Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34190
|
| Title: | 董事身份特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究 |
| Authors: | 李亭誼 |
| Contributors: | 馬秀如
李亭誼 |
| Keywords: | 非財務資訊
背景能力資訊
薪資酬勞資訊
資訊揭露
董事特性 |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 |
| Abstract: | 企業須揭露的資訊，並不以財務資訊，甚至營運資訊為已足。美國標準普爾公司所做的公司透明度與揭露調查，不僅包括財務資訊，也注重非財務資訊。這些非財務資訊包括所有權之結構及與投資者之關係，以及董事會結構與運作過程二類資訊。OECD建議，企業至少應揭露七項資訊中，有一項為「董事會成員及主要經營階層，及其報酬」，可見「董監經理人相關資訊」的重要性，不亞於財務資訊與營運資訊。但我國企業所揭露的非財務資訊，常有不足，且國際評等機構對我國企業資訊揭露的評價亦不高。
本研究認為，若能掌握影響企業董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度之因素，將有助於我國企業透明度之提升。在我國公司法制的設計下，企業資訊之揭露係由董事會負責，然董事會是否重視資訊揭露，可能與其成員之身份特性有關。因此，本研究欲檢視董事成員身份特性因素是否是影響董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度的重要因素。
本研究為我國首次關注企業非財務、營運資訊之揭露，所關心的資訊包括董監經理人之背景能力與薪資酬勞二類資訊。資訊揭露程度之衡量，係將樣本公司年報、財務報告中相關揭露內容，與本研究自行設計的揭露索引表之揭露項目逐一比對，並考慮資訊揭露詳細程度之差異，進行項目評分，再加總得出一揭露總分之方式。提出探討的董事身份特性變數包括家族董監事、法人機構董監事、法人股東是否同時選任為董事與監察人、獨立董監事，以及董事長是否兼任總經理等五項。
研究樣本為民國90年度已在台灣證交所上市之公司，排除金融保險業、官方色彩濃厚公司、判斷資料不全公司後，共計樣本數426家。實證結果顯示非關係法人董監事席次比例、獨立董監事席次比例與資訊揭露程度呈正向顯著關係，表示二者之監督，有助於提升企業資訊揭露程度。法人股東同時選任為董事與監察人時，資訊揭露程度較低，可見此情形有削弱企業監管機制，有礙資訊揭露的傾向。但家族董監事席次比例、董事長是否兼任總經理二變數，則與資訊揭露程度間未發現顯著關係。
The information that enterprises should disclose is not limited to financial and operating information. The “Company Transparency and Disclosure Survey” by Standard & Poor’s not only includes financial information, but also focuses on nonfinancial information, including ownership structure and investor relations, and board structure and process. OECD suggests enterprises at least disclose seven kinds of material information, and one of them is “ members of the board and key executives, and their remuneration.” Thus it could reveal that “the information related to board and executives” is no less important than financial and operating information. But in our country enterprises disclosure level in nonfinancial information is not enough. Besides, national evaluation institutions set a low value on information disclosure level of our country’s enterprises.
This study presumes that if we can control the influential factor of the disclosure level about information related to board and executives, it will help to enhance enterprises’ transparency in our country. In our country’s Company Law system, board is responsible for the information disclosure of enterprises. We surmise whether board emphasizes on information disclosure has relationship with characteristics of directors’ identities. So the study wants to examine if the characteristics of directors’ identities are the important factors influencing the disclosure level of the information about board and executives.
This is the very first study in our country to focus the information disclosure on nonfinancial and nonoperating information, that related to background and remuneration of board and executives. The way to measure the disclosure level is that the study designs a disclosure checklist to examine if these disclosure items appear on sample enterprises’ information disclosure of annual report and financial report, and also scrutinize to what extent the disclosure detail of information reaches. Finally the study gives each item a point, and sums up a total grade. The study has five directors’ identities characteristics variables, including family directors, institutional directors, whether institutional shareholder serves as director and supervisor simultaneously, independent directors, and whether the board chairman serves as the CEO simultaneously.
