政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34186
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50974930      線上人數 : 863
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34186


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34186


    題名: 顧客利潤影響因素之實地實證研究-以某個案銀行為例
    作者: 陳信克
    貢獻者: 吳安妮
    Anne, Wu
    陳信克
    關鍵詞: 顧客利潤分析
    作業基礎成本制度
    作業基礎管理
    customer profitability analysis
    activity-based costing
    activity-baased management
    日期: 2002
    上傳時間: 2009-09-18
    摘要: 隨著相關管理技術之發展，準確衡量個別顧客所帶來的利潤已非難事，除此之外，亦有越來越多學者發現大多數企業之利潤其實集中於少部分客戶身上，符合80/20法則，因此本研究乃以一個案銀行內部之授信顧客資料為研究樣本，結合公司內外部相關資訊，探討影響顧客授信利潤高低之因素為何，以幫助企業有效配置行銷資源，作為企業實行客戶關係管理之參考。
    在研究變數方面，本研究先針對全部樣本探討顧客交易習性、本身屬性(如年數、規模、獲利能力、成長趨勢、創新程度)、銷售人員特質等對顧客利潤之影響，嗣後再將顧客依行業別與往來期間作一區隔，探討不同行業別與往來期間之顧客利潤影響因素是否相同。
    本研究研究結果顯示，顧客交叉銷售數、年數、獲利能力、成長趨勢、創新程度等皆會對顧客利潤產生影響。在短期內，僅交叉銷售會對顧客造成影響，然在中長期，除了交叉銷售數外，顧客之年數、獲利能力、成長趨勢、創新程度等皆會對顧客利潤產生影響，由此可知，在短期內，個案公司所採行之交叉銷售策略係增進顧客利潤最有效之方式，然就中長期而言，仍須考量顧客本身的屬性(如年數、規模、獲利能力、成長趨勢、創新程度)與本身銷售人員之特質，因此，就長期而言，選擇正確之顧客與培育適當的銷售人員亦為增加顧客利潤之關鍵因素。然在行業別方面，非高科技業顧客之模式並不顯著，顯示非高科技業顧客利潤影響因素可能仍受其他因素影響，值得後續研究進一步探討。
    With the development of related management technology, it’s easier for business to measure the customer profitability now. In addition, there’re more and more researchers indicate that in most company the profitability are concentrated on a few customers, which is according to the 80/20 rule. Accordingly, this research combines internal and external information from one bank in Taiwan to analyze the factors that affect the loan customer profitability in that bank. The purpose of this research is try to help business allocate marketing resources effectively, and try to provide for business as a reference to implement CRM.
    In the respect of variables, at first this research tries to analyze the affection of customer trading style, customer attributes, sales person attributes to customer profitability, after that this research will try to analyze whether the affection factors are the same or not when customers are in different industry and have different transaction period.
    Finally, this research has found that customer cross-selling number, year, profitability ability, growth rate, innovation degree and sales person have affection on customer profitability. In short-term period, only customer cross-selling number will affect the customer profitability, and in long-term period, in addition to customer cross-selling number, other variables like customer year, profitability ability, growth rate, innovation degree and sales person will also affect customer profitability. It indicates that in short-term period, the cross-selling strategy adopt by the research company is the best most effective way to increase customer profitability. But in long-term, selecting the right customer and training adequate sales employers are also very important factors to increase customer profitability. When taking industry into consideration, this research has found that the variables mentioned above also have affection on the customer profitability in high technology industry, but in non-high technology industry, the statistic model is not significant and could be discuss by further researches.
