Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34219
|
| Title: | 機構投資人與資訊透明度關聯性之研究 |
| Authors: | 曾亞亭 |
| Contributors: | 林宛瑩
曾亞亭 |
| Keywords: | 機構投資人
資訊透明度
公司治理
institutional investor
transparency
cooperate governance |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:02:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以2002年至2005年之上市公司為研究對象，衡量2002與2004年兩年之年報資訊揭露水準，探討資訊揭露水準與機構投資人持股兩者間之關係，並分析兩期資訊透明度與機構投資人持股比率的改變對經營績效與公司價值變動的影響。
實證結果發現，機構投資人持股意願受到前期年報資訊揭露水準高低的影響，顯示資訊揭露水準為機構投資人之選股決策因素之一。前期年報資訊揭露水準愈佳，機構投資人持股比率愈高，但當期資訊揭露程度對同期機構投資人持股意願則無顯著影響。此外，機構投資人持股比率高低與公司同期或次期資訊揭露程度皆無顯著關聯性。企業資訊揭露水準之改善與機構投資人持股比率增加皆與公司經營績效及公司價值之提升呈顯著正相關。
Based on a sample of firms listed on Taiwan Securities Exchange over the period of 2002 to 2005, this study first examines the relationship between the information transparency, measured the disclosure level of annual reports, and shareholdings of institutional investors. In addition, this study investigates the influence of increase in the level of disclosure transparency and shareholdings on performance and firm value.
The empirical results suggest that firms with higher disclosure level are associated with greater institutional ownership next year, but the same relationship didn’t hold for concurrent period. This finding suggests that disclosure level of annual report is considered by the institutional investors when making their investment decisions. The findings also indicate that improvement in disclosure level and increase in institutional investors’ shareholdings not only enhances the operating performance but also the firm value. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
王大維，2003，公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究－以台灣上市公司為例，私立淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
企業亞洲網絡，2004，2004年證券界對台灣公司治理調查報告。
朱建州，1999，機構投資人與月營收資訊內涵之關聯性研究－以台灣股市為例，國立中正大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
何里仁，2003，公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究，私立逢甲大學會計與財稅所未出版碩士論文。
何幸芳，2003，獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
李亭誼，2003，董事身份特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
李美琳，1996，企業經營績效綜合指標之研究，國立台灣大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
吳岳忠，2003，機構投資人、公司治理與公司價值之研究~以台灣電子業為例，私立東吳大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
沈宜慶，2002，企業資訊透明度與債券發行資金成本關係之實證研究，私立淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
林欣怡，2003，公司資訊透明度與權益資金成本之關係探討，國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林淑棻，2003，公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究，國立政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林聖棠，2004，機構投資者對股票投資報酬影響之研究，國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
林尚志，2004，我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
林政衛，2004，公司治理結構、資訊透明度與股票報酬變異關聯性之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
林鼎堯，2003，管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係：企業研發支出之實證研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
周至文，2004，資訊揭露與股權結構關係之研究，私立昆山科技大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
周真貞，1998，董事長與總經理的傳承對企業經營績效之影響，國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
周行一、陳錦村、陳坤宏，1996，家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究，中國財務學刊 ，第四卷，第一期，頁115-139。
邱毅、張訓華，1991，股權結構､董事會組成與企業財務績效，臺北市銀月刊，第二十二卷，第五期，頁11-32。
易換棣，1995，台灣股市機構投資人下單策略分析，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
柯承恩，2000，「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)(下)」，會計研究月刊，第173（4月）、174期（5月）。
徐佩鈺，2002，財務比率與股票型基金持股關聯性之實證研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
許崇源、林宛瑩、胡書展與陳兆辰，2004，金融業控股型態(Ⅲ)-新光集團，貨幣信用觀測與信用評等 47，台灣經濟新報社，頁11-34。