The study samples are companies listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2001, but exclude banking and insurance industry, and government-involved companies or companies with insufficient judging information are excluded. The rest amount to 426 samples. The empirical result indicates that the proportion of nonrelated institutional directors and independent directors on board are positively related to the extent of information disclosure. If a company has an institutional shareholder serves as director and supervisor simultaneously, it has lower extent of information disclosure. The proportion of family directors on the board and whether the board chairman serves as the CEO simultaneously reveal no significant relationship with the extent of information disclosure. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
方至民、曾志弘、鐘憲瑞，1999，高階經營團隊特質與財務能力對企業研發支出影響之究--以台灣上市電子產業公司為例，科技管理研討會，國立中山大學。
王婉茲，2002，高階主管獎酬、盈餘結構與後續經營績效之實證研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
林淑芬，2001，管理者品質與企業價值之關係研究—以台灣上市資訊電子產業為例，國立中正大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
林明謙，2001，股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
侍台誠，1994，董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究---兼論法人董事的影響，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
邱碧珠，2000，資訊揭露程度與權益資金成本間之關係：我國資訊電子業之研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
金志遠，2000，董事會特性與年報自願性揭露關係之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
翁銘鴻，1998，我國上市公司董事會特徵與經營績效之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
翁淑育，2000，台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
張旨華，2002，企業國際化程度、最高階管理者之薪酬與組織績效，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
陳美娟，1997，年報自願性揭露水準與公司特徵之關聯性研究， 國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳家惠，2000，我國上市公司管理機制與盈餘管理相關性之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
陳文杰，2001，公司控制機制、高階經營團隊能力與公司經營績效之相關性研究，國立中正大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
陳嵩、蔡明田、張淑昭，1997，總經理人口特徵、產品/市場策略、經營績效關係之實證研究，管理學報，卷14(12月)：585-610。
陳依蘋，2002 ，透明度與企業價值，會計研究月刊，第200期（7月）：48-54。
許如婷，1997，高階管理團隊特徵對公司經營績效之影響－台灣地區上巿公司之實證研究，國立中央大學財務管理學系未出版碩士論文。
許盟，2000，我國董事會節後與自願性盈餘預測與績效關係之實證研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
黃鈺光，1993，我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究，國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃耀慶，2001，從企業風險、企業資訊透明度與權益資金成本關係探討影響企業透明度因素，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
劉俞青，2002，臉不紅氣不喘的超高酬勞執行長，財訊月刊（8月）：331-334。
蔡其諭，2002，揭露程度與負債資金成本之關係，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
謝文馨，1999，家族企業管治機制與盈餘管理之關聯性研究，私立東吳大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
簡上智，1996，家族企業上市後股權結構變動對企業經營績效影響之研究，國立成功大學企業研究所未出版碩士論文。
英文文獻
Abbott, W. F. and R. J. Monsen. 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal 22(Autumn): 501-515.
Ancona. D. and D. Nadler. 1989. Top hats and executive tales: Designing the senior team. Sloan Management Review 31(1): 19-29.
Balsam, S. 1998. Discretionary accounting choices and CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (Autumn ): 229-252.
Bantel, K. A. 1994. Strategic planning openness: The role of top team demography. Group and Organization Management 19(4): 406-424.
Bantel, K. A. and S .E. Jachson. 1989. Top management and innovation in banking: does the composition of the top management make a difference? Strategic Management Journal 10(Special Issue): 107-124.
Barry, C. B., S. J. Brown. 1984. Differential information and the small firm effect. Journal of Economics 13(2): 283-295.
Barry, C. B., S. J. Brown 1985. Differential information and security market equilibriums. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 20: 407-422.
Barry C. B., S. J. Brown. 1986. Limited information as a source of risk. Journal of Portfolio Management 12: 66-72.
Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323-334.
Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease, and C. W. Smith. 1988. Ownership structure and finance economics. Journal of Financial Economics: 267-291.
Chau, G.K. and S. J. Gray. 2002. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting 37: 247-265.
Childs, A. and R. J. Klimoski. 1986. Successfully predicting career success an application of the biographical inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: .3-7.
Coffee, J. C. 1991. Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review 91(6): 1277-1368.
Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal.1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovative. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.
Cooke, T.E. 1991. An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations. The International Journal of Accounting 26: 174-189.
Davis, E., and J. Kay. 1993. European Mergers and Merger Policy. New York : Oxford University Press.
Diamond, D., R. Verrechia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of the capital. The Journal of Finance 66: 1325-1355.
Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory of agency theory：CEO
governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16 (1): .49-64.
Drieghe, R. 1986. Board of directors and corporate governance. The case of greenmail legency theory, corporate control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
Drucker, P. E. 1976. Foundations of finance. New York: basic books.
Farragher, E., R. Kleiman and M. Bazaz. 1994. Do investor relations make a difference? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34 (Winter): 403-412.
Finkelstein S. and D. C. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effect on organization. St. Paul: West.
Forker, J.J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research 22: 111-124.
Gerald, K. C. and S. J. Gray. 2002. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting 37: 247-265.