    參考文獻: 參考文獻
    中文部分
    中央銀行經濟研究處，2003，中華民國台灣地區金融統計月報，中央銀行經濟研究處，2003年2月。
    汪台中，2000，銀行對企業貸款之實證分析─以中國農民銀行為例，國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版論文。
    李貞育，2002，我國工業銀行人力資源規劃之研究，國立政治大學勞工研究所未出版論文。
    李昆正，2000，資料庫行銷：以組合分析理論和行銷資訊作為顧客獲利性分析之實證研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    李佳珍，1997，公司融資決策、投資決策與公司成長關係之研究，國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版論文。
    李湘傑，1997，國際投資銀行發展策略研究，台灣大學國際企業學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳明宗，1993，銀行市場區隔之研究─以台南地區為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    吳欣穎，2000，企業導入顧客關係管理之研究，國立台北大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    吳思華，1998，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：臉譜文化。
    吳政穎，1997，台灣地區銀行放款行為之實證研究－以公開發行公司之借款者為例，私立東海大學管理研究所未出版論文。
    宋家瑜，2001，顧客利潤影響因素之實地實證研究-以某銀行法人授信戶為探討對象，國立政治大學會計系未出版論文。
    周士淳，2002，金融業跨業合併探討，國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所未出版論文。
    林呈祥，1994，臺灣科技產業融資行為之實證研究，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林洪澤，2002，美國, 日本及台灣金融控股公司制度比較之研究，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程未出版論文。
    科普朗與庫柏（Kaplan R. S., and R. Cooper），2000，成本與效應：以整合性成本制度 提昇獲利與績效，徐曉慧譯，台北：臉譜。
    高得三，1993，銀行資金管理與經營績效-利率變動對各銀行經營績效之影響，東海大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    莊子正，1993，銀行放款訂價行為之探討，國立台北大學未出版論文。
    陳太齡，2002，金融控股公司關鍵成功因素之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所未出版論文。
    陳怡君，2002，顧客生命週期價值分析之實地實證研究-以某銀行信用卡部門為例，國立政治大學會計系未出版論文。
    陳柏彰，2002，創新發明能力與企業生產力及企業價值之關連性研究－以台灣之資訊電子業為例，國立台灣大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    張啟禎，1996，高科技產業初期融資決策之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版論文。
    張嘉魁，1995，公司長短期融資決策影響因素及其調整速率之實證研究，國立台灣工業技術學院管理技術研究所未出版論文。
    葉忠麟，2000，以作業基礎成本制分析商業銀行利率訂價決策--以國內W銀行為例，中原大學會計系未出版論文。
    溫珮妤，2000，企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    廖芝嫻，2002，智慧資本與經營績效關聯之實證研究─以我國資訊電子業技術人力資本為例，國立政治大學會計學系未出版論文。
    歐進士、傅鍾仁、楊忠城、張寶光，2001，技術密集與員工獲利力關聯之研究，論文草稿，國立政治大學。
    劉逸鈞，1999，資訊電子業上市公司資金需求與融資策略之模式建構，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    鄭傑之，2000，資料庫行銷：以顧客獲利性為基礎配置行銷資源，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。
    謝建平，2001，現代投資銀行，台北，致勝文化。
    英文部分
    Albright, T.L. 1998. The effect of deviations from optimal production schedules on batch-level.Journal of Managerial Issues 10 (Fall):267-286.
    Anderson, E.W., C. Fornell, and D. R. Lehmann. 1994. Customer satisfaction , market share, and profitability: findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 53-66.
    Baskin, Jonathan. 1989. An Empirical Investigation of The Pecking Order Hypothesis. Financial Management 10:7-22.
    Blatterberg, R. A., and J. Deighton. 1996. Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harward Business Review (July-August):136-144.
    Booth, J.R. 1992. Contract Costs, bank loans, and the cross-monitoring hypothesis, Journal of Financial Economics 31:25-41.
    Bosworth, D., and M. Rogers. 2001. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. The Economic Record 77: 323-337.
    Berger, P. D. and N. Nasr. I. 1998. Customer lifetime value: marketing models and applications.Journal of Interactive Marketing 12: 17-30.
    Carroll, P., and M. Tsdikonfa. 1997. Customer profitability: irrelevant for decisions? Banking Strategies 73 (November/December): 76-82.
    Cockburn, I., and Z. Griliches. 1988. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review Proceedings 78: 419-423.
    Connolly, R. A., and M. Hirschey. 1990. Firm size and R&D effectiveness: A value-based test. Economics Letters 32: 277-281.