莊尚志，2003，資訊揭露程度與資金成本關係之實證研究，私立東吳大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
歐育誠，2002，公司價值和系統風險關係之實證研究---以台灣上市公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
許周全，2001，機構投資人與管理當局自願性盈餘預測之關聯性研究，國立台北大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
陳瑞斌，2005，公司治理結構與資訊透明度對於資本市場之影響，國立政治大學會計學系未出版博士論文。
陳彥豪，2002，外資與投信法人持股比率變化對股價報酬率影響之研究－以上市電子股為例，國立中山大學財務管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳惠玲，2000，「銀行逾放比推估─由企業信用評等看銀行資產品質」,貨幣觀測與信用評等, 11月,第2-7頁。
陳櫻建，2002，外資持股比率、公司特性與公司價值，國立中正大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
張旭玲，1998，我國股票上市公司股權結暨經營績效之研究，國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
張璧蘭，2003，公司治理之資訊透明度與銀行授信決策之實證研究，私立大葉大學會計資訊學系未出版碩士論文。
崔琇玟，2002，高研發企業主動揭露預測性非盈餘及智慧資本資訊行為之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
黃明潔，2002，多期損益平穩化行為之決定因素，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
黃耀慶，2000，從系統風險、企業透明度與權益資金成本關係探究影響企業透明度因素，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
雷勇洲，1996，機構投資者:交易策略與市場衝擊，國立中正大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
楊素芳，2002，我國公司治理制度下有關資訊揭露之研究，私立淡江大學國際貿易學系未出版碩士論文。
劉倩文，2004，以投資人關係為目的之資訊揭露，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
劉慧欣，1997，外國機構投資人交易策略及交易行為對我國股市衝擊之研究，國立政治大學財務管理學系未出版碩士論文。
劉立倫，2004，股權結構、財務決策與公司績效關聯性之研究 ，私立中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
蔡坤哲，2003，資訊揭露程度與盈餘管理關係之探討-以上市電子類股為例，國立東華大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩，2002，公司治理與評等系統，台北：商智文化事業股份有限公司。
英文部分
Agrawal,A., and G. N. Mandelker 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25:143-162.
Badrinath, S. G., G. D. Gay, and J. R. Kale. 1989. Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial “safety net hypothesis”. Journal of Risk and Insurance 55 : 605-629.
Badrinath, S. G., T. H. Noe, and J. R. Kale. 1995. Of Shepherds, Sheep, and the Cross-autocorrelations in Equity Returns. The Review of Financial Studies (1986-1998)8：401-440.
Beiner S. ,W. Drobetz , M. M. Schmid ,and H. Zimmermann.2004. An Integrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation - Evidence from Switzerland. Working paper, University of Basel , University of Oxford.
Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 : 323-349.
Brickley, J.A., R. C. Lease, C. W.Smith,and Jr.. 1988. Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments.Journal of Financial Economics 20：267-291.
Bushee B. J., and F. N. Christopher. 1999. Disclosure quality, institutional
investors, and stock return volatity. Working paper, University of Pennylvania.
Bushee B. J., C. F Noe. 2000. Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility.Journal of Accounting Research 38：171-202.
Chi J. 2005.Understanding the Endogeneity Between Firm Value and Shareholder Rights. Financial Management 34：65-76.
Chen C. J P and B. Jaggi.2000. Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19：285.
Chaganti R. and F. Damanpour.1991. Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal 12：479-491.
Claessens S., S. Djankov, J. P H Fan,and L. H P Lang.2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance 57：2741-2771.
Ciccone S. J.2000. Two essays on financial transparency: 1. Information quality and stock returns and 2. International differences in financial transparency. Ph.D. dissertation, The Florida State University.
Cronqvist H.and M. Nilsson.2003. Agency Costs of Controlling Minority Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38：695-719.
Dobrzynski J. H.1993. Relationship investing. Business Week（March）：68-74.
El-Gazzar, S. M. 1998. Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A
cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods. Accounting Review 73: 119-129.
