政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34198
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113393/144380 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51241405      線上人數 : 874
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34198


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34198


    題名: 管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係：企業研發支出之實證研究
    作者: 林鼎堯
    貢獻者: 李怡宗
    林鼎堯
    關鍵詞: 管理當局短視
    機構投資人持股比例
    盈餘管理
    公司治理
    management myopic
    ownership of institutional investor
    earning management
    corporation governance
    日期: 2002
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18
    摘要: 現今，世界經濟脈動迅速，科技發展日新月異，如何在瞬息萬變的趨勢洪流中掠取先機，端賴自身競爭力強弱而定。然而管理當局短視行為的發生，卻易損及企業的競爭優勢，甚至對企業未來有不利影響。造成管理當局短視之因源於多方面，來自資本市場投資人的影響即為其一。而資本市場中，機構投資人往往是大家注目的焦點，因此本研究乃對機構投資人持股比例與管理當局短視行為的關係進行探討，並期望能對公司治理制度的擬定上有所助益。
    本研究以民國八十四年至民國九十年為研究期間，針對我國上市公司研究其管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例間的關係，並探究在電子與非電子產業間兩者關係是否相同。此外，本研究亦比較機構投資人與個人投資者，各自持股比例與管理當局短視行為的相關情形，進以探尋真正能發揮監理機制的投資人類別。
    實證結果顯示：(1)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例高低有顯著之負向關係，而與個人投資者持股比例間則有顯著的正向關係。(2)在非電子產業中，機構投資人持股與管理當局短視行為呈顯著負向關係，而電子產業中兩者則無顯著關係。(3)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例變動的幅度有顯著之負向關係，而與個人投資者持股比例變動則有顯著的正向關係。(4)在非電子股產業方面，機構投資人持股比例變動幅度與管理短視行為間無顯著關係；但在電子產業中，則兩者間呈現顯著之負向關係。
    Nowadays, the economy situation is changing so fast and the development of new technology has altered with each passing day. To be ahead of their competitors, firms must sharpen their competitive edge. However, management myopia often damage their competitive advantages and would do harm to the firms in the future. The phenomenon of management myopia is derived from many reason, one of them is the effect of the investors in the capital market. Furthermore, participants in the capital market always pay attention to the behavior of institution investors. Thus, this research explores the relationships between the ownership of institution investors and management myopic. We hope it would be beneficial to the enactment of the system of corporate governance.

    This research focuses on the relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors of the listed companies in Taiwan Stock Exchange from 1995 to 2001. It also explores if the relationship is the same in both electronic industry and non-electronic industries. Besides, the study also compares the effect of the ownership of individual or institution investors on the management myopia in order to point out the type of investors that can provide monitory function clearly.

    The empirical study indicates that (1) there is a significant negative relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors. Conversely, there is a significant positive relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of individual investors. (2) In the electronic industry, the relationship between the ownership of institution investors and the myopic behavior of management is not significant. However, it is significant negative in other industries. (3) The change of percentage of ownership of institution investors has significant negative relationship with the management myopia. However, it is opposite to the individual investors. (4) No significant relationship between the institution investors and the management myopic in non-electronic industries. But in the electronic industry, it is significant negative.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王金凱，1987，我國製造業廠商研究發展決定因素之研究，國立台灣大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
    朱建州，1999，機構投資人與月營收資訊內涵之關聯性研究－以台灣股市為例，國立中正大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    金成隆、林修葳、張永芳，2000，強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係：20%門檻限制影響之研究，中國財務學刊，第7卷第1期：59-96。
    林威伸，1997，企業研究發展與專利權間之遞延效應，私立東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    馬維揚，1988，民間研究發展之促進，私立東吳大學經濟學研究所未出版之論文。
    許周全，2000，機構投資人與管理當局自願性盈餘預測之關聯性研究，國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳忠榮，1995，技術引進與研究發展：台灣高科技廠商之實證分析，國科會補助研究計畫。
    徐君毅，2001，研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究，私立東海大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃明潔，2002，多期損益平穩化行為之決定因素，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版之論文。
    黃雅苓，1998，研究發展支出與經營績效關係及其費用化之探討─以台灣上市公司電子與非電子業為例，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版論文。
    梁玲菁，1988，我國資訊電子業研究與發展決定因素之研究，國立中興大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
    湯珮妤，2000，企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    溫順德，2002，企業研究發展支出租稅減免問題及其影響之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    董秋梅，1999，機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響，國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    鄭嘉珮、劉錦添，1992，台灣廠商研究發展支出的分析，台灣銀行季刊，第45卷第2期：139-152。
    英文部分
    Albrecht, J.A. 1999. Policy instruments and incentives for environmental R&D: A market-driven approach. Working paper, University of Ghent-Ceen.
    Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review 66: 818-829.
    , S. Janakiraman, and S. Kang. 1996. Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 297-318.
    Badrinath, S., G. Gay, and J. Kale. 1989. Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial ”safety-net” hypothesis. Journal of Risk and Insurance 56 (December): 605-629.
    Barth, M., J. Elliott, and M. Finn. 1997. Market rewards associated with increasing earnings patterns. Working paper, Standford University.
    Bebchuk, L., and L. Stole. 1993. Do short-term objectives lead to under- or overinvestment in long-term projects? Journal of Finance 48: 719-729.
    Beldona, S., A. Inkpen, and A. Phatak. 1998. Are Japanese managers more long-term oriented than United States managers? Management International Review 38 (March): 239-256.
    Ben-Zion, U. 1984. The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm’s market value: Some preliminary results. Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Berger, P. 1993. Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 131-171.
    Brancato,C. K. 1997. Institutional investors and corporate governance: Best Practices for increasing corporate value, Chicago, IL: Irwin. Professional Publishing.
    Bronwyn, H., M. Jacques, B. Lee, and C.Bruno. 1998. Does cash flow investment and R&D? An exploration using panel data for French, Japanese, and United States scientific firms. Working paper. University of California.
    Brown, K., and B. Brooke. 1993. Institutional demand and security price pressure: The case of corporate spin-offs. Financial Analysts Journal 49 (September/October): 53-62.
    Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev . 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24 ( December): 99-126.
    Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73 (July): 305-33.
    . 2001. Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-term value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (Sumnmer): 207-46.
    , and C .Noe. 1999. Disclosure quality, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Working paper. University of Pennsylvania.
    Campbell, T.S., and A. M. Marino. 1994. Myopic investment decisions and competitive labor markets. International Economic Review 35 (November): 855-75.
    Cheng, S. 2002. R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. Working paper. University of Michigan.
    Cohen, W., and S. Klepper. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2): 232-243.
    DeAngelo, H., and E. Rice. 1983. Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 329-59.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs and corporation governance: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10 (January): 3-36.
    Dechow, P., and R. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and horizon problem : An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (March): 51-89.
    , , and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations : An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1-36.
    Dobrzynski, J. 1993. Relationship investing. Business Week 3309 ( March 15): 68-75.
    Duke, J ., and H. Hunt. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January): 45-63.
    El Sawy, O. 1988. Temporal biases in strategic attention. Working paper, University of Southern California.
    Eng, L., and M. Shackell. 2001. The implications of long-term performance plans and institutional ownership for firms’ research and development investments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing& Finance 16: 117-139.
    Froot, K., A. Perold, and J. Stein. 1992. Shareholder trading practices and corporate investment horizons. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance: 42-58.
    Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1986. A signal-jamming theory of predation. Rand Journal of Economics.ⅩⅤⅠⅠ: 366-76.
    Grabowski, H.G., and N. D. Baxter. 1973. Rivalry in industrial research and development. Journal of Industrial Economics: 209-35.
    , and D. C. Mueller. 1978. Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks, and firm profit rates. Bell Journal of Economics: 328-43.
    Graves, S. A., and S. Waddock. 1990. Institutional ownership and control: Implication for long-term corporate strategy. Academy of Management Executive 4 (February) : 75-83.