    Crosby, L. A., K. R., Evans and D. Cowles. 1990. Relationship quality in services: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 68-81.
    Deeds, D. L. 2001. The Role of RandD Intensity, Technical Development and Absorptive Capacity in Creating Entrepreneurial Wealth in High Technology Start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18(1): 29-47.
    Donaldson, G. 1961. Corporate debt capacity. Division of Research Graduate school of Business Administration, Harvard University Boston:51-56.
    Dwyer, F.R. 1989. Customer lifetime profitability to support marketing decision making. Journal of Direct Marketing 3:8-15.
    Edvardsson, B., M. D. Johnson, G. Anderson, and T. Strandvik.2000. The effects of satisfaction and loyalty on profits and growth: products versus services. Total Quality Management 11: 917-928.
    Garland, R. 2001. What influences customer profitability? Service-Profit Chain .Non-financial drivers of customer profitability in personal retail banking. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing.
    Ittner,C.D., and D.F.Larcker. 1998.Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36:1-35.
    Jarrar, F. Y., and A. Neely. 2002. Cross-selling in the financial sector: customer profitability is key. Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 10: 282-296.
    Katrak, H. 1994. Imports of Technology, Enterprise Size and RandD-Based Production in a Newly Industrializing Country: The Evidence from Indian Enterprises. World Development 22(10): 1599-1608.
    Keane, T., and P. Wang. 1995.Application for the lifetime value model in modern newspaper publishing. Journal of Direct Marketing 9:59-66.
    Miller, R. 1998-1999. Case study: customer profitability measurement at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Bank Accounting and Finance 12 (Winter): 26-33.
    Mulhern, F. J. 1999.Customer profitability analysis: measurement, concentration, and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing 13:25-40.
    McNeilly, K. M., and F. A. Russ. 2000. Does relational demography matter in a personal selling context ? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 20 (Fall): 279-288.
    Myers, S.C., 1984. The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance 13:273-307.
    Ness. J. A., M. J. Schroeck, R. A. Letendre and W. J. Douglas 2001a. The role of ABM in measuring customer value. Strategic Finance. March: 32-37.
    Ness. J. A., M. J. Schroeck, R. A. Letendre and W. J. Douglas 2001b. The role of ABM in measuring customer value. Strategic Finance. April: 44-49.
    Niraj, R., Gupta, M. and C.Narasimhan. 2001. Customer profitability in a supply chain. Journal of Marketing (July):1-16.
    Pakes, A., 1985. On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return” Journal of Political Economy 93(April) no. 2
    Reichheld, F. F., R. G. Jr. Markey., and C. Hopton. 2000. The loyalty effect-the relationship between loyalty and profits. European Business Journal 12:134-139.
    Reinartz, W.J. and V. Kumar. 2000. On the profitability of long-life customers in a noncontractual setting: an empirical investigation and implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing 64(October):17-35.
    Stanley, Roger, and Lajaunie. 1995. Loan Pricing. Bankers Magazine 178: 37-41.
    Storbacka, K. 1997. Segmentation based on customer profitability─Retrospective analysis of retail bank customer bases.Journal of Marketing 13: 479-492.
    Wayland, R. E., and P. M. Cole. 1994. Turn customer service into customer profitability. Management Review 83(July):22-24.
    Wyner, G.A. 1996. Customer profitability: linking behavior to economics. Marketing Research: A magazine of Management & Applications 8(Summer): 36-38.
    Zeithaml, V. A. 2000. Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: what we know and what we need to learn. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28: 67-85.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    90353012
    91
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353012
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    35301201.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2753檢視/開啟
    35301202.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2973檢視/開啟
    35301203.pdf18KbAdobe PDF2858檢視/開啟
    35301204.pdf21KbAdobe PDF2860檢視/開啟
    35301205.pdf34KbAdobe PDF21094檢視/開啟
    35301206.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21265檢視/開啟
    35301207.pdf124KbAdobe PDF22410檢視/開啟
    35301208.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2942檢視/開啟
    35301209.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21046檢視/開啟
    35301210.pdf39KbAdobe PDF2853檢視/開啟
    35301211.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21298檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