Guidry, F., A. J. Leone and S. Rock. 1999. Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26(January): 113-142.
Hambrick, D. C. 1981. Environment, strategies and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 253-275.
Hambrick, D. C. and P. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Journal 15: 514-535.
Hambrick, D.C. and S. Finkelstein. 1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior 9: 369-406.
Harrison, J.R., D. L. Torres and S. kukalis. 1988. The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 211-232.
Healy, P.M.1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(April): 85-107.
Hermalin, B.E. and M. S. Weisbach.1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20: 101-112.
Hill, G. W. 1982. Group versus individual performance: Are n+ heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin 91: 517-539.
Hill, N.T. and K. T. Stevens. 1995. CEO compensation and corporate performance. Journal of General Management 20 (Summer): 65-67.
Holderness, C. G. and D.P. Sheehan. 1988. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 20: 317-346.
Holthausen, R. W., D. F. Larcker, and R.G. Sloan. 1995. Annual bonus schemes and manipulation of earning. Journal of Accounting Review 19 (March-May): 29-74.
Holthausen, R. W., R. W. Leftwich and D. Mayers. 1990. Large-block transactions, the speed of response, and the temporary and permanent stock-price effects. Journal of Financial Economics 26: 71-95.
Hossain, M., L. M. Tan and M. Adams.1994. Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market: some empirical evidence from companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting 29: 334-351.
Hossain, M., M. H. B. Perera and A. R. Rahman.1995. Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 6(1): 69-85.
Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosures. Journal of International accounting, auditing and taxation 10: 139-156
Jarrell, G. A. and A. B. Poulson.1987. Shark repellents and stock price: the effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980’. Journal of Financial Economics 19: 127-168.
Jenkins, E. and R. E. Seiler. 1990. The impact of executive compensation shemes upon the level of discretionary expenditures and growth in stockholder wealth. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 17 (Autumn): 585-592.
Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.
Jensen, M.C. and K.J. Murphy. 1990.Performance pay and top-management incentive. Journal of Political Economy 98(April): 225-264.
Jesen, M. C. and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98:225-264.
Kerr, L. J. and R. A. Bettis. 1987. Board of direction top management compensations and shareholder’s return. Academy of Management Journal: 645-664.
Kevin, K., T. Steve and W. Mike.1997.Corporate governance: Economic and financial issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kim, O., R. Verrechia. 1994. Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 41-68.
Malone, D., C. Fries and T. Jones. 1993. An empirical investigation of the extent of corporate financial disclosure in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance: 249-273.
Mangel, R., and Singh, H.. 1993. Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and Business Research 23/91 A: 339-362.
McConnell, J.J. and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts and S. J. Gray. 1995. Factor influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (Autumn): 555-572.
Morley, M., S. Moore and P. O’Regan. 1995. The impact of the top management team on the sales growth performance of international of divisions of US multinational enterprises operating in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Business and Administrative Research 17(1): 118-134.
Murray, A. I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 10: 125-142.
Nesbitt, S. L. 1994. Long-term rewards from corporate governance. Working paper, Wilshire Associates.
Noburn, D. and S. Birley. 1988. The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal 9: 225-237.
Opler, T. C. and J. Sokobin. 1995. Does coordinated institutional activism work. Working paper, Ohio State University.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 1999. Principles of Corporate Governance.
Patton, A. and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why won’t directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Reviews 65(6): 10-18.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salanick. 1978. The external control of organization. New York: Harper and Row.
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
Rechner, P. L.1989. Corporate governance: Fact or fiction? Business Horizons 32(4): 11-15.
Robbins, W. A. and K. R. Austin. 1986. Disclosure quality in governmental financial reports: An assessment of the appropriateness of a compound measure. Journal of Accounting Research 24(Autumn): 412-421.
Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate Disclosure quality and the cost of the debt. The Accounting Review 73(October): 459-474.
Smith, M. P. 1996. Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance 51:227-252.
Tushman, M. and E. Romanelli. 1983. Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision making: A sociometric analysis. Management Science 2991: 12-23.
Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Toward a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53(January): 52-77.
Weidenbaum, M. L. 1986. Updating the corporate board. Journal of Business Strategy 7: 77-83.
Welker, M. 1995. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(Spring): 801-827.
Winter, R. 1977. State law, shareholder protection and the theory of the corporation. Journal of Legal Studies 6: 251-292.
Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23:3-28.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and J.Y. Shy. 1998. Family control, board composition and corporate performance in Taiwan. NFA/APFA First Joint International Conference, Tokyo, Japan. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
90353025
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353025 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