    Graves, S. B. 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry . Academy of Management Journal 31: 417-427.
    Hand, J. 1990. A test of the extended functional fixation hypothesis. The Accounting Review 65 (October): 740-763.
    . 2001. The economic versus accounting impacts of R&D on U.S. Market-to-book ratios. Working paper. University of North Carolina.
    Hemmer, T. 1996. On the design and choice of “modern” management accounting measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8: 87-116.
    Hirschey, M. 1985. Market structure and market value. Journal of Business: 89-99.
    Hirshleifer, D., and T. Chordia. 1992. Managerial incentives to manipulate the timing of project resolution. Working paper. Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    Holmstrom, B. 1982. Managerial incentive problems-a dynamic perpective. In Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics.
    Jacobs, M. 1991. Short-Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Jalilvand, A., and R. Harris. 1984. Corporate behavior in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: An econometric study. Journal of Finance 39 (March) : 127-145.
    Jarrell, G.A., K. Lehn, and W. Marr. 1985 . Institutional ownership, tender offers and long-term investments. Working paper. Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.
    , and A. Poulsen. 1987. Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (September): 127-68.
    Jensen, M. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76: 323-29.
    Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced-scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review(Jan/Feb):71-79.
    , .1996. The balanced-scorecard. Harvard University Press, Boston.
    Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. 3d edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Kim, J., I. Krinsky., and J. Lee. 1997. Institutional holdings and trading volume reactions to quarterly earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 12 (Winter): 1-14.
    Laughhunn, D., J. Payne., and R.Crum. 1980. Managerial risk preference for below-target returns. Management Science 26: 1238-1249.
    Linn, S., and J. McConnell. 1983. An empirical investigation of the impact of antitakeover amendments on common stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 361-99.
    Loescher, S. M. 1984. Bureaucratic measurement, shutting stock share, and shortened time horizons: Implication for Economic growth. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 24 (April): 8-23.
    Meulbroek, L., M. Mitchell, H. Mulherin, J. Netter, and A. Poulsen. 1990. Shark repellents and managerial myopia: An empirical test. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1108-1117.
    Monks, R., and N. Minow. 1995. Corporate Governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Myers, S . 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (Judy): 575-592.
    Nanus, B. 1975. The future-oriented corporation. Business Horizons 18 (January): 5-12.
    Narayanan, M. 1985. Managerial incentives for short-term results. The Journal of Finance 5: 1469-84.
    Opler, T., and J. Sokobin. 1997. Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work? An analysis of the activities of the Council of Institutional Investors. Working paper. Ohio State University.
    Perry, S., and R. Grinaker. 1994. Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending. Accounting Horizons 8 (December): 43-51.
    Porter, M. 1992. Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. Boston, MA: Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Bussiness School.
    Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Working paper. University of Washington.
    Shavell, S. 1979. Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55-73.
    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1990. Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. American Economic Review 80: 148-153.
    Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics (August): 312-20.
    Stein, J. 1988. Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy 96 (February): 61-80.
    . 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (November): 655-669.
    Thevaranjan, A., K. Joseph, and D. Shinivasan. 2000. Managerial myopia and non-financial measures: The case of customer satisfaction mitigating hard-selling. Working paper. Syracuse University.
    Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking: 15-29.
    Tse, D., K. Lee, L. Vertinsky, and D. Wehrung. 1988. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives’ choice, decisiveness and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing 52: 81-95.
    Wiedman, C. 1996. The relevance of characteristics of the information environment in the selection of a proxy for the market’s expectations for earnings: An extension of Brown, Richardson, and Schwager(1987). Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Autumn): 313-324
    Yin, X., and E. Zuscovitch. 1998. Is firm size conducive to R&D choice? A strategic analysis of product and process innovations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35: 243-262.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    90353040
    91
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353040
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    35304001.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2818檢視/開啟
    35304002.pdf368KbAdobe PDF22070檢視/開啟
    35304003.pdf19KbAdobe PDF2804檢視/開啟
    35304004.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2674檢視/開啟
    35304005.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2814檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