Falkenstein,E.G. 1996. Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings. Journal of Finance 51：111-135.
Fan J. P. H., and T.J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting & Economics 33：401-425.
Fuerst O. and S.-H., Kang. 2000. Corporate Governance, Expected Operating Performance, and Pricing. Working paper, The George Washington University.
Gelb D. and P. Zarowin. 2000. Corporate Disclosure Policy and the Informativeness of Stock Prices. Working paper, New York University.
Glosten, L. R., and P. R. Milgrom. 1985. Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist marketwith heterogeneously rents. Journal of Political Economy 103:75-93.
Gompers P. A., A. Metrick. 2001. Institutional investor and equity prices.The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116：229-259.
Graves S.A. and S.A. Waddock.1990.Institutional Ownership and Control: Implications for Long-term Corporate Strategy.Academy of Management Executive 4：75-83.
Han K. C., D. Y. Suk.1998. The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence. Review of Financial Economics 7：143-155.
Healy P., and K. G.Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, andthe capital markets：A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440.
Heflin F., Shaw K.W., and Wild J. 2001. Disclosure Quality and Market Liquidity. Working paper, Florida State University , University of Missouri at Columbia.
Hessel, C. A., and M. Norman. 1992. Financial characteristics of neglected and institutionally held stocks. Journal of Accounting, Auditing &Finance:313-334.
Holderness, C. G., D. P. Sheehan.1988. The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20：317-346.
Jacobs R. S.1991.Understanding marketing relationships: The role of self-disclosure reciprocity in buyer-seller interactions. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University.
Kesner I. F., R. B. Johnson. 1990. An Investigation of the Relationship Between Board Composition and Stockholder Suits. Strategic Management Journal 11：327-336.
La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A.Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance 54：471-571.
La Porta R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny.2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance 57：1147-1170.
Lang M. H., and R.J. Lundholm .1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31: 246-271.
Lang M. H., and R.J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst
behavior. The Accounting Review 71(4): 467-492.
Leuz C. and F. Oberholzer-Gee. 2003. Corporate transparency and political
connections. Working paper,University of Chicago.
Lins K. V.2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38：159-184.
Meek,G. K, C. B Roberts,and S. J Gray.1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26：555-572.
Monks R. and N. Minow. 1995. Watching the watchers: Corporate governance for the 21st century.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Morck R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
McConnell J. J. and H.Servaes.1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.Journal of Financial Economics 27 ：595-612.
Organization for economic co-operation and development 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance May 1999.
Opler T. C. and J. S. Sokobin.1997. Does Coordinated Institutional Activism Work? An Analysis of the Activities of the Council of Institutional Investors. Working Paper.
Patton A.,J. C. Baker. 1987. Why Won`t Directors Rock the Boat? Harvard Business Review 65：10-14.
Phalippou L.2004. Institutional Ownership and the Value Premium. Working paper, University of Amsterdam.
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
Rajgopal S. and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The role of institutional investors in
coporate governance: An empirical investigation.Working paper, University of Washigton.
Rechner P. L., D. R Dalton. 1991. CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis. Strategic Management Journal 12：155-160.
Sengupta P.1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt . The Accounting Review 73：459-472.
Seetharaman A., Z. L. Swanson, and B. Srindhi. 2001. Analytical and empirical evidence of the impact of tax rates on the trade-off between debt and managerial ownership. Journal of Accounting, Auditing &Finance16:249.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny.1986. Large shareholders and corporate control.
Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.
Spence,A.M.,1974. Market signaling.Cambridge,Mass：Harvard University Press.
Velury U., J. T. Reisch, D. M. O`Reilly. 2003. Institutional Ownership and the Selection of Industry Specialist Auditors. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 21：35-48.
Vishwanath, Tara, and Daniel Kaufmann. 1999. Towards transparency in finance and governance. The world bank draft, September 6.
Yu, F. 2002. Accounting Transparency and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads. Working paper,University of California. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
93353006
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
