊，第99期：100-104。 ______、______，1994，審計上的政策捕捉研究－透視模型之應用（下），會計研究月刊，第100期：125-128。林美花，1975，會計師法律責任之研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。俞洪昭，1988，重要性判斷之研究－透視模型的應用，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。馬秀如，1996a，員工舞弊與管理舞弊釋疑，會計研究月刊，第126期：104-111。 ______，1996b，非法事項、錯誤及舞弊，會計研究月刊，第129期：112-123。高晶萍，1995，我國審計功能認知差距之實證研究，國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。許伯彥，2002，財務報表舞弊風險評量模式研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。黃柄勳，2003，會計師執行財務報表查核對利害關係人所負民事責任之研究，逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。陳兆宏，1987，變異數分析下的統計值- 值之介紹，會計評論第二十二期：120-145。陳兆宏，1988，審計人員內部控制判斷行為之研究－透視模型之運用，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。陳秋芳，1989，企業倒閉與會計師責任，工商雜誌，第33卷第8期：28-29。 ______，1998，公司管理舞弊會計師豈應連坐同罪，會計研究月刊，第147期：7-8。陳韻年，1989，查核人員面臨之法律責任及其因應之道，會計評論，第24期：47-58。蔡信夫、馮拙人，審計學概念和應用第四版，新陸書局，2004。鄭惠之，2004a，財務報表的管理責任，會計研究月刊，第220期：31-41。 ______，2004b，投資人要獲得真實的正義，會計研究月刊，第220期:42-46。 ______，2004c，財務報表的審計責任，會計研究月刊，第220期：53-60。簡駿貿， 2003，會計師法律責任對經理人舞弊與會計師查核努力水準之研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。中華民國審計準則公報第十四號，舞弊與錯誤，財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。中華民國審計準則公報第四十三號，會計師對財務報表考量舞弊之責任，財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。中華民國會計師法中華民國民法總則中華民國證券交易法英文部分 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.53: The Auditor’s Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities. New York, NY: AICPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.54: Illegal Acts by Clints. New York, NY: AICPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997. Statement of Auditing Standard No.82: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. New York, NY: AICPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2003. Statement of Auditing Standard No.99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. New York, NY: AICPA. Andrew, H. B., J. E. Brown, R. Fleming, and W. J. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74. Arrington, C. E., C. D. Bailey, and W. S. Hopwood. 1985. An attribution analysis of responsibility assessment for audit performance. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 1-20. Ashton, R. H. 1974. An experimental study of internal control judgment. Accounting Research 12: 143-157. Barnett, A., R. Fleming., and J. W. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74. Bonner, S. E., V. Z. Palmrose, and. M. S. Young. 1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation: An analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review 73: 503-533. David, G. B. 2004. The fight against fraud. The Internal Auditor 61: 34-39. Epstein, M. J., and A. M. Geiger. 1994. Investor veiws of audit assurance: Recent evidence of the expectation gap. Journal of Accountancy 177: 60-65. Fadzly, M. N., and Zauwiyah A. 2004 Audit expectation gap: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal: 897. Gramling, A. A., J. W. Schatzberg, and W. A. Wallace. 1996. The role of undergraduate auditing coursework in reducing the expectations gap Accounting Education. 11:131-133. Hussain, I. 2003. Auditing expectations gap: A possible solution. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 3: 67-87. Joni, J Y. 1997. Defining auditors` responsibilities. The Accounting Historians Journal 24: 25-64. Joyce, E. J. and R. Libby. 1982. Behavioral studies of audit decision making. Journal of Accounting Literature 1(spring): 103-123. Kimberly, F., E. L. D. Jordan, and S. K. James. 2001. The expectation gap: Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students. Managerial Auditing Journal 16: 145-150. Libby, R., and B. L. Lewis. 1982. Human information processing research in accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society 7: 231-285. Lowe, D. J. and P. Kurt. 1993. Expectations of the audit function. The CPA Journal 63: 58-61.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 93353009 95
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353009
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
35300901.pdf		85Kb	Adobe PDF2	790	View/Open
35300902.pdf		173Kb	Adobe PDF2	766	View/Open
35300903.pdf		208Kb	Adobe PDF2	871	View/Open
35300904.pdf		144Kb	Adobe PDF2	688	View/Open
35300905.pdf		358Kb	Adobe PDF2	1453	View/Open
35300906.pdf		433Kb	Adobe PDF2	4309	View/Open
35300907.pdf		455Kb	Adobe PDF2	1198	View/Open
35300908.pdf		353Kb	Adobe PDF2	782	View/Open
35300909.pdf		270Kb	Adobe PDF2	865	View/Open
35300910.pdf		251Kb	Adobe PDF2	1247	View/Open
35300911.pdf		560Kb	Adobe PDF2	3470	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback