Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34106
|
| Title: | 勞工保險老年給付年金制之資產負債管理探討 |
| Authors: | 莊竣名 |
| Contributors: | 王儷玲
莊竣名 |
| Keywords: | 存續期間
資產負債管理
利率風險
勞保基金
duration
asset liability management
interest risk
labor insurance fund |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 |
| Abstract: | 本研究運用的投資組合理論(Portfolio Theory)與免疫理論(Immunization Theory)建構資產負債管理模型，希望在於免除利率風險下，能夠極大化勞保基金的投資報酬率。本研究探討勞保老年給付年金制實行後，勞保基金在資產負債管理之下最適資產配置。我們以勞保局編印之「勞工保險統計年報」中勞保基金民國81年到91年實際投資的資料及勞保局委託研究之精算報告對於老年給付年金制實行後未來勞保基金的給付預測值，在不同年金選擇率以及不同的費率與控管年限下，根據勞保基金資產與負債的存續期間，建議勞保基金最適的投資組合，並計算資產負債管理成本，研究結果發現：
1 年金選擇率為100％及80%時，勞保費率提高至8.3%僅能確保未來30年與40年勞保基金不會因為利率變動而導致基金破產甚至無力清償，但考慮年限為50年時，國內市場無法找到存續期間可以配合的投資工具，無法規避利率風險。年金選擇率為50%時，由於未來各年之勞保的給付獲得舒緩，使得資產配置所需的存續期間也降低，故當勞保費率提高 至8%即可確保勞保基金未來50年可以規避利率風險的危機，且在國內市場上可以找到投資工具配合。
2. 要使勞保基金免於利率風險的考慮年限越長，其投資組合的重心應該從現行的銀行存款移轉到債券及股票與受益憑證。
3. 進行資產負債管理是需要成本的，若以資產負債管理前後效率前緣下的投資報酬率的差異為資產負債管理成本，在年金選擇率100%時資產負債管理平均成本為0.3695%；選擇率80%時平均成本為0.434%；年金選擇率為50%時資產負債管理平均成本為0.384%，研究結果顯示資產負債管理平均成本都低於0.5%以下，故建議勞保基金應盡早進行資產負債管理以因應老年給付年金化後利率風險對於勞保基金財務上的衝擊。
This paper investigates the Asset-Liability Management for Labor Insurance Fund. We utilize Immunization Theory and Portfolio Theory selection model to immunize the surplus of Labor Insurance Funds against interest-rate fluctuations and to maximize expected return of Labor Insurance Funds simultaneously. In addition, we use the data from Labor Insurance Funds from 1992 to 2002 to demonstrate the implementation of our model. We calculate the optimal asset allocation and the ALM cost under different lump-sum/annuity selection ratio、time horizon and contribution rates. The empirical results from this study show that：
1. Assuming 100% and 80% participants choice annuity, to prevent the insolvency of Labor Insurance Fund from interest-rate fluctuations in 30 and 40 years, the Labor Insurance premium must increase to 8.3%. Assuming 50% participants choice annuity, to prevent the insolvency of Labor Insurance Fund from interest-rate fluctuations in 50 years, the Labor Insurance premium must increase to 8%.
2. To prolong the period over which the Labor Insurance Funds can immunize its surplus against interest-rate fluctuations, a large proportion of the investment asset should be allocate from bank deposit to bond and stock.
3. ALM needs cost. Assuming 100% participants choice annuity, the average ALM cost is 0.3695%.Assuming 80% participants choice annuity, the average ALM cost is 0.434%.Assuming 50% participants choice annuity, the average ALM cost is 0.384%. We find the average ALM cost is very small under any lump-sum/annuity selection ratio. Therefore, we suggest Bureau of Labor Insurance should start to implement ALM as soon as possible to avoid the affect of interest-rate fluctuations. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
中文部分：
1.葉順山，「勞工保險老年給付改採年金給付制度之精算與評估」，2002年。
2.黃介良，「退休基金的投資策略及其資產配置」，公務人員退撫基金季刊第五期，1997b。
3.中華民國勞工保險年鑑，1999。
4.古瀨正敏撰，賴建業譯，「美國壽險公司之新經營策略」1992年。
5.施淑芳，「壽險公司資產負債管理對公司價值影響之研究」，1997年。
6.賴幸瑜，「資產負債管理-平均存續其間在壽險監理運用之研究」，國立政治大學保險研究所論文，1997年。
7.陳登源，「退撫基金投資哲學與運用概況」，公務人員退休撫卹監理委員會，1998年。
8.李明黛，「利率風險對公司經營之影響：台灣壽險市場之實證研究」，國立政治大學保險研究所論文，2002年。
9.李孟茹，「我國勞工保險老年給付改採年金制之研究」，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所論文，2002年。
10.陳學裕，「政府基金管理與運用績效之研究－以勞工保險基金為例」，中國文化大學勞工研究所論文，2002年。
11.彭愛蘋，「公務人員退休撫卹基金之資產負債管理」，國立政治大學保險研究所論文，2001年。
12.謝冠生，「一般帳戶投資型年金之資產負債管理：免疫理論與最適資產配置之應用」，國立政治大學保險研究所論文，2001年。
英文部分
1.Arnott, Robert D (1985), “The Pension Sponsor’s View of Asset Allocation”, Financial Analysts Journal , p17-23.
