Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34211
|
| Title: | 我國上市公司董監事會特性與權益資金成本關聯性之研究 |
| Authors: | 徐裕欽 |
| Contributors: | 李怡宗
徐裕欽 |
| Keywords: | 公司治理
董監事會特性
權益資金成本
Corporation governance
Characteristic of board of directors and supervisors
Cost of equity capital |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:01:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 董監事會為公司治理之核心，本研究以民國87年至民國91年為研究期間，針對我國上市公司探討董監事會特性與權益資金成本之關聯性，而不同於以往國內有關估計權益資金成本的方法，本研究以Ohlson模型來設算權益資金成本。實證結果顯示：
1.董監事會成員持股比率與企業權益資金成本率之關係並不顯著，若觀測兩者間是否存有非線性關係，本研究亦未發現兩者間的不顯著關係是由非線性因素所造成。
2.複迴歸分析顯示，董監事會持股質押比與權益資金成本之關係並不顯著，若進一步區分全體樣本為正、負盈餘樣本，則發現在負盈餘樣本中，董監事會持股質押比與企業權益資金成本呈現顯著正向關係；另外，若以Panel Data分析，本研究則發現在電子業中董監事持股質押比與權益資金成本始呈現正相關。
3.公司是否聘任獨立董監與權益資金成本之關係並不顯著，且不論是在有聘任或無聘任獨立董監之樣本間，或是在自願性聘任與強制性聘任獨立董監之樣本間，其權益資金成本並無明顯的差異。
This study examines the relations between characteristic of board of directors and supervisors and cost of equity capital. It is unlike previous research to use capital assets pricing model（CAPM）, this research adopts an alternative technique for estimating the cost of equity capital. Specifically, we use Ohlson (1995) model to generate a market implied cost of capital. Our samples consist of all public companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporate over 5 years period 1998-2002. The empirical results are as follows:
1.There is no significant negative relation between the ratio of the stock held by the board and supervisors and the cost of equity capital. Moreover, we don’t find this relation caused by nonlinear specification.
2.There is no significant positive relation between the pledged share ratio of the board and supervisors and the cost of equity capital. When the entire samples are divided into the sub-samples of firms experiencing losses and others, the existence of the positive relationship is found only in the firms experiencing losses. In addition, the relation is further proved in the electronic industry when adopting panel data analysis.
3.There is no significant reverse relation between the independent directors and supervisors and the cost of equity capital. And there is also no significant difference in the cost of equity capital between companies with implementing the independent directors and supervisors and those without implementing the regulation. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
丁立平，民91，公司治理、會計資訊與公司價值關係之研究，國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
王鼎立，民91，董事會結構與公司盈餘的傳遞效果，東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳建頤，民87，董事會規模對公司價值的影響，國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
周文賢，民91，多變量統計分析－SAS/ STAT 使用分析，智勝文化事業有限公司。
林玉霞，民91，台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究，中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
林明謙，民90，股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究，輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
林育雅，民83，我國上市公司董事會特性與盈餘操縱現象之研究，國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
金志遠，民88，董事會特性與年報自願性揭露關係之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
郎咸平、劉玉珍，民83，財務管理，雙葉書廊有限公司。
翁淑育，民89，台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究，輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
翁銘鴻，民87，我國上市公司董事會特徵與經營績效之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
高蘭芬，民91，董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響，國立成功大學會計研究所未出版博士論文。
張峻萍，民88，公司治理與經營績效之關係，國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
許加昂，民89，董監質押比率與公司經營績效、融資政策、股利政策關聯性之研究，國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
許盟，民88，我國董事會結構與自願性盈餘預測行為之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳世昌，民84，負債比率與資金成本、獲利能力之間關係的實證研究，國立中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳宏姿，民90，董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳家慧，民89，我國上市公司管理機制與盈餘管理相關性之實證研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
彭筱倩，民92，盈餘管理與公司治理關聯性之研究—以我國財務危機公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃璟琦，民91，上市公司董監事持股、持股質押、市值與經營績效關聯性之研究，國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊建業，民89，亞太地區銀行業權益資金成本與報酬的比較，國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊慧玲，民89，董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究，朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
趙玉清，民90，董監持股質押對公司現金增資資訊內涵及財務結構關係之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
魏早啟，民86，上市公司董監事特性與經營績效之研究，東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
羅陽春，民90，我國上市公司董監改選前盈餘管理行為之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
英文部分
Barry, C., and S. Brown. 1985. Differential information and security market equilibrium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20: 407-422.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71: 443-466.
Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323-349.
Botosan, C. A., and M. A. Plumlee. 2001. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 21-40.
Cadbury, A. 1999. What are the trends in corporate governance? How will they
impact your company? Long Range Planning Journal 32: 12-19.
Chen, W. K, Z. Chen, and K. C. J. Wei. 2003. Disclosure, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Working paper. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asia corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia (CLSA). 2001. Saints & Sinners: Who’s got religion?
Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia (CLSA). 2002. Make me holy…but not yet!
DeChow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1996. Cause and consequence of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13: 1-36.
Diamond, D., and R. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 66: 1325-1355.
Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
Fama, E., and K. French. 1997. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43: 153-193.
Gebhardt, W.R., C.M.C. Lee, and B. Swaminathan. 2001. Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 39: 135-176.
Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Kesner, I. 1987. Directors’ stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management 13: 499-508.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.
Mayers, D., A. Shivdasani, and C. Smith. 1997. Board composition and corporate control: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Business 70: 33-62.
McConnell, J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and
corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27(2): 595-612.
McKinsey & Company. June 2000. Investor opinion survey.
Mitton, T. 2002 A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 64: 215-241.
Morck, R., A. Shleisfer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 661-687.
Prowse, S. 1998. Corporate governance: Emerging issues and lessons from East Asia. Responding to the global financial crisis-World Bank mimeo.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 117-142.
Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
World Bank. 1999. Corporate governance: A framework for implementation overview. The World Bank. Washington D. C.
Yeh, Y. H., and T. S. Lee. 2001. Corporate governance and performance: The case of Taiwan. The Seventh Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference. Shanghai. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353026
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353026 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