2.Allen, E.T, J.J.Melone, J.S Rosenbloom, and J.L.vanderhei, Pension Planning 7th ed .,Richard D. Irwin, INC (1998)
3.Bierwag, G.O , George G. Kaufman and Alden Toeves (1983), “Duration：Its Development and Use in Bond Portfolio Management” Financial Analysts Journal, July-August, pp15-35.
4.Bookstaber, Richard and Jeremy Gold(1988) , “In Search of the Liability Asset.”., Financial Analysts Journal, January-February, p70-80.
5.Bostock, Paul, Paul Woolley and Martin Duffy(1989), “Duration-Based Asset Allocation.” Financial Analyst Journal, January-February, p53-61.
6.Bodie (1990), “Pension as Retirement Income Insurance”, Journal of Economic, pp28-49.
7.Bitner, J.W, and R.A Goddard (1992),”Successful Bank Asset/Liability Management：A Guide to the Future Beyond Gap”.
8.Boender, C.G.E, P.C. Van Aalst, and F. Heemskerk, 1996, Modelling and Management of Assets and Liability of Pension Plans in the Netherlands, in Worldwide Asset and Liability Modelling(Cambridge University Press).
9.Barney, L.D., 1997, ”The Relation Between Capital Structure, Interest Rate Sensitivity, and Market Value in the Property-Liability Industry” , The Journal of Risk and Insurance,64(4),p733-p738.
10.Cox, C. Johnathan E. Ingersoll, and Stephen A. Ross. ”Duration and the Measurement of Basis Rosk.” Journal of Business (1979), p51-61.
11.Choie, Kenneth S. (1992), “Caveats in Immunization of Pension Liability.” Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter, pp54-69.
12.Douglas, L.G. ,(1990) “Bond Risk Analysis：A Guide to Duration and Convexity”, New York Institute of Finance 29.
13.Gagnon, Louis, and Lewis D. Johnson. “Dynamic Immunization Under Stochastic Interest Rates.” The Journal of Portfolio Managenment (1994),P48-p54.
14.Hicks, J.R., Value and Capital, Oxford：Clarendon Press, 1939
15.Keintz, Richard J. and Clyde P. Stickney (1980), “Immunization of Pension Funds and Sensitivity to Actuarial Assumption.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 47 , p222-238.
16.Leibowitz, Martin L .and Roy D. Henriksson(1988) , “Portfolio Optimization Within a Surplus Framework. “ Financial Analysts Journal, March-April, p43-51.
17.Logue. Dennis E. , Managing Corporate Plans, Hanper Business. (1991)
18.Logue, Dennis E. and Jack S. Rader, Managing Pension Plans：A Comprehensive Guide to Improving Plan Performance, Havard Business School Press, 1998.
19.Macaulay, Frederick R, The Movement of Interest Rates, Bonds, Yield, and Stock Prices in the United States Since 1965, New York：Columbia University Press, 1938.
20.Markowitz, Harry, Portfolio Selection, New York：John Wiley＆Sons,1959.
21.Redington, FM(1952),”Review of the Principle of Life office Valuations.” Journal of the Institute of Actuaries78, PP.286-340.
22.Maloney J. Kevin and Dennis E. Logue. “Neglected Complexities in Structured Bond Portforlios. “ The Journal of Portfolio Management (1989),P59-68.
23.Staking,K.B. and Babbel,D.F.,1995, ”The Relation Between Capital Structure, Interest Rate Sensitivity, and Market Value in the Property-Liability Industry” , The Journal of Risk and Insurance,62(4),p690-p718.
24.Saunders, Anthony, Financial Institution Management：A Modern Perspective,3rd edition, Irwin Publishing Co,2000。
25.Tzeng, Larry Y. , Jennifer L . Wang and June H. Soo (2000), “Surplus Management under A Stochastic Process.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol 67, p451-462.
26.Vasicek, Oldrich.” A Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure” The Journal of Financial Economics(1977), p177-p188. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險研究所
90358014
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090358014 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
